Will low-wage job until 70 reduce Social Security benefits? Confused about survivor benefits calculation
My husband (68) wants to delay claiming Social Security until 70 to maximize his benefit, but he's willing to step back from his high-stress job and work part-time at a much lower wage for the next two years. I'm worried this might actually hurt his SS benefit calculation. Will those last two years of lower earnings reduce what he'd get at 70? I'm also confused about something an SSA rep mentioned about a "35 year calculation" and "highest earning years." She said something about how they use your top 35 years and there was a 3-year something-or-other that I couldn't follow. Another concern: If he passes away before reaching 70 without filing, would my survivor benefit be based on what he would have received at FRA? Or is it based on what he actually filed for? Different people have told us different things. We're in Alabama and getting pretty stressed about making the right decision. I'd appreciate hearing from anyone who's navigated this successfully. We're planning to meet with a financial advisor, but I want to understand the basics first so I don't feel completely lost during the meeting.
18 comments


Oliver Schulz
Good news - your husband working a lower-paying job until 70 won't hurt his benefits! Social Security calculates based on his highest 35 years of earnings (adjusted for inflation). If he's worked a full career, those final lower-earning years will likely just drop off and not be counted. The "3 year thing" might refer to the 3 year lookback for disability, but that's not relevant for retirement benefits. Regarding survivor benefits: If your husband passes before claiming, your survivor benefit would be based on what he would have received if he had applied for benefits on the date of death (including any delayed retirement credits he earned up to that point). So if he dies at 69, you'd get a survivor benefit based on his age-69 amount, not his FRA amount. If he files at 70 and then passes away later, you'd receive his full age-70 benefit amount as your survivor benefit. Hope this helps clarify things!
0 coins
Amina Diallo
•Thank you so much for explaining! So if I understand correctly, his last 2 years of lower earnings won't affect his benefit calculation if they're not in his top 35 years? That's such a relief. I'm still not entirely clear on the survivor benefit. If he passes at 69 without having filed, would I receive what he would have gotten at 69 (with delayed credits)? Or would it be his FRA amount?
0 coins
Natasha Kuznetsova
I was in almost your exact situation with my husband. Let me simplify what the SSA person was probably trying to explain: SSA takes your 35 highest earning years (adjusted for inflation) to calculate your benefit. If your husband has 35+ years of solid earnings, then working those last couple years at lower wages won't affect his benefit at all - those years just won't be used in the calculation. As for survivor benefits, if he passes before filing, you'll get what he would have been entitled to when he died, including delayed retirement credits. So if he dies at 69 without filing, you'd get his age-69 benefit amount (which is higher than his FRA amount). BTW, when trying to reach SSA to discuss these details, I was getting nowhere with the regular phone line until I found Claimyr (claimyr.com). They connected me to an agent in under 10 minutes. They have a video showing how it works: https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU. Saved me hours of frustration!
0 coins
AstroAdventurer
•Does this work for real? I've been trying to get through to SSA for WEEKS about my disability application. Might have to try this!
0 coins
Javier Mendoza
my husband did this exact thing worked at walmart greeter for 2 yrs before claiming at 70. didnt hurt his check at all still got the big delayed credits and his check was way higher than if he took at frs. just make sure hes not collecting any ss while working before 70 or hell hit the earnings limit!!
0 coins
Amina Diallo
•That's encouraging to hear! Yes, he's definitely not planning to collect anything until 70. Did your husband's check end up being significantly higher by waiting?
0 coins
Emma Wilson
PLEASE be careful with this decision! My brother-in-law waited until 69 to claim and then dropped dead a month later!! All those years of waiting and my sister only got a single month's worth of the higher benefit. If your husband's health isn't 100% perfect, you might be making a HUGE MISTAKE by waiting. Has anyone calculated your break-even age?? That's what really matters!!!!
0 coins
Oliver Schulz
•While I understand your concern, it's important to note that survivor benefits are very different from retirement benefits. Even if someone passes away shortly after claiming (or before claiming), the surviving spouse still receives the higher benefit amount for the rest of their life. In your sister's case, she should be receiving a survivor benefit based on her husband's age-69 benefit amount, not just for that one month. This survivor benefit aspect is actually one of the strongest arguments FOR delaying benefits when possible, especially for the higher earner in a couple.
0 coins
Malik Davis
I worked with retirees for 30+ years and can confirm these answers are correct. SSA uses your highest 35 earning years, indexed for inflation. If your husband has 35+ years of good earnings, a couple years of lower wages won't hurt him at all. For survivor benefits: 1. If he dies before claiming: you get what he would have received at his age of death (including delayed retirement credits) 2. If he claims at 70 then dies later: you get his full age-70 benefit amount As for professional help, look for a fee-only financial planner who specializes in retirement planning, not someone who earns commissions selling products. They can run scenarios specific to your situation. There are also specialized Social Security consulting services ranging from $50-300 that can analyze your claiming options.
0 coins
Isabella Santos
•Not to contradict you but my mom was told her survivor benefit would be based on my dad's FRA not his age at death? He died at 64 before claiming. This is so confusing!
0 coins
Malik Davis
To answer your question about who to speak with: The SSA representatives typically won't give claiming strategy advice. I'd recommend looking for a fee-only financial advisor who specializes in retirement planning, particularly someone who has experience with Social Security optimization strategies. Some advisors have specialized software that can model various claiming scenarios based on your specific situation, life expectancy, and other factors.
0 coins
Amina Diallo
•Thank you for this recommendation. We definitely want professional advice. Do you know if these specialists typically charge by the hour or a flat fee for Social Security planning?
0 coins
AstroAdventurer
i dont think anyone mentioned yet but the 3 year thing might be the earnings test lookback? if u work after claiming SS before FRA they look at monthly earnings not just annual. its complicated tho so maybe thats not what the rep meant
0 coins
Oliver Schulz
•You're right - there is a monthly earnings test that applies in the year you retire. If you're under FRA and claim benefits, SSA will look at your monthly earnings rather than annual earnings in the first year of retirement. But since the OP's husband is already past FRA (he's 68) and not claiming until 70, the earnings test doesn't apply to their situation at all.
0 coins
Isabella Santos
I was in a similar boat to u last year & honestly the BEST thing we did was just schedule an appointment at our local SSA office. My husband & I brought all our questions written down & the rep walked us thru everything step by step. Took about an hour but so worth it! Just be prepared for a long wait to get an appointment (took us like 3 weeks).
0 coins
Natasha Kuznetsova
•That's a great suggestion! In-person appointments can be really helpful for complex situations. If you're having trouble getting an appointment, that's where services like Claimyr can help - they can connect you with an SSA representative over the phone much faster than waiting on hold yourself. But an in-person appointment is definitely worth the wait if you can get one.
0 coins
Javier Mendoza
make sure u look at the tax situation too bc sometimes waiting doesnt help if ur gonna pay more taxes on the bigger benefit its all about whats left after taxes
0 coins
Malik Davis
•While tax considerations are important, they rarely outweigh the benefit of delaying Social Security for a higher-earning spouse. The permanent 8% per year increase in benefits (plus COLAs on that larger amount) typically overshadows any tax differences. Plus, survivor benefits are a critical factor - ensuring the surviving spouse gets the highest possible benefit for life is usually worth potential tax implications. That said, a comprehensive financial plan should absolutely include tax planning.
0 coins