


Ask the community...
In my experience selling a similar property, Form 4797 is your friend. You'll need to use this form to report the sale of business property, which includes the rental portion. For the primary residence part, you'll use Schedule D and Form 8949. The trick is making sure the allocation method is reasonable and consistent. My CPA recommended documenting EVERYTHING about how we determined the split. Also, don't forget to account for any improvements made specifically to one unit or the other! If your mom renovated just her apartment, that would adjust the basis differently than improvements to the rental unit.
This is so confusing! Does your mom need to file all these extra forms even if her total gain after the allocation might be under the $250k exclusion? Seems like a lot of paperwork for possibly no additional tax...
You're dealing with a classic mixed-use property situation, and yes, you're absolutely right that you need to treat this as essentially two separate properties for tax purposes. Here's what you need to know: **Allocation Method**: Use a reasonable method to split the property - square footage is most common, but you could also use fair market value of each unit or number of rooms. Whatever method you choose, document it thoroughly and be consistent. **Primary Residence Portion**: Your mom can claim the Section 121 exclusion (up to $250,000) on the gain allocated to her primary residence portion, assuming she meets the ownership and use tests (lived there 2 of the last 5 years). **Rental Portion**: This is where it gets tricky. You'll need to: - Calculate the adjusted basis (original cost basis minus accumulated depreciation) - Report any gain on Form 4797 (Sale of Business Property) - Pay depreciation recapture tax at 25% on the depreciation previously claimed - Any remaining gain above the recapture amount gets taxed at capital gains rates **Key Point**: Even if your mom never actually claimed depreciation on her tax returns, the IRS assumes she should have, so you'll still need to recapture the "allowable" depreciation. I'd strongly recommend getting a tax professional involved given the complexity, especially since there are specific rules about mixed-use properties that can trip people up.
This is really helpful! One question about the "allowable" depreciation - if mom's accountant didn't claim the full amount they could have claimed each year, does the IRS still make you recapture the maximum allowable amount? Or just what was actually claimed on the returns? I'm worried we might be on the hook for more depreciation recapture than what was actually taken as a deduction.
Has anyone used the "simplified" method for calculating depreciation that I've heard about? My accountant mentioned there might be an easier way to handle all this for small landlords with just 1-2 properties.
There isn't really a "simplified" method for depreciation itself - the 27.5 year schedule for residential buildings is pretty much standard. What your accountant might be referring to is the safe harbor for small taxpayers that lets you immediately expense (not depreciate) certain improvements under $2,500 per invoice (or $5,000 if you have applicable financial statements). But this doesn't apply to the initial property purchase or major renovations.
This is exactly the kind of confusion I had when I started with rental properties! The key thing to understand is that depreciation carryover only applies if you owned the property in previous years - since this is your first year, you don't have any carryover amounts to worry about. For your kitchen improvements, those $8,500 in costs will need to be depreciated over their useful life (typically 5-15 years depending on what you installed), not deducted all at once. The depreciation starts when the property was "placed in service" - meaning ready for rent, not when tenants actually moved in. One tip: make sure you're separating the land value from the building value when calculating your depreciation basis. Only the building and improvements can be depreciated, not the land itself. You can usually find this breakdown on your property tax assessment or have an appraiser determine it. Keep detailed records of all improvements with dates and costs - you'll need this information every year going forward, and it becomes crucial when you eventually sell the property for calculating depreciation recapture.
This is really helpful! I'm also a first-time landlord and was getting overwhelmed by all the depreciation terminology. One question - when you mention separating land value from building value, how do you handle that if your property tax assessment doesn't break it down clearly? My county just shows one total assessed value. Should I be getting a professional appraisal just for tax purposes, or is there a simpler way to estimate this split?
Great question! You don't need to get a professional appraisal just for this. The IRS actually accepts several reasonable methods for determining the land/building split. The most common approach is to use your county assessor's records - even if they show one total, you can often call the assessor's office and they'll provide the breakdown they use internally. Another accepted method is to look at comparable vacant land sales in your area and estimate what your lot would be worth empty. You can also use the replacement cost method - estimate what it would cost to rebuild the structure today, then subtract that from your total property value to get the land value. The key is being reasonable and consistent. The IRS isn't looking for perfection here, just a good faith effort to separate the depreciable building from the non-depreciable land. I'd suggest starting with a call to your county assessor - they're usually helpful and it's free. Document whatever method you use in case you're ever asked about it later.
I've been dealing with consolidated 1099s for years and they're always confusing at first! The key thing to remember is that these forms are designed to be comprehensive, so they include ALL possible sections even if only a few apply to your situation. For your specific case with only box 6 (acquisition premium) having a value, you're actually in good shape. As others have mentioned, acquisition premium is an adjustment that reduces OID income - but since you don't have any OID income to reduce (no values in boxes 1-3), there's nothing for you to report on your tax return. The reason brokerages can't just show zeros in empty boxes is actually due to IRS formatting requirements. They're only supposed to include boxes that have actual values or are relevant to your specific investments. It's counterintuitive, but that's how the system works. My advice: keep that 1099-OID page with your tax records, enter the information exactly as shown if your tax software asks for it, but don't stress about reporting anything additional. The acquisition premium will just sit there as informational data unless you have actual OID income in future years.
This is really helpful context! I was wondering why some boxes were missing entirely while others showed zeros. The IRS formatting requirements explanation makes total sense - they're trying to reduce clutter by only showing relevant sections, but it definitely makes it harder to understand what you're looking at as a taxpayer. Your point about keeping the 1099-OID page as informational data is smart too. Even though I don't need to report anything this year, if I end up with actual OID income from these same investments in the future, having that acquisition premium on record could be important for calculating the correct taxable amount. Thanks for breaking this down in such clear terms! It's reassuring to know that having a "partial" form like this is totally normal and not a sign that something's wrong with my investment account or tax situation.
I completely understand your frustration with consolidated 1099s! They really do make things unnecessarily confusing. From what you've described with only box 6 (acquisition premium) showing a value, you're actually dealing with a pretty common scenario that doesn't require any action on your tax return. Think of it this way: acquisition premium is like having a coupon that reduces the cost of something you're buying - but if you're not actually buying anything, the coupon doesn't matter. Since you don't have any OID income to report (which would show up in boxes 1-3), that acquisition premium amount is essentially just sitting there unused. I'd recommend just entering the information exactly as shown if your tax software prompts you for 1099-OID data, but don't expect it to change your tax liability. The software should recognize that there's no reportable income and handle it appropriately. And definitely keep that form with your tax records - it shows you received the proper documentation even though it doesn't impact this year's taxes. The good news is once you understand how these work, future years will be much less stressful when you see similar "incomplete" forms!
This is exactly the kind of clear explanation I needed! The coupon analogy really helps - I was overthinking this whole situation. It's reassuring to know that having these "unused" values on tax forms is completely normal and not a sign that I'm missing something important. I'll definitely keep the 1099-OID page with my records as you suggested. It makes sense that even though it doesn't affect this year's taxes, having that acquisition premium documented could be relevant if my investment situation changes in future years. Better to have the paper trail than wonder later where that information came from. Thanks for taking the time to explain this so thoroughly! I feel much more confident about handling my tax filing now.
Thank you all for this incredibly helpful discussion! I've been lurking here for months but finally decided to create an account because I'm dealing with this exact situation right now. My divorce was finalized last month and I've been really stressed about what this means for my tax future. Reading through all these responses has been such a relief - especially hearing from people who have actually been through this process. I had no idea about needing to file that formal termination statement, so thank you @Lindsey Fry for bringing that up! I almost would have just filed as single and assumed the IRS would figure it out. One question I haven't seen addressed - does anyone know if there are any implications for state taxes? I'm in California and wondering if I need to do anything special at the state level when terminating this federal election, or if it's automatically handled when I file my state return as single. Also, has anyone dealt with this situation where there were joint estimated tax payments made during the year before the divorce was final? I'm not sure how to handle those on my separate return. Thanks again everyone - this community has been more helpful than hours of trying to decipher IRS publications!
Welcome to the community, @Omar Mahmoud! I'm glad this discussion has been helpful for your situation. Regarding your California state tax question - generally, California follows federal filing status, so when you terminate the federal election and file as single, your California return should automatically reflect that change. You shouldn't need any special documentation at the state level beyond what you're already filing federally with the termination statement. For the joint estimated tax payments, you'll need to figure out how much each spouse contributed and allocate accordingly on your separate returns. If you made the payments jointly from a shared account, you might need to work out with your ex-spouse who gets to claim which portions, or you might need to split them proportionally based on your respective tax liabilities. This can get tricky, so it might be worth consulting with a tax professional for your specific situation. The good news is that these are just one-time complications from unwinding the joint filing - once you get through this transition year, everything becomes much more straightforward!
I've been following this thread closely as I'm currently going through a similar situation with my non-resident spouse election. What strikes me most is how many people (myself included) had no idea about the formal termination statement requirement - this really should be more clearly explained in IRS materials! One thing I'd add that I learned from my tax attorney: if you're dealing with this situation, make sure to review any prior year returns where you made the election. Sometimes the original election statement wasn't properly formatted or included all required information, which could create issues down the road. It's better to identify and correct any deficiencies while you're already dealing with the termination process. Also, for anyone worried about the "once-in-a-lifetime" restriction like I was - remember that the vast majority of people will never need to make this specific election again anyway. The restriction only matters if you plan to marry another non-resident alien in the future, and even then, there are other ways to handle international tax situations. The most important thing is getting that termination properly documented now so you can move forward with confidence in your future tax planning!
This is such great advice about reviewing the original election statement! I hadn't thought about potential formatting issues with the initial paperwork. You're absolutely right that the IRS materials don't make the termination statement requirement clear enough - I only learned about it from this thread. Your point about the restriction rarely mattering in practice is really reassuring too. When you're in the middle of dealing with divorce and taxes, it's easy to catastrophize about these limitations, but you're right that most people won't ever need to make this specific election again anyway. Thanks for mentioning the tax attorney perspective - it sounds like having professional help during this process can really save headaches later. Did your attorney help you identify any specific issues with your original election statement, or was it more of a precautionary review?
Lucas Kowalski
I think the IRS intentionally makes these forms confusing lol. Has anyone had their Form 8802 rejected? How long did it take to get a response? I'm supposed to start a position in Korea in 6 weeks and I'm worried about timing.
0 coins
Olivia Martinez
ā¢Mine took exactly 4 weeks from submission to receiving the certificate. My friend who applied around the same time but had some discrepancies between his application and tax returns had his rejected after about 3 weeks, then had to resubmit with corrections. The IRS is actually fairly quick with these compared to other services. If you're in a real rush, there's an expedited process, but you need to provide proof of urgency (like a letter from your employer with a deadline).
0 coins
Layla Mendes
I went through this exact same nightmare with Form 8802 about 6 months ago! For line 4a when you check "Individual," you literally just need to write your full name exactly as it appears on your most recent tax return - nothing more, nothing less. Don't add your SSN, don't add extra info, just your name. Since you're working for a Singapore company, make sure you're also including copies of your most recently filed 1040 and any relevant schedules (like Schedule C if you have any self-employment income). The IRS uses this to verify your U.S. tax residency status for the foreign tax authority. One tip that saved me - call the IRS practitioner priority line if you get stuck. The regular customer service line is useless, but the practitioner line (even though you're not technically a practitioner) sometimes gets you through to someone who actually knows about international forms. Good luck with your deadline!
0 coins
Justin Trejo
ā¢This is super helpful! I had no idea there was a practitioner priority line. Do you happen to know the number for that line? I've been trying the regular customer service number and like you said, it's been completely useless. Also, when you say "exactly as it appears on your tax return" - does that include middle initials if that's how you filed, or just first and last name?
0 coins
Mae Bennett
ā¢The practitioner priority line is 866-860-4259, but heads up - they might ask if you're an enrolled agent or CPA. I just said I was calling on behalf of a client (which is technically true since you're your own client, right?). For the name on line 4a, include everything exactly as it appears - so if you filed with your middle initial, include it. If you used your full middle name, use that. The IRS computer system matches character by character, so "John A. Smith" is different from "John Smith" to them. I learned this the hard way when my first application got delayed because I abbreviated my middle name differently than on my 1040. Also make sure you're looking at the "name" field on line 1 of your 1040, not the signature line - sometimes people sign differently than they fill out the form.
0 coins