Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.
Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.
Using Claimyr will:
- Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
- Skip the long phone menu
- Call the correct department
- Redial until on hold
- Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
- Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call
If I could give 10 stars I would
If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!
Really made a difference
Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.
Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.
Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.
An incredibly helpful service
An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls ā which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!
Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.
Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.
IT WORKS!! Not a scam!
I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!
Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
This thread has been absolutely invaluable! I'm amazed by how much detailed, practical advice everyone has shared here. As someone who's also preparing for the Intuit HireVue interview, I wanted to add a few thoughts based on my research and preparation. One thing I've been focusing on is preparing examples of how I've helped people understand government processes or complex information in previous roles. Since this is the government-services/irs community, I think it's worth emphasizing how tax preparation really is about helping people navigate an important government service. I worked at a local DMV office for two years and got a lot of experience explaining confusing regulations and helping frustrated people work through bureaucratic processes - I think those skills translate perfectly to tax season customer support. I've also been practicing explaining why certain tax rules exist from a policy perspective. For example, understanding that the Earned Income Tax Credit is designed to help working families with lower incomes can help you explain not just how it works, but why it matters. I think showing that broader understanding of how tax policy serves the public good could really set you apart. The tip about researching Intuit's values resonated with me too. From what I can see, they really emphasize making tax filing accessible to everyone, which aligns well with the idea of public service even though they're a private company. Thanks to everyone who's made this such a helpful resource - I'll definitely report back on how my interview goes!
Your DMV experience is such a perfect background for this role! You're absolutely right that tax preparation is fundamentally about helping people navigate government processes, and having that hands-on experience with frustrated customers trying to understand bureaucratic requirements is incredibly valuable. I love your point about understanding the policy perspective behind tax rules. Being able to explain not just how the EITC works, but why it exists as a support for working families, shows exactly the kind of deeper understanding that would help customers feel more confident about their tax situation. That's the difference between just processing forms and actually helping people understand their relationship with the tax system. Your insight about Intuit's mission to make tax filing accessible really resonates too. Even though they're a private company, there's definitely a public service element to what they do - especially for seasonal employees who are often the first point of contact for people who find taxes overwhelming or intimidating. This thread has become such an amazing resource thanks to everyone sharing their perspectives and experiences. Your government service background brings a really unique angle that I hadn't considered before. Best of luck with your interview - you sound incredibly well-prepared and thoughtful about the role!
Ezra Collins
This thread has been such an incredible resource! I'm scheduled for my Intuit HireVue interview tomorrow and honestly feeling so much more prepared after reading through everyone's detailed experiences and advice. A few things that really stood out to me from all the shared wisdom here: The emphasis on simple explanations really resonates - I love the tax bracket "climbing stairs" analogy and the itemized deductions comparison to business receipts. I've been practicing explaining concepts to my roommate who knows nothing about taxes, and it's amazing how much clearer my explanations have become. The technical setup tips are so practical too. I did a practice run with a friend yesterday and discovered my lighting was terrible - fixed that and also positioned a glass of water just out of frame. These small details seem like they could make a huge difference in how polished the interview feels. One thing I wanted to add based on my preparation is that I've been reviewing IRS Publication 17 (Your Federal Income Tax) to brush up on common situations that might come up in customer scenarios. It's helped me feel more confident about explaining things like filing status requirements and common credits. For anyone else preparing, I also found it helpful to practice transitions between topics since you only have 2 minutes per response. Having smooth ways to move from acknowledging a customer's frustration to outlining next steps has been key for staying within the time limit. Thanks to everyone who made this such a comprehensive guide - I'll definitely come back to share how it goes. This community support has been amazing!
Good luck with your interview tomorrow! You sound incredibly well-prepared after all this practice. The fact that you've been explaining concepts to your roommate is such a smart approach - if you can make tax ideas clear to someone with zero background, you'll definitely handle whatever customer scenarios they throw at you. Your point about reviewing IRS Publication 17 shows exactly the kind of initiative they're looking for. Having that foundational knowledge of common situations will give you so much more confidence when discussing how you'd help customers navigate different tax scenarios. The practice with smooth transitions is brilliant too - I hadn't thought about how important that would be for staying within the 2-minute limit while still covering all your key points. That's the kind of detailed preparation that really sets candidates apart. This whole thread has been like a masterclass in interview prep thanks to everyone sharing their experiences. You're going to do great tomorrow - you've put in the work and have all the tools you need to succeed. Make sure to come back and let us know how it goes! We're all rooting for you.
Join the conversation
Grace Lee
Has anyone switched from standard mileage to actual expenses after the first year? I'm wondering if it's worth keeping track of everything just in case actual expenses end up being higher in future years.
Mia Roberts
ā¢I did this with my last car. Used standard mileage the first 2 years then switched to actual when repair costs started piling up. You need to keep ALL your receipts and good records of business vs personal use percentage. Also, if you switch to actual, you have to use straight line depreciation for the remaining recovery period and you can't switch back to mileage later for that vehicle.
Grace Lee
ā¢Thanks for sharing your experience! That makes sense about keeping all receipts just in case. I'm guessing the "straight line depreciation for remaining recovery period" is the complicated part. Did you use an accountant to help figure that out or were you able to calculate it yourself?
Nia Harris
Just to add some clarity on the depreciation calculation if you do switch from mileage to actual expenses - it's actually not too complicated once you understand the concept. When you use standard mileage, the IRS considers that you've already "taken" depreciation at a rate of 27 cents per mile for 2024 (this is built into the 67 cents total rate). So if you drove 10,000 business miles in your first year using standard mileage, you've already "used up" $2,700 of depreciation ($0.27 x 10,000 miles). If you switch to actual expenses in year 2, you'd subtract that $2,700 from your vehicle's basis before calculating remaining depreciation. For your $26,500 Forester with 60% business use, your depreciable basis would be $15,900 (60% of $26,500). If you used standard mileage in 2024 and drove, say, 8,000 business miles, you'd subtract $2,160 in "deemed depreciation" from that $15,900 basis. Then you'd depreciate the remaining amount over the rest of the 5-year recovery period using straight-line method. The math gets a bit involved, but it's definitely doable with a good tax software or spreadsheet once you understand the concept.
This is really helpful! I never understood how the IRS handled the transition between methods. So basically they assume you've been depreciating at 27 cents per business mile even when using standard mileage? That makes the math much clearer. Do you know if there's an official IRS publication that explains this calculation, or did you learn this from experience? I'd love to have a reference in case I need to explain it to my accountant.
Join the conversation
I'm currently dealing with a 570 code too after filing head of household for the first time following my divorce! Filed on February 22nd and got the code on March 8th. Reading through everyone's experiences here has been incredibly reassuring - I was absolutely convinced I'd made some major error on my return. It's amazing how many of us newly divorced folks are going through this exact same situation right now! The consistent 2-4 week timelines everyone's sharing really helps set realistic expectations. Based on what I'm learning here, it sounds like the IRS just needs to verify our head of household eligibility since it's our first time filing with this status post-divorce. I'm feeling much more optimistic now that this will resolve automatically without me having to take any action. Thank you for starting this discussion - finding so many people in identical situations has really helped ease my stress during this waiting period!
I'm in almost the exact same situation! Filed head of household for the first time on Feb 19th after my divorce was finalized in November, and got my 570 code on March 6th. I was completely panicking until I found this thread - honestly thought I'd screwed up my entire return somehow. It's so reassuring to see how many of us are dealing with this identical process right now! The consistent timelines everyone's sharing (2-4 weeks) really give me hope that this is just routine verification. Based on what everyone's experiencing, it sounds like we should both see resolution around the same time in early April. This community has been amazing for managing the stress - I was about to lose my mind checking my transcript every few hours before reading all these similar stories!
Chloe Harris
I'm going through the exact same situation right now! Filed head of household for the first time on February 28th after my divorce was finalized in December. Got my 570 code on March 9th and have been anxiously checking my transcript multiple times a day since then. Reading through everyone's experiences here has been such a huge relief - I was completely convinced I'd made some terrible error on my return until I found this thread. It's incredible how many of us newly divorced people are dealing with this identical scenario! The consistent 2-4 week timelines everyone's sharing really helps set realistic expectations for what to expect. Based on what I'm learning here, it sounds like the IRS just needs to verify our head of household eligibility since it's our first time filing with this status post-divorce, which makes total sense given it's such a major change from married filing jointly. I'm feeling much more optimistic now that this will resolve automatically in the next few weeks without me having to take any action. Thank you for starting this discussion - finding so many people in the same boat has really helped manage my stress during this waiting period!
I'm literally in the exact same situation as you! Filed head of household for the first time on March 1st after my divorce finalized in January, and just got my 570 code this morning (March 12th). I was having a complete meltdown thinking I'd messed up something major on my return, but reading through this entire thread has been like finding a support group! It's wild how many of us newly divorced folks are all going through this identical process at the same time. The consistent 2-4 week timelines everyone's sharing really give me hope that this is just standard verification rather than a red flag. Based on what I'm seeing here, sounds like we should both expect resolution around the same time in early to mid-April. This community has been a godsend - I was about to start panicking and calling the IRS before I found all these reassuring stories!
Join the conversation
Savannah Vin
I've been wrestling with similar trademark expense classification issues for my consulting practice. One approach that's helped me gain clarity is treating this like any other Section 197 intangible asset decision - focus on whether the expense creates, enhances, or extends the useful life of the intangible property. For your monthly $3,500 in legal fees, I'd suggest implementing a two-bucket system: (1) "Rights Creation/Extension" expenses that must be capitalized, and (2) "Rights Protection" expenses that can be immediately deducted. The tricky part is that some activities can fall into both categories depending on the specific circumstances. A few practical guidelines I've developed: - Trademark searches, applications, and renewals ā Always capitalize - Watching services and routine monitoring ā Usually expense immediately - Office action responses ā Capitalize (they're part of securing the rights) - Cease and desist letters ā Usually expense (protecting existing rights) - Opposition/cancellation proceedings ā Depends on whether you're defending existing rights or trying to clear the way for new ones The key is establishing clear, documented policies and applying them consistently. I also recommend setting up separate GL accounts for each category and requiring detailed invoice descriptions from your attorneys. This makes year-end tax prep much smoother and provides solid audit documentation. Most importantly, don't let perfect be the enemy of good. A reasonable, well-documented approach is much better than trying to capitalize every minor expense or getting paralyzed by edge cases.
This two-bucket approach is exactly what I needed! I've been overthinking this whole process and getting bogged down in edge cases. Your "Rights Creation/Extension" vs "Rights Protection" framework makes it much clearer to categorize expenses. I especially appreciate the specific examples you provided. The distinction between cease and desist letters (protecting existing rights) versus office action responses (securing new rights) is something I hadn't fully considered before. That alone will help me properly categorize a bunch of expenses I've been unsure about. One quick follow-up - when you mention opposition/cancellation proceedings "depends on whether you're defending existing rights or trying to clear the way for new ones," could you elaborate a bit? I'm currently involved in an opposition where we're challenging someone else's trademark application that conflicts with ours. Would that fall under "clearing the way" and therefore be capitalizable? Your point about not letting perfect be the enemy of good really resonates. I think I've been trying to create an overly complex system when a straightforward, consistent approach would serve me much better. Thanks for the practical guidance!
For your opposition where you're challenging someone else's conflicting trademark application, that would typically be capitalizable as "clearing the way for new ones." You're essentially removing a legal obstacle that could prevent you from fully exploiting your trademark rights or expanding into related areas. The IRS generally views these defensive actions as enhancing the value of your existing trademark portfolio. However, if you were defending against someone challenging YOUR existing registered trademark (like in a cancellation proceeding), that would more likely be "protecting existing rights" and potentially expensible. The key test I use is: "Does this legal action result in stronger, clearer, or more expansive trademark rights for my business?" If yes, capitalize. If it's just maintaining the status quo against an attack, it's more likely expensible. Your opposition sounds like it's strengthening your position in the marketplace by eliminating a potential competitor's conflicting mark, so I'd lean toward capitalizing those legal costs. Just make sure to document your reasoning in case you need to explain it later! And you're absolutely right about not overcomplicating things. A simple, consistent approach with good documentation will serve you much better than trying to analyze every nuance to death.
Diego Chavez
One thing that hasn't been mentioned yet is the importance of timing when it comes to Section 197 amortization. The 15-year amortization period begins in the month you place the trademark in service, not when you start the registration process or pay the legal fees. For ongoing portfolios like yours, this means if you're paying legal fees throughout the year for trademark renewals, each renewal's amortization clock starts when that specific renewal is completed and the trademark rights are extended. This can create some complexity in tracking, but it's important for accurate compliance. Also, regarding your international trademarks - while the legal renewal periods vary by country (7 years in some places, 10 in others), for U.S. tax purposes you still amortize all trademark-related capitalized costs over the standard 15-year period regardless of the actual legal term length. I'd recommend creating a master calendar that tracks not just when renewals are due, but when they're actually completed, since that's when your amortization periods begin. This will help you stay organized as your portfolio grows and avoid any timing issues with your tax reporting. The monthly legal fees you're paying are definitely manageable with the right system - just make sure you're capturing the placed-in-service dates accurately for each trademark action that gets capitalized.
Omar Hassan
ā¢This timing point is really crucial and something I hadn't fully considered! I've been assuming that the amortization starts when I pay the legal fees or when the renewal application is filed, but you're right that it should be when the trademark is actually "placed in service" with the extended rights. For international renewals, this could mean significant timing differences since some jurisdictions take months to process renewals while others are much faster. Do you track the actual grant/completion dates for each jurisdiction separately, or is there a practical approach for estimating these dates when you have a large portfolio? Also, I'm curious about the master calendar approach you mentioned. Are you tracking this manually or using specific software? With dozens of trademarks across multiple countries, each with different renewal cycles and processing times, it seems like it could get complex quickly to maintain accurate placed-in-service dates for amortization purposes. Your point about the 15-year U.S. tax amortization period regardless of actual legal term length is really helpful - I was getting confused trying to match the amortization to each country's specific renewal periods. Thanks for clarifying that!
Malik Davis
This thread has been absolutely invaluable! I'm currently dealing with my own H&R Block nightmare where they somehow managed to miss my dependent care FSA contributions AND incorrectly calculated my child tax credit. I've been banging my head against the wall for three weeks trying to get through their customer service maze. Reading through everyone's experiences, I'm realizing I've been approaching this all wrong. Instead of just calling and venting my frustration, I need to get organized and systematic about this. The combination of technical analysis, multiple complaint channels, and proper documentation seems to be the secret sauce that actually gets results. I'm particularly struck by how many people mentioned that having specific, technical documentation of the errors completely changed how H&R Block responded to their complaints. It makes perfect sense - transforming from "angry customer" to "person with documented evidence of professional negligence" obviously carries much more weight. Planning to start with the taxr.ai analysis tomorrow to get concrete documentation of their mistakes, then launch the multi-pronged approach with BBB, state AG, and credit card dispute simultaneously. The IRS Taxpayer Advocate Service is also going on my list since this mess is already generating IRS notices. Thanks to everyone who shared their strategies and success stories - this thread is like a roadmap for actually getting justice instead of just getting the runaround!
0 coins
Mason Lopez
ā¢Welcome to the community! Your situation with the missed FSA contributions and incorrect child tax credit calculations sounds incredibly frustrating, but you're absolutely right that having a systematic approach makes all the difference. I just went through something similar a few months ago, and the transformation from "angry customer" to "person with documented evidence" really is the key. When I could point to specific line items where they made calculation errors, the whole dynamic of my conversations with H&R Block changed immediately. One thing I'd add to your strategy - when you're documenting their FSA mistake, make sure to calculate not just the tax impact but also any lost savings from the pre-tax contributions they failed to account for. That can add up to significant additional damages beyond just the basic tax errors. The multi-pronged approach you're planning sounds perfect. I found that having multiple official complaints active simultaneously really accelerated their willingness to resolve things. They clearly have internal processes that get triggered when they see complaints coming from different regulatory channels at once. Good luck with your case - with this level of preparation and the systematic approach, you should see much better results than the customer service runaround. Keep us updated on how it goes!
0 coins
Nia Davis
I've been reading through this entire thread and I'm amazed at how helpful everyone's strategies have been! I'm currently dealing with a similar H&R Block situation where they completely missed my mortgage interest deduction (despite me providing the 1098 form) and somehow calculated my standard deduction incorrectly. What really stands out to me is how everyone emphasizes the importance of having concrete documentation before starting the complaint process. I've been hesitating to take action because I wasn't sure if I had enough evidence, but after reading about the taxr.ai analysis tool, I realize that's exactly what I need to transform my vague frustration into specific, actionable complaints. I'm planning to follow the systematic approach outlined here: get the technical analysis first, then launch complaints with H&R Block corporate, BBB, state AG, and my credit card company simultaneously. The idea of filing multiple official complaints at once to create maximum pressure makes so much sense. One question I have - for those who calculated damages for your time spent fixing H&R Block's errors, what hourly rate did you use? I'm a teacher, so my salary translates to about $22/hour, but I'm wondering if I should use a higher rate since this is specialized tax work that required me to research and understand complex tax issues. Thanks everyone for sharing such detailed experiences - this thread should honestly be stickied as the definitive guide to dealing with tax preparer negligence!
0 coins
Tyrone Johnson
ā¢Welcome to the community! Your situation with the missed mortgage interest deduction is particularly egregious - that's one of the most common and straightforward deductions, especially when you provided the 1098 form directly. This is exactly the type of clear preparation error that should be easy to document and get resolved with the systematic approach everyone's outlined here. Regarding your hourly rate question, I'd actually suggest using something closer to $35-40/hour rather than your teaching salary. The rationale is that you're having to perform specialized research and problem-solving work that you wouldn't normally do - essentially functioning as your own tax consultant to fix their professional mistakes. Many people in similar situations have successfully used rates in that range by arguing it represents the fair market value of tax consultation services, not just general labor time. You're absolutely right that this thread has become an incredible resource! The combination of technical documentation, multiple simultaneous complaints, and proper damage calculation seems to be the formula that actually works. Your plan sounds solid - just make sure to document every hour you spend on this mess from this point forward, including research time, phone calls, and paperwork preparation. The mortgage interest miss should be really straightforward to prove with the taxr.ai analysis, which will give you concrete ammunition for all your complaint channels. Good luck with your case!
0 coins