Social Security spousal benefits reduced if lower-earning spouse claimed at 62?
My wife and I are trying to maximize our Social Security benefits and I'm confused about how early claiming affects spousal benefits. My wife turns 62 next month and is considering claiming her own retirement benefits now (about $1,250/month) since she's no longer working. I'm 60 and plan to wait until 67 (my FRA) to claim my benefits, which should be around $3,100/month. Here's what's confusing me: If my wife claims her own benefit early at 62, when I claim at 67, can she switch to a spousal benefit that would be 50% of my benefit? Or will her spousal benefit be permanently reduced because she claimed her own benefit early? I've heard conflicting information about this "split strategy" approach. Some friends said she'll be stuck with the reduction, others say she can get the full 50% spousal amount when I file. Does anyone know definitively how this works? We're trying to plan our retirement income for the next 5-7 years. Thanks!
23 comments
Savanna Franklin
This is a common point of confusion. When your wife claims her own benefit early at 62, she'll receive a permanently reduced amount (about 70% of her full retirement age benefit). Later, when you claim at 67, she becomes eligible for spousal benefits, BUT her spousal benefit will ALSO be reduced because she claimed early. The way SSA calculates it: She'll receive her own reduced benefit plus an additional amount that brings her total up to the reduced spousal rate (not the full 50%). This reduction happens because she filed before her FRA. So yes, claiming early has a permanent effect on both her own benefit AND her eventual spousal benefit. The only way to get the full 50% spousal benefit is to wait until her own FRA to claim anything.
0 coins
Sergio Neal
•That's disappointing but makes sense. So she'd essentially be losing money permanently by taking early benefits. Do you know approximately how much the spousal benefit would be reduced? Would it be around 35% of my benefit instead of 50%?
0 coins
Juan Moreno
my sister did this exact thing and regrets it so much!!! she took her ss at 62 and her total benefit after her husband filed is way less than half of his. the ssa rep told her she could never get the full amount because she filed early. wish she'd waited those extra few years!!
0 coins
Amy Fleming
•Same with my aunt, she lost out on thousands every year because nobody explained how it worked. SSA doesn't exactly go out of their way to make this clear either. Their website mentions it but it's buried in technical language most people don't understand.
0 coins
Alice Pierce
To give you a more precise explanation: When your wife files at 62, her own benefit will be reduced by approximately 30%. When you file at 67, her spousal benefit will be calculated at her FRA spousal rate (50% of your PIA) MINUS her FRA primary insurance amount. That difference is then reduced because she filed early. This results in her getting her own reduced benefit plus a reduced differential amount, which totals less than 50% of your benefit. Example with simplified numbers: - Your PIA/FRA benefit: $3,100 - Her PIA (at her FRA): $1,800 - Her reduced age 62 benefit: $1,260 (70% of $1,800) - Full spousal benefit would be: $1,550 (50% of your $3,100) - Differential at FRA would be: $1,550 - $1,800 = $0 (since her own benefit exceeds half of yours) In this case, she wouldn't receive any spousal benefit. But if her PIA were lower, she would receive a reduced differential amount. The exact calculation is complex, but claiming early permanently affects ALL her benefits.
0 coins
Sergio Neal
•Thank you for breaking it down with numbers. I think I was overestimating her PIA. Her statement shows closer to $1,800 at her FRA, so her reduced benefit at 62 would be about $1,260. Since my PIA is $3,100, half would be $1,550. So there would be a small spousal boost of about $290 after I file, right? ($1,550 - $1,260
0 coins
Alice Pierce
No, that's not quite right. The calculation isn't as straightforward as taking the difference between her reduced benefit and half of yours. The way SSA actually calculates it: 1. They take her PIA (unreduced benefit at FRA): $1,800 2. They calculate the spousal add-on at FRA: $1,550 (50% of your PIA) - $1,800 (her PIA) = $0 (in this case) 3. Since that difference is $0, there is no spousal add-on. Basically, if her PIA is more than half of your PIA, she won't receive any spousal benefit, regardless of when she files. The calculation compares PIAs (full retirement age amounts) before any reductions. If her PIA were $1,500 instead, then she would get a small spousal boost, but that boost would also be reduced because she filed early.
0 coins
Esteban Tate
•Wait I'm confused now. I thought the calculation always looks at the actual received benefit not the PIA? My wife gets spousal benefits and they definitely looked at what she was actually receiving not what she would have gotten at FRA.
0 coins
Ivanna St. Pierre
I've been dealing with this exact situation! It's incredibly frustrating how complex they make these rules. I spent HOURS trying to reach someone at Social Security to explain this to me. After being disconnected four times and waiting on hold for nearly 2 hours, I finally got through to someone who could explain it. If you're having trouble reaching SSA, try using Claimyr (claimyr.com). It saved me hours of frustration - they connect you directly to an SSA agent without the wait. There's a video showing how it works: https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU As for your actual question - the rule is exactly as others described. If your wife claims at 62, BOTH her own benefit AND any future spousal benefit will be permanently reduced. The spousal boost (if she's eligible for one) is reduced based on how early she filed for her own benefits.
0 coins
Sergio Neal
•Thanks for the tip about Claimyr. I've been trying to call SSA for days with no luck. I'll check that out because I think we need to speak directly with SSA to get figures specific to our situation before making any decisions.
0 coins
Elin Robinson
i think everyone is making this more complicated than it needs to be! bottom line: if your wife takes ANY benefits before FRA she gets penalized FOREVER. thats the rule. no way around it. tell her to wait if she can afford to. the longer she waits the more she gets simple as that.
0 coins
Juan Moreno
•This is basically the simple truth! My husband and I did ALL the calculations and the best strategy is almost always for both people to wait if they can afford it. We overthought it for months and ended up with the same conclusion.
0 coins
Amy Fleming
The SSA rules are deliberately complicated to confuse people and save the government money!!! They WANT people to file early because it costs them less in the long run. I made this mistake and I'm getting $570 less EVERY MONTH for the rest of my life because I didn't understand the rules. That's almost $7000 a year they're keeping from me!!! If your wife can wait until her FRA, TELL HER TO WAIT. The system is designed to punish early filers in ways they don't explain clearly until it's too late.
0 coins
Esteban Tate
•I'm not sure it's a conspiracy, but I agree the rules are needlessly complex. My financial advisor said they're actually actuarially fair - meaning you get roughly the same lifetime benefits whether you claim early or late, assuming average lifespan. But if you expect to live longer than average, waiting is usually better.
0 coins
Savanna Franklin
To clarify what seems to be confusing some commenters - there are two separate calculations the SSA performs: 1. First, they determine if your spouse is eligible for a spousal benefit by comparing her PIA (full retirement age amount) to 50% of your PIA. If her PIA is already more than half of yours, she gets no spousal benefit regardless of when she files. 2. If she IS eligible for spousal benefits (her PIA is less than half of yours), then the early filing reduction applies to the spousal portion. So in your case, if her PIA is $1,800 and yours is $3,100, then half of yours is $1,550. Since her PIA ($1,800) exceeds half of yours ($1,550), she won't receive any spousal benefits regardless of when she files. However, if her PIA were only $1,400, then she would be eligible for some spousal benefits, but those would be reduced if she claimed any benefits before her FRA.
0 coins
Sergio Neal
•Thank you for this clear explanation. I need to double-check her statement because I might have misremembered her PIA amount. If it's lower than I thought, this calculation becomes really important.
0 coins
Esteban Tate
I'm going through similar planning with my wife. What complicates this more is that the reduction for claiming early isn't linear - it's more severe for the first 36 months before FRA and then less severe for months beyond that. Also remember that while the financial calculation is important, there are other factors to consider. If your wife isn't working and needs income now, taking reduced benefits might make sense despite the permanent reduction. Or if either of you has health concerns that might affect longevity, that could change the calculation. Sometimes people focus so much on maximizing the monthly amount that they forget to consider their unique circumstances and when they actually need the money.
0 coins
Sergio Neal
•That's a good point about our specific circumstances. My wife isn't working now and we're using savings to bridge the gap. We're both in good health with long-lived parents, so longevity is definitely a consideration for us. I think we'll need to weigh the immediate need against the long-term reduction.
0 coins
Juan Moreno
has anyone mentioned that the spousal benefit can never exceed 50% of the higher earner's benefit at their FRA? like even if the higher earner delays to 70 the spousal benefit is still based on their FRA amount not the increased amount. just another confusing detail i learned recently
0 coins
Savanna Franklin
•That's correct. Spousal benefits are always based on the worker's PIA (the amount at full retirement age), not including any delayed retirement credits. So even if the higher earner waits until 70 and gets a 32% increase, the spousal benefit is still calculated on the pre-increase amount.
0 coins
Atticus Domingo
my situation was kinda like yours but reversed because i was the higher earner and my husband was deciding when to claim. we actually found it worked best for him to claim at 62 and me to wait till 70. we ran the numbers a million ways and that gave us the most money over our expected lifetimes. so dont just assume waiting is always better you have to look at your specific situation
0 coins
Sergio Neal
•That's interesting! Can I ask what made that strategy work better in your situation? Were there specific factors that made claiming early better for one of you?
0 coins
Atticus Domingo
well my benefit was much higher (similar to your situation) and we needed some income but not all of it right away. so by having him claim early we got some money coming in while letting my larger benefit grow till 70. since my benefit would be the survivor benefit if i die first it made sense to maximize that one. his early filing reduction didn't matter as much in the big picture since his benefit wasnt that big anyway and he didn't qualify for much spousal benefit because of the PIA comparison thing others explained.
0 coins