Social Security timing question - do S-Corp distributions count as earned income for retirement benefits?
Just turned 67 and trying to figure out the best time to claim my Social Security retirement benefits. My husband is 64 and still working full-time. I'm a 30% owner in an S-Corporation and take quarterly owner distributions, but don't receive a regular salary anymore since stepping back from day-to-day operations last year. My big question is: Do these S-Corp distributions count as 'earned income' for Social Security purposes? I'm trying to figure out if the earnings test would apply if I claim now, or if I should wait until my Full Retirement Age. Also wondering if there's any benefit to waiting until 70? My monthly benefit would be about $2,850 at FRA and around $3,550 if I wait until 70. My husband's benefit at his FRA would be lower than mine (about $2,100). Any advice on maximizing our combined benefits would be really appreciated!
34 comments


Wesley Hallow
S-corp distributions are NOT earned income for Social Security purposes! Only actual wages reported on W-2 are counted for the earnings test. Distributions are considered a return on investment, not earnings. So if you're not taking a salary and only getting distributions, you won't trigger the earnings test limit. As for waiting, the 8% per year increase from FRA to 70 is pretty substantial. Since you mentioned your benefit is higher than your husband's, it might make sense for you to delay to 70 if possible, especially if you have longevity in your family. That way, whoever lives longer gets the maximum benefit.
0 coins
Kennedy Morrison
•Thank you! That's exactly what I needed to know about the distributions. I wasn't sure if they counted the same as regular income since they do show up on my personal tax return. So I could essentially claim now and still receive distributions without any reduction, that's good news! Good point about the longevity factor - both my parents lived into their 90s, so maximizing that survivor benefit might be smart planning.
0 coins
Justin Chang
r u SURE about that?? my brother in law has an s-corp and SSA counted his distributions when they calculated his earnings test last year. he had to pay back some benefits!
0 coins
Wesley Hallow
•There's often confusion about this. Your brother-in-law may have been taking both a salary AND distributions. SSA only counts the salary portion (W-2 income). But many S-Corp owners don't realize they should maintain a "reasonable salary" if they're actively working, and IRS might reclassify some distributions as wages if the salary is artificially low. That might explain what happened.
0 coins
Grace Thomas
I went through almost exactly this situation! The previous answers are mostly right - S-Corp distributions themselves aren't earned income for the earnings test. HOWEVER, the IRS and SSA look closely at S-Corps where owners work but take minimal/no salary while taking large distributions. They can reclassify those distributions as wages if they think you're trying to avoid payroll taxes. If you're truly not working in the business anymore, it's fine to just take distributions. But if you're still involved in operations and taking no salary, that could be problematic. For the claiming strategy - with your numbers, I'd suggest you wait until 70 and have your husband claim at his FRA. That way you maximize your benefit (which becomes the survivor benefit if you pass first) while still getting some income from his benefit sooner.
0 coins
Kennedy Morrison
•That's very helpful context. I do occasionally consult on major decisions (maybe 5-10 hours a month), but I'm not involved in daily operations. Should I be taking some small salary to avoid problems? I really appreciate the claiming strategy advice too.
0 coins
Grace Thomas
•Even for 5-10 hours monthly, I'd recommend a small but reasonable salary that reflects market rates for that limited work. Better safe than sorry when it comes to IRS scrutiny! A tax professional who specializes in S-Corps could give you specific guidance based on your exact situation.
0 coins
Hunter Brighton
The previous replies cover the S-Corp question well, but I want to add something about maximizing your combined benefits. Since your benefit is substantially higher, another strategy to consider: 1. Your husband could file for his benefits at 64 (now) 2. You could file a restricted application for SPOUSAL benefits only (available to people born before Jan 2, 1954) 3. This lets you collect 50% of his FRA benefit while letting YOUR retirement benefit grow until 70 4. At 70, switch to your maximum benefit This works ONLY if you were born before that 1954 cutoff date. If so, it's free money while you wait to maximize your own benefit.
0 coins
Kennedy Morrison
•Unfortunately I was born in 1958, so I don't think that strategy works for me. But thanks for mentioning it - maybe it will help someone else reading this thread!
0 coins
Dylan Baskin
My brother tried to claim SS while taking s-corp distributions and it was a NIGHTMARE!!! They kept sending confusing letters and every time he called SS he got different answers and waited on hold for HOURS. Some agents said distributions count, others said they don't. Took him 8 months to straighten out!!! The whole system is designed to confuse older people I swear
0 coins
Lauren Wood
•Been there with the endless hold times! I finally used a service called Claimyr when I needed to talk to SSA about my retirement application. They hold your place in line and call you when an agent is available. Saved me hours of frustration. You can see how it works at https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU - they have a demo video on their website claimyr.com. Totally worth it for complicated situations like S-Corp questions where you need to talk to an actual person.
0 coins
Kennedy Morrison
•I hadn't heard of that service before! I'll check it out because I've already tried calling SSA twice about this and got disconnected both times after waiting 45+ minutes. Thanks for the tip.
0 coins
Ellie Lopez
Just want to clarify something that others have hinted at but not directly stated: the SSA and IRS don't always see eye-to-eye on S-Corp distributions. IRS is primarily concerned with proper tax collection. SSA is looking at what constitutes earnings for benefit calculations. In practical terms, this means that while distributions aren't counted as earnings for the Social Security earnings test, there's a separate issue of whether your compensation structure is reasonable. If you're not truly retired from the business, the IRS could challenge your lack of salary. It gets complicated fast!
0 coins
Kennedy Morrison
I really appreciate everyone's insights here! After reading all your responses, I'm leaning toward claiming at 70 to maximize my benefit. I'll also talk to my accountant about setting up a small salary for the limited consulting work I still do for the S-Corp, just to be safe with the IRS. For anyone reading this later with a similar question - it seems the short answer is: S-Corp distributions do NOT count as earned income for the Social Security earnings test, but make sure your overall compensation structure is reasonable if you're still involved in the business at all.
0 coins
Klaus Schmidt
Great summary! One additional point to consider - since you're planning to wait until 70, make sure to apply for Medicare Part A and B when you turn 65 (even though you're not claiming Social Security yet). Many people don't realize that Medicare enrollment isn't automatic if you delay Social Security benefits, and missing the initial enrollment window can result in permanent late penalties. Also, if your S-Corp provides health insurance, you'll want to coordinate that transition carefully. The Medicare decision is separate from your Social Security timing strategy, but it's easy to overlook when you're focused on optimizing benefits.
0 coins
Emma Wilson
•Thank you for bringing up the Medicare point! I hadn't even thought about that aspect. So I need to enroll in Medicare at 65 regardless of when I claim Social Security? I assumed they were tied together. This is exactly the kind of detail that's easy to miss when you're focused on the benefit timing strategy. Do you know if there are any other deadlines or enrollment periods I should be aware of for someone in my situation?
0 coins
CosmicCruiser
•Yes, Medicare enrollment is completely separate from Social Security claiming! You have a 7-month Initial Enrollment Period that starts 3 months before you turn 65. If you miss it and don't have creditable coverage (like through an employer or spouse's plan), you'll face late enrollment penalties that last for life. There are a few other key deadlines to watch: Medicare Supplement (Medigap) policies have a 6-month open enrollment period starting when you first enroll in Medicare Part B - during this time you can't be denied coverage regardless of health conditions. Also, if you decide to enroll in Medicare Part D (prescription drug coverage) later, there are penalties there too unless you have creditable coverage. The good news is that if your S-Corp provides good health insurance, that typically counts as creditable coverage, so you might be able to delay Medicare Part B without penalties. But definitely check with Medicare or a benefits counselor as you approach 65 to make sure you understand all your options!
0 coins
Emma Thompson
This is such a helpful thread! I'm in a similar situation as an S-Corp owner approaching retirement. One thing I wanted to add that might be useful - if you do decide to take a small salary for your consulting work (which sounds like a smart move), make sure your accountant helps you document that the work you're doing justifies that salary amount. The IRS has been scrutinizing S-Corps more closely lately, especially when there's a big disparity between salary and distributions. Having clear documentation of your reduced role and the market rate for that level of consulting can protect you if they ever question your compensation structure. Also, since you mentioned your husband is still working full-time, don't forget that his continued earnings might affect his Social Security benefits calculation if he's earning more now than in previous years. The SSA uses your highest 35 years of earnings, so if he's having high-earning years now, it could actually boost his eventual benefit amount.
0 coins
Tyler Murphy
•This is really great advice about documenting the consulting work! I hadn't thought about the importance of having clear records that justify the salary amount. It sounds like creating a simple consulting agreement or work log that shows the specific tasks and hours would be smart. You make an excellent point about my husband's current earnings potentially boosting his benefit calculation too. He's actually in his peak earning years right now, so those wages are likely higher than what he was making 10-15 years ago. It's nice to know that could work in our favor for his eventual benefits. I'm learning there are so many interconnected pieces to consider when planning retirement timing with business ownership involved. Thanks for adding those practical tips!
0 coins
Mateo Gonzalez
This has been incredibly informative! As someone approaching 62 with a small S-Corp, I'm taking notes on all of this. One question I haven't seen addressed - if Kennedy does decide to take a small salary for her consulting work, would those wages count toward the earnings test if she claimed Social Security before her FRA? It sounds like she's planning to wait until 70 anyway, but I'm curious about this scenario since I might face a similar choice. If someone has minimal S-Corp wages (say $10-15k annually for light consulting) but significant distributions, would only that small salary amount be subject to the earnings test limits? Also, thank you to everyone who shared the Medicare enrollment reminders - that's definitely something I need to research more as I get closer to 65!
0 coins
NebulaNomad
•Great question, Mateo! Yes, if Kennedy (or you) took a small salary from S-Corp consulting work and claimed Social Security before FRA, only that salary amount would count toward the earnings test - not the distributions. So in your example of $10-15k in wages, that's well under the 2025 earnings test limit of $23,400, so it wouldn't trigger any benefit reductions. This is actually one advantage of the S-Corp structure for early retirees who want some Social Security income - you can take reasonable compensation for actual work performed while receiving distributions that don't count against the earnings limits. Just make sure that salary truly reflects the market value of the work being done! The Medicare research is definitely worth doing early. I learned the hard way that there are a lot more moving pieces than most people realize, especially when you have business ownership involved.
0 coins
Layla Mendes
This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm dealing with a similar situation as a 66-year-old S-Corp owner. One thing I wanted to add that might be useful for Kennedy and others - when I was researching this last year, I found that the SSA has a specific publication (SSA-05-10069) that addresses self-employment income and Social Security benefits. It specifically mentions that S-Corp distributions are treated differently from wages for earnings test purposes. Also, regarding the strategy discussion - Kennedy, you might want to run some break-even analysis on waiting until 70 vs claiming now. While the 8% annual increase is substantial, if you're in good health and could invest the earlier payments, the break-even point might be different than you expect. A fee-only financial planner who specializes in Social Security optimization could help you model different scenarios. One last tip from my experience - keep detailed records of your transition from active business owner to passive investor. If the IRS ever questions your compensation structure, having clear documentation of when and how your role changed will be invaluable.
0 coins
Ingrid Larsson
•This is exactly the kind of detailed guidance I was hoping to find! Thank you for mentioning that specific SSA publication - I'll definitely look that up. Having official documentation that clarifies the distinction between S-Corp distributions and wages for earnings test purposes will give me more confidence in my decision. The break-even analysis suggestion is really smart too. I've been focused on the guaranteed 8% increase, but you're right that there could be other factors to consider, especially since I'm in good health and could potentially invest earlier payments. A fee-only planner who specializes in Social Security optimization sounds like a worthwhile investment. Your point about documenting the transition from active to passive ownership is particularly valuable. I should probably create a formal record showing when I stepped back from daily operations and how my role shifted to occasional consulting only. Better to have that documentation ready than scramble to create it if questions come up later. Thanks again for sharing your research and experience - it's so helpful to hear from someone who has actually navigated this process!
0 coins
Axel Far
As a newcomer to this community, I'm amazed by the depth of knowledge shared here! I'm 63 and own a small consulting S-Corp, so this discussion is incredibly timely for me. One thing I haven't seen mentioned yet - if you're still contributing to a SEP-IRA or Solo 401(k) through your S-Corp, those contributions can also affect your tax planning around Social Security benefits. Since Social Security benefits can become taxable once your combined income reaches certain thresholds, the timing of retirement account contributions and distributions becomes another layer to consider alongside your claiming strategy. Kennedy, given your situation with distributions and the potential for a small consulting salary, you might want to model how different scenarios affect not just your Social Security benefits, but also the tax implications of those benefits once you start receiving them. Sometimes the "optimal" claiming strategy from a pure benefit maximization standpoint isn't the best when you factor in the total tax picture. Thanks to everyone for sharing such practical, real-world insights. This is exactly the kind of peer-to-peer knowledge sharing that makes these decisions less overwhelming!
0 coins
Fidel Carson
•Welcome to the community, Axel! You raise an excellent point about retirement account contributions that I hadn't considered. The tax implications of Social Security benefits definitely add another layer of complexity to the timing decision. I'm curious - for someone in Kennedy's position with S-Corp distributions, would those distributions affect the "combined income" calculation that determines whether Social Security benefits become taxable? I know wages and traditional retirement account distributions count, but I'm not sure about S-Corp distributions since they're treated differently for the earnings test. This whole discussion has really highlighted how interconnected all these retirement planning decisions are. Between the S-Corp compensation structure, Social Security timing, Medicare enrollment, and now the tax implications - it seems like getting professional help to model all the scenarios is probably the smart move rather than trying to optimize just one piece at a time. Thanks for bringing up that additional consideration!
0 coins
Geoff Richards
•Great question about S-Corp distributions and taxable Social Security! Yes, S-Corp distributions DO count toward your "combined income" for determining whether your Social Security benefits become taxable, even though they don't count for the earnings test. The IRS uses your Adjusted Gross Income plus half your Social Security benefits plus any tax-exempt interest to calculate this. So Kennedy would need to factor in her quarterly distributions when modeling the tax impact of different claiming strategies. If she's taking substantial distributions and then adds Social Security benefits on top, she could push herself into the range where 50% or even 85% of her Social Security becomes taxable. This is a perfect example of why the "optimal" Social Security timing strategy really needs to be evaluated holistically rather than in isolation. Sometimes claiming earlier and managing the total tax burden across all income sources can be better than maximizing the Social Security benefit alone. A tax professional who understands both S-Corp taxation and Social Security rules would be invaluable for running these scenarios!
0 coins
Evelyn Kelly
As someone who's been helping folks navigate Social Security and S-Corp issues for years, I wanted to add a few practical points to this excellent discussion: First, Kennedy, you mentioned taking quarterly distributions - make sure you're paying estimated taxes on these if you haven't already set that up. The IRS expects quarterly payments on S-Corp income, and underpayment penalties can add up. Second, regarding the "reasonable compensation" discussion - the IRS has safe harbor guidelines suggesting that if you're working less than 20 hours per week in the business, minimal or no salary might be acceptable. Your 5-10 hours monthly consulting sounds like it would fall well within this range, but documenting those hours is key. Finally, one strategy some of my clients have used successfully: if you do implement a small salary for your consulting work, consider timing it strategically. You could potentially take salary in years when you need to boost your Social Security earnings record, and rely more heavily on distributions in years when you want to minimize earned income. The combination of all the advice here - waiting until 70, taking a minimal but reasonable salary for actual work performed, and getting professional tax planning help - sounds like a solid approach for your situation.
0 coins
Zara Khan
•Welcome to the community! As someone new here, I'm really impressed by how thorough and helpful everyone's responses have been. Evelyn, your point about the 20-hour safe harbor guideline is particularly useful - I hadn't seen that specific threshold mentioned before. The strategic timing of salary vs distributions based on Social Security earnings record needs is really clever too. It sounds like there's a lot more flexibility in structuring S-Corp compensation than I initially realized, as long as you can document the reasoning and keep good records. I'm taking notes on all of this for my own situation. The combination of expertise from people who've actually been through this process, plus the professional insights, makes this thread incredibly valuable. Thank you everyone for sharing your knowledge so generously!
0 coins
AstroAdventurer
As someone new to this community, I want to thank everyone for such an incredibly thorough discussion! I'm 65 and in a somewhat similar situation as an S-Corp owner, though I'm still more actively involved in operations. One thing that struck me from reading all these responses is how critical the documentation aspect seems to be - whether it's documenting your reduced role in the business, keeping records of consulting hours, or maintaining evidence of reasonable compensation decisions. It sounds like having a clear paper trail is just as important as getting the tax and Social Security strategies right. Kennedy, your original question has generated such valuable insights that go way beyond just the S-Corp distribution issue. The Medicare enrollment reminders, the tax implications of combined income, the break-even analysis suggestions - this thread is like a masterclass in retirement planning for business owners! I'm curious if anyone has experience with how SSA handles the transition period when you're stepping back from active business involvement? Is there a formal way to notify them of your changing role, or do they only look at this if questions arise later during an audit or review? Thanks again to everyone who contributed their knowledge and experience here. This is exactly the kind of peer support that makes complex decisions feel more manageable!
0 coins
Lucas Notre-Dame
•Welcome to the community! You're absolutely right about the documentation being crucial - I've learned so much from this thread about keeping proper records. From my experience, there isn't a formal process to notify SSA about changing your business role. They typically only review your work status if there's a question about benefits or during an audit. However, I'd recommend keeping a simple timeline document showing when you stepped back from active management, along with any board resolutions or business agreements that formalize the change in responsibilities. If you're reducing your ownership percentage or changing your title, those corporate documents become especially important. One thing I learned the hard way - even if SSA doesn't require formal notification, your business insurance and liability coverage might be affected by changes in your active involvement. It's worth reviewing those policies when you transition to a more passive role. Thanks for highlighting how comprehensive this discussion has become! It really shows how interconnected all these retirement planning pieces are for business owners.
0 coins
Isabel Vega
As a newcomer to this community, I'm incredibly grateful for this comprehensive discussion! I'm 62 and own a small S-Corp, so Kennedy's question has provided a wealth of information that's directly applicable to my situation. What really stands out to me is how this thread has evolved from a simple question about S-Corp distributions and Social Security into a complete roadmap for business owners approaching retirement. The key takeaways I'm noting are: 1. S-Corp distributions don't count as earned income for Social Security earnings test purposes 2. But they DO count toward combined income for determining if SS benefits become taxable 3. Documentation of your changing business role is critical for both IRS and future reference 4. Medicare enrollment is separate from Social Security claiming and has its own deadlines 5. The interaction between all these factors makes professional guidance valuable Kennedy, your situation has generated such practical, actionable advice. I'm particularly appreciative of the specific publication references, the 20-hour safe harbor guideline, and the reminder about estimated tax payments on S-Corp distributions. For others in similar situations reading this later - this thread demonstrates why it's worth seeking out communities like this where people share real-world experience alongside professional insights. The combination of personal experiences and technical knowledge has made a complex topic much more approachable. Thank you to everyone who contributed their expertise and time to help not just Kennedy, but all of us navigating similar decisions!
0 coins
Chloe Harris
•Welcome to the community, Isabel! You've done an excellent job summarizing the key points from this discussion. As someone new here myself, I'm amazed at how much practical knowledge has been shared. One additional point I'd add to your summary - the importance of timing these decisions strategically. What I've learned from everyone's contributions is that it's not just about getting each piece right individually, but about coordinating the timing of S-Corp compensation changes, Social Security claiming, Medicare enrollment, and tax planning to work together optimally. Kennedy's situation really highlights how business ownership adds layers of complexity that employed individuals don't face. The fact that she can potentially claim Social Security without the earnings test applying (due to distributions not counting) while still maintaining some business involvement through minimal consulting salary is a unique advantage of the S-Corp structure. I'm also taking note of the recommendation to work with professionals who understand both sides - the Social Security rules AND the business tax implications. It seems like finding advisors with that combined expertise is crucial for getting the strategy right. Thanks for highlighting how valuable this peer-to-peer knowledge sharing is. This thread will definitely be a reference I come back to as I plan my own transition!
0 coins
Tyrone Hill
As a newcomer to this community, I'm blown away by the depth and quality of advice shared here! This thread has become an incredible resource that goes far beyond Kennedy's original question about S-Corp distributions. What I find most valuable is how everyone has emphasized the interconnected nature of these decisions. It's not just about Social Security timing or just about S-Corp tax strategy - it's about how all these pieces work together. The reminder about Medicare enrollment deadlines, the tax implications of combined income, and the importance of proper documentation are all critical considerations I wouldn't have thought of initially. Kennedy, your situation perfectly illustrates why business owners face such unique retirement planning challenges compared to traditional employees. The flexibility of S-Corp structures can be advantageous (like avoiding the earnings test with distributions) but also requires careful navigation to stay compliant with both IRS and SSA rules. For anyone else reading this thread, I'd echo the recommendation to work with professionals who understand both the tax and Social Security sides of these decisions. The complexity level definitely warrants expert guidance, especially when you're dealing with business ownership transitions. Thank you to everyone who shared their knowledge and experiences - this is exactly the kind of community support that makes complex financial decisions feel more manageable!
0 coins
Fatima Al-Qasimi
•Welcome to the community, Tyrone! I'm also new here and completely agree about the quality of advice in this thread. What's struck me most is how everyone has been so generous with sharing not just theoretical knowledge, but actual real-world experiences and practical tips. As someone just starting to think about these issues, I'm realizing that business ownership really does create a whole different set of retirement planning considerations. The interplay between S-Corp structures, Social Security rules, Medicare timing, and tax implications is far more complex than I initially understood. Kennedy's question has essentially created a comprehensive guide for S-Corp owners approaching retirement. I'm bookmarking this entire discussion as a reference for when I need to make similar decisions in a few years. One thing that really stands out is how important it is to plan ahead and understand all these moving pieces well before you need to make the actual decisions. The Medicare enrollment deadlines alone could catch someone off guard if they're solely focused on Social Security timing. Thank you to Kennedy for asking such a great question, and to everyone else for creating such a valuable resource through your detailed responses!
0 coins