Social Security Administration
CommunityGovernment Services


Ask the community...
I'm really struggling to wrap my head around this whole 'break-even age' concept with Social Security benefits. My FRA is 67, but I'm eligible to start collecting at 62 (with reduced benefits of course). I've read dozens of articles that talk about this break-even point, but honestly, I still don't fully understand how to calculate it for MY situation. If I take benefits at 62, I'll get about $1,870 monthly versus waiting until 67 for around $2,680. When would I actually come out ahead by waiting? Is there a simple formula I'm missing? Everyone keeps saying 'it depends on how long you live' but I need something more concrete to make this decision. My financial advisor just tells me to wait without really explaining why.
I'm trying to figure out if I'm getting the right amount for my spousal benefit. My husband waited until 70 to file for his SS retirement and now gets about $5,300 monthly (he had high earnings throughout his career). I started collecting at 62 based on his record since I didn't have enough work credits on my own. I'm currently receiving $1,200 per month. My full retirement age is 66 and 4 months, but I'm 5 years younger than my husband who's already 71. When I calculated what I thought I should get, it seemed like I should be receiving more, even with the reduction for claiming early. Isn't the spousal benefit supposed to be 50% of his benefit at his FRA (not his age 70 amount)? If his FRA benefit was around $3,900 before his delayed credits, shouldn't I be getting closer to $1,950 minus the early claiming reduction? I'm so confused about how they calculated my benefit. The SSA explanation letter wasn't clear at all. Has anyone else dealt with this kind of spousal benefit calculation? Did I miss something important here?
I called SSA this morning and finally got through after trying for days! The agent explained that my benefit is actually a combination of my own small retirement benefit plus a spousal supplement that brings the total to $1,200. The math works out exactly as you all explained! She said my own benefit at 62 was calculated at $320 (reduced from my PIA of about $500), and then they added a reduced spousal supplement of $880 to reach $1,200 total. The full spousal benefit would have been around $1,950 if I'd waited until my FRA. I'm kicking myself a bit for not waiting, but at the time we really needed the income. At least now I understand how they calculated it. Thank you all so much for your help!
Glad you got it figured out! Don't beat yourself up about claiming early - sometimes the immediate need for income outweighs the long-term increase. Plus, you'd need to live quite a few years past your FRA to break even on the money you're collecting now. Financial decisions aren't just about math but about what works for your particular situation at a specific time.
Has anyone noticed that the SSA calculators online are TERRIBLE at explaining spousal benefits? They focus almost entirely on retirement benefits based on your own record. Their website barely mentions that spousal benefits don't increase past FRA! I spent HOURS researching this when helping my mother with her benefits. The most important details are buried in footnotes or completely missing!
So true. The Social Security Handbook is over 700 pages long with thousands of rules. Even many SSA employees don't understand all the nuances around spousal benefits, especially after the law changes in 2015 that eliminated some filing strategies. Always good to double-check your benefit calculations and ask specifically for a breakdown of how they arrived at your amount.
Absolutely agree! I'm new to navigating all this Social Security stuff and the online resources are so confusing. I've been trying to understand spousal benefits for my own situation and this whole thread has been more helpful than anything I found on the official SSA website. It's frustrating that such important financial decisions rely on information that's so hard to find and understand. Thank you all for sharing your experiences - it really helps newcomers like me!
Getting nervous as retirement approaches next year. I've worked for our state highway department for the past 15 years, but before that I put in 32 years at various private companies where I paid into Social Security. I've heard horror stories about something called the Windfall Elimination Provision that can slash your Social Security check if you get a government pension. But I thought there was some kind of protection if you had 30+ years of "substantial earnings" under Social Security? My financial advisor mentioned something about this but wasn't sure how it works. Will my state pension actually reduce my Social Security benefit even though I have well over 30 years of SS contributions? I'm trying to finalize my retirement budget and this uncertainty is making it impossible to plan!
I want to thank everyone for their incredibly helpful responses! I've learned so much about WEP and now understand I need to confirm exactly how many years of "substantial earnings" I have according to SSA's specific thresholds. I'm going to try contacting SSA to get my full earnings record and request written confirmation about my WEP status. It sounds like with my 32 years in the private sector, I'm likely exempt from WEP reductions as long as my earnings met the thresholds for at least 30 of those years. I'll also look into whether my state highway department might have a Section 218 Agreement, though I'm pretty sure we don't pay into Social Security there. Thanks again for clarifying this confusing topic - I feel much better prepared to finalize my retirement plans now!
Great summary Aisha! One additional tip - when you get your earnings record from SSA, you can actually request what's called a "WEP factsheet" that will show you exactly which years count toward your substantial earnings and what your projected benefit would be with and without WEP. This document is super helpful for retirement planning since it eliminates the guesswork. Also, if you find you're just short of the 30 years needed for full exemption, remember that you might still qualify for a reduced WEP penalty rather than the full reduction. The penalty decreases as you get closer to 30 years of substantial earnings. Good luck with your retirement planning!
I lost my husband unexpectedly in 2022 when I was 37, and my son (now 8) and I have been receiving survivor benefits since then. Each month, one payment comes under my name and one under my son's name. Here's where I'm confused - I remarried back in January, and the SSA rep who processed my name change said both our benefits would continue. But when I mentioned this to my sister, she said that's wrong and MY benefits should have stopped immediately after remarriage, though my son's would continue. I've called the SSA four different times trying to get a straight answer, and I swear I get different information every time! One rep told me I'd get an official letter when my benefits would terminate, but it's been 4 months and nothing has arrived. I'm honestly scared to spend any of the money that's coming in under my name because I'm worried they'll suddenly realize their mistake and demand thousands back. The payments total about $2,900 monthly between us, and I've been setting aside my portion (about $1,450) in a separate savings account just in case I have to return it. Has anyone dealt with this remarriage situation with survivor benefits? What's the actual rule here? I'm so frustrated with the inconsistent answers!
Am I the only one wondering why she's been getting benefits at all? You have to be retirement age to get social security, right? I'm confused.
Social Security provides several different types of benefits. Retirement benefits are just one type. Survivor benefits are paid to widows/widowers and dependent children when an insured worker dies, regardless of the survivor's age. These benefits are based on the deceased person's work record and what they would have received in retirement benefits. Children can receive survivor benefits until age 18 (or 19 if still in high school), and a surviving spouse caring for their children under 16 can also receive benefits. There are also disabled adult child benefits and several other specialized situations.
I'm really sorry you're going through this confusing situation. As others have mentioned, your sister was correct - survivor benefits for a surviving spouse do stop when you remarry before age 60. The good news is that you've been incredibly responsible by saving those payments! One additional tip: when you visit the SSA office, bring documentation of EVERYTHING. Your marriage certificate, records of when you reported the name change, and if possible, try to remember the name or employee number of the person who told you the benefits would continue. This documentation could be crucial if you decide to pursue the overpayment waiver that Marina mentioned. Also, don't feel bad about this mistake - the SSA's own training materials acknowledge that the remarriage rules are one of the most commonly misunderstood aspects of survivor benefits, even among their own staff. You did the right thing by asking and following the guidance you were given. Your son's benefits will definitely continue unchanged, which is one less thing to worry about. Stay strong - you've handled this situation very responsibly so far!
Hi everyone, I need advice about ex-spousal benefits and survivor benefits. My ex-husband (divorced 5 years ago after 17 years of marriage) is currently 65 and receiving disability benefits. I'm 62 but haven't filed for Social Security yet. I'm confused about a few things: 1. When my ex turns 66, will his disability automatically convert to regular retirement benefits? Or does SSDI continue? 2. If something happened to him, would I be eligible for survivor benefits as his ex-wife? 3. Would those survivor benefits be based on his disability amount or what his retirement would have been? I'm trying to figure out if it's better for me to claim on my own record now or wait. My work history is spotty because I stayed home with our kids for several years. Any insights would be really helpful!
The previous commenter is partially right - the "file and suspend" and "restricted application" strategies were largely eliminated by the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015. However, since you're 62 now, you were born in approximately 1963, which means you can't file a restricted application (that option ended for people born after January 1, 1954). When you file for any retirement benefit, you're deemed to be filing for all benefits you're eligible for, and you'll receive the highest amount. So you can't take ex-spouse benefits now and switch to your own later. Still worth getting the specific numbers from SSA to make the best decision for your situation.
Thank you for that clarification! Yes, I was born in 1963, so it sounds like I need to make a more straightforward decision between claiming early (either my own or divorced spouse benefit, whichever is higher) versus waiting until FRA or even 70. I'm going to try to get an appointment with SSA. Sounds like getting accurate numbers is the key to making the right decision.
Just wanted to add one more important point that might affect your decision - if your ex-husband remarries, it won't impact your eligibility for divorced spouse benefits or survivor benefits at all. His new marriage has zero effect on your benefits as long as YOU remain unmarried. I mention this because I see a lot of people worry unnecessarily about what their ex does after divorce. The 10+ year marriage rule protects your rights regardless of his future relationships. Also, since you mentioned having kids together - if any of your children are still under 18 (or disabled), they might be eligible for benefits on their father's SSDI record too. That's a separate benefit that doesn't reduce what you could get. Good luck with your SSA appointment! Having all the numbers will really help you make the best choice for your situation.
Amina Diop
Thanks for this thoughtful advice. I think I'll create that spreadsheet to visualize the scenarios better. The quality of life considerations are important too - I don't love my job but don't hate it either. I think I'm leaning toward a middle path, maybe claiming around 65. That gives me some early retirement years but doesn't reduce the benefit quite as drastically as claiming at 62.
0 coins
Anastasia Kozlov
I'm glad this discussion has been so helpful! As someone who just went through this exact decision process last year, I wanted to add one more perspective. I ended up creating what I called a "regret minimization" framework instead of just focusing on break-even math. I asked myself: "Which choice would I regret LEAST if things don't go as planned?" For me, that was waiting until 66 (one year before my FRA). Here's why: if I live a long life, I'm not leaving too much on the table compared to waiting until 67. But if something happens to me earlier, I still got several years of benefits I wouldn't have had by waiting the full time. It felt like the sweet spot between the two extremes. The peace of mind from having that guaranteed monthly income bump was worth more to me than the mathematical optimization. Sometimes the "good enough" decision that you can sleep well with is better than the theoretically perfect one that keeps you up at night worrying!
0 coins