

Ask the community...
I'm dealing with similar spinal issues and wanted to share something that might help with your decision-making process. Since you mentioned your boss is starting to notice productivity issues, have you considered talking to HR about requesting reasonable accommodations under the ADA before making any major employment decisions? Things like a sit/stand desk, more frequent breaks, or even working from home a few days a week could help you maintain your job longer while you're going through the disability application process. This creates a paper trail showing you tried to continue working with accommodations, which can actually strengthen your SSDI case by demonstrating that even with workplace modifications, your conditions prevent you from maintaining substantial gainful activity. Also, given your upcoming laminectomy, make sure your surgeon documents in detail your current functional limitations and expected recovery timeline. Post-surgical complications or incomplete recovery can be significant factors in disability determinations, especially when you're already dealing with multiple conditions affecting different body systems. The fact that you're 59 with 35 years of work history puts you in a strong position under the medical-vocational guidelines if your conditions prevent you from doing any work you've done in the past 15 years. Don't lose hope - the process is daunting but your situation sounds like it has merit.
This is excellent advice about ADA accommodations! I hadn't thought about how requesting accommodations could actually strengthen a disability case by showing you tried everything possible to keep working. That's really smart strategic thinking. I'm definitely going to explore the sit/stand desk option - sitting for long periods is one of my biggest challenges right now. Working from home even part-time would be amazing since it would eliminate my commute (which aggravates my spine issues) and give me more control over my environment during pain flares. You make a great point about having my surgeon document everything thoroughly. I've been so focused on just getting through the surgery that I didn't think about how the documentation could impact a potential disability claim. I'll make sure to discuss my current limitations in detail during my pre-op appointment. Thank you for the encouragement about my age and work history - it's reassuring to know that those factors could work in my favor. This whole situation feels overwhelming but having a community of people who understand really helps.
I want to echo what others have said about documentation being absolutely critical. As someone who went through the SSDI process with multiple conditions (though different from yours), I can't stress enough how important it is to be completely honest with your doctors about your pain levels and limitations. One thing I learned the hard way is that SSA doesn't just look at your individual conditions - they also consider the cumulative effect of multiple impairments. In your case, the combination of severe TMJ affecting eating/speaking, spinal issues requiring multiple surgeries, GERD with Barrett's, and fibromyalgia creates a compelling picture of someone whose overall functioning is significantly compromised. Since you're still working full-time, consider keeping a detailed daily log of how your symptoms affect your work performance - times you had to take breaks due to pain, days you couldn't concentrate because of medication side effects, instances where TMJ made it difficult to communicate with colleagues, etc. This real-world evidence of how your conditions impact your ability to perform work tasks can be incredibly valuable. Also, don't underestimate the impact of Barrett's esophagus - this is a serious condition with cancer risk that requires ongoing monitoring and can significantly affect your quality of life and ability to work consistently. The insurance gap issue mentioned by others is real and scary, but don't let fear paralyze you into continuing to damage your health. There may be options you haven't considered yet, and a disability attorney can help you navigate the timing to minimize gaps in coverage.
As someone who went through this exact decision process two years ago, I want to add another perspective on the life expectancy vs. breakeven calculation. You're absolutely right to question whether the breakeven point relates to SSA's life expectancy data - it doesn't directly, but there's an important connection you should know about. The SSA's actuarial assumptions built into the delayed retirement credit system were designed decades ago when life expectancies were shorter. What this means is that if you have reason to believe you'll live longer than the "average" person from those older tables (better healthcare, higher education, good genes on one side of the family), the 8% annual increase for delaying becomes even more valuable. But here's what really struck me about your situation: you mentioned your wife is younger and would likely outlive you. Have you looked into the "claim and invest" strategy? Some people in your position claim at FRA, then invest the difference between what they would have received versus what they'll eventually get at 70. If you're disciplined about investing that money, you might come out ahead even if you don't live to the traditional breakeven age. One more thought - at 63 with some health concerns, consider getting a more comprehensive health evaluation. Sometimes blood pressure issues can be early indicators of other cardiovascular risks that might influence your longevity projections. Knowledge is power in this decision!
Emma, thank you for bringing up the "claim and invest" strategy - I hadn't heard of that approach before! That's a really interesting middle ground that could potentially give me the best of both worlds. Do you happen to know what kind of investment returns you'd need to make that strategy work compared to just delaying benefits? I'm curious about the math behind it. The point about getting a more comprehensive health evaluation is also spot-on. My blood pressure has been creeping up over the past few years, and you're right that it could be signaling other issues I'm not aware of yet. A thorough checkup might give me better data to work with than just relying on my parents' lifespans. I'm really grateful for all these different angles everyone has shared. This decision felt overwhelming when I started, but now I feel like I have a much clearer framework for thinking through all the variables.
This is such a great discussion! As someone who's been wrestling with similar questions about Social Security timing, I wanted to add a perspective that might help others in this situation. One thing I've learned from talking to a fee-only financial planner is that the "breakeven analysis" most people focus on is actually pretty limited because it only looks at the cumulative dollars received. But there are several other factors that can tip the scales: 1. **Inflation protection**: Social Security benefits get annual COLA adjustments, but other retirement income sources might not. The larger base benefit you get from delaying means more inflation protection over time. 2. **Tax considerations**: Depending on your other income sources, the timing of SS benefits can significantly impact your tax situation. Sometimes claiming earlier pushes you into higher tax brackets or triggers more taxation of your benefits. 3. **Medicare planning**: If you're considering delaying Social Security, make sure you still sign up for Medicare Part A at 65 to avoid potential penalties, even if you're not claiming SS yet. Connor, given that you mentioned you're still working part-time, you might want to also consider how your current earnings will affect your future benefit calculation. SS uses your highest 35 years of earnings, so if you're earning well now, those years might replace some lower-earning years from earlier in your career and boost your eventual benefit. The family longevity piece is tricky because we're all living longer than our parents' generation on average, but individual health factors definitely matter. Have you considered talking to your doctor about your actual health risks rather than just relying on family history?
I work as a benefits specialist and want to emphasize something important that might affect your planning: when you remarry, make sure your new husband understands that life insurance or other private retirement accounts might be crucial to supplement what would be a much lower Social Security survivor benefit based on your earnings record. Since you mentioned your earnings history is much lower than your deceased husbands', this gap could be significant. You might want to consider term life insurance or other financial products to help bridge that difference for his financial security. It's wonderful that you're thinking ahead about these issues - many people don't realize how remarriage affects survivor benefit calculations until it's too late.
I'm in a similar situation - turning 70 next year and trying to figure out the COLA timing. Based on what everyone's saying here, it sounds like I should budget for my statement amount PLUS whatever the 2025 COLA ends up being. Does anyone know when SSA typically announces the official COLA percentage? I want to update my retirement budget as soon as the real number comes out rather than guessing.
SSA typically announces the official COLA percentage in mid-October each year. It's based on the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W) from the third quarter (July-September). So you should have the official 2025 COLA number by October 2024, which gives you several months to finalize your budget before you turn 70. I'd recommend checking the SSA website around mid-October or signing up for their news updates so you get notified as soon as it's announced.
Just to add another perspective here - I work at a local AARP office and help people navigate Social Security questions daily. Everything that's been said about COLA not being included in your statement estimates is absolutely correct. One thing I'd also mention is that since you're planning to file in March 2025, you might want to consider filing a month or two earlier in January/February. There's no additional benefit increase after age 70, and filing earlier ensures you don't miss any payments due to processing delays. SSA has been experiencing longer processing times lately, so giving yourself that buffer could be helpful. Your first payment would still reflect the full age-70 benefit amount plus any applicable COLA adjustments.
Ezra Bates
Just want to follow up to say that when I called SS about my IRMAA appeal, they told me I could also fax the completed SSA-44 form with supporting documentation to my local office. Might be worth trying that approach if you continue having trouble reaching someone by phone. The fax number should be available on the SSA website for your local office.
0 coins
Ryan Vasquez
•That's a great tip - I hadn't considered faxing it in. I'll look up my local office's fax number. Did they confirm receipt when you faxed your documents?
0 coins
Ezra Bates
•No confirmation when I faxed it, which was nerve-wracking. I called about 2 weeks later and they confirmed they had received it, but hadn't processed it yet. The whole process took about 4-5 weeks from faxing to receiving the updated determination letter.
0 coins
Jamal Harris
I went through this exact same situation last year! My income dropped significantly when I switched from corporate to consulting work. Here's what I learned: You definitely qualify for an IRMAA appeal with that income reduction. The key is documenting the "life-changing event" properly. Since you went from employment to self-employment, that counts as work reduction. For your S-Corp structure, only your $15K salary plus any distributions you take will count toward IRMAA - the business profits staying in the company won't affect your personal MAGI. A few practical tips: - Try calling SSA right at 8am when they open - I had better luck then - Have your SSA-44 form filled out before you call so you're ready - Keep detailed records of every call attempt (date/time) in case you need to escalate The whole process took about 6 weeks for me, but the premium reduction was backdated to when it should have started. Don't give up - that $258K to $74K drop should easily get you out of the IRMAA surcharge tiers!
0 coins
Ethan Wilson
•This is really encouraging to hear from someone who went through the same situation! I'm definitely going to try calling right at 8am tomorrow. Quick question - when you say the premium reduction was backdated, does that mean Medicare actually refunded the higher premiums I've already been charged? I've been paying the IRMAA surcharge for a couple months now and wondering if I'll get that money back once this gets sorted out.
0 coins