< Back to Social Security Administration

When should lower-earning spouse claim Social Security - age 62 or wait until FRA?

I'm trying to figure out the best strategy for my husband and me with Social Security. I'm the higher earner (I've made about $75,000/yr for most of my career) while my husband has mostly worked part-time ($30,000/yr average) while raising our kids. We're approaching retirement age (I'm 61, he's 60) and trying to decide when he should start claiming benefits. Our financial advisor gave us two options: 1. Have my husband claim at 62 (getting reduced benefits) 2. Wait until his Full Retirement Age (67 for him) We don't have any other significant income sources lined up yet. I'm planning to wait until at least my FRA or possibly 70 to maximize my benefit. But what about my husband? Is there an advantage to him taking early benefits since his benefit is much lower anyway? Or should we both wait? I've heard conflicting advice about this, and the SSA calculator online isn't helping me understand the strategic aspects of this decision when there's a big income gap between spouses. Any insights from people who've been in similar situations?

Caleb Bell

•

This is a common planning situation and there's no one-size-fits-all answer. Here are some considerations: - If your husband claims at 62, he'll get about 30% less than his FRA benefit permanently. - If he waits until FRA, he gets 100% of his benefit amount. - When one spouse dies, the survivor gets the higher of the two benefit amounts. Since you're the higher earner and waiting until your FRA or 70, the survivor benefit is likely based on your record regardless of when your husband claims. Many financial planners suggest the lower-earning spouse claim early (62) if you need the income, especially if the higher earner is delaying to 70. This creates some income while maximizing the eventual survivor benefit.

0 coins

Kaitlyn Jenkins

•

Thank you, that's helpful! We do need some income soon. So if I understand correctly, him taking reduced benefits at 62 won't affect what happens later if I pass away first (he'd get my higher benefit amount regardless)?

0 coins

i was in EXACTLY your situation (i made more, husband made less). we decided to have him take SS at 62 and it was a BIG MISTAKE!!!! nobody told us about the earnings test - he wanted to keep working part time and they took back almost all of his benefit because he was making too much!!! had to pay some back too. SO FRUSTRATING!!! make sure your husband isnt planning to work AT ALL if he claims before FRA!!!

0 coins

Rhett Bowman

•

The earnings limit for 2025 is around $22,320 if under FRA. They deduct $1 for every $2 earned above that limit. Important consideration!

0 coins

Abigail Patel

•

For married couples with a significant earnings gap, I typically see the lower earner claiming early and the higher earner delaying as long as possible. This is especially true when there's a reasonable expectation the higher earner's benefit will become the survivor benefit eventually. Here's a simplified calculation: If your husband's FRA benefit would be ~$1,500/month: - At 62: ~$1,050/month (permanently reduced) - At FRA (67): $1,500/month The total difference from age 62-67 is about $27,000 in benefits he'd collect by starting early versus waiting. It would take ~15 years at FRA to break even on this amount (the difference between $1,050 and $1,500 monthly). Since the higher earner's benefit will become the survivor benefit, many advisors see this as a reasonable approach - getting some money flowing while maximizing the eventual survivor benefit by having you delay.

0 coins

Kaitlyn Jenkins

•

This is exactly the kind of calculation I was looking for! When you put it that way, it seems to make sense for him to claim early - especially since we do need the income. We're both in good health, but statistically speaking, I'll likely outlive him (women usually do), so maximizing my benefit seems most important long-term.

0 coins

Daniel White

•

NOOO dont have him claim early!!! The SSA wants you to think thats a good idea but its a TRAP!!! When you claim early they STEAL your money for the rest of your life!! Its all a scam to save the govt money because they know most people cant wait!!!

0 coins

Abigail Patel

•

That's not accurate. Early claiming isn't a "trap" - it's simply a different option with a permanent reduction to account for the longer period benefits will be paid. For some couples, having the lower earner claim early can be mathematically advantageous, especially when the higher earner delays to maximize the eventual survivor benefit.

0 coins

Nolan Carter

•

Has anyone managed to actually speak with a SSA agent about this? I've been trying to get specific advice for my situation (similar to yours) but keep getting disconnected or waiting for hours.

0 coins

Natalia Stone

•

After weeks of trying to get through to SSA about my complicated spousal benefit situation, I finally found a service called Claimyr (claimyr.com) that got me connected to an agent in under 15 minutes. They have a video showing how it works here: https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU The agent I spoke with was able to run calculations specific to my situation showing the difference between filing at different ages. Way more helpful than trying to figure it out myself with online calculators.

0 coins

i think u also need to look at taxes!!!!! when we started taking ss while still having some work income our taxes went way up because of something called "provisional income" - they tax ur ss benefits if ur over certain limits. another thing nobody warned us about!!!!

0 coins

Rhett Bowman

•

This is true. Up to 85% of SS benefits can be taxable if your combined income (adjusted gross income + nontaxable interest + 1/2 of SS benefits) exceeds certain thresholds. It's $25,000 for individuals and $32,000 for married filing jointly.

0 coins

Caleb Bell

•

Another important consideration: If your husband claims early at 62, and you're still working, he cannot claim spousal benefits on your record until you file for your own benefits. This is something many couples overlook. If he claims at 62 on his own record, and later becomes eligible for spousal benefits when you file (which could provide up to 50% of your FRA benefit if that's higher than his own benefit), his spousal amount will still be reduced because he claimed early. The reduction is permanent.

0 coins

Kaitlyn Jenkins

•

That's a good point I hadn't considered. So even though he'd start with his own benefit at 62, once I file for mine (at FRA), he could potentially get a spousal benefit if it's higher than his own - but that spousal benefit would also be reduced because he filed early for his own? That complicates things.

0 coins

Rhett Bowman

•

My wife and I were in a similar position. Here's what we did: she claimed at 62 (lower earner), I waited until 70 (higher earner). This gave us some income while maximizing the eventual survivor benefit. In our case, after running the numbers, we found we'd be ahead unless we both lived past 83. Given family health history, this was the right call for us. Everyone's situation is different though.

0 coins

Kaitlyn Jenkins

•

That's helpful, thank you! Could I ask if your wife encountered any issues with the earnings test that someone mentioned above? Or was she fully retired when she started claiming?

0 coins

Rhett Bowman

•

She was fully retired. If your husband plans to work at all while collecting before FRA, definitely look into the earnings test. For 2025, if you earn over $22,320 and are under FRA, SSA withholds $1 for every $2 earned above that limit. Once you reach FRA, there's no earnings test.

0 coins

Kaitlyn Jenkins

•

Really appreciate this information. My husband is planning to fully retire, so it sounds like the earnings test won't be an issue for us. I think we're leaning toward having him claim at 62 while I wait until at least my FRA or possibly 70. Thanks everyone for the helpful discussion!

0 coins

Abigail Patel

•

Sounds like you have a good plan forming. Just to summarize the key points from this discussion: 1. Lower-earning spouse claiming early makes mathematical sense when the higher earner delays (especially since the higher benefit will become the survivor benefit) 2. Be aware of the earnings test if your husband plans to work while collecting before FRA 3. Consider potential tax implications of having Social Security income while you're still working 4. Remember that when you file, your husband might qualify for a spousal benefit if it's higher than his own, but it would be reduced if he claimed his own benefit early I recommend creating a spreadsheet to compare your total household benefits under different scenarios through age 85-90. This often helps couples visualize the long-term impact of different claiming strategies.

0 coins

TaxRefund AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
6,859 users helped today