Has anyone successfully used their ITIN instead of an SSN for the TikTok verification? I'm not a US citizen but live here on a visa, and I'm stuck on the verification page.

As someone who works in tax preparation, I want to emphasize that using your SSN for TikTok's Creator Fund verification is completely legitimate for minors. The key thing to understand is that a TIN (Tax Identification Number) is just the umbrella term that includes SSNs, ITINs, and EINs. For your 17-year-old brother, he should use his SSN as his TIN. When he starts earning from the Creator Fund, he'll need to track that income and report it on his tax return if it exceeds the filing threshold. Even if it doesn't, it's good practice to file anyway since TikTok will likely send him a 1099 form. One important consideration: if he expects to earn over $400 from TikTok this year, he'll owe self-employment tax on that income, which means he should consider making quarterly estimated tax payments to avoid penalties. This is something many young creators don't realize until tax time. The Montana LLC idea is definitely unnecessary and creates more complexity than it solves. Keep it simple and legitimate with his SSN!

Has anyone used an online service like Zillow or local property tax records to figure out the historical value? I inherited a house from my grandmother in 2012 and the lawyer handling the estate didn't get an appraisal at the time. Now I'm selling and have no idea how to document what it was worth back then.

One thing I haven't seen mentioned yet is that you might want to consider the timing of your sale carefully. If this puts you into a higher income bracket for the year, you could end up paying the 20% long-term capital gains rate instead of 15%. Also, since you mentioned this is for your kid's college, look into whether your state offers any tax advantages for education expenses that might offset some of the capital gains. Some states allow you to contribute to 529 plans and get state tax deductions, which could help reduce your overall tax burden. Make sure you keep detailed records of all the property taxes you've paid over the 20 years too - while these don't add to your basis, they can sometimes be deducted in the year of sale depending on how the closing is structured.

Has anyone else noticed that this seems to be happening more often lately? I returned something to HomeGoods last week and they tried to keep the tax too. When I questioned it, they suddenly "found a way" to refund the full amount. I think some retailers are trying this as a sneaky profit tactic hoping people don't notice or complain.

This is really concerning if retailers are systematically doing this. I work in tax compliance and can tell you that what BigTech Store told you is absolutely incorrect. Sales tax refunds on returned merchandise are governed by state law, not store policy. When you return an item, the original transaction is essentially being reversed. The store collected that tax as an agent of the state - they don't get to keep it when the underlying sale is canceled. Most states have specific provisions requiring retailers to refund sales tax on returned items, and failure to do so can result in penalties for the retailer. I'd recommend going back with your receipt and asking to speak with a manager. If they refuse, you can file a complaint with your state's department of revenue. They take sales tax compliance seriously and will investigate retailers who aren't following proper refund procedures. The fact that some commenters are seeing this happen more frequently suggests this might be a deliberate policy at some chains, which is even more problematic from a regulatory standpoint.

Has anyone here actually upgraded from a normal SUV to one over 6,000 lbs GVWR specifically for the tax advantages? I'm considering trading my Ford Edge (business use about 70%) for a Ford Expedition or similar just to take advantage of the Section 179 expensing and bonus depreciation. Is it worth the extra gas and higher purchase price just for the tax benefits? My CPA says absolutely yes but I'm not convinced.

I've been through this exact situation with my construction business vehicles. The key thing to understand is that the IRS requires you to maintain consistent records of your business use percentage throughout the vehicle's life, not just calculate it once at purchase. For your varying business use percentages (60-70% annually), you need to track this each year because it affects both your annual depreciation deduction and the final disposition calculation. When you traded in that first SUV, if your business use in the final year was different from previous years, the IRS requires you to "true up" the depreciation based on the actual business use over the vehicle's entire life in your hands. The inflated basis on your second SUV ($49K vs $41K) is correct - that's the deferred depreciation recapture from your first vehicle rolled into the new basis under the pre-2018 like-kind exchange rules. You're not losing anything, just spreading the tax impact over a longer period. One crucial point: since you mentioned retiring, be very careful about suddenly dropping business use to zero on a vehicle with remaining basis. The IRS may require you to recapture excess depreciation taken in prior years. Consider gradually reducing business use as you approach retirement rather than an abrupt change. For your GVWR question - the total lifetime deduction is generally the same whether you buy a heavy vehicle or not. The advantage is timing: you can accelerate deductions into earlier tax years when you might be in higher tax brackets, versus spreading them out over the vehicle's depreciation life.

As a newcomer to this community, I'm truly amazed by the depth and quality of guidance shared in this thread! Reading through everyone's contributions has been incredibly educational - it's like getting a comprehensive course in charitable donation valuation from people with real-world experience. What impresses me most is how you've all taken what initially seemed like a complex tax question and broken it down into a clear, systematic approach. The conservative depreciation method (20% first year, 10% annually thereafter) combined with thorough documentation creates such a defensible framework that any taxpayer could follow. The $3,400 valuation for a specialized tilt wheelchair that originally cost $5,300 seems very well-reasoned, especially with the professional validation from the CPA and insights from the estate administrator. Having multiple perspectives - from people who've actually donated medical equipment to tax professionals who handle these cases regularly - really builds confidence in the methodology. I'm particularly grateful for the comprehensive documentation checklist that emerged: original purchase receipts, timestamped photos showing condition, depreciation calculation worksheets, comparable pricing research, and proper charity acknowledgment letters. This roadmap will be invaluable for anyone facing similar donation situations. The emphasis throughout on "good faith effort" and systematic documentation rather than seeking perfection really helps demystify what the IRS actually expects. It's reassuring to know that reasonable estimation methods are acceptable when properly supported. Thank you all for creating such a valuable educational resource through your shared expertise and experiences. This is exactly why community-driven advice is so powerful!

As a newcomer to this community, I'm absolutely blown away by the incredible depth and practical wisdom shared in this thread! What started as a question about valuing a donated wheelchair has become a comprehensive masterclass in charitable donation valuation that I know I'll reference for years to come. The systematic approach that emerged here is so valuable - using conservative depreciation rates (20% first year, 10% annually), combined with thorough documentation including photos, receipts, and comparable research. The $3,400 valuation for your specialized tilt wheelchair seems exceptionally well-supported, especially with validation from actual tax professionals and people who've successfully navigated IRS reviews. What really impresses me is how everyone emphasized that the IRS values good faith effort and systematic documentation over perfect precision. As someone who's never dealt with non-cash donations of this magnitude, learning that reasonable estimation methods are acceptable when properly documented makes this whole process feel much more manageable. The documentation checklist that developed organically through this discussion - original receipts, timestamped photos, depreciation worksheets, comparable pricing research, and proper charity acknowledgment letters - creates such a clear roadmap that any taxpayer could follow with confidence. Beyond the tax implications, it's wonderful that your father's wheelchair will genuinely help someone who needs these specialized therapeutic features. You're handling both the charitable and tax aspects with exactly the kind of care and thoroughness that honors your father's memory while ensuring everything is done properly. Thank you all for demonstrating what makes this community so special - the combination of real-world experience, professional expertise, and genuine desire to help others creates an invaluable resource that you simply can't find anywhere else!