< Back to IRS

Jamal Edwards

Secure 2.0 Act RMD age increase to 75 in 2033 - Where's the confirmation?

I've been digging into the Secure 2.0 Act changes to Required Minimum Distributions (RMDs) and I'm confused. Everyone keeps saying that the RMD age is now 73 starting in 2023, and will eventually increase to 75 in 2033. I can confirm the change to 73 in IRS publication 590b, but I can't find any official IRS documentation mentioning the future increase to age 75. What I'm really wondering about is how this will affect the RMD tables (like Table III). Currently, the first listed rate is Age 72 with a Rate of 27.4. When the changes fully take effect, will the table stay the same with just a different starting age for withdrawals, or will it actually be revised to show Age 75 with Rate 27.4 as the first entry? Has anyone seen any official IRS guidance on the future change to age 75 and how the distribution tables might be affected? I'm trying to plan for the long-term and want to make sure I understand how these changes will play out.

The confusion is totally understandable! You're right that Secure 2.0 has a two-phase implementation for RMD age increases: first to 73 beginning in 2023, then to 75 beginning in 2033. The reason you're not seeing the age 75 change in current IRS publications is because the IRS typically updates its guidance closer to when provisions take effect. The law itself (Secure 2.0 Act, which was part of the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2023) definitely contains both changes. Section 107 of SECURE 2.0 specifically outlines this two-step increase. Regarding the RMD tables - great question! The Uniform Lifetime Table (Table III) will likely be adjusted before 2033 to reflect the new starting age, but the factors themselves probably won't change significantly. The IRS just updated these tables effective for 2022, which reflects longer life expectancies. When they update again, they'll likely just extend the table to start at age 75 with appropriate factors. For planning purposes, you can reasonably assume similar distribution factors will apply, just with different age triggers for when you must start taking distributions.

0 coins

So does this mean I should definitely wait until 75 to take my RMDs if I don't need the money? I turn 70 in 2026 and was planning to wait until I'm forced to withdraw. Would there be any advantage to starting earlier?

0 coins

Whether to wait until the required beginning date or start earlier really depends on your individual tax situation. While delaying RMDs can allow more tax-deferred growth, there are some scenarios where taking distributions earlier might make sense. If you expect to be in a higher tax bracket later (perhaps due to Social Security, pension payments, or other income sources kicking in), taking smaller distributions before you're required to might help you manage your overall tax burden by spreading the income over more years. This strategy can sometimes help avoid pushing you into higher tax brackets down the road.

0 coins

Just wanted to share my experience using taxr.ai for figuring out the whole RMD situation. I was in a similar position trying to understand how these Secure 2.0 changes would affect my retirement planning. I found this tool at https://taxr.ai that helped me get clarity on exactly how the RMD age changes would impact my specific situation. You basically upload your relevant tax and retirement account documents, and their AI analyzes everything and gives you personalized explanations about how tax laws like Secure 2.0 apply to your specific situation. It even created a timeline showing me exactly when I would need to start taking distributions based on my birth year. The best part was that it explained how the RMD tables would likely be applied in my case, even with the future changes. Definitely worth checking out if you're trying to plan long-term like I was.

0 coins

This sounds interesting but I'm worried about security. Do you have to upload sensitive financial info to this site? Not sure I'm comfortable with some random AI having access to my retirement account details.

0 coins

Does it actually tell you anything different than what a human tax advisor would? I've been working with the same CPA for 15 years and she's already explained all of this to me, but wondering if the AI might catch something she missed about these Secure 2.0 changes.

0 coins

For security concerns, they use bank-level encryption and you can actually redact account numbers and other sensitive info before uploading. I was hesitant too but their privacy policy is pretty solid. They don't sell your data and you can request deletion anytime. What makes it different from a human advisor is that it analyzes all the documentation simultaneously and connects dots across different tax situations. My CPA is great but didn't have time to create detailed future scenarios with different RMD strategies like the AI did. It ran multiple projections showing different withdrawal sequences and how each would affect my tax situation through 2035.

0 coins

I tried taxr.ai after posting my question about this same RMD issue and I'm honestly impressed. I was super skeptical at first (as you might have seen from my reply above), but I decided to give it a shot and just blocked out my account numbers before uploading anything. The analysis it provided was way more comprehensive than what my financial advisor gave me. It showed me exactly how the Secure 2.0 changes affect my specific birth year and created this year-by-year breakdown of what my RMDs would look like under different scenarios. It even factored in the potential tax impacts of waiting until 75 versus taking voluntary withdrawals earlier. What really surprised me was how it found a potential issue with how my traditional and Roth IRAs were structured that could have caused me to take more RMDs than necessary. Definitely worth checking out if you're trying to navigate these Secure 2.0 changes.

0 coins

For anyone struggling to get clear answers about these Secure 2.0 RMD changes from the IRS, I had a surprisingly good experience using Claimyr to actually reach a human at the IRS who could explain this. I tried calling the IRS directly for weeks and kept getting the "high call volume" message and disconnects. With Claimyr (https://claimyr.com), they somehow get you past the IRS phone tree and hold times. You can actually see how it works in this video demo: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c The IRS agent I spoke with confirmed that yes, the age increase to 75 in 2033 is definitely part of the law, and they'll be issuing updated guidance and likely new tables closer to that implementation date. She explained that they typically don't publish guidance on provisions that are still years away from taking effect, which is why we're not seeing the age 75 info in current publications. Just wanted to share since getting an actual human on the phone at the IRS made a huge difference in understanding these changes.

0 coins

Wait, what? You can pay to get through to the IRS? That doesn't sound legit. Shouldn't the IRS phone line be equally accessible to everyone? I'm pretty sure paying to cut the line would be against some kind of regulation.

0 coins

How much does this service cost? Seems ridiculous that we have to pay extra just to talk to the IRS about our taxes. The system is broken if we need third-party services just to get basic information.

0 coins

It's not about cutting the line or getting special access - they basically automate the calling process and wait on hold for you. When a human at the IRS finally picks up, they connect you to that person. You're not getting any different service than anyone else would get if they were willing to call repeatedly and stay on hold for hours. I completely understand the frustration. The system is definitely broken when it's this hard to reach the agency we all have to deal with for taxes. But until the IRS improves their customer service (which they're supposedly working on), this was the only way I could get clear answers about these RMD changes.

0 coins

So I was super skeptical about this Claimyr thing (you might have seen my comment above questioning it), but I was desperate for answers about how these RMD changes would affect my mom who turns 73 next year. I reluctantly tried the service, and I have to admit it actually worked. After trying for literally weeks to get through to the IRS myself, Claimyr got me connected to an IRS agent in about 47 minutes. I didn't have to sit there listening to hold music - they just called me when an agent was on the line. The IRS representative confirmed everything about the Secure 2.0 RMD changes, including the future increase to age 75 in 2033. She also explained that they're planning to issue updated uniform lifetime tables closer to that implementation date, but that the distribution factors themselves shouldn't change dramatically from the current ones. For anyone else struggling to get clear answers from the IRS, I hate to admit it but this service saved me a ton of frustration.

0 coins

Something everyone seems to be missing in this discussion is that the Secure 2.0 Act actually has different RMD age requirements depending on when you were born: - If you turned 72 in 2022 or earlier: You're already taking RMDs under the old rules - Born 1951-1959: Your RMD age is 73 - Born 1960 or later: Your RMD age will be 75 This is why the IRS hasn't updated all their publications yet - they'll phase in the guidance as each group approaches their RMD age. The law is definitely on the books though. And remember that the first RMD can be delayed until April 1 of the year after you reach the RMD age, but all subsequent RMDs must be taken by December 31 of each year.

0 coins

This is super helpful! Do you know if these changes affect QCDs (Qualified Charitable Distributions)? I thought those could still start at 70.5 regardless of RMD age changes?

0 coins

You're absolutely right about QCDs (Qualified Charitable Distributions). The age for making QCDs remains at 70½, even though the RMD age has increased. This creates an interesting planning opportunity where you can make tax-advantaged charitable donations for several years before you're required to take RMDs. This is actually one of the more overlooked benefits of the SECURE Act and SECURE 2.0 - that gap between QCD eligibility and RMD requirements gives people more flexibility for tax planning through charitable giving.

0 coins

I'm a bit confused about all this. If I was born in 1962, does that mean I don't have to take money out of my 401k until I'm 75? What happens to the RMD tables between now and 2033? Will they just keep the old ones until then?

0 coins

Yes, if you were born in 1962, your RMD age will be 75 since you're born after 1960. The tables will likely stay as they are until closer to 2033, then the IRS will publish updated guidance. They just updated the tables last year to reflect longer life expectancies, so the distribution factors themselves shouldn't change dramatically - just the starting age.

0 coins

I've been following this thread closely as someone in a similar situation, and I wanted to add some practical context about planning with these future changes. Even though the age 75 requirement won't kick in until 2033, it's worth considering how this affects your overall retirement withdrawal strategy now. One thing I learned from my financial planner is that the delayed RMD age might actually create some tax planning challenges. If you're waiting until 75 to start required withdrawals, you could end up with larger account balances that force bigger RMDs when they do start. This could potentially push you into higher tax brackets in your later 70s and 80s. The key is thinking about voluntary distributions in your early 70s to manage your tax bracket, especially if you have other income sources like Social Security or pensions that will increase your taxable income over time. The flexibility to choose when to start taking money out (versus being forced to) is actually a valuable planning tool. Has anyone else considered how these changes might affect their overall tax strategy, not just the technical compliance with RMD rules?

0 coins

This is such a great point about the potential tax trap! I hadn't really thought about how delaying RMDs could actually backfire if your account keeps growing. My 401k has been doing pretty well, and if I wait until 75 to start taking distributions, the required amounts could be massive by then. I'm starting to think the sweet spot might be taking some voluntary distributions in that gap period between when I could take them penalty-free and when I'm required to. Maybe starting small distributions at 70 or 72 to keep my tax bracket manageable, even though I won't be forced to until 75. Does anyone know if there are any downsides to taking voluntary distributions before the RMD age kicks in? Like, are there any restrictions on how much you can take, or does it work just like regular IRA/401k withdrawals as long as you're over 59.5?

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today