Social Security claiming strategy: Take early at 62 or wait until 65 while spouse delays to 70?
I'm struggling with our Social Security claiming strategy and need some real advice. My current plan is to file for my retirement benefits at 62 (I'll reach that age next March), while my wife would wait until 70 to maximize her benefit. She's 2 years younger than me. But now I'm wondering - if I could manage to wait until 65 to claim, would that make financial sense for us? We have some savings that could potentially bridge the gap for those extra 3 years. My FRA is 67 and my estimated benefit at 62 would be around $1,750/month versus about $2,260 if I wait until 65. I know the general rule is that delaying increases your benefit, but I'm not sure if waiting those 3 extra years (62 to 65) really makes enough difference when I'll still be claiming before my FRA anyway. My wife's benefit at 70 will be higher than mine regardless of when I file. Anyone with experience on this "mixed strategy" of one spouse early and one spouse late? Are there specific considerations I'm missing?
17 comments
Sophia Russo
This is a classic optimization question that depends on multiple factors. Based on your numbers, waiting until 65 would give you approximately $510 more per month, which is significant. That's $6,120 more annually, and that difference continues for life (plus annual COLAs). The break-even analysis is key here. You'd "lose" 36 months of payments by waiting (roughly $63,000 total), but after about 10.3 years of receiving the higher payment ($510 × 12 months × 10.3 years), you'd come out ahead if you live beyond about age 75-76. But also consider: 1) Your health/family longevity 2) Whether you're still working (earnings limit comes into play if claiming before FRA) 3) Tax implications of SS income combined with other income 4) Whether your spouse might need to claim survivor benefits on your record later
0 coins
Mason Kaczka
•Thanks for breaking that down. I hadn't calculated the break-even point, but 75-76 seems reasonable given my family history. My father lived to 88 and mother is still alive at 84. I am actually planning to work part-time until at least 65, which I guess complicates things with the earnings limit. Would that be another reason to wait until 65 to avoid some of those earnings limit reductions?
0 coins
Evelyn Xu
my husband took his at 62 and i waited till fra (66 at that time) and it worked fine for us. but everyones situaton is diffrent. do u have pension to? that changes things.
0 coins
Mason Kaczka
•No pension, unfortunately. Just 401k savings and whatever we get from Social Security. That's why I'm trying to optimize our claiming strategy as much as possible.
0 coins
Dominic Green
I would strongly consider waiting until at least 65 if you can afford it. The significant reduction for claiming at 62 is permanent and compounds over time with COLA increases. There's also the earnings test issue - if you're working and making over the annual limit ($21,240 in 2025), SSA will withhold $1 for every $2 you earn above that limit until you reach FRA. One important consideration: if your wife's own benefit will be higher than any spousal benefit she could get on your record, your filing age doesn't affect her benefit amount. But if you pass away before her, she would receive survivor benefits based on your benefit amount - including any delayed retirement credits you earned. So waiting helps protect her future income too. The age 65 vs 62 decision depends on: 1) Life expectancy (longer favors waiting) 2) Current income needs 3) Whether you're still working 4) Tax situation 5) Health insurance needs (Medicare starts at 65
0 coins
Mason Kaczka
•I didn't consider the survivor benefit angle! That's a really important point since my wife is younger and statistically likely to outlive me. So my understanding is that if I wait until 65, not only do I get more during my lifetime, but she would get a higher survivor benefit based on my higher amount if she outlives me? That might be the deciding factor here.
0 coins
Hannah Flores
I did the same thing you're planning! Took mine at 62 and spouse waited. BIG MISTAKE. The reduction is HUGE and PERMANENT. Plus I was still working part-time and they took back almost half my benefit because of the earnings limit. Should have waited!!!
0 coins
Kayla Jacobson
•You can actually fix this mistake in some cases! If you're within 12 months of filing, you can withdraw your application (Form SSA-521), pay back all benefits, and it's like you never filed. Or if you've reached FRA, you can suspend benefits to earn delayed credits (but can't undo the early filing reduction). The earnings test is frustrating but remember those withheld benefits aren't completely lost - after FRA, your benefit gets recalculated to credit you for the months benefits were withheld.
0 coins
William Rivera
Have u tried calling SSA directly? i spent 2 weeks trying, but kept getting disconnected after waiting forever. SO frustrating!!! Then someone told me about this service called Claimyr that gets you through to SSA quickly. I was skeptical but it actually worked! Got connected in under 10 minutes when I'd been trying for weeks. The rep did a personalized calculation for our specific situation that really helped us decide. Check out their video demo: https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU or just go to claimyr.com The SSA person did a "what-if" calculation for different ages that showed the cumulative lifetime benefit. Made our decision much clearer! Worth talking to them directly.
0 coins
Mason Kaczka
•That's a good suggestion. I've been avoiding calling because I've heard the wait times are awful. I'll check out that service - getting personalized calculations would definitely help with this decision.
0 coins
Grace Lee
Am I the only one who thinks it's ridiculous that we need advanced mathematics degrees to figure out when to take our own benefits? The whole system is deliberately complicated. At 62 you get your money sooner but less of it. At 70 you might be DEAD before collecting a dime. No perfect answer.
0 coins
Sophia Russo
•While it can seem complex, the system actually offers flexibility to accommodate different situations. It's not about finding a perfect answer, but rather the best strategy for your specific circumstances. The SSA's website has calculators that can help with the math, and financial advisors who specialize in Social Security planning can provide personalized guidance.
0 coins
Kayla Jacobson
Something important that hasn't been mentioned: if you're still working while collecting before FRA, you're subject to the earnings test. For 2025, if you earn over $21,240, SSA withholds $1 in benefits for every $2 earned above that limit. If you're planning to work until 65 anyway, this could be a strong argument for waiting, since you might see significant benefit reductions if claiming at 62 while working. Also consider that your wife's spousal benefit (if applicable) would be based on your PIA (Primary Insurance Amount), not your reduced benefit. However, survivor benefits ARE affected by when you claim, so waiting would provide her with higher survivor benefits if she outlives you. Lastly, regarding your specific benefit amounts: The increase from $1,750 to $2,260 represents approximately a 29% increase for waiting those 3 years, which is significant. It affects not just your lifetime income but potentially your wife's as well.
0 coins
Mason Kaczka
•The earnings test is definitely a concern since I plan to work part-time making about $30,000/year. It sounds like I would lose quite a bit of my benefit if I claimed at 62 while still earning that much. I think I'm leaning toward waiting until at least 65 now based on all this feedback. The combination of avoiding the earnings test penalty, getting a higher monthly amount for life, and potentially providing my wife with a higher survivor benefit makes a compelling case.
0 coins
Evelyn Xu
but what about medicare??? doesnt it start at 65? does that effect when u should file for ss?
0 coins
Dominic Green
•Good question! Medicare eligibility begins at 65 regardless of when you start Social Security benefits. You don't have to file for both at the same time. However, if you're already receiving Social Security benefits when you turn 65, you'll be automatically enrolled in Medicare Parts A and B. If you're not receiving SS benefits, you'll need to proactively sign up during your Initial Enrollment Period (which begins 3 months before your 65th birthday). So Medicare timing shouldn't dictate your Social Security claiming strategy, but it's an important milestone to plan for separately.
0 coins
Mason Kaczka
Thank you everyone for all this helpful information! I think I've decided to wait until at least 65 to claim benefits, for several reasons: 1. The earnings test would reduce my benefits significantly if I claim at 62 while still working part-time 2. The 29% higher monthly amount ($510 more per month) will add up substantially over time 3. The survivor benefit consideration for my wife is important - I want to make sure she's well taken care of 4. My family history suggests longevity, so the break-even point of 75-76 likely makes waiting worthwhile I'm going to try to speak with SSA directly to get personalized calculations before making the final decision. Thanks again for all your insights!
0 coins