
Ask the community...
This is completely normal. Your own benefit is called your Primary Insurance Amount (PIA). The spousal benefit is a supplement that ensures you get the higher of: your own benefit OR up to 50% of your spouse's PIA (reduced for early claiming). The adjustment happens automatically when your own benefit changes. Nothing to worry about!
Based on your situation, here's what likely happened: 1. When you initially filed, you received your reduced retirement benefit plus a spousal add-on to reach your total entitled amount 2. Those 6 years of part-time work were recently added to your earnings record during an automatic recomputation 3. This increased your own benefit amount based on those additional earnings 4. Since your total entitlement remained the same, the spousal portion decreased accordingly This is working correctly. The formula ensures you receive the correct total amount you're entitled to, regardless of how it's divided between your own benefit and the spousal supplement.
FRA stands for Full Retirement Age - it's when you're eligible for 100% of your Social Security retirement benefit. It varies based on birth year: - If born 1943-1954: FRA is 66 - If born 1955: FRA is 66 and 2 months - If born 1956: FRA is 66 and 4 months - If born 1957: FRA is 66 and 6 months - If born 1958: FRA is 66 and 8 months - If born 1959: FRA is 66 and 10 months - If born 1960 or later: FRA is 67 Based on the original poster considering filing at 63 next year, her FRA is likely 67.
Just sharing my experience - I'm getting survivor benefits now at age 66 (my FRA) after taking my own reduced benefits at 62. When my husband passed last year, SSA automatically gave me the higher amount (his benefit). I didn't have to do anything special because they already had his death certificate from the funeral home. Maybe it varies by state though.
I'm glad it worked smoothly for you, but your situation is definitely not the norm. In most cases, survivor benefits are NOT automatically awarded and require a separate application. The funeral home filing the death certificate with SSA only initiates the process of stopping the deceased's benefits and paying the one-time $255 death benefit. Everyone should be proactive about applying for survivor benefits rather than assuming SSA will handle it automatically.
i forgot to say make sure u keep ALL paperwork they send u. my sister threw away what looked like junk mail but was actually important SS stuff & it was a huge mess to fix
One final consideration: Double-check when your FRA actually is for survivor benefits. For retirement benefits, FRA for someone born in 1962 is 67. But for survivor benefits, the FRA can be different - it could be 66 and 10 months. This small difference matters for planning purposes if you want to completely avoid the earnings test.
Another question - how will they calculate the survivor benefit amount? Will it be based on what it would have been when the person first became eligible, or will it be based on what they would receive if applying now? There could be COLAs and other adjustments that would make a difference!
Great question about the calculation. Based on standard SSA procedures, the benefit amount would likely be calculated as if you were newly eligible in January 2024, which would include all the COLAs that have occurred since the spouse passed away. So for someone whose spouse died in 2019, the initial benefit would be based on the deceased's earnings record and applicable calculation methods, and then all COLAs from 2019 through 2024 would be applied to determine the current benefit amount. This is actually advantageous for most people, as it means the benefit will reflect inflation adjustments.
I just want to thank everyone for their thoughtful responses. This is exactly the kind of discussion I was hoping for. I'm going to help my mother prepare all her documentation so we're ready to file as soon as the law is signed, and I'll specifically request retroactive benefits to January 2024 with a clear explanation about why she never filed before. If anyone gets actual information from SSA about this specific situation once the law is signed, please come back and update this thread. I'll do the same if we learn anything concrete during our application process.
My cousin had name change issues with SS and it was a NIGHTMARE to fix. Took like 6 months to sort out!
Name change issues usually only become complicated if there's a discrepancy between SSA records and current identification, or if the person can't provide documentation. Most routine name changes (marriage, divorce, legal name changes with documentation) are processed without major issues. If your cousin's situation took 6 months, there were likely complicating factors or missing documentation involved. For the original poster, since the name change happened during childhood and was apparently handled properly at that time (with SSA records updated), there's usually no need to provide additional documentation unless specifically requested.
Don't stress too much about the withholding form - it's pretty straightforward. For your husband, I'd suggest waiting until he gets his approval letter with his claim number before submitting his W-4V. That way everything will match up in their system. Has your husband checked his my Social Security account online to see the status of his application? Sometimes you can see if they need additional documents there.
I had something similar happen with my disability benefits. I got through to SSA by calling my local office directly instead of the main number. Google "social security office [your city]" and you might find a direct number. Worked for me!
Just wanted to update on my earlier comment - I remembered something else that might help you. When I finally got through to SSA about my wrong account number, they told me I could go to my bank and see if they could help. My bank actually called SSA on a special line they have and helped resolve it in about a week. Might be worth asking your bank if they can help!
my sister went thru this last yr. don't forget hes still eligible for the lump sum death benefit when u pass away even with GPO. not much but its something.
True about death benefit but it's only $255 - barely covers flowers at the funeral these days! The whole system needs fixing. Law enforcement and teachers get completely screwed by WEP and GPO even after working their whole lives. My neighbor taught for 30 years AND worked summers paying into SS and still lost thousands in benefits!
One final point that might help others in similar situations: If your husband had enough Social Security-covered employment (40 quarters/10 years), he would be exempt from the WEP (Windfall Elimination Provision) that could otherwise reduce his own benefit. But GPO still applies to spousal benefits regardless of quarters of coverage. The distinction between WEP (affects your own benefit) and GPO (affects spousal/survivor benefits) confuses many people. And unfortunately, there's been legislation proposed to reform these provisions for years but nothing has passed yet.
That's a great point about the WEP vs. GPO distinction. And to clarify further for the original poster: even though your husband might not qualify for additional spousal benefits now, he may still be eligible for survivor benefits if you pass away before him. Survivor benefits can be up to 100% of your benefit (rather than the 50% for spousal), so even after the GPO reduction, he might receive some survivor benefits. This is something to consider for long-term financial planning.
THIS IS WHY IM WAITING TILL 70 TO CLAIM!!! All these complicated rules and reductions! The system is designed to confuse us and give us less money!!!
Waiting until 70 makes sense for some people, but not everyone. It's not a conspiracy - the reductions for early claiming are actually based on actuarial calculations to make the total lifetime payout roughly equivalent regardless of when you claim (assuming average life expectancy). For people with health issues or who need the income sooner, claiming early can be the right choice.
Thank you everyone for all the helpful responses! I feel much better knowing my husband's income won't affect my benefits. I'm a bit disappointed about the spousal benefit reduction, but it makes sense. I'll definitely try to get an exact calculation from SSA about what my top-up might be when my husband reaches FRA. Thanks again!
One more thing to consider - if you're taking care of any children or dependents with disabilities that your late husband was supporting (even if not biological children), there might be benefits available to them. Also, while the 9-month marriage rule is generally strict, there are occasionally unique circumstances where SSA can make exceptions. For anyone dealing with a similar situation, it's worth filing an application even if you think you'll be denied, because: 1. The application establishes your protective filing date 2. You get a formal, appealable decision 3. Sometimes unusual circumstances do result in exceptions In your specific case, since you mentioned you're 58 now, the most viable path would likely be examining benefits based on your 10+ year first marriage when you reach age 62, while comparing that amount to what you'd receive on your own record.
Thank you for the additional information. We didn't have any children or dependents together, so that won't help in my case. I think I will go ahead and file an application anyway, just to get the formal decision. And then I'll definitely look into the ex-spouse benefits when I turn 62. I worked part-time for many years while caregiving, so my own benefit might not be very high.
wait i'm confused...if you were with him for 16 years why did you only get married 6 months before he died? not judging just wondering if there was a reason because that timing seems important
We always planned to get married eventually, but there was never a rush since we were committed to each other. When he got his cancer diagnosis and it was terminal, we decided to make it official. We didn't realize the Social Security rules at the time or that the 9-month requirement would matter. By the time we learned about it, his health was declining rapidly and we knew we wouldn't make it to 9 months. It's heartbreaking that decades of commitment means nothing compared to a few months on paper.
Rajiv Kumar
my sister inlaw kept working after she started ss and they took back 7 months of payments from her the next year. be careful!
0 coins
ApolloJackson
One more important thing to understand: if they do withhold some of your benefits because you exceed the earnings limit, it's not lost forever. They'll recalculate and increase your monthly benefit when you reach your Full Retirement Age to account for the months they withheld benefits. And remember, the earnings limit only applies to wages or self-employment income. It doesn't apply to investment income, pension payments, or other non-work income. Good luck with your seasonal work pattern - sounds like you've got a good handle on it now!
0 coins
Grace Patel
•That's really good to know about the recalculation at FRA! Takes some of the pressure off. Thanks again everyone for the help - feel much better about my work situation now.
0 coins