IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Gavin King

•

Tip from someone who deals with this every year: Take screenshots or save PDFs of the historical stock prices for any noncovered securities you sell, especially if you're using stepped-up basis or had to research the original purchase price. Keep these files with your tax records. The IRS has been paying more attention to capital gains in recent years, and having documentation ready if you get questioned will save you massive headaches. I learned this the hard way after getting a CP2000 notice for some old stocks I sold.

0 coins

This is exactly the kind of confusion that trips up so many people! I went through the same thing last year with some old mutual fund shares. The key thing to remember is that "noncovered" literally means the IRS isn't getting that basis information from your broker, so it's 100% on you to report it correctly. One thing I'd add to the great advice already given - make sure you're consistent across all your noncovered securities. If you have multiple sales throughout the year, use the same method for calculating basis (FIFO, specific identification, etc.) and document your approach. The IRS wants to see consistency in your reporting methodology. Also, if you're using TurboTax, it should walk you through this step by step. When it asks about the noncovered securities, just make sure you're entering your actual basis, not necessarily what's printed on the 1099-B. The software will handle the rest and make sure it gets reported properly on your Schedule D and Form 8949.

0 coins

Jabari-Jo

•

This is really helpful advice about being consistent with methodology! I'm curious - if I have some noncovered securities where I used FIFO method and others where I did specific identification (because I had records for some but not others), do I need to explain that somewhere on my return or just make sure each individual security uses one consistent method? Also, when you mention documenting the approach - is this something that goes on the actual tax forms or just something I keep in my personal records in case of questions later?

0 coins

GalaxyGazer

•

Has anyone tried just using Google Drive or Dropbox instead of specialized tax document software? Seems like paying for fancy features might be overkill for a small practice?

0 coins

I tried the Google Drive route for two tax seasons and ultimately switched to specialized software. The main issues were security compliance (most free cloud storage doesn't meet IRS Pub 4557 requirements) and limited search capabilities. Basic cloud storage is fine for general documents, but when tax season hits and you need to quickly pull "all clients claiming child tax credits with income over $75K" or "everyone with 1099-NEC income who might benefit from an S-Corp election," specialized tax document systems pay for themselves immediately.

0 coins

As someone who recently went through this exact transition, I can't stress enough how much the right document management system will transform your practice. I was in your same situation last year - drowning in paper and basic cloud storage that was becoming a nightmare. One thing I wish I had considered earlier is the total cost of ownership beyond just the monthly subscription. Factor in training time, data migration, and potential productivity loss during the transition. I made the mistake of switching systems right before tax season and it was stressful, even though it worked out great in the long run. Also, whatever system you choose, make sure it has robust backup and disaster recovery features. I learned this the hard way when my old system had a sync issue that could have lost weeks of client uploads. Now I always ask about their backup protocols and how quickly they can restore data if something goes wrong. The investment is absolutely worth it though. My stress levels during tax season dropped dramatically once I could instantly find any document I needed instead of digging through folders. Good luck with your decision!

0 coins

This is such valuable advice! The timing aspect is really important - I'm already feeling overwhelmed and definitely don't want to add the stress of learning new software right when things get crazy. Can you share what specific backup features you look for now? I'm pretty tech-savvy but disaster recovery isn't something I've had to think much about before. Also, did you find any systems that offered migration help to transfer existing documents, or did you have to do that manually? Your point about total cost is spot on too. I was only looking at monthly fees but hadn't considered the time investment for setup and training.

0 coins

Rita Jacobs

•

This is such a stressful situation, but you're definitely not alone in dealing with this! I went through something similar a few years ago when my tax preparer accidentally used outdated bank info from my previous return. One thing that really helped me was getting a copy of my tax transcript from the IRS website (irs.gov) - it shows exactly where your refund was sent and the status. You can access it immediately online with your SSN and some basic verification info. This gave me concrete details to reference when I called both the IRS and my tax prep company. Also, while you're waiting for everything to get sorted out, consider asking your tax preparer if they offer any kind of emergency assistance or advance on the refund amount since it was their error. Some of the larger chains have policies for situations like this, especially when it's clearly their mistake. At minimum, they should be covering any fees you incur because of their error. The good news is that your sister and cousin are right - the money will eventually come back to you, it's just a matter of time. Banks are required to reject deposits when the account name doesn't match, so it will bounce back to the IRS who will then issue a paper check. Hang in there!

0 coins

Miguel Diaz

•

Thanks for mentioning the tax transcript - that's such a helpful tip! I didn't even know you could access that online immediately. For anyone else dealing with this, the transcript will show the exact routing and account numbers where your refund was sent, which is crucial evidence when you're trying to prove the error to both the IRS and your tax preparer. I'd also add that when you call the IRS, having that transcript in front of you makes the conversation so much more productive. The agents can see the same information you're looking at, and it eliminates any confusion about what actually happened. Plus, if there are any discrepancies between what your tax preparer filed and what you authorized, the transcript will show that clearly.

0 coins

Emma Anderson

•

I'm so sorry you're going through this stress! As someone who works in banking, I can confirm that when a refund is deposited to an account where the name doesn't match, the receiving bank is required to return those funds to the originating source (the IRS) within a specific timeframe - usually 1-3 business days after they catch the mismatch. The key thing is to document everything right now. Get a written statement from your tax preparer acknowledging their error, and file Form 3911 (Taxpayer Statement Regarding Refund) with the IRS to initiate a payment trace. This form officially starts the process of tracking where your refund went and getting it back to you. While waiting, also check if your state has a taxpayer advocate office - they can sometimes help expedite these cases when there's clear preparer error involved. The $3,800 amount definitely qualifies as a significant financial hardship situation that they take seriously. Most importantly, don't panic! I've seen dozens of these cases over the years and the money always gets returned eventually. The banking system has safeguards specifically to prevent people from keeping money that isn't theirs.

0 coins

IRA withdrawal strategy: Is maximizing current tax bracket always smart?

I'm approaching retirement and trying to figure out the best tax strategy for IRA withdrawals or Roth conversions. I've always heard financial advisors recommend "max out your current tax bracket if it's low," but I'm wondering if this advice has serious flaws in certain situations. Let me share my current numbers (rounded for simplicity): I'm earning about $135,000 in regular taxable income (wages, interest, etc.) and have around $188,000 in qualified dividends and long-term capital gains. I'm married filing jointly, and my marginal rate for regular income is 12%, though some LT investment gains are taxed at 15%, with about $12,500 subject to the Net Investment Income Tax (NIIT) at 3.8%. Looking at this, I initially thought: "Great! My marginal rate for regular income (which is how an IRA withdrawal would be taxed) is only 12%. I can withdraw $22,000 to fill up that 12% bracket without hitting the 22% bracket." But here's where it gets complicated: If I take that $22,000 withdrawal, it not only gets taxed at 12%, but it also pushes another $22,000 of my investment income from the 0% to the 15% capital gains rate, plus pushes more income into the NIIT territory. When I run the numbers, that $22,000 withdrawal actually costs me about $6,750 in taxes – roughly a 30.8% effective rate on that withdrawal, despite being in the "12% bracket." Am I missing something? Is the "max out your bracket" rule only smart in certain income ranges – not too low where investments are taxed at 0% (so nothing gets pushed to 15%) and not high enough to trigger NIIT? For example, if my regular income were $160,000 and qualified dividends were $125,000, I'd already be in the 22% bracket, so an IRA withdrawal would be taxed at 22% without any ripple effects on my other income. Should I just be grateful some investments are taxed at 0% and avoid IRA withdrawals in this situation? The traditional advice doesn't seem to make sense for my circumstances.

Libby Hassan

•

Thanks everyone for the incredibly helpful advice! I'm going to look into both taxr.ai and potentially using Claimyr to confirm my specific situation with the IRS. I hadn't considered the expiring tax provisions after 2025 either, so that's another factor to weigh. I think I'll scale back my planned conversion amount this year to avoid the worst of these tax interactions, but still do a small conversion to chip away at future RMDs. The suggestions about timing conversions with charitable giving or higher deduction years make a lot of sense too. This has been eye-opening - clearly the standard advice to "fill up your bracket" is way too simplistic for many situations like mine. I'll definitely be running more detailed projections before making any moves.

0 coins

Great analysis! You've perfectly illustrated why cookie-cutter tax advice can be so dangerous. I'm a tax preparer and I see this all the time - clients come in having followed generic "fill your bracket" advice without understanding these cascading effects. One additional consideration for your situation: if you're still working and have access to a 401(k), you might want to maximize pre-tax contributions there first before doing any Roth conversions. This could lower your AGI enough to keep more of your qualified dividends in the 0% bracket, making future conversions more tax-efficient. Also, don't forget about the Medicare premium implications (IRMAA) if your modified AGI gets too high. Those can add another layer of "stealth taxes" that make conversions even more expensive than they appear on paper. The tax code has so many interconnections that proper planning really requires modeling your entire tax picture, not just looking at marginal brackets in isolation.

0 coins

Steven Adams

•

This is exactly what I needed to hear! I'm still working and do have access to a 401(k), but I've been prioritizing the Roth conversions thinking they were more important. Your point about maximizing pre-tax contributions first to lower my AGI makes perfect sense - that could keep more of my dividends in the 0% bracket and make any future conversions much more efficient. I hadn't even thought about the Medicare IRMAA implications either. Do you know at what income levels those kick in? It sounds like I really need to model my entire tax situation rather than just focusing on one piece at a time.

0 coins

Aisha Khan

•

For 2024, the Medicare IRMAA thresholds start at $103,000 for single filers and $206,000 for married filing jointly (based on your 2022 modified AGI). The surcharges can range from about $70 to over $400 per month per person, so they really add up quickly. What's tricky is that IRMAA uses your AGI from two years prior, so any large conversion you do this year won't affect your Medicare premiums until 2027. But it's definitely something to factor into your long-term planning, especially if you're close to those thresholds. Your strategy of maxing pre-tax 401(k) contributions first is spot on. Every dollar you put into your 401(k) reduces your current AGI, which could keep more of your qualified dividends at 0% and delay hitting IRMAA thresholds. Then you can do smaller, more strategic Roth conversions in future years when your earned income drops but before RMDs kick in. It's a complex puzzle, but getting it right can save tens of thousands over your retirement years.

0 coins

Lim Wong

•

This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm currently in my 4th year as an F1 student (arrived in January 2021) so I'll be hitting this transition soon. One thing I'm curious about that hasn't been fully addressed - what about state taxes? I know the federal rules change after 5 years, but do state tax residency rules follow the same pattern? I'm in California and I've been filing as a nonresident for state taxes too. Will I automatically become a California resident for tax purposes when I become a federal resident alien, or do states have their own separate rules? This could make a huge difference since California taxes are pretty high compared to what I've been paying as a nonresident. Also wondering if anyone has experience with estimated tax payments during this transition year? As a nonresident I never had to worry about quarterlies, but I assume that changes once you're filing as a resident alien with worldwide income.

0 coins

The Boss

•

Great questions! State tax residency rules are actually separate from federal rules, so becoming a federal resident alien doesn't automatically make you a California resident for state tax purposes. California has its own residency tests based on factors like where you maintain a permanent home, where your personal and economic ties are strongest, and your intent to remain in the state. However, since you've been in California for several years as a student, you might already meet California's residency requirements even before your federal status changes. I'd recommend looking into California's residency rules specifically - they're pretty detailed and different from the federal substantial presence test. As for estimated taxes, yes, that's definitely something to plan for! Once you're a resident alien, you'll likely need to make quarterly estimated payments if you have income that's not subject to withholding (like that foreign investment income). The general rule is you need to pay estimates if you expect to owe $1,000 or more in tax after subtracting withholding and credits. I'd suggest running some projections for your transition year to see what your tax liability might look like with worldwide income reporting - better to be prepared than get hit with underpayment penalties!

0 coins

Just to add to what The Boss said about California - you're absolutely right to be concerned about the state tax implications! California is notoriously aggressive about claiming residency, and as an F1 student who's been there for several years, you might already be considered a California resident for tax purposes regardless of your federal status. California looks at the "totality of circumstances" including where you spend most of your time, where your belongings are, where you're registered to vote (if applicable), where you bank, etc. The fact that you've been filing as a nonresident doesn't necessarily mean you actually qualify for that status under California's rules. I'd strongly recommend reviewing FTB Publication 1031 which explains California residency rules in detail. You might want to consult with a tax professional who understands both federal immigration tax rules AND California state tax law, because getting this wrong could be expensive - California can go back and assess additional taxes plus penalties if they determine you should have been filing as a resident. The estimated tax payments are definitely something to plan for too. California requires estimates just like federal, and with your worldwide income potentially pushing you into higher brackets, the quarterly payments could be substantial. Start calculating early so you're not scrambling come January!

0 coins

This is such a comprehensive thread! As someone who went through this transition two years ago, I wanted to add a few practical tips that might help: 1. **Keep detailed records** - Start documenting your presence in the US now if you haven't already. I created a simple spreadsheet tracking entry/exit dates, which was super helpful when calculating my substantial presence test days. 2. **Plan for the tax impact** - The switch to worldwide income reporting can be a shock! My tax liability nearly doubled in my transition year because I suddenly had to report rental income from my home country that I'd never had to declare before. 3. **Consider professional help for the transition year** - I tried to handle it myself initially but ended up hiring a CPA who specializes in international tax. The cost was worth it to make sure I got everything right, especially with foreign tax credits and treaty benefits. 4. **Start thinking about retirement contributions** - One silver lining of resident alien status is you can finally contribute to IRAs and 401(k)s if your employer offers them. I wish I'd started earlier! The whole process seems overwhelming at first, but once you get through that first year as a resident alien, it actually becomes much simpler than the complicated nonresident forms we used to deal with. Hang in there!

0 coins

Olivia Evans

•

This is incredibly helpful, thank you! The point about retirement contributions is something I hadn't even considered - that's actually a huge benefit I didn't realize came with resident alien status. I've been watching my US citizen friends contribute to their 401(k)s and getting employer matches while I couldn't participate. Quick question about the professional help - how did you find a CPA who specializes in international tax? I'm worried about just picking someone random who might not understand the nuances of F1 to resident alien transitions. Did you look for specific certifications or just ask around? Also, roughly what should I expect to pay for this kind of specialized help? The spreadsheet idea for tracking presence is brilliant too. I've been pretty good about keeping my travel documents, but having it all organized in one place would definitely make the calculations easier when the time comes. Thanks for sharing your experience!

0 coins

Prev1...20182019202020212022...5643Next