


Ask the community...
my sister had part time job when she filed and it wasnt a big deal. just be honest on ur application and weekly claims and ull be fine
To summarize what everyone's saying: 1) File now based on your full-time job layoff, 2) Report your part-time bartending job and its earnings both on your initial application and weekly claims, 3) Start doing and documenting your work search activities immediately (even while still bartending), 4) Have documentation ready from your employer about the layoff reason, and 5) If you have trouble reaching someone at UC, consider using a service to help you get through. Once both jobs end, you should receive your full weekly benefit amount as long as you continue meeting all eligibility requirements.
Great to hear you're making progress. Based on current processing times, you should see movement within 7-10 business days after your employer's new submission. If not, that's when I'd consider using a service to reach a claims examiner directly or asking your state rep to escalate to a supervisor level at UC.
7-10 MORE days???? That's crazy when they've already been waiting nearly 2 months!!! The system is so broken!!!
FINAL UPDATE: I'm in shock but my claim was just approved this morning! All pending weeks are showing as paid! After I got my employer to resend everything AND my state rep followed up again, something finally clicked. For anyone in a similar situation - don't give up and definitely try the state rep route if you're stuck. Thanks everyone for your help!
I work for a different state agency (not UC) but interact with them occasionally. While I can't speak to your specific case, I can tell you that claims do remain active during review regardless of how long it takes. The one-year benefit year only affects how long you can collect benefits, not the determination process. One thing that might help: when you call, specifically ask if there are any "information requests" showing on your claim that you haven't responded to. Sometimes determinations are delayed because they're waiting for information they requested but you never received (mail gets lost, emails go to spam, etc.).
Omg my husband went through almost the EXACT same situation last year! His claim was pending for 7 months!!! What finally worked was emailing the UC executive director (not just calling the regular service center). I found the email address on LinkedIn and sent a very detailed but professional email explaining the hardship the delay was causing. His claim was magically "found" and processed within 2 weeks after that email. Sometimes you have to go above the regular channels.
That's brilliant! I never thought about going that route. Would you be willing to share the email address you used? Or should I just look it up on LinkedIn like you did?
did you get the 6 month extension on tricare when u got out? might help with medical costs while u waiting for uc to fix this mess
I'd like to update everyone on this thread since I've seen several similar questions recently. PA UC has been experiencing technical issues with federal wage verification since they updated their system in January 2025. There is a workaround that seems to be helping claimants: 1. Submit your UCF-18/19 forms AND a signed letter requesting your claim be "manually adjudicated under the UCX program due to system limitations" 2. In the letter, cite PA UC Policy Letter 2025-03 (which addresses the known system issue with federal wages) 3. Provide a detailed wage calculation based on your military rank and time in service This approach has been successful for about 70% of the military claimants I've worked with in the past month. The other 30% still required intervention from a congressional office.
Thank you for this detailed information! I had no idea there was a specific policy letter addressing this issue. I'll definitely include this in my follow-up. Would you happen to know where I can find a copy of PA UC Policy Letter 2025-03 to reference in my letter?
Unfortunately the policy letters aren't publicly available on the website, but you can reference it in your letter anyway. The UC representatives will be able to look it up in their internal system. Just make sure you cite it exactly as "PA UC Policy Letter 2025-03 regarding Federal Wage System Integration Issues.
Ravi Kapoor
The REAL problem is that PA UC just automatically sides with employers no matter what evidence you have!! I know dozens of people who had IRON-CLAD cases with PROOF their employers were lying and they STILL lost their appeals. The entire system is rigged against workers. Why do you think these shady companies keep doing this?? BECAUSE THEY KNOW THEY CAN GET AWAY WITH IT!!
0 coins
Isabella Ferreira
•While the system isn't perfect, the Board of Review does overturn many referee decisions. In fact, about 35% of appeals result in a reversal. The key is having clear documentation and making sure you're addressing the specific reason for denial. Text messages showing retaliation for reporting safety issues could be very compelling evidence.
0 coins
Freya Nielsen
Quick update from my experience: One thing that helped me win my appeal was getting statements from former coworkers who witnessed what happened. If you have any colleagues who saw the situation unfold or know about the safety violations you reported, ask them to write a statement for your case. Also, double-check the PA UC appeal portal daily for any updates or requests for additional information. Sometimes they'll post questions there but won't notify you by email or mail, and if you miss responding, it can delay your case.
0 coins
Malik Thompson
•That's helpful, thanks. I've been checking the portal but didn't realize they might post questions there without notifying me. I'll ask my former teammate if she's willing to provide a statement - she heard the manager talking about wanting to get rid of me after the safety report.
0 coins