Pay nothing until a live IRS agent is on the phone with you.
Can't reach IRS? Claimyr calls for you, so you don't have to wait on hold.
$0 upfront. We only hold your card.
No live agent, no charge.
$9.99 is charged only once a live IRS agent is on the phone with you.
Using Claimyr will:
- Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
- Skip the long phone menu
- Call the correct department
- Redial until on hold
- Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
- Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call
If I could give 10 stars I would
If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!
Really made a difference
Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.
Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.
Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.
An incredibly helpful service
An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!
Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.
Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.
IT WORKS!! Not a scam!
I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!
Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Has anyone here used TurboTax to report a lemon law settlement? I'm trying to figure out where to even put this on my tax forms and the software isn't clear about it.
I used TurboTax last year for my lemon law settlement. If part of your settlement is taxable, you'd report it as "Other Income" when it asks about additional income sources. There should be a section for settlements/legal proceeds. But first figure out how much is actually taxable - don't just report the whole thing! My attorney gave me a letter breaking down what was taxable vs. non-taxable.
Based on what everyone's shared here, it sounds like you really need to get clarity on what your $17k settlement was specifically compensating you for. The fact that your paperwork just says "settlement amount" without breaking it down is going to be problematic. I'd recommend a two-pronged approach: First, contact your attorney immediately and request a detailed breakdown letter specifying what portions of the settlement were for vehicle value recovery versus other compensation. Most lemon law settlements are primarily for diminished value (which isn't taxable), but without documentation, the IRS could assume it's all taxable income. Second, if you can't get your attorney to respond, consider using one of those document analysis tools people mentioned or getting professional tax advice. Don't guess on this - a $17k mistake could cost you thousands in unnecessary taxes or penalties if you get it wrong. The key thing to remember is that you're still making payments on the truck, so this isn't a completed sale transaction where you could claim a loss. The settlement and your ongoing loan are separate issues for tax purposes.
Great question about the state statute approach! Looking at your state's lemon law can definitely provide helpful context for how settlements are typically structured. California's lemon law specifically allows for restitution of purchase price minus reasonable use allowance, which would generally be non-taxable as a return of capital. For professional help, either a CPA or enrolled agent should be sufficient for this type of question - enrolled agents actually specialize in tax matters and are often more cost-effective than CPAs for pure tax issues. You could also try calling the IRS directly (though good luck getting through!) or using one of those callback services people mentioned. One other tip: check if your settlement agreement references specific Civil Code sections. If it mentions Civil Code 1793.2(d)(2) or similar statutes about restitution/refunds, that's a good indication the payment is for vehicle value recovery rather than punitive damages or emotional distress compensation.
Great questions! Looking at your state's lemon law statute is actually a smart approach - many state lemon laws do specify that damages are primarily for "diminished value" or "purchase price recovery," which would support the non-taxable treatment. California's lemon law specifically mentions restitution for the vehicle's diminished value, so that could help document your position if audited. For professional help, either a CPA or Enrolled Agent would be qualified to handle this. Enrolled Agents often charge less than CPAs and specialize specifically in tax matters, so they might be more cost-effective for your situation. You could also try calling the IRS directly (or using that Claimyr service others mentioned) - sometimes a quick conversation with an IRS agent can clarify things without needing to hire anyone. One more tip: if you do end up having to make a reasonable allocation without attorney documentation, keep detailed notes about your reasoning and any research you did (like reviewing your state's lemon law). That documentation could be valuable if questions come up later. The IRS generally looks favorably on taxpayers who made good-faith efforts to determine the correct treatment.
Join the conversation
Has anyone with a similar cycle code (20250503) received their refund yet? I'm in the same boat and getting a bit anxious since I need this money for a car repair next week! 😬
I have the exact same cycle code (20250503) and filed on February 28th! Based on what everyone's saying here, it sounds like we should both see updates this Saturday morning. I've been checking my transcript obsessively too - filed jointly for the first time this year and claimed the Child Tax Credit, so I'm expecting it might take the full timeline mentioned. Keep me posted if you see any movement on yours! We're probably in the same processing batch. 🤞
Join the conversation
Has anyone dealt with the situation where the employee already filed their taxes before we discovered the withholding was incorrect? One of our employees exercised NSOs in December, we underwithheld, and she's already filed her return using the incorrect W-2 we provided. Do we need to issue a corrected W-2 or is there another way to handle this?
Yes, you should issue a W-2c (corrected W-2) as soon as possible. The employee will then need to file an amended tax return (Form 1040-X) to correct their reported income and tax liability. Make sure to clearly communicate with the employee about what happened and why they're receiving a corrected form. It's important to explain that the original withholding was insufficient and they may owe additional taxes. Some companies offer to cover the cost of preparing the amended return since it was the company's error.
This is exactly the kind of situation that makes startup HR so challenging! I went through something very similar last year with our NSO exercises. One thing that helped me was creating a simple spreadsheet to track all the moving pieces - employee name, exercise date, number of shares, strike price, FMV at exercise, total spread (taxable income), and then columns for each tax component (federal income, state, Social Security, Medicare, any local taxes). This made it much easier to see where the discrepancy was coming from. In our case, we discovered that Carta was using a flat 22% supplemental wage rate for federal withholding, but some of our higher-earning employees should have been subject to the 37% rate since their total annual income exceeded certain thresholds when combined with the NSO income. Also double-check if your state has any special rules for equity compensation - California, for example, has some quirky requirements that can throw off calculations. The key is getting both platforms to show you their exact calculation methodology line by line. Don't let them just give you totals - demand the breakdown. Once you have that, the discrepancy usually becomes obvious. Good luck! This stuff is unnecessarily complex but definitely solvable with some persistence.
Join the conversation
Thank you for posting this! I was getting so frustrated seeing all these "I got my EITC refund already" posts too. Like you said, it's literally impossible - the IRS systems won't even let them process these refunds until mid-February. I think some people are confusing regular refunds with EITC/ACTC refunds, or maybe they're remembering wrong from previous years. Either way, it's giving people false hope when we're all stuck waiting until at least February 15th. The PATH Act isn't optional for the IRS - it's federal law!
Kayla Jacobson
My small business return was accepted on January 29th, 2024. Transcript updated with 570 code on February 12th. Then showed 571 code on February 19th. Got 846 code on February 23rd with February 28th deposit date. But the money hit my account on February 23rd - same day as the transcript update! Just like yours! My WMR still shows processing even though I already have the money. This is definitely a new pattern for 2024 filing season.
0 coins
Ryan Young
This is really encouraging to hear! I filed my LLC return on 2/3 and have been anxiously waiting since my transcript still shows "N/A" for 2024. Based on your timeline and what others are sharing, it sounds like the IRS might actually be processing business returns much more efficiently this year. The fact that your deposit hit the same day as the transcript update is incredible - that never happened in previous years. I'm going to stop obsessing over WMR and just wait for my transcript to update. Thanks for sharing the detailed timeline, it really helps set expectations for those of us still waiting!
0 coins