IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Understanding Bargain Element, Taxes & Compensation Income for My Company's ESPP Plan

I've been part of my company's ESPP (Employee Stock Purchase Plan) and I'm trying to figure out the tax implications before selling. Our plan has a 6-month offering period with a 15% discount off the lower price between the start and end dates, plus a mandatory 1-year holding period. For context, I joined the January-June 2024 offering period. Ended up buying 62 shares at $57 each (total investment of $3,534) on June 28, 2024. The offering period started with a share price of $68 (would've been $4,216 for 62 shares), but ended at $92 (would've been $5,704). So my purchase price was $57 ($68 Γ— 85% = $57.80, rounded down). I'm planning to sell right after the 1-year holding requirement in early July 2025. Let's assume the stock will be trading around $119 then. Here's what I'm confused about: * 1) What exactly counts as the "bargain element/compensation income" that gets taxed as ordinary income? Is it $682 (the $4,216 - $3,534 difference, representing my discount from the starting price) or $2,170 (the $5,704 - $3,534 difference, representing discount from market value on purchase date)? * 2) Will this bargain element/compensation income appear on my 2025 W-2 form? * 3) Is this bargain element/compensation income subject to the 7.65% FICA tax? * 4) Many articles mention that if I wait to sell until at least 2 years after the grant date (January 2026 in my case), it's considered a "qualifying disposition." I don't understand the practical difference between qualifying vs. disqualifying dispositions. Are there tax benefits I'm missing? From examples I've read, both scenarios seem to treat the bargain element as ordinary income and the difference between my basis and sale price as long-term capital gains. *All figures rounded to whole dollars for simplicity*

Diego Rojas

β€’

One thing I wanted to add that might help with your planning - you mentioned assuming the stock will be at $119 when you sell in July 2025. Just remember that with ESPPs, you're essentially making two decisions: the tax optimization decision (qualifying vs disqualifying) and the investment decision (when to sell based on market conditions). I've found it helpful to set up price alerts on my ESPP shares so I can monitor if there are any major price movements that might influence my selling decision. Sometimes the tax savings from waiting for a qualifying disposition can be completely wiped out by a market downturn, so it's worth keeping an eye on the stock performance as you approach your decision dates. Also, since you're getting that supplemental statement from your benefits team, make sure to save a digital copy in addition to the physical one. I learned this the hard way when I needed to reference an old ESPP transaction for an amended return and couldn't find the paperwork anywhere!

0 coins

This is really solid advice about monitoring the stock price! I'm new to ESPPs and hadn't thought about the investment risk aspect of waiting for qualifying disposition. Setting up price alerts is a great idea - do you use any specific apps or platforms for tracking? Also, regarding the digital copies of statements, I've started using a dedicated tax folder in my cloud storage where I immediately scan and upload any ESPP-related documents. It's saved me so much time already when I needed to reference purchase dates and prices for planning purposes.

0 coins

Freya Ross

β€’

Great question about ESPP taxation! I've been through this exact scenario with my company's plan. One additional consideration I'd mention is to check if your company provides any ESPP tax modeling tools or has partnerships with financial planning services. My employer actually offers free sessions with financial advisors who specialize in equity compensation during open enrollment periods. They walked me through scenarios comparing immediate sale vs waiting for qualifying disposition, factoring in both tax implications and market risk. It was incredibly helpful for making an informed decision. Also, regarding the W-2 reporting - make sure to ask your benefits team exactly when the compensation income will appear. Some companies report it in the year of purchase (even for qualifying dispositions), while others report it in the year of sale. This timing can affect which tax year you need to plan for, especially if you're close to year-end when making your selling decision. The peace of mind from having official guidance from both your company and the IRS (as others mentioned) is definitely worth the effort when you're dealing with thousands of dollars in potential tax implications!

0 coins

Joshua Hellan

β€’

This is excellent advice about checking for company-provided resources! I wish I had known about these services earlier - I ended up paying for my own financial advisor consultation when my company might have offered it for free. Quick question about the W-2 timing - if the compensation income appears in the year of purchase rather than sale, does that change the tax strategy at all? I'm wondering if it makes the qualifying vs disqualifying distinction less important from a cash flow perspective, since you'd be paying taxes on the bargain element regardless of when you sell. Also, has anyone dealt with ESPP taxation across state lines? I participated in my company's plan while living in Texas (no state income tax) but moved to California before selling. I'm trying to figure out if California will want to tax the entire gain or just the portion that accrued while I was a resident here.

0 coins

Cass Green

β€’

As someone who's been in the contracting business for 8 years, I can confirm that understanding sales tax is absolutely crucial before you start your business. What your friend's contractor mentioned about resale certificates is legitimate, but there are strict rules about when and how you can use them. In Texas, if you're doing home repairs (which sounds like what you're planning), you'll likely fall under "retail contractor" rules in most cases. This means you can purchase materials tax-free with a resale certificate, but then you MUST collect sales tax from your customers on those materials. The labor portion is also taxable in Texas for repair work. The biggest mistake I see new contractors make is thinking they can just avoid sales tax altogether - that's not how it works. You're essentially acting as a middleman collecting tax for the state. Keep detailed records of everything because the Texas Comptroller's office does audit contractors, and they're pretty thorough. My suggestion: get your sales tax permit from the Texas Comptroller's office first, then talk to a local CPA who understands contractor taxes before you take on your first job. The setup cost is way less than the penalties you'd face for doing it wrong.

0 coins

This is really helpful advice! I'm actually the original poster and I'm feeling much more confident about understanding the basics now. Just to clarify - when you say "retail contractor" rules for home repairs, does that apply to all types of repair work? Like if I'm doing kitchen cabinet repairs versus replacing a water heater, are those treated the same way tax-wise? And do you know if there's a dollar threshold where the rules change, or is it more about the type of work being done?

0 coins

CosmicCadet

β€’

Great question about the different types of repair work! In Texas, the "retail contractor" classification generally applies to most repair and maintenance work regardless of the specific type - so yes, cabinet repairs and water heater replacements would typically be treated the same way for sales tax purposes. The key distinction isn't usually the dollar amount but rather whether you're doing "repair/maintenance" versus "new construction/improvement to real property." Replacing a broken water heater or fixing kitchen cabinets would both fall under repair work, so you'd collect sales tax on both materials and labor from your customers. However, there are some nuances - for example, if you're completely renovating a kitchen (not just repairing cabinets), that might be considered improvement to real property depending on the scope. The Texas Comptroller's office has specific guidelines about what constitutes repair versus improvement. One thing to watch out for: HVAC work has some special rules in Texas, especially for new installations versus repairs. Since you mentioned water heaters, if you get into any heating/cooling work, definitely check those specific regulations. I'd really recommend downloading the Texas Comptroller's "Contractors" publication (it's free on their website) - it has detailed examples of different scenarios and how they're taxed. Much more reliable than trying to piece it together from online forums!

0 coins

This is exactly the kind of detailed breakdown I was hoping to find! Thank you for mentioning the Texas Comptroller's "Contractors" publication - I had no idea that existed and it sounds like it would save me a lot of guesswork. The distinction between repair/maintenance versus improvement to real property makes sense, but I'm curious about those gray area situations. Like if I'm replacing old kitchen cabinets with new ones - is that repair or improvement? Or if I'm fixing a leaky pipe but end up having to replace a whole section of plumbing? Also, you mentioned HVAC has special rules - do you know if plumbing or electrical work has similar exceptions? I'm planning to start with basic handyman repairs but might want to expand into those areas eventually if I can get the proper licensing. Really appreciate everyone's input on this thread. As a newcomer to contracting, this conversation has been incredibly valuable for understanding what I'm getting into tax-wise before I make any costly mistakes!

0 coins

Teresa Boyd

β€’

Just wanted to add another perspective here - I was in a very similar situation when my husband stopped working to care for our newborn. Beyond the tax advantages everyone mentioned, there are some practical benefits to filing jointly that aren't always obvious. For instance, if you ever need to apply for certain government programs or benefits, having a joint return can sometimes be required or preferred. Also, if your wife decides to go back to work later in the year or starts any freelance/gig work, filing jointly makes it much easier to handle those income changes without having to amend returns. One thing I learned the hard way - make sure you're both familiar with the tax return details even though only one of you is earning. Banks, mortgage companies, and other financial institutions will often want to see both spouses' information when you apply for loans or refinancing, and it's helpful if you're both up to speed on your tax situation. The bottom line is definitely file jointly - you'll save money and avoid complications down the road!

0 coins

Kendrick Webb

β€’

This is such great practical advice! I never thought about the loan/mortgage aspect of having consistent joint filing history. We're actually hoping to refinance our house next year, so it's good to know that having a clean joint filing record could help with that process. Also really appreciate the point about getting both spouses familiar with the tax details. Even though I'm the one earning income now, my wife should definitely understand our tax situation in case she needs to handle anything if I'm unavailable or when she goes back to work eventually. Thanks for sharing your experience - it's helpful to hear from someone who went through the same transition!

0 coins

Great question! I went through this exact same situation two years ago when my spouse became a stay-at-home parent. Everyone here is absolutely right - filing jointly is definitely your best option and you cannot claim your spouse as a dependent under any circumstances. One additional tip I'd share: since you're now the sole income earner, this might be a good time to review your tax withholdings at work. You may want to adjust your W-4 to account for the fact that you're supporting a family on one income. Sometimes people find they're having too much tax withheld and could benefit from having more money in their paychecks throughout the year instead of waiting for a big refund. Also, if you haven't already, make sure you're taking advantage of dependent care credits if you're paying for any childcare expenses, and consider maxing out any pre-tax benefits your employer offers like health savings accounts or dependent care FSAs. These can provide additional tax savings that really add up when you're on a single income. The transition to one income can feel overwhelming tax-wise, but married filing jointly will definitely give you the best outcome!

0 coins

Emma Garcia

β€’

This is really helpful advice about adjusting withholdings! I hadn't thought about that aspect. Since we're going from two incomes to one, I should probably look at whether I'm having too much taken out of my paychecks. Quick question about the dependent care credits - we do pay for some part-time daycare a few days a week so I can work. Is there a specific form for that or does it get calculated automatically when I file? I want to make sure I don't miss out on any credits we're eligible for. Also appreciate the reminder about HSAs and FSAs. I think my employer offers both but I never really looked into them seriously when we had dual incomes. Now that we're more budget-conscious, every tax saving helps!

0 coins

Yara Sayegh

β€’

I'd recommend being very careful about the employment arrangement between spouses in an LLC. The IRS has specific "reasonable compensation" requirements that can trip people up. Your wife would need to receive wages that are comparable to what you'd pay an independent trader with similar skills and responsibilities. One often overlooked aspect is that if you elect S-Corp taxation for the LLC, your wife would be subject to employment taxes on her salary, but any additional distributions could avoid self-employment taxes. However, the salary portion must still be reasonable for the work performed. Also consider that creating a formal business structure means you'll need to maintain corporate formalities - separate bank accounts, formal documentation of business decisions, and proper record-keeping. The IRS looks closely at family businesses to ensure they're legitimate business arrangements rather than just tax avoidance schemes. Before making any decisions, I'd strongly suggest consulting with both a tax professional and a business attorney who have experience with trading businesses. The rules around trader vs. investor status, reasonable compensation, and family employment can be quite complex.

0 coins

This is excellent advice about maintaining corporate formalities and reasonable compensation. I've seen too many family businesses get into trouble because they treated the LLC like a personal piggy bank rather than a legitimate business entity. One additional consideration is the "economic substance doctrine" that the IRS applies to family business arrangements. They look beyond just the legal structure to see if there's a real business purpose and genuine economic activity. Since your wife is already actively trading and generating profits, you likely have the economic substance, but documenting her role, responsibilities, and time commitment will be crucial. Also worth noting that if you go the S-Corp election route, you'll need to run payroll regularly (not just year-end distributions) and handle employment tax withholdings. This adds administrative burden but can provide legitimate tax benefits if structured correctly. The key is making sure everything would pass the "would a stranger do business this way" test if the IRS ever examines your arrangement.

0 coins

I've been through a similar situation and want to add a few practical considerations that might help with your decision. First, regarding the LLC structure - if your wife is already making 8-12 trades daily and showing consistent profits, you likely have the activity level needed to support a legitimate trading business. However, make sure to track her time investment carefully. The IRS expects trading businesses to involve substantial time commitment, not just occasional activity. One thing that caught my attention is that she's currently trading on your personal account. Before setting up any business entity, you'll need to establish trading accounts in the LLC's name. This means liquidating positions in your personal account and potentially triggering taxable events, so factor that into your timing. Regarding retirement benefits, an LLC can definitely help her start building retirement savings, but consider starting with a SEP-IRA rather than a 401(k). SEP-IRAs are much simpler to administer for small businesses and still allow substantial contributions (up to 25% of compensation or $69,000 for 2024, whichever is less). Finally, don't overlook state tax implications. Some states have additional franchise taxes or fees for LLCs that could affect your cost-benefit analysis. Make sure to factor in all the administrative costs - business registration, separate tax returns, potential quarterly estimated taxes, and accounting fees. The structure can definitely work, but success depends heavily on proper documentation and treating it as a genuine business from day one.

0 coins

Mason Stone

β€’

Just wanted to share that we ran into this exact situation last year with a client. A non-BBA LLC received an 8986 showing reduced K-1 income from an AAR filing. We called the IRS Partnership Hotline and confirmed our client did NOT need to issue 8986s to their partners. We just had to make sure the adjustments were properly reflected on the client's tax return for that year. The key factor was exactly what others have mentioned - since there was no imputed underpayment (just income/capital adjustments), there was nothing to push out further.

0 coins

Did you have to file anything special with the return or attach the 8986 you received? We have a similar situation but I'm not sure how to document it properly.

0 coins

We attached a copy of the 8986 we received to the return and included a brief statement explaining how the adjustments were incorporated. Nothing fancy - just a note that said "Income and capital adjustments per Form 8986 received from [Partnership Name] dated [Date] have been reflected in the amounts reported on this return." The IRS agent we spoke with said this was sufficient documentation. They mainly want to see that you received the adjustment and properly accounted for it. Keep the original 8986 with your permanent client files too - you'll want that if there are ever any questions down the road.

0 coins

Daryl Bright

β€’

This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm dealing with a similar situation right now - my client (a small LLC that elected out of BBA) just received Form 8986 from a partnership they invested in. The 8986 shows adjustments that reduce their distributive share of income, but like the original poster mentioned, there's no imputed underpayment. Based on all the responses here, it sounds like I just need to incorporate these adjustments into my client's return and keep good documentation. I'm planning to attach the 8986 to their return with a brief explanation, similar to what Giovanni suggested. One follow-up question though - if these adjustments result in my client owing less tax than they originally paid, do they need to file an amended return to claim a refund? Or can they just carry the overpayment forward to next year's estimated payments?

0 coins

Prev1...20752076207720782079...5645Next