IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Has anyone actually calculated what this refund would be? I'm in a similar boat.

0 coins

Based on the info provided, here's a rough calculation: - Family of 5 (married filing jointly with 3 kids under 17) - Income around $65k - No federal withholding - $2500 American Opportunity Credit - $300 educator expense deduction Standard deduction for married filing jointly in 2025 is projected to be around $29,200. So taxable income would be approximately $65,000 - $29,200 = $35,800. Tax on that would be roughly $3,900. Credits: - Child Tax Credit: $2,000 Ɨ 3 children = $6,000 - American Opportunity Credit: Up to $2,500 (with $1,000 refundable) So $6,000 + $2,500 = $8,500 in credits against $3,900 tax liability. That's potentially a refund around $4,600 plus any refundable portion of unused credits.

0 coins

Esteban Tate

•

This is really helpful info! I was in a similar situation last year and want to add a few things based on my experience. First, make sure all 3 of your kids will qualify as "qualifying children" for the Child Tax Credit - they need to be under 17 at the end of the tax year and meet the relationship/support tests. Sounds like yours will qualify no problem. One thing to watch out for - the American Opportunity Credit has income limits too. For married filing jointly, it starts phasing out around $160,000, so you should get the full benefit at $65k income. Also, don't stress too much about the calculator differences. I found that some online calculators don't account for all the interactions between different credits, or they use different assumptions about your filing status or deduction amounts. The rough calculation that Natalie provided above looks pretty reasonable to me. With no withholding, you're essentially getting an interest-free loan from the government through these refundable credits. Just make sure you file on time to get your refund processed quickly!

0 coins

This is such great practical advice! I'm new to understanding how all these tax credits work together, but the point about refundable credits being like an interest-free loan really puts it in perspective. One question - when you mention making sure the kids qualify as "qualifying children," is there anything specific to watch out for beyond the age requirement? I have 3 kids (ages 4, 7, and 9) so age shouldn't be an issue, but I want to make sure I don't miss anything that could affect our Child Tax Credit eligibility. Also, do you know if there's any benefit to filing early in the season versus waiting closer to the deadline when you're expecting a refund this large?

0 coins

CosmicCadet

•

Can I just point out that all this complicated gifting strategy might not even be necessary depending on how much stock we're talking about? The $19k limit is PER RECIPIENT, PER YEAR. So if you're gifting to both your mom and dad, you could actually gift up to $38k total ($19k to each) without any reporting requirements. And if you're married, both you and your spouse can each give $19k to each parent, meaning up to $76k total ($19k Ɨ 2 givers Ɨ 2 recipients) without triggering gift tax reporting.

0 coins

Chloe Harris

•

This is a really good point. I've been overthinking my own stock gifting situation. Another thing to remember is that even if you go over the annual exclusion, you don't necessarily pay gift tax - you just have to file a gift tax return (Form 709) and it counts against your lifetime exemption, which is over $13 million per person for 2025!

0 coins

Miguel Ramos

•

Just want to add a timing consideration that might help with your volatile stock situation. Since you need to use the fair market value on the actual date of transfer to determine if you're under the $19k limit, you might want to monitor the stock price and choose a day when it's trading lower if possible. For example, if your stock is currently worth $25k but you only want to gift $18k worth, you'd need to transfer fewer shares on a high-price day versus a low-price day. This gives you some flexibility to maximize the number of shares you can gift while staying under the annual exclusion limit. Also, make sure you document everything clearly - the exact number of shares transferred, the closing price on the transfer date, and your original purchase information. Your parents will need all this information when they eventually sell, and having it organized from the start will save everyone headaches later.

0 coins

Mateo Sanchez

•

This is really helpful timing advice! I'm dealing with a similar situation where my tech stock has been swinging 10-15% in a single day lately. I never thought about strategically timing the transfer date to maximize how many shares I could gift within the limit. One question though - does the IRS care about which price you use if there's a big difference between opening, closing, high, and low on the transfer date? Should I use the closing price specifically or could I use an average of the day's trading range? @Miguel Ramos - also curious if there are any rules about how quickly the actual transfer has to happen once you decide on a date? Like if I see a good price on Monday but the brokerage transfer doesn t'complete until Wednesday, which date s'price counts?

0 coins

Amara Eze

•

This has been such an incredibly helpful discussion! I'm dealing with a similar situation - about $13,000 in loss carryovers from 2023, and I've been absolutely puzzled by how TurboTax was handling them this year. Like so many others here, I was completely wrong about thinking the $3,000 limit applied to ALL capital loss usage. I had no idea that losses can offset capital gains dollar-for-dollar with no annual limit, and that the $3,000 restriction only applies to losses used against ordinary income like wages. What really drives this home for me is that I've actually been making some decent gains this year - probably around $7,000 in capital gains from stocks that have recovered. Instead of being worried about TurboTax "using up" my loss carryover too quickly, I should be celebrating that it's working exactly as intended! My losses are first wiping out those $7,000 in gains completely, and then I still get to use $3,000 more against my regular income. This means I'll use $10,000 of my $13,000 carryover in just one year, which is actually fantastic for my tax situation. I was dreading having to carry these losses forward for 4+ years, but now I realize that having investment gains actually helps me use them up more efficiently. Thank you everyone for making this so clear with real examples and patient explanations. This thread should be required reading for anyone dealing with capital loss carryovers!

0 coins

Mei Wong

•

This entire thread has been a game-changer for me too! I'm relatively new to investing and had some significant losses in 2023 that I'm carrying forward - about $14,500. Like everyone else, I was completely confused about how these carryovers actually work in practice. What's been most eye-opening is realizing that capital gains actually HELP you use up your loss carryovers faster, not slower. I had been avoiding taking any profits this year because I thought it would somehow interfere with my ability to claim the full $3,000 deduction. Turns out that's completely backward! Reading through all these examples, especially seeing how losses first offset gains with no limit before the $3,000 rule even kicks in, has completely changed my investment strategy. I actually have about $5,000 in unrealized gains right now that I was hesitant to take, but now I understand that taking those gains would let me use $5,000 of my carryover losses PLUS still get the full $3,000 against my ordinary income. This community really shows the power of people sharing their real experiences and confusion. Sometimes these complex tax rules make so much more sense when explained by regular people dealing with the same situations rather than trying to decode IRS publications. Thank you all for such a thorough and helpful discussion!

0 coins

Ethan Scott

•

This thread has been absolutely incredible! As someone who's been lurking in this community for a while but never posted, I finally had to jump in because this exact situation has been driving me crazy for months. I have about $19,000 in capital loss carryovers from some really poor investment decisions in 2022-2023, and I've been so confused watching TurboTax apply way more than $3,000 of them this year. Like literally everyone else here, I was convinced there was some kind of software error because I "knew" you could only use $3,000 per year, period. Reading through all these explanations - especially the clear breakdown that losses first offset capital gains with NO LIMIT, and only then does the $3,000 cap apply to ordinary income - this has completely blown my mind. I actually have about $8,000 in capital gains this year from some recovery in my tech stocks, so TurboTax was correctly using $8,000 of my carryover losses against those gains, plus allowing another $3,000 against my regular income. What really gets me is that I've been beating myself up thinking I was somehow "wasting" my loss carryovers by having gains this year. Turns out having those gains is actually helping me use up the carryovers more efficiently! Instead of taking 6+ years to exhaust them at $3,000 annually, I'm using $11,000 in just one year. This community is amazing for helping people understand these complex rules through real examples and shared experiences. Thank you all for such patient and thorough explanations - you've saved me from making some seriously bad investment decisions based on my misunderstanding!

0 coins

Ava Williams

•

This has been such an enlightening thread for all of us! I'm also new to dealing with capital loss carryovers and had the exact same confusion. I've been carrying forward about $12,000 in losses from some bad stock picks in 2023, and when I saw TurboTax applying more than $3,000 of them this year, I was convinced something was wrong. Like everyone else here, I had completely misunderstood how the system works. I thought the $3,000 was a hard cap on ALL loss usage, not realizing it only applies to losses used against ordinary income. The explanation that losses first offset capital gains dollar-for-dollar with no annual limit has been a total revelation. I actually have about $4,000 in capital gains this year from some investments that recovered, so now I understand that TurboTax is correctly using $4,000 of my carryover losses against those gains, plus the full $3,000 against my regular income. That's $7,000 of my $12,000 carryover used in one year - much faster than the 4 years I was expecting! This thread really shows how valuable community knowledge sharing is. Sometimes complex tax rules are much clearer when explained through real examples by people dealing with the same situations. Thanks to everyone for taking the time to share their experiences and help newcomers like me understand these tricky concepts!

0 coins

I've been through a very similar situation with DraftKings and can offer some additional perspective on the sessions method. After working with a tax attorney who specializes in gambling cases, I learned that the sessions method isn't just about convenience - it's actually the most legally defensible approach for frequent online gamblers. The key insight my attorney shared is that the sessions method better reflects the "economic substance" of your gambling activity. When you're betting continuously throughout a day on the same platform, treating each individual wager as separate creates an artificial inflation of both wins and losses that doesn't match the economic reality of your gambling behavior. For your specific situation with $815k in winning sessions and $246k in losing sessions, you're absolutely correct to use these figures. The $3.1m in total transaction losses becomes irrelevant once you've chosen the sessions method - mixing methodologies is exactly what gets people in trouble with audits. One thing I'd add that others haven't mentioned: consider the timing of when you actually received payouts versus when sessions closed. Some gamblers get tripped up by cash-out timing, especially with promotional bonuses or delayed settlements. Make sure your session calculations align with when you actually had access to winnings, not just when bets were placed or resolved. Also, document any promotional credits or bonuses separately - the IRS sometimes scrutinizes how these are handled in session calculations.

0 coins

Sofia Perez

•

This is really valuable insight about the "economic substance" aspect - I hadn't thought about it that way before. Your point about promotional credits is especially relevant since FanDuel gave me several bonus credits throughout the year that I used for additional betting. When you mention aligning session calculations with when you actually had access to winnings, did you run into any issues with pending withdrawals or delayed settlements? I had some larger payouts that took 2-3 days to clear, and I'm wondering if those should be counted in the session when the bet was placed/won or when the funds actually became available in my account. Also, did your tax attorney provide any specific guidance on how to handle those promotional bonuses in the session calculations? I received probably $15k worth of various bonuses and free bets throughout the year, and I'm not sure if those should be treated as separate income or just factored into the overall session results when used.

0 coins

For pending withdrawals and delayed settlements, the general rule is to count winnings in the session when the gambling event concluded (when you won the bet), not when funds actually hit your account. The delay is just a processing issue, not part of the gambling activity itself. However, document these timing differences clearly in case questions arise. Regarding promotional bonuses, my experience has been that free bets and bonus credits should be treated as having a $0 basis when calculating session results. So if you use a $100 free bet and win $300, your session gain is $300, not $200. But if you lose the free bet, there's no loss to record since you had no money at risk. Cash bonuses that become withdrawable after meeting wagering requirements are different - those should be treated as income when they become unrestricted. The key is consistency and clear documentation. I kept a separate log of all promotional activity and how it was integrated into my session calculations. This level of detail really helped when my CPA was preparing my return and gave me confidence that everything would hold up if questioned. One more tip: consider reaching out to a gambling tax specialist rather than a general CPA if your gambling activity is substantial. The specialized knowledge is worth the extra cost for complex situations like this.

0 coins

Javier Cruz

•

This is an incredibly helpful thread - I've been struggling with the exact same situation with my BetMGM gambling records. After reading through all these responses, I finally understand why my tax preparer kept asking me to "be consistent" with my methodology. One thing I wanted to add from my research: make sure you understand how your state handles gambling income if you're using the sessions method. Some states don't recognize the sessions method at all and require you to report the full W-2G amounts as income, even if you're using sessions for federal purposes. This can create a significant difference between your federal and state tax calculations. In my case, I live in a state that doesn't allow gambling loss deductions, so even though I'm using the sessions method federally to report $650k instead of $1.8m in W-2Gs, I still have to report the full $1.8m on my state return with no offsetting deductions. It's brutal, but at least the federal savings help offset the state tax hit. Also, for anyone considering the professional gambler route mentioned earlier - be extremely careful. I consulted with a tax attorney about this, and they warned that the IRS has been aggressively auditing professional gambler claims, especially for sports betting. Unless you truly treat gambling as a full-time business with systematic approaches, detailed business records, and can demonstrate consistent profit-seeking behavior over multiple years, stick with the sessions method as a recreational gambler. The documentation standards everyone mentioned are spot-on. I created a comprehensive audit file with my session calculations, methodology explanation, and supporting case law. Better to over-document than wish you had more records later.

0 coins

I'm in almost the exact same boat as you - hit the SS cap at my previous job in late October and just started a new position this week. This whole thread has been incredibly educational! One thing I wanted to add from my research is that if you're dealing with this situation, it's worth double-checking whether your previous employer correctly calculated your SS wages throughout the year. I discovered that some pre-tax deductions (like 401k contributions) reduce your SS taxable wages, so the actual income threshold where you hit the cap might be higher than the $160,200 base limit. For example, if you contributed $20,000 to your 401k, you'd actually hit the SS cap when your gross wages reach $180,200, not $160,200. This affected my calculations for how much I was being overwitheld at the new job. I'm planning to use the IRS withholding estimator that everyone has recommended, but I wanted to make sure I had the right numbers going in. It's worth pulling your final paystub from your previous employer and double-checking the YTD SS wages line to confirm you actually exceeded the cap. Thanks to everyone for sharing their experiences - having this roadmap makes what initially seemed like a really complex situation much more manageable!

0 coins

Rita Jacobs

•

This is such an excellent point about pre-tax deductions affecting the SS wage calculation! I hadn't considered that 401k contributions would push the effective threshold higher than the base $160,200 limit. That's definitely something I need to double-check on my own situation. Your example really clarifies this - if someone maxed out their 401k contribution ($22,500 for 2023), they wouldn't actually hit the SS cap until their gross wages reached $182,700. That could significantly change the overwithholding calculations for the new job. I'm also planning to carefully review my final paystub from my previous employer before running the IRS withholding estimator. It's a great reminder that the "SS wages" line on the paystub is what actually matters for this calculation, not just the gross wage total. This thread has been amazing for highlighting all these nuances that aren't immediately obvious when you're first dealing with this situation. Between the pre-tax deduction considerations, the different payroll schedule complications, and all the practical tips about working with HR and payroll systems, I feel much more prepared to handle this properly. Thanks for adding this important detail about the wage base calculation!

0 coins

Freya Larsen

•

I'm currently facing this exact situation and this thread has been incredibly comprehensive! Just wanted to add one more practical tip that saved me some headaches. When I hit the SS cap at my previous job in September and started my new position in October, I initially tried to handle all the calculations myself. What I found helpful was creating a simple month-by-month projection showing exactly when I'd hit the cap, how much would be overwitheld each remaining paycheck, and what my total refund would be. But here's the key thing I learned: don't forget about year-end bonuses or other irregular compensation at your NEW employer. I almost got my withholding adjustment perfect, but then my new company announced an unexpected year-end bonus that threw off all my calculations. The bonus pushed my overwithholding higher than I had planned for. If you're starting a new job late in the year, try to get clarity from HR about any potential year-end compensation beyond your regular salary. This will help you be more precise with your IRS withholding estimator inputs and W-4 adjustments. Also, I second everyone's advice about being proactive with HR. Most companies appreciate when new employees come prepared with documentation and clear explanations rather than just complaining about "wrong" deductions. Having your final paystub showing you hit the SS cap makes the conversation much smoother.

0 coins

This is such a valuable addition about year-end bonuses! I'm in a very similar situation - hit the SS cap in late October and started a new job in November. I hadn't even thought to ask about potential year-end compensation at my new employer, but you're absolutely right that this could significantly impact the overwithholding calculations. Your point about creating a month-by-month projection is really smart. I've been trying to do all the math at once, but breaking it down by pay period and projecting forward would probably give me a much clearer picture of exactly how much I'll be overwitheld. I'm definitely going to ask HR about any potential bonuses or other irregular compensation when I meet with them this week. Even if they can't guarantee anything, at least knowing the possibilities will help me be more conservative with my withholding adjustments. Thanks for sharing this practical insight - it's exactly the kind of real-world detail that makes the difference between getting this right and having to scramble to fix it later. This whole thread has been incredibly helpful for navigating what initially seemed like an impossible tax situation!

0 coins

Prev1...2324252627...5643Next