


Ask the community...
I'm about 6 weeks into this process myself - filed my Form 7202 amendments for both 2020 and 2021 in early March 2025. As a freelance photographer who had to cancel multiple shoots due to COVID exposure and childcare issues during school closures, I'm looking at potential credits of around $5,800 for 2020 and $9,200 for 2021. Reading through everyone's experiences here has been incredibly valuable! When I first filed, I was optimistically hoping to see results within 8-10 weeks, but clearly I need to adjust my expectations to the 16-22 week timeline that seems to be the norm for these COVID credit amendments. The "Where's My Amended Return?" tool still shows "received" for both years, but based on all the detailed timelines people have shared, this appears to be completely normal at this stage. It's reassuring to know that this status typically doesn't change until around week 15-16. What really stands out to me from reading everyone's stories is how consistent the process seems to be - yes, it's frustratingly slow, but almost everyone who filed legitimate claims eventually received their full payments. That gives me a lot of confidence that patience will pay off, literally! Carlos, thank you so much for starting this thread. It's become such a lifeline for those of us navigating this lengthy process. We're definitely all in this waiting game together, but at least now we have realistic expectations and know we're not alone!
I'm just getting started with this process myself - filed my Form 7202 amendments about 5 weeks ago for both 2020 and 2021. As a freelance web developer who had to juggle childcare during virtual learning while trying to maintain client work, I'm expecting around $7,100 for 2020 and $8,600 for 2021. This thread has been absolutely invaluable for setting proper expectations! I initially thought this would be processed like a regular refund, but seeing everyone's 16-22 week timelines helps me understand this is a completely different beast. The "Where's My Amended Return?" tool showing "received" for both years makes much more sense now knowing it typically stays that way until week 15+. What gives me the most confidence is seeing how many people have successfully received their full payments after going through the complete process. Yes, the wait is long and anxiety-inducing when you're talking about significant amounts, but the consistency in everyone's experiences suggests the system does work - it just requires patience. Thanks Carlos for asking this question, and thanks to everyone who shared such detailed timelines. It's comforting to know we're all going through this together and that there's light at the end of the tunnel!
I'm about 4 weeks into this process - just filed my Form 7202 amendments for both 2020 and 2021 in mid-March 2025. As a freelance marketing consultant who had to manage childcare during school closures while trying to keep clients happy, I'm looking at potential credits of around $6,400 for 2020 and $10,100 for 2021. This thread has been absolutely incredible for managing expectations! When I first submitted my amendments, I was naively thinking I'd see results in maybe 6-8 weeks, but reading everyone's detailed 16-22 week timelines has really helped me understand what I'm actually in for. The "Where's My Amended Return?" tool showing "received" status makes so much more sense now knowing it typically stays that way for months. What really gives me confidence is seeing the consistency in everyone's successful outcomes. Yes, the wait is brutal when you're talking about life-changing amounts of money, but almost every person who shared their complete experience eventually received their full payments. That predictability is actually quite reassuring. Carlos, thank you for starting this discussion - it's become such an essential resource for all of us navigating this lengthy but ultimately worthwhile process. We're definitely all in this marathon together!
I think we're overcomplicating this. The rule is simple - if it's personal, it's not a corporate expense, period. It doesn't matter if you call it non-deductible on M-1, it's still a distribution to the shareholder. The only legitimate non-deductible expenses are things that benefit the corporation but aren't deductible under tax law (life insurance premiums, certain penalties, 50% of meals, political contributions, etc). I tell my clients there are only 3 ways to get money out of a C-corp: 1. Salary for services actually rendered 2. Loans (with proper documentation) 3. Dividends Anything else is just dividends in disguise, and the IRS isn't stupid.
Don't forget reasonable shareholder fringe benefits! Health insurance, disability insurance, retirement plans, and other qualified fringe benefits are legitimate corporate expenses that benefit the shareholder without being dividends.
This is exactly the kind of situation that drives me crazy as a tax professional. You're absolutely right to push back on the previous accountant's approach. The fundamental test isn't whether an expense is deductible - it's whether the expense has ANY legitimate business purpose. Personal expenses like family vacations and tuition have zero business purpose and should never touch the corporate books, even as M-1 adjustments. I've seen too many practitioners use the M-1 approach as a lazy way to avoid difficult conversations with clients. But you're setting up both yourself and the client for problems down the road. The IRS has gotten much more aggressive about constructive dividend audits, especially with closely-held C-corps. My advice: bite the bullet now and clean this up. Reclassify the personal expenses as dividends (or loans if there's proper documentation and repayment ability). Yes, it'll create some additional tax liability, but it's better than dealing with an IRS audit that could go back multiple years with penalties and interest. The client may not like it initially, but they'll thank you when they're not facing a massive IRS bill later.
I completely agree with this approach. I'm relatively new to handling C-corp clients, but I've been reading up on the constructive dividend rules and it seems like the IRS is really cracking down on this area. What's the best way to handle the conversation with a client when you're essentially telling them their previous accountant was wrong and they now owe additional taxes? I'm worried about losing the client, but I also don't want to perpetuate bad practices. Any specific language or approach that works well for these difficult conversations? Also, when you reclassify these as dividends, do you typically need to file amended returns for prior years, or can you just correct the treatment going forward?
This is really encouraging to hear! I filed my LLC return on 2/3 and have been anxiously waiting since my transcript still shows "N/A" for 2024. Based on your timeline and what others are sharing, it sounds like the IRS might actually be processing business returns much more efficiently this year. The fact that your deposit hit the same day as the transcript update is incredible - that never happened in previous years. I'm going to stop obsessing over WMR and just wait for my transcript to update. Thanks for sharing the detailed timeline, it really helps set expectations for those of us still waiting!
I'm in a similar boat - filed my single-member LLC return on 2/8 and transcript still shows N/A. After reading all these experiences, I'm feeling more optimistic! It's really helpful to see the actual timelines people are experiencing versus what the IRS tools are showing. The disconnect between WMR and actual processing seems to be the new normal. I'm going to try checking my transcript daily instead of relying on WMR. Has anyone noticed if there's a particular day of the week when transcripts tend to update with the 846 codes?
This is exactly what I experienced too! Filed my Schedule C return on 2/1, transcript showed N/A for weeks, then suddenly updated with 846 code on 2/25 and deposit hit my account the SAME DAY. WMR still showed "being processed" even after I had the money in my account! What really surprised me was that my regular W-2 employee friends who filed later are still waiting, but us business filers seem to be getting processed much faster this year. I think the IRS may have streamlined their business return verification process. The old timeline of 6-8 weeks for Schedule C returns seems to be obsolete. One tip for others waiting - I noticed my transcript updated on a Friday morning around 6 AM EST, and the deposit hit by 2 PM the same day. Seems like they're doing batch processing on Fridays now instead of the old Tuesday/Wednesday pattern.
This is so reassuring to hear! I'm a new business owner and this is my first year filing a Schedule C, so I had no idea what to expect. All the horror stories online about 6-8 week waits for business returns had me really stressed about cash flow. Your timeline gives me hope that maybe the IRS really has improved their systems. I filed on 2/12 and my transcript is still N/A, but based on everyone's experiences here, I'm going to stop checking WMR obsessively and just monitor my transcript on Friday mornings like you suggested. Thanks for sharing the specific timing details - that Friday 6 AM pattern is super helpful to know!
Has anyone here used TurboTax to report a lemon law settlement? I'm trying to figure out where to even put this on my tax forms and the software isn't clear about it.
I used TurboTax last year for my lemon law settlement. If part of your settlement is taxable, you'd report it as "Other Income" when it asks about additional income sources. There should be a section for settlements/legal proceeds. But first figure out how much is actually taxable - don't just report the whole thing! My attorney gave me a letter breaking down what was taxable vs. non-taxable.
Based on what everyone's shared here, it sounds like you really need to get clarity on what your $17k settlement was specifically compensating you for. The fact that your paperwork just says "settlement amount" without breaking it down is going to be problematic. I'd recommend a two-pronged approach: First, contact your attorney immediately and request a detailed breakdown letter specifying what portions of the settlement were for vehicle value recovery versus other compensation. Most lemon law settlements are primarily for diminished value (which isn't taxable), but without documentation, the IRS could assume it's all taxable income. Second, if you can't get your attorney to respond, consider using one of those document analysis tools people mentioned or getting professional tax advice. Don't guess on this - a $17k mistake could cost you thousands in unnecessary taxes or penalties if you get it wrong. The key thing to remember is that you're still making payments on the truck, so this isn't a completed sale transaction where you could claim a loss. The settlement and your ongoing loan are separate issues for tax purposes.
This is really helpful advice! I'm in a similar boat - just got a lemon law settlement last month and my paperwork is super vague too. The attorney response thing is so frustrating - they're all over you during the case but disappear once they get paid. One thing I'm wondering about - if I can't get my attorney to provide that breakdown letter, would it help to look at what my state's lemon law statute says about damages? My settlement was in California and I'm wondering if the law itself might give some guidance on how these payments are typically categorized for tax purposes. Has anyone tried that approach? Also, @e08769462bbb, when you mention getting professional tax advice, are you talking about a CPA or would an enrolled agent be sufficient for this kind of question? I'm trying to keep costs reasonable but don't want to mess this up.
Astrid BergstrΓΆm
According to Internal Revenue Manual 21.4.1.3, cycle codes are assigned based on the processing center and submission pathway. The change you're experiencing is consistent with your return being routed to a different processing queue, possibly for manual review as indicated by your 570/971 codes. Per IRS Publication 5344, this is standard procedure when certain verification protocols are triggered. While this may extend processing time, it doesn't necessarily indicate an audit or significant issue with your filing.
0 coins
Dylan Mitchell
I went through this exact same scenario last year! My cycle code switched from 0520 to 0620 overnight, and I was convinced something terrible had happened to my return. Like you, I was desperately waiting for that refund money for some urgent expenses. The cycle change ended up being completely normal - my return was just moved to a different processing batch. It did add about 10 days to my timeline, but everything processed fine in the end. The waiting is definitely nerve-wracking when you need the money, but try not to stress too much about the code change itself. Keep checking your transcript for any new developments, and hopefully you'll see movement soon!
0 coins
Sofia Rodriguez
β’Thanks for sharing your experience Dylan! It's really reassuring to hear from someone who went through the exact same thing. The 10-day delay isn't ideal but definitely manageable compared to what I was imagining in my head. Did you notice any other codes appearing during those 10 days, or did your transcript stay pretty quiet until the refund was actually issued? I'm trying to figure out if I should expect more changes or just wait it out.
0 coins