


Ask the community...
Your cousin might want to consider proper legal structuring here. Having some properties in personal name and others in an LLC is creating confusion. He might benefit from putting ALL properties into LLCs (maybe separate LLCs for liability purposes) but then having all of those LLCs owned by a holding company that could elect S-Corp taxation. This way, he gets liability protection for all properties, potential self-employment tax savings on the management portion of his activities, and clearer separation between his rental business and handyman service business.
I disagree. Having too many LLCs creates unnecessary complexity and filing requirements. The annual costs of maintaining multiple LLCs (state fees, registered agent fees, etc.) would likely outweigh any tax benefits for small rental properties, especially in "low income neighborhoods" as mentioned. Plus, many banks won't allow you to have conventional mortgages in LLCs - they require commercial loans which have higher rates.
There's another important consideration here that I haven't seen mentioned - the passive activity loss rules. Since your cousin has a handyman business (which generates active income), he needs to be careful about how rental losses interact with his other income. If he's actively managing the rental properties (collecting rent, finding tenants, making management decisions), he might qualify for the $25,000 rental loss deduction against his handyman income, but this phases out at higher income levels. However, if he's paying his handyman business for work on the rentals, this could actually reduce his rental losses and affect this calculation. Also, regarding the LLC properties on Schedule C - this is definitely incorrect as others have mentioned. LLCs are typically disregarded entities for tax purposes unless they elect corporate taxation. The rental income should still go on Schedule E regardless of the LLC structure. One more thing to consider: if he's serious about building the handyman business, he should consider whether having it work primarily on his own properties might hurt his ability to claim it's a legitimate business activity rather than just a hobby or tax avoidance scheme. The IRS looks at factors like profit motive, time spent, expertise, and success in making profits when determining if something is a business.
This is such a helpful breakdown of the passive activity rules! I hadn't even thought about how paying his handyman business could actually reduce his rental losses and affect that $25,000 deduction. The point about legitimacy of the handyman business is really important too. If most of his handyman income comes from his own properties, wouldn't that make it look more like a tax shelter than a real business? Should he be actively seeking outside clients to strengthen his case that it's a legitimate business operation? Also, do you know if there are any specific documentation requirements he should follow to prove active participation in managing the rentals? I assume just doing the physical work himself wouldn't count as "active management" for the passive loss rules.
Be careful with dependent care FSAs - they're typically "use it or lose it" by the end of the plan year! I set aside $5000 last year and then our childcare situation changed (my mother-in-law retired and started watching the kids 3 days a week). We only spent about $3200 on paid childcare and LOST the remaining $1800 we had contributed! Still kicking myself over that one. Make sure you're very confident about your childcare expenses before committing to the full $5000.
Some plans offer a grace period though! My company's FSA gives until March 15th of the following year to use funds. Worth checking if your plan has this feature.
Great question! I went through this exact same analysis last year. At your income level ($165k), you're definitely in a tax bracket where the Dependent Care FSA makes financial sense. Here's what I learned: The Child Tax Credit ($2,000 per qualifying child) is completely separate from childcare expenses and won't be affected by using the FSA. You'll still get the full $4,000 for your twins regardless. The FSA saves you taxes on that $5,000 contribution - at your income level, that's probably around $1,200-1,500 in tax savings depending on your state taxes. Since you're spending way more than $5,000 on daycare anyway, you're guaranteed to use the full amount. The "hassle" factor was my biggest concern too, but honestly it's pretty minimal. Most employers have mobile apps now where you just snap photos of receipts and submit them. I probably spend 10 minutes total per quarter on FSA paperwork. One tip: make sure to ask about your plan's grace period or rollover rules. Some plans let you carry over a small amount ($610 this year) or give you extra time to spend the money. Definitely worth maxing it out in your situation!
This breakdown is really helpful! I'm curious about one thing though - you mentioned the FSA saves around $1,200-1,500 in taxes at the $165k income level. Is that calculation based on federal taxes only, or does it include state taxes too? We're in a state with income tax, so I'm wondering if the savings would be even higher than that estimate. Also, do you know if the FSA contribution affects your AGI for other tax benefit calculations?
Don't forget that even if your clients don't send you 1099-NECs (which happens a lot with smaller clients who don't know the rules), you still need to report ALL your income! The IRS doesn't care if you got a form or not. I've been freelancing for 6 years and I just create my own tracking system. I have clients that pay through Venmo, PayPal, direct deposit, and even paper checks (yes, still). I record everything in a spreadsheet with the payment method noted. Then at tax time, I can easily see what should be on forms and what might not be.
What tax software do you use? I tried using TurboTax last year but got confused when entering 1099 information from multiple sources.
I just went through this exact situation last year as a freelancer! Here's what I learned after making some mistakes: You definitely need to provide W-9s to ALL your clients who pay you $600+ per year - this includes Client A for their full $4,000. The payment method doesn't matter for the client's 1099-NEC reporting requirement. For the 1099-K situation with Wise: Yes, if your total transactions across ALL clients through Wise exceed $20,000 AND you have more than 200 transactions, Wise will issue you a 1099-K. But here's the key - you won't be double-taxed because you only report your actual income once on Schedule C. What saved me was keeping a detailed spreadsheet with columns for: Client Name, Payment Date, Amount, Payment Method, and any fees deducted. This way when I got my 1099-NECs from clients AND a 1099-K from my payment processor, I could easily reconcile everything and make sure I wasn't over-reporting. One tip: Don't wait until tax time to organize this! I update my spreadsheet weekly now, and it makes everything so much easier. The IRS cares about your total income, not how many different forms report pieces of it.
This is really helpful advice, especially about updating the spreadsheet weekly! I'm just starting out with freelancing and already feeling overwhelmed by the record-keeping aspect. Quick question - when you say "any fees deducted," are you referring to the processing fees that platforms like Wise charge? So if a client pays me $1000 but Wise takes a $15 fee, I should record both the gross amount and the fee separately? And then I can deduct that $15 as a business expense? Also, do you recommend keeping digital copies of all payment confirmations/receipts from these platforms, or is the spreadsheet tracking sufficient for IRS purposes?
Don't forget about the Deason Rule if your clergy client has both ministerial income and housing allowance! This rule requires you to allocate expenses proportionally between taxable and tax-exempt income. For example, if 30% of the minister's income is tax-exempt housing allowance, then 30% of business expenses would not be deductible. It's a tricky calculation that many preparers miss, but the IRS definitely looks for it in clergy returns.
I've never heard of this Deason Rule before - is this something new? I've done a few clergy returns and never had to adjust their business expenses.
The Deason Rule isn't new - it comes from a 1981 Tax Court case (Deason v. Commissioner). It's based on the general tax principle that you can't deduct expenses related to tax-exempt income. For clergy, this means if part of their compensation is the tax-exempt housing allowance, then a proportional amount of their ministerial business expenses (like professional development, books, travel for church business, etc.) becomes non-deductible. So if a minister receives $40k salary + $20k housing allowance (total $60k), then 1/3 of their income is tax-exempt. Therefore, 1/3 of their business expenses would be non-deductible. It's definitely something to watch for, especially with higher housing allowances relative to salary.
As someone who's worked with several clergy clients over the years, I'd strongly recommend getting a copy of IRS Publication 517 (Social Security and Other Information for Members of the Clergy and Religious Workers) if you haven't already. It's the definitive guide for these situations. One thing I haven't seen mentioned yet is that you should also verify the housing allowance was properly designated in advance by the church's governing body. The IRS requires that housing allowances be officially designated before the tax year begins, not retroactively. If Pastor Mike's church didn't properly designate the $18,000 housing allowance in writing before 2024, it might not qualify for the exclusion. Also, since this is your first clergy client, you might want to ask Pastor Mike if he has any other ministerial income from weddings, funerals, or guest speaking that wasn't reported on his W-2. This additional income would also be subject to self-employment tax and needs to be reported on Schedule C or Schedule C-EZ. The dual tax status of clergy really trips up a lot of preparers initially, but once you understand the basic principle (employee for income tax, self-employed for SE tax), it becomes much more manageable.
This is such valuable information, thank you! I hadn't even thought about the advance designation requirement - that could be a major issue if the church didn't handle it properly. Quick question about the additional ministerial income you mentioned - if Pastor Mike performed weddings or funerals but the payments went directly to the church (and he didn't receive them personally), would those still need to be reported as his income? Or does it only count if he personally received the fees? Also, should I be asking about any parsonage or church-provided housing? I assume that would be handled differently than a cash housing allowance, but I want to make sure I'm covering all the bases with this return.
Jade Lopez
Has anyone used both the standard deduction and itemized for different tax years? I'm trying to figure out if it's worth keeping track of all my potential deductions or if the standard deduction is just gonna be higher anyway. I make about $75k.
0 coins
Tony Brooks
ā¢Since the 2017 tax law changes, the standard deduction got much higher ($13,850 for single filers in 2023). Unless you have a mortgage with significant interest, pay high state/local taxes, have major medical expenses, or give a lot to charity, standard deduction is usually better for most people making around $75k. I've done both, and honestly, for my situation ($83k income), the standard deduction has been the better option the last few years. Save yourself the headache of tracking everything unless you know you're close to exceeding the standard deduction threshold.
0 coins
Harper Hill
Coming from someone who just went through this exact same shock last year - you're definitely not alone in feeling overwhelmed by that first "real job" tax hit! I remember staring at my paystub thinking there had to be some mistake. One thing that helped me understand it better was breaking down exactly where that 30% is going. It's not all "income tax" - you've got federal income tax (probably around 12-22% marginal rate at your salary), Social Security (6.2%), Medicare (1.45%), state tax (varies wildly by state), and potentially other deductions like health insurance or retirement contributions. The good news is there are definitely ways to reduce your taxable income legally. I started contributing to my company's 401(k) last year and it made a noticeable difference - not just for retirement but for lowering my current tax burden. Even contributing just enough to get any company match is essentially free money. Also, don't forget about things like student loan interest deduction if you have loans, or setting up an HSA if your health plan qualifies. These aren't huge game-changers but every bit helps when you're starting out your career. The frustrating part is that unlike other countries where you see direct benefits like healthcare or education, in the US it's harder to connect what you're paying to what you're getting. But hang in there - as your income grows, you'll have more options for tax planning!
0 coins