Thank you all for the incredibly helpful information! This cleared up so much confusion. Based on what I'm hearing, it sounds like my best strategy is to continue working until my FRA and then apply for benefits - either my own or ex-spouse benefits, whichever is higher at that point. I'm going to try to get through to SSA to confirm all these details for my specific situation. It's frustrating that these rules are so complicated, but I'm grateful for all your insights!

Just wanted to add one more consideration that might be helpful - since you mentioned your ex's benefit will be about twice yours, make sure you're comparing apples to apples. When you say "twice what mine would be," are you comparing both benefits at full retirement age? Also, don't forget that your own benefit can continue to grow with delayed retirement credits if you wait past your FRA (up to 8% per year until age 70), but ex-spouse benefits don't get those delayed credits. So depending on how much higher your ex's benefit actually is, it might be worth running the numbers on waiting until 70 for your own benefit vs. taking the ex-spouse benefit at FRA. The Social Security website has a retirement estimator that can help you model different scenarios, though talking to SSA directly is still your best bet for personalized advice!

One thing I haven't seen mentioned here is the importance of understanding how SSA treats distributions vs. salary for S-corps. While everyone is correct that only your W-2 wages count toward the earnings test, you still need to be careful about taking "unreasonably low" salary compared to distributions - the IRS has guidelines about reasonable compensation for S-corp owners. Also, regarding the suspension/restart process - I found it helpful to request written confirmation whenever I made changes to my benefits. SSA phone representatives sometimes give different information, so having documentation of what was agreed upon saved me headaches later. You can also make some of these requests through your my Social Security account online, which creates an automatic paper trail. Your plan sounds solid, Ava! Just make sure when you do restart benefits after any suspension that you double-check your first payment reflects the correct amount. I've heard of cases where the restart didn't process correctly and people had to follow up multiple times.

Just wanted to add another perspective on the S-corp earnings test situation. I've been collecting SS benefits with my S-corp for 3 years now, and one thing that caught me off guard was how SSA handles estimated quarterly payments. Even though only your W-2 wages count toward the earnings test, if you're making quarterly estimated tax payments on significant business income, they sometimes flag your account for review. I learned to keep a simple one-page summary ready that shows: 1) My annual W-2 wages from the S-corp, 2) My quarterly salary payments, and 3) A note explaining that business profits are distributions, not wages subject to FICA. This has saved me time during their random compliance checks. Also, regarding your 2026 strategy - consider that if you do need to suspend benefits early in the year, you might want to time it so that you can restart before April when you hit FRA. That way you don't miss out on those final months of benefits before the earnings test disappears completely. The restart process usually takes 3-4 weeks, so plan accordingly if you think you might need to do this.

I'm in almost the same boat (69, working full-time, taking SS since Jan 2025). My tax guy told me that the payroll withholding counts exactly the same as quarterly estimated payments. But he did say to check what my actual tax liability is likely to be. Don't forget that up to 85% of your SS benefits could be taxable depending on your total income. Make sure your extra $200/paycheck covers that. I'm having $275 extra taken out per paycheck just to be safe.

I went through this exact same situation last year when I turned 67 and started collecting SS while still working! The frustration with getting clear answers from both SSA and IRS is so real - I must have spent 6 hours on hold between the two agencies. What you're doing with the extra $200 withholding is perfect. I did something similar and had no issues at tax time. The key thing I learned is that as long as your total withholding (regular + extra) covers either 90% of this year's tax or 100% of last year's tax, you're golden. No penalties, no quarterly payment forms needed. One tip: keep good records of when you started the extra withholding and how much. It helped me when I filed my taxes to have everything documented. Also, don't let anyone scare you into thinking you need to do BOTH withholding AND quarterly payments - that's overkill and completely unnecessary. You're handling this the smart way. The extra withholding from your paycheck is actually better than quarterly payments because the IRS treats it as if you paid evenly throughout the year, even though you didn't start until August.

One more thing worth mentioning - when you apply, make sure you're clear about applying for BOTH your retirement benefit AND spousal benefits. While SSA is supposed to automatically check if you qualify for both, sometimes this gets overlooked. Also, for planning purposes: as a spouse filing at 64 (assuming your FRA is 67), you'll receive approximately 35% of your husband's PIA as a spousal benefit (rather than the 50% at FRA). Your total benefit will be your own reduced retirement benefit, plus the spousal add-on to reach the 35% of his PIA (if that's higher than your own benefit alone).

I'm going through a similar situation right now! My husband filed at 70 in 2019, and I'm trying to figure out the spousal benefit calculation for when I file next year. One thing that helped us was requesting a "benefit verification letter" from SSA - sometimes this shows more detailed information than what's visible in the online account. You can request it through his mySocialSecurity account or by calling. Also, I learned that if you can find ANY old Social Security statement from around his FRA years (even a year or two off), you can use that as a starting point. The SSA website has historical COLA increases listed, so you could potentially work forward from an older statement to estimate his FRA amount. The math gets tricky with all the COLAs and delayed credits, but at least it gives you a ballpark figure to compare against what SSA tells you when you apply. Good luck - the whole system really isn't designed to make this easy for us!

I read somewhere that for couples with big differences in their benefit amounts, there's almost ALWAYS an advantage to the lower-benefit spouse filing early and the higher-benefit spouse delaying, especially considering survivor benefits. Has anyone else seen research on this? Or is this just conventional wisdom that doesn't always hold up with actual numbers?

As someone who went through this exact decision process two years ago, I can share what we learned. My wife and I had a similar PIA gap ($850 vs $3,900), and after consulting with a fee-only financial planner who specialized in Social Security, we ended up with the "62/70 split" strategy that others have mentioned. The key insight was realizing that the break-even calculations change dramatically when you factor in the survivor benefit scenario. Yes, the lifetime benefit difference might seem small when both spouses are alive, but the protection for the surviving spouse (likely you) is substantial. We also discovered that having other retirement assets actually makes delaying MORE valuable, not less, because you can afford to let the higher benefit grow while living off savings. The enhanced survivor benefit essentially becomes a form of longevity insurance that you can't buy anywhere else. One practical tip: Get your actual benefit estimates from SSA (not calculators) and run the numbers assuming you live to 90-95, not just average life expectancy. The differences become much more meaningful over longer time horizons. Given your solid retirement savings, I'd strongly consider having your husband delay to 70 while you file at 62. The survivor benefit protection alone is probably worth it.