IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Has anyone used TurboTax or H&R Block software for reporting foreign pensions? I'm wondering if they handle these situations well or if I need something more specialized.

0 coins

Aria Khan

β€’

I tried using TurboTax for my German pension and it was a disaster. The software doesn't properly guide you through the foreign tax credit forms for specific types of foreign income. It also doesn't incorporate tax treaty provisions automatically - you have to know which ones apply to your situation. I ended up using a specialized expat tax service and they found that I'd been reporting things incorrectly for years. If your situation is simple, regular tax software might work, but for foreign pensions, I wouldn't risk it.

0 coins

Jamal Carter

β€’

I'm dealing with a similar situation with my Italian disability pension, and after reading through all these responses, I wanted to share what I learned from my tax attorney. The key thing that many people miss is that disability pensions from workplace injuries often have different treaty treatment than regular retirement pensions. Since your pension is classified as "rente d'invaliditΓ© professionnelle" (work-related disability), you'll likely need to use Form 8833 to claim treaty benefits under Article 18 of the US-France tax treaty. What I found helpful was getting the official French documentation that clearly states the nature and classification of your pension payments. The IRS will want to see that it's specifically a work-related disability benefit, not just a general pension. Also, definitely don't overlook the FBAR filing if your French accounts exceed $10,000. The penalties are no joke - I learned that the hard way when I missed filing for two years and had to go through the voluntary disclosure process. One more tip: keep detailed records of all French taxes paid on this income. You'll need those exact amounts for Form 1116 if any portion ends up being taxable in the US after applying treaty provisions.

0 coins

Chloe Taylor

β€’

This is incredibly helpful, thank you! I'm just starting to navigate this whole situation and feeling pretty overwhelmed. Quick question - when you mention getting "official French documentation," are you talking about something specific from the French pension authority? I have my regular pension statements, but I'm not sure if those clearly spell out the work-related disability classification in a way the IRS would want to see. Also, for the voluntary disclosure process you went through - was it as scary as it sounds? I'm worried I might be in a similar boat since I've been filing US taxes for years without reporting this French income.

0 coins

This is such a helpful discussion! I've been wanting to maximize my I-Bond purchases but wasn't sure about the gifting rules. Based on what everyone's shared, it sounds like my spouse and I can each buy $10K in I-Bonds as gifts for each other right now, hold them in our gift boxes, then deliver them next year when our annual limits reset. This would effectively let us get $40K in bonds over two years instead of just $20K. One follow-up question - if we're doing this strategy, should we be concerned about any documentation or record-keeping requirements? Like do we need to keep receipts showing when we purchased the gifts versus when we delivered them, in case the IRS ever asks about our I-Bond holdings?

0 coins

Great question about record-keeping! From what I understand, TreasuryDirect automatically maintains records of when you purchase gift bonds versus when they're delivered to recipients' accounts. You can see the purchase dates, delivery dates, and issue dates in your account history. That said, it's always good practice to keep your own records, especially screenshots or printouts showing the purchase dates and delivery dates of gift bonds. This could be helpful if you ever need to demonstrate the timing for tax purposes or if there are questions about which year the bonds count toward annual limits. The Treasury's electronic records should be sufficient, but having your own backup documentation gives you extra peace of mind, especially when you're strategically timing deliveries across tax years like this.

0 coins

This thread has been incredibly helpful for understanding I-Bond gifting strategies! I just wanted to add one more consideration for folks planning this approach - make sure you have your TreasuryDirect accounts properly set up and linked before you start purchasing gifts. I ran into issues last year where I bought gift bonds but then had trouble delivering them because of account verification problems. Also, if you're planning to do this strategy with multiple family members (like the example with parents mentioned earlier), it might be worth creating a simple spreadsheet to track who you're gifting to, when you purchased each gift, and when you plan to deliver them. With multiple $10K gifts floating around in gift boxes, it's easy to lose track of the timing, especially when you're trying to optimize across multiple tax years. The strategy definitely works as everyone has described, but the logistics can get a bit complex when you're coordinating with multiple people!

0 coins

Benjamin Kim

β€’

This is excellent advice about the logistics! I'm just starting to explore this I-Bond gifting strategy and hadn't thought about the account setup complexities. Quick question - when you mention account verification problems, was this related to identity verification for new TreasuryDirect accounts, or something else? I want to make sure I get everything properly configured before attempting to purchase any gift bonds. Also, do you know if there are any restrictions on how long you can keep bonds in your gift box before delivering them, or can you theoretically hold them indefinitely until you decide to deliver?

0 coins

Ezra Beard

β€’

This is exactly why these misconceptions persist - people hear about the "6,000 lb rule" and think it's a magic bullet for tax savings! Your partners are mixing up old information with current rules. Yes, Section 179 applies to vehicles over 6,000 lbs GVWR, but as others mentioned, SUVs have that $28,900 cap for 2025. The key thing they're missing is that this only applies if the vehicle is used MORE than 50% for business. Before anyone makes a $78k purchase decision, here are the real questions you need to answer: 1. Will this Escalade truly be used more than 50% for business? (Personal commuting doesn't count) 2. Can you document and justify this business use? 3. Does your consulting firm actually NEED a luxury SUV for legitimate business purposes? The IRS scrutinizes luxury vehicle deductions heavily. If you can't show clear business necessity and proper usage documentation, you're setting yourself up for an audit. A $78k vehicle purchase to save maybe $10-15k in taxes (assuming legitimate business use) doesn't make financial sense for most small businesses. Wait for your accountant to return and get proper advice before making any major purchases!

0 coins

Toot-n-Mighty

β€’

This is such solid advice! I'm a newcomer here but I've been following this thread because I'm in a similar situation with my small marketing agency. My business partner keeps pushing for us to buy a big SUV for "client meetings" but honestly, most of our clients are virtual these days. The part about documenting business necessity really hit home - I think a lot of small business owners (myself included) sometimes get caught up in the tax savings potential without thinking through whether the expense actually makes sense for the business. A $78k vehicle is a huge cash outlay that could be used for so many other growth investments. Thanks for breaking down those key questions - I'm definitely going to use that framework when we revisit this discussion. Better to be conservative and keep good records than to get creative and risk an audit!

0 coins

As someone who just went through this exact scenario with my consulting firm last year, I can't stress enough how important it is to get proper professional advice before making any large vehicle purchases based on tax benefits. We almost made the same mistake your partners are pushing for - buying a luxury SUV thinking we could write off the entire cost. Thankfully our CPA stopped us and explained the real rules. The $28,900 Section 179 limit for SUVs is very real, and the business use requirements are strictly enforced. What really opened my eyes was when our accountant showed us the math: even with legitimate 75% business use, we'd only save about $21,675 in taxes (75% of $28,900 limit). That's nowhere near enough savings to justify a $78,000 purchase! Plus, we'd still be on the hook for the remaining $49,100+ that couldn't be deducted. The IRS has closed most of the vehicle loopholes that existed years ago. Your instinct to wait for your accountant is absolutely right - don't let anyone pressure you into a major financial decision based on outdated or misunderstood tax advice. A good CPA will help you find legitimate tax strategies that actually make sense for your business size and cash flow.

0 coins

This is incredibly helpful perspective from someone who actually went through this decision process! The math you laid out really drives home the point - saving $21,675 on a $78k purchase is basically a 28% "discount" at best, which isn't nearly as compelling as the "write off the whole thing" narrative that gets thrown around. What really resonates with me is your point about cash flow. Even if you could somehow justify the full business use (which sounds nearly impossible for most consulting firms), you're still tying up almost $80k in a depreciating asset instead of investing that money in growing the actual business - better technology, additional staff, marketing, etc. Did you end up purchasing a different vehicle, or did you realize the business didn't actually need one at all? I'm curious how you approached the transportation needs once you got past the tax benefit fixation.

0 coins

Jordan Walker

β€’

Former tax preparer here. One important point nobody's mentioned - there's a BIG difference between business expenses and actual charitable donations on taxes. When MrBeast gives $10,000 to a random person on the street for a video, that's a BUSINESS EXPENSE (Schedule C), not a charitable donation. It's only a charitable donation if it goes to a qualified 501(c)(3) organization. Business expenses reduce your taxable income dollar-for-dollar, while charitable donations have limits and may not be as beneficial depending on your tax situation.

0 coins

Do these YouTubers actually save more on taxes by doing giveaways as business expenses versus if they just kept the money? I always hear people say "it's just for tax write-offs" but I don't understand how that would save them money overall.

0 coins

Ana Rusula

β€’

@Alexander Zeus No, business expense write-offs don t'actually save you more money than just keeping the cash. If a YouTuber is in a 30% tax bracket and spends $50K on a giveaway car, they save about $15K in taxes but they re'still out $35K net. The real benefit isn t'the tax savings - it s'that the giveaway video generates way more revenue than it costs. Like @Sebastian Scott mentioned, a $50K car giveaway might generate $100K+ in ad revenue, sponsorships, and increased subscriber value. So they re'not doing it primarily for tax benefits - they re'doing it because it s'profitable content that happens to also be tax deductible. The tax "write-off narrative" is kind of misleading. It s'really just smart business where the content creation costs including (giveaway items are) legitimately deductible because they re'necessary for producing the revenue-generating content.

0 coins

Raul Neal

β€’

Something I haven't seen mentioned yet is the reporting requirements for these giveaways. If you're a YouTuber giving away prizes worth $600 or more to any individual, you're generally required to issue a 1099-MISC form to the recipient and report it to the IRS. This means these creators need to collect personal information (name, address, SSN) from winners before giving them the prize. Many viewers don't realize this when they see these "spontaneous" giveaways to random people on the street. Also, for the creators, proper documentation is crucial. You need receipts, proof of delivery, records of the business purpose, and evidence that it was used in content creation. The IRS can challenge these deductions if they think the expenses are personal rather than business-related. The key test is whether the giveaway serves a legitimate business purpose (like creating content to generate revenue) versus being primarily personal generosity that happens to be filmed.

0 coins

Malik Johnson

β€’

This is really helpful context about the 1099 requirements! I never thought about how these "spontaneous" street giveaways would actually work logistically. Like when TomDoesGiveaways surprises some random person with a car, they'd have to get all their tax info before actually giving it to them? That must make those interactions way more complicated than what we see in the final video. Do you know if there are any penalties for creators who don't properly issue the 1099 forms, or if the IRS actually enforces this stuff regularly?

0 coins

Gabriel Ruiz

β€’

I've been following this discussion and wanted to add some perspective as someone who's dealt with similar situations. The consensus here is spot-on - your CPA's approach sounds very reasonable for your circumstances. One thing I'd emphasize that hasn't been mentioned much is the importance of consistency in your methodology. If you use the averaging approach for your real estate income this year, and you have a similar situation next year, stick with the same method unless there's a compelling reason to change. The IRS appreciates consistency in tax positions from year to year. Also, given that you're new to Form 2210AI, you might want to understand the "safe harbor" rules for estimated payments. For future years, if you pay either 100% of last year's tax liability (110% if your prior year AGI was over $150,000) in estimated payments, you can avoid penalties regardless of how much you owe when you file. This might be simpler than dealing with annualization if your income continues to be variable. Your 25% quarterly variation is really quite manageable, and combined with properly isolating that Q4 Roth conversion, you should be in good shape. The key takeaway is that you and your CPA approached this thoughtfully rather than just trying to game the system to minimize penalties.

0 coins

Sophia Bennett

β€’

This is such valuable information about the safe harbor rules! I hadn't really understood that option before reading your explanation. It sounds like for someone in my situation with variable income, paying 100% of last year's tax liability might actually be the simpler path forward rather than trying to perfectly time estimated payments with my unpredictable real estate commissions. The point about consistency in methodology is also really helpful - I can see how switching approaches from year to year could raise red flags even if each individual approach was reasonable. Thanks for sharing this broader perspective on managing estimated payments for variable income situations!

0 coins

Eleanor Foster

β€’

This has been such an informative discussion! As someone who's also navigating Form 2210AI for the first time, I really appreciate everyone sharing their experiences and expertise. One thing I'm curious about - for those of you who've been through audits where the IRS questioned your 2210AI allocations, how detailed did they get in their review? Did they want to see every single commission check and closing statement, or were they more focused on whether your overall methodology made sense? I'm in a similar boat as the original poster with variable income (though mine comes from freelance consulting rather than real estate), and I'm trying to figure out what level of documentation precision I really need to maintain. My income can vary by 40-50% between quarters depending on when big projects wrap up, so I'm wondering if I should be tracking things more granularly than I currently do. Also, for future reference, does anyone know if there are any IRS publications or guidance documents that specifically address best practices for income allocation on Form 2210AI? I'd love to have some official guidance to reference when making these decisions.

0 coins

Savannah Vin

β€’

Great questions! From what I've seen in audit situations, the IRS typically focuses more on whether your methodology was reasonable and consistently applied rather than scrutinizing every individual transaction. With your 40-50% quarterly variation in consulting income, you'd definitely benefit from more precise allocation than simple averaging. For documentation, I'd recommend keeping project completion dates, invoice dates, and payment received dates. The IRS usually wants to see that you allocated income to the quarter when you actually received payment (assuming you're cash basis), not when you did the work or sent the invoice. As for official guidance, check out IRS Publication 505 "Tax Withholding and Estimated Tax" - it has a section on the annualized income installment method. Also, the instructions for Form 2210 itself provide some guidance on acceptable allocation methods. The key phrase the IRS uses is that allocations should "reasonably reflect" when income was actually received or earned, which gives you some flexibility but requires good faith efforts at accuracy.

0 coins

Prev1...2122232425...5643Next