Should I really take Social Security at 62 while my higher-earning husband waits? Confused about this advice
I keep hearing the same advice everywhere and I'm starting to think I'm missing something important. My husband (61) has always been our primary breadwinner, making about 2.5 times what I earned during my working years. I just turned 62 last month and we've been married for 8 years. Everyone - our financial advisor, friends, even my sister who works in insurance - keeps saying the same thing: "You should claim your SS benefits at 62, but your husband should wait until at least his FRA or even 70 to maximize his benefit." I understand there are earnings limits if you claim early, but that's not an issue for me since I retired last year. What I don't understand is WHY this seems to be universal advice. Is it because of the spousal benefit? Or survivor benefits if he passes first? Or something about our 8-year marriage duration? I've tried reading articles online but they get so technical with all the calculations and percentages. Can someone explain in plain English why this strategy is recommended so often? Is there a significant advantage I'm not seeing?
16 comments


Astrid Bergström
its just math. if he waits til 70 his benefit goes up by 8% every year after fra. yours only goes up like 6.5% i think. plus when either of u die the survivor gets the HIGHER of the two benefits not both. so if he has the bigger benefit and waits u get more $ if he dies first
0 coins
Ravi Patel
•Oh! So it's mainly about what happens after one of us passes away? That actually makes a lot of sense, thank you. So essentially we're maximizing what I'd receive as a widow if he passes first (which statistically is more likely
0 coins
PixelPrincess
This strategy is commonly recommended because it optimizes your household's lifetime Social Security income. Here's why: 1. Survivor Benefit: When one spouse dies, the surviving spouse receives the HIGHER of the two benefits. By having your husband delay until 70, he increases his benefit by 8% per year beyond FRA. This creates a larger survivor benefit for whichever of you lives longer. 2. Spousal Coordination: When you claim at 62, you'll receive your own reduced benefit. Later, if your spousal benefit (up to 50% of his FRA amount) would be higher than your own reduced benefit, you can switch to that. 3. Life Expectancy: Women typically outlive men. Having the higher earner delay benefits creates insurance against longevity risk for the surviving spouse. 4. Married 8 Years: Since you've been married more than the required minimum (1 year for spousal benefits, 9 months for survivor benefits), you qualify for both types of benefits, assuming neither of you remarried after any previous divorces. This strategy balances getting some income now (your age-62 benefit) while maximizing the long-term household benefit through your husband's delayed retirement credits.
0 coins
Ravi Patel
•Thank you for such a clear explanation! So even though I'll take a reduction by claiming at 62, the strategy makes sense for us as a couple over the long term. One question though - what happens if my husband claims at his FRA instead of waiting all the way to 70? Is there still a significant advantage?
0 coins
Omar Farouk
I had the EXACT same question when I was approaching 62 (I'm 64 now). My husband is 63 and was the higher earner too. What really helped me understand was calculating the "break even" point. I ended up claiming at 62 and my monthly check is $1,420. If I had waited until my FRA at 67, it would have been around $2,125. My husband is waiting until 70 and will get about $3,780 instead of the $2,700 he'd get at his FRA. The KEY thing to understand is that if he dies first, I'll step up to his $3,780 benefit as a survivor. If I die first, he keeps his higher amount anyway. This creates a much higher "floor" for whoever is left. One thing no one told me - when I claimed early, they automatically check if my spousal benefit (when my husband files) would be higher than my own. You don't have to do anything special to get the higher amount later!
0 coins
Ravi Patel
•Thank you for sharing your actual numbers - that really helps me visualize the difference! I hadn't thought about the automatic check for spousal benefits later. It sounds like you don't regret taking yours at 62 then?
0 coins
Chloe Martin
This strategy is recommended ALL the time because the SSA agents are USELESS at explaining the actual benefits!!! I tried SEVEN TIMES to get a straight answer about this exact situation for me and my wife. Every time I called, I'd wait 2+ hours and either get disconnected or get someone who gave me different information than the last person!!! The real reason for this advice: IT'S ALL ABOUT THE SURVIVOR BENEFIT!!! When you die, your benefits DIE WITH YOU! But your husband's larger benefit (especially if he waits until 70) becomes YOUR benefit if he dies first! The system is designed to protect the lower earner (usually the wife). Don't listen to the SSA - they'll just confuse you more!!
0 coins
Diego Fernández
•If you're having trouble reaching the SSA, I had a good experience using Claimyr to get through. Instead of waiting on hold for hours, I got connected to an agent in about 15 minutes. You can see how it works in their video demo: https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU - their website is claimyr.com. It really helped when I needed to sort out a complex survivor benefit question and couldn't get through the normal way.
0 coins
Anastasia Kuznetsov
I think everyones situation is different and u shouldn't just follow what other ppl say. My wife and I both claimed at 62 and were happy with our choice. Who knows how long any of us have? I rather have the money now then wait around for years hoping to live long enough to break even. Just my 2 cents
0 coins
Sean Fitzgerald
•While personal preferences matter, it's important to understand that this isn't just about breaking even. The higher earner delaying creates insurance against longevity risk. It's statistically proven that women outlive men on average, and a widow can face 15-20 years living on Social Security. The difference between a spouse claiming at 62 vs. 70 can mean $1,000+ more per month for potentially decades - easily a six-figure difference in lifetime benefits.
0 coins
Ravi Patel
Thank you everyone for your helpful responses! I'm understanding this much better now. It seems like the key benefit is protecting me long-term through the survivor benefit if my husband passes away first. I'm going to sit down with him this weekend and look at some actual calculations with our specific benefit amounts from the SSA website. Apparently I've been thinking too short-term about the immediate monthly checks rather than our total lifetime benefits. I really appreciate everyone sharing their knowledge and experiences!
0 coins
PixelPrincess
•That's exactly right. One helpful approach is to think of your husband's delayed retirement credits as purchasing the cheapest form of life insurance possible. By waiting until 70, he's essentially buying you an inflation-protected lifetime annuity that pays the difference between your benefit and his maximized benefit. The Social Security website has calculators that can help you see the long-term impact of different claiming strategies.
0 coins
Omar Farouk
Just wanted to add one thing - if your husband is still working, make sure to factor in how his last few years of earnings might increase his benefit calculation. My husband's final years of work at higher income actually bumped up his PIA since they replaced some lower-earning years from when he was young. The SSA uses the highest 35 years of earnings, so those last high-earning years can make a meaningful difference!
0 coins
Diego Fernández
•That's such an important point! My brother-in-law missed this completely. He retired at 63 thinking his benefit was fixed, not realizing that working even part-time at a decent wage for a few more years could have replaced some zero-earning years in his calculation. The SSA doesn't do a great job explaining this.
0 coins
Astrid Bergström
im confused about one thing. if ur only married 8 yrs does that affect spousal benefits? i thought u had to be married 10 yrs for that?
0 coins
Sean Fitzgerald
•You're thinking of divorced spouse benefits, which require a 10-year marriage. For current spouses, you only need to be married for 1 year to qualify for spousal benefits, and 9 months for survivor benefits (with some exceptions). Since they've been married 8 years, she qualifies for both types of benefits as long as they remain married.
0 coins