IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Has anyone actually looked at the new 2023 Schedule A? I just downloaded it and Box 8a specifically says "Home mortgage interest and points reported to you on Form 1098." Wouldn't that mean you just put the full amount from your 1098 forms regardless of these limits? The forms from my lenders show about $65k in combined interest.

0 coins

The Schedule A form itself doesn't have the calculation limitations built in - that's on you to know and apply. The mortgage company reports the FULL interest you paid on Form 1098, but you're only allowed to deduct the portion that falls under the acquisition debt limits. Your lenders don't track how you used the money or which debt limits apply to you - they just report what you paid in interest. It's your responsibility to know that you can only deduct interest on $750K (for post-2017 loans) or $1M (for pre-2017 loans) of acquisition debt per qualified residence. The IRS expects you to calculate and enter the correct deductible amount, even if it's less than what appears on your 1098 forms.

0 coins

Nathan Dell

•

This is such a complex area of tax law! I've been dealing with a similar situation where I have properties purchased on different sides of the 2017 cutoff. One thing that helped me was creating a simple spreadsheet to track each property separately. For your situation, I'd recommend documenting everything clearly: - Primary residence: $700K mortgage (pre-12/15/2017) = 100% of interest deductible - Second home: $1.1M mortgage (post-12/15/2017) = interest on first $750K deductible The key insight from all these responses is that you DON'T combine the limits - each property stands alone based on its purchase date. So you're not limited to some combined $1.75M cap. Also worth noting - since you mentioned renovations on the second home, make sure any loan proceeds used for substantial improvements still count as acquisition debt. The IRS considers improvements that add value, prolong the home's life, or adapt it for new uses as qualifying for the mortgage interest deduction. Keep detailed records of how loan proceeds were used, especially if you did any cash-out refinancing. The documentation will be crucial if you ever face questions about your deductions.

0 coins

This spreadsheet approach is brilliant! I'm definitely going to set something like this up for my own records. One question though - when you mention "substantial improvements" for the acquisition debt qualification, do you know if there's a specific dollar threshold or percentage of home value that defines "substantial"? I'm asking because we spent about $85K on renovations to the second home (new kitchen, bathroom remodel, flooring throughout), but I want to make sure this actually qualifies as substantial improvement rather than just maintenance/repairs. The IRS language is pretty vague on what constitutes "substantial" versus regular upkeep.

0 coins

This is such a comprehensive breakdown - thank you for sharing all these specific details! I've been stuck in verification hell since April with EITC issues and seeing your actual check arrival with all the exact formatting gives me real hope for the first time in months. The envelope details are incredibly helpful - I had no idea what to look for on Informed Delivery when my refund finally comes. That Treasury seal, the Kansas City postmark, and the specific check number format (000876706167) will help me identify it immediately when it shows up. I'm seriously leaning toward filing a 1040X to remove my EITC at this point. Eight months of "still processing" messages is absolutely brutal and it sounds like the amendment route is way faster than continuing to wait in verification limbo. The mental exhaustion from constantly checking WMR and getting nowhere just isn't sustainable anymore. Did you get any kind of notification or status update when they started processing your amendment, or did the check just appear out of nowhere like you described? Also, do you feel like you made the right choice looking back, even though you had to give up credits you legitimately qualified for? Posts like this with real details are what keep those of us still waiting somewhat sane - thanks again for taking the time to share your experience! šŸ™

0 coins

Lola Perez

•

Hey Connor! As someone new to this community, I've been reading through all these experiences and it's both reassuring and frustrating to see how common these verification delays are. Eight months since April is absolutely insane - the IRS system is clearly broken when people are waiting that long for legitimate refunds. I'm dealing with similar issues (CTC verification since June) and this thread has been incredibly eye-opening about the 1040X option. The detailed check information from the original post is so valuable - I never would have known what to look for on Informed Delivery either. That specific Treasury envelope format and check numbering system gives us something concrete to watch for instead of just hoping. The fact that so many people in this thread found faster resolution through amendments really says something about how backed up the verification system is. Sometimes you just have to be practical and take what you can get rather than waiting indefinitely for what you're owed. Hope you find a path forward that works for you! šŸ¤ž

0 coins

This is incredibly helpful - thank you for sharing such detailed information about your refund check! I've been waiting since May with AOTC verification issues and posts like this give me hope that there actually is light at the end of the tunnel. The specific check details are amazing - the envelope formatting with "U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY" and "BUREAU OF THE FISCAL SERVICE," the check number format (000876706167), and even the processing codes. I had no idea what to look for on Informed Delivery when my refund finally arrives, so knowing about that Treasury seal and Kansas City postmark will help me identify it immediately. I'm really considering the 1040X route after reading your experience and all these responses. Six months of "still processing" messages with no end in sight is exhausting, and it sounds like amending to remove unverified credits might be way faster than staying in verification limbo indefinitely. Sometimes getting something is better than potentially waiting another year for maybe getting everything. Quick question - roughly how long was it from when you filed the 1040X to receiving this check? And did you use tax software for the amendment or file it manually? Thanks again for taking the time to share all these specifics - seeing that actual check number and envelope details makes this whole process feel real again after months of wondering if refunds even exist anymore! šŸ™

0 coins

As someone who's made similar mistakes in the past, I completely understand the appeal of trying to find creative tax strategies. The math seems so logical on paper! But I learned the hard way that the IRS has pretty much thought of every angle when it comes to tax arbitrage schemes like this. Beyond the interest deduction issue everyone's mentioned, there's also the risk factor to consider. Even if this strategy were legal, you'd be taking on $100k in debt to potentially save a few thousand in taxes. That's a lot of leverage for a relatively small potential benefit, especially in an environment where interest rates could change. The suggestions about maxing out retirement accounts are spot on. I've found that boring, straightforward tax strategies like 401k contributions, HSAs, and legitimate business deductions end up saving way more money with zero risk compared to these complex schemes. Sometimes the simplest approach really is the best!

0 coins

This is exactly the kind of perspective I needed to hear! I got so caught up in the numbers that I completely overlooked the risk side of the equation. Taking on $100k in debt for what would probably amount to minimal tax savings (if any) seems pretty reckless when you put it that way. I think I was getting too clever for my own good. Your point about the IRS having seen every angle is probably spot on - if there was really a simple arbitrage opportunity like this, everyone would be doing it. I'm definitely going to focus on the basics like maxing out my 401k instead. Much safer and probably more effective in the long run. Thanks for the reality check!

0 coins

I've been following this thread and wanted to add another perspective from someone who works in financial compliance. The reason the IRS is so strict about personal loan interest deductions is to prevent exactly the type of arbitrage you described. They've seen every variation of "borrow money to invest and deduct the interest" schemes over the decades. Even beyond the tax code issues, there are some practical concerns with your strategy. Treasury bond prices fluctuate with interest rate changes, so you could end up with capital losses if rates rise and you need to sell before maturity. Meanwhile, you'd still owe the full loan amount regardless of what happens to your investment. I'd echo what others have said about focusing on legitimate tax-advantaged accounts first. If you have $100k to work with, consider maxing out retirement accounts, exploring backdoor Roth conversions if you're over the income limits, or looking into tax-loss harvesting strategies with your existing investments. These approaches are tried, true, and won't put you at risk of an IRS audit or unexpected debt burden.

0 coins

GalaxyGazer

•

Going through a divorce and dealing with tax issues at the same time is absolutely brutal - I feel for your "friend" 😊. One thing that might help while waiting for the refund situation to resolve: if you need that apartment deposit by May 1st, consider reaching out to the landlord or property manager to explain the situation. Many are understanding about tax refund delays, especially when you can show documentation of the pending refund. Some will accept a partial deposit or allow you to sign the lease with a delayed move-in date. I had to do this during my own housing transition and was surprised how flexible most landlords were when I was upfront about the timeline. Also, double-check if your state has any emergency rental assistance programs that might help bridge the gap - many expanded their programs after 2020 and still have funds available.

0 coins

This is such great advice! I went through something similar during my own financial transition last year. Another option to consider while waiting for the refund is checking with local credit unions - many offer small emergency loans or lines of credit specifically for situations like this where you have documented income coming (like a pending tax refund). The rates are usually much better than payday loans or cash advances. Also, some apartment complexes have relationships with companies that will essentially "guarantee" your deposit while you're waiting for funds to clear, though they do charge a fee. It's definitely worth asking the leasing office if they have any programs like that available.

0 coins

I've been through this exact situation twice (thanks to two different bank mergers that closed my accounts without proper notice). Here's what I learned: the timeline everyone's mentioned is accurate, but there are a few things your "friend" can do right now to protect themselves. First, get everything in writing from your tax preparer - when they expect to receive the funds, their process for notifying you, and how quickly they'll cut you a check once received. Second, if you're using a major chain preparer (H&R Block, Jackson Hewitt, etc.), they often have customer service lines that can track rejected refunds more effectively than individual preparers. Third, and this saved me - start documenting everything NOW. Screenshot your "Where's My Refund" status, get written confirmation from your bank about the account closure date, and keep records of all calls. If this drags past your May 1st deadline, having this documentation can help if you need to escalate or pursue any kind of expedited processing. Also, some tax preparers will work with you on payment plans for their fees if you're in a tight spot - doesn't hurt to ask! Hang in there - this process is frustrating but it WILL resolve eventually.

0 coins

This is incredibly thorough advice! I'm a newcomer here but going through something very similar right now. The documentation part especially resonates with me - I wish I had started keeping records from day one instead of scrambling to piece everything together after the fact. Quick question for anyone who's been through this: when you say "get everything in writing from your tax preparer," did you find email confirmations sufficient, or did you need physical letters? I'm dealing with a smaller local preparer who seems pretty informal about their communication, and I want to make sure I'm protecting myself properly. Also, has anyone had success getting expedited processing if you can prove financial hardship? I keep seeing conflicting information about whether that's even possible with rejected direct deposits.

0 coins

NeonNinja

•

Just wanted to add a practical suggestion that worked for me - I created an LLC for my collectibles separate from my main business. The collectible LLC owns the items and "rents" them to my main business at fair market rates. This arrangement has to be properly documented with formal agreements, but it creates a cleaner separation. Definitely talk to your accountant about whether this makes sense for your situation though - it adds some administrative complexity.

0 coins

As a fellow small business owner, I'd strongly recommend getting professional guidance before making these purchases. The IRS has specific rules about what constitutes "ordinary and necessary" business expenses, and expensive collectibles often fall into a gray area. A few things to consider: First, the cost needs to be reasonable for your type of business. While a $500 piece of local artwork might be justifiable for a law firm's conference room, $2500 sports memorabilia could raise red flags during an audit. Second, items over certain thresholds typically need to be capitalized and depreciated rather than expensed immediately. I'd suggest starting with more modest decorative items that clearly serve a business purpose - perhaps some professional artwork or photographs that create an impressive but appropriate atmosphere for client meetings. You could always add collectibles later once you've established a track record with the IRS for reasonable business expenses. Document everything thoroughly - photos of the items in your business space, records of client meetings in that room, and clear business justification for each purchase. Having this documentation ready makes a huge difference if you're ever questioned about these deductions.

0 coins

Kyle Wallace

•

This is really solid advice, especially about starting with modest purchases first. I'm curious though - when you mention "certain thresholds" for capitalization, what are those specific dollar amounts? I keep seeing different numbers thrown around and want to make sure I'm planning correctly for my own business purchases.

0 coins

Prev1...998999100010011002...5644Next