RMD distribution timing - which tax year applies when I take my first IRA withdrawal in 2025?
Title: RMD distribution timing - which tax year applies when I take my first IRA withdrawal in 2025? 1 I've got a question about my first required minimum distribution (RMD) from my traditional IRA. Since 2024 is the first year I need to take an RMD, I understand the deadline extends to April 15, 2025. If I wait and actually make the withdrawal in March 2025, which tax year will this count for - 2024 or 2025? I'm confused because no 1099-R was issued for 2024 (obviously, since I didn't take anything out yet). Will this March 2025 withdrawal show up on my 2024 taxes or do I report it next year for 2025? Trying to plan ahead and understand the tax implications. Thanks for any help!
22 comments


Drake
4 When you take your first RMD by the April 15, 2025 deadline for the 2024 tax year, it's reported as income on your 2025 tax return - not your 2024 return. This often confuses people! The RMD rule gives you until April of the following year to take your first distribution, but the tax impact follows when you actually receive the money. So if you take it in March 2025, you'll get a 1099-R in early 2026 showing the distribution, and you'll report it on your 2025 tax return (which you file in 2026). Just be aware that if you wait until 2025 to take your 2024 RMD, you'll have two RMDs in the same tax year - your 2024 RMD (taken by April 15) and your 2025 RMD (required by Dec 31, 2025). This means double the taxable income in one year, which might push you into a higher tax bracket.
0 coins
Drake
•12 Thanks for explaining this! I'm in a similar situation but a bit confused. If I take both my 2024 and 2025 RMDs in 2025, could I split them differently to minimize the tax hit? Like take the 2024 RMD in March and the 2025 RMD in December? Or would it be smarter to take the 2024 RMD now in December 2024?
0 coins
Drake
•4 Yes, you could split them up within 2025 (March for 2024's RMD, December for 2025's RMD), but both would still count as 2025 income. The timing within the year doesn't matter for tax purposes - it's all 2025 income if taken in 2025. Taking your 2024 RMD in December 2024 would spread the income across two tax years (2024 and 2025), which is usually more tax-efficient. This way you wouldn't have two RMDs counted as income in a single tax year. Many people find this approach helps keep them in a lower tax bracket.
0 coins
Drake
7 I went through this exact same confusion last year and found that taxr.ai really helped me figure out my RMD situation. I was getting conflicting advice from different sources about which tax year my distribution would count towards. I uploaded my 1099-R and IRA documents to https://taxr.ai and it provided a clear explanation of how RMDs work with the extended deadline. The service analyzed my specific situation and confirmed that distributions taken in 2025 (even for the 2024 RMD) would count as 2025 income. What I found most helpful was that I could ask follow-up questions about my specific tax bracket concerns and get straightforward answers without accounting jargon. They even provided suggestions on how to potentially manage the two distributions to minimize tax impact.
0 coins
Drake
•18 Does this taxr.ai thing actually work with complicated retirement questions? I've got multiple IRAs from different jobs plus a 401k rollover and I'm completely lost trying to figure out my RMDs. Would it understand all these different accounts or just basic situations?
0 coins
Drake
•22 I'm skeptical of these online tax services. How does it compare to just talking to a CPA? I spent $300 on an accountant consultation for my RMD questions and wondering if this would have been cheaper and just as accurate.
0 coins
Drake
•7 It handles complicated retirement questions quite well actually. I had three different IRAs plus an old 403(b), and it correctly identified which accounts needed RMDs and which didn't. You just upload your statements and it figures out the details specific to your situation. As for comparing it to a CPA, I've done both. The service costs significantly less than the $300 you spent while providing similar accuracy. The advantage is you can ask unlimited follow-up questions as you think of them, rather than paying for another consultation. For RMD-specific questions, I found it covered everything my previous accountant had told me, plus it provided some additional strategies my accountant hadn't mentioned.
0 coins
Drake
22 Update on my RMD situation: I decided to try taxr.ai after posting my skeptical comment here. I was genuinely surprised by how helpful it was! I uploaded statements from my various retirement accounts and it immediately identified which ones required RMDs and which didn't. The system explained that my March 2025 withdrawal (for my 2024 RMD) would indeed count as 2025 income, and suggested I consider taking it in December 2024 instead to spread the tax burden. It even ran calculations showing how taking both RMDs in 2025 would push me into a higher tax bracket versus spreading them across two tax years. Definitely worth it for the peace of mind and clear tax planning advice!
0 coins
Drake
15 If you're having trouble reaching the IRS to get a straight answer about RMDs (I was on hold for 2+ hours), I found this service called Claimyr that got me through to an actual IRS agent in about 20 minutes. I was ready to give up after multiple failed attempts to get confirmation about my RMD tax situation. I went to https://claimyr.com and watched their demo at https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c. They basically call the IRS for you, wait through the hold time, and then call you once they have an agent on the line. The IRS agent I spoke with confirmed everything about RMDs and tax years that people have mentioned here - that the 2024 RMD taken in 2025 is taxable in 2025, not 2024.
0 coins
Drake
•10 Wait, how does this actually work? Do they just sit on hold for you? I've been trying to get through to ask about calculating my RMD with inherited IRAs and keep hitting dead ends.
0 coins
Drake
•22 This sounds too good to be true. The IRS hold times are notorious. What's the catch? Do they have some secret phone number or connection that regular people don't have access to?
0 coins
Drake
•15 They basically have a system that navigates the IRS phone tree and stays on hold for you. When they reach a human, they call you and connect you directly with the agent. You're not getting a special number - you're just skipping the hold time. No special connection - they just have technology that waits on hold so you don't have to. I was skeptical too but it worked exactly as advertised. I got clear answers about my RMD situation directly from an IRS representative, which gave me much more confidence than trying to interpret the rules myself. The agent confirmed that RMDs taken in 2025 (even for 2024) count as 2025 income, exactly as others have said here.
0 coins
Drake
22 Wanted to follow up about my RMD question and the Claimyr service I was skeptical about. I broke down and tried it after waiting on hold with the IRS for nearly 3 hours one day and getting disconnected. Using Claimyr, I got through to an IRS tax specialist in about 25 minutes while I was cooking dinner - they just called me when an agent was on the line. The IRS agent confirmed everything discussed in this thread and gave me additional info specific to my inherited IRA situation that I couldn't find online. The peace of mind was worth it, and I saved hours of frustration. For anyone struggling with complex RMD questions and wanting official answers, this definitely works and saved me from more IRS hold music torture!
0 coins
Drake
8 Remember that RMDs have changed recently. The SECURE Act and SECURE 2.0 modified the age when RMDs start. If you turned 72 after December 31, 2022, and before January 1, 2033, your RMDs start at age 73. If you turn 74 after December 31, 2032, RMDs start at age 75. Double-check that you actually need to take an RMD for 2024 based on your age. It would be awful to double up on distributions in 2025 if you don't actually need to take one for 2024!
0 coins
Drake
•12 Wait, I thought RMDs started at 70½? I've been taking them for years but maybe I started too early? I was born in 1949, so I guess that ship has sailed, but now I'm curious if I was following outdated rules.
0 coins
Drake
•8 The RMD rules have changed several times in recent years, which causes a lot of confusion. You're thinking of the old rule. Prior to 2020, RMDs started at age 70½. Then the SECURE Act changed it to 72 for those who turned 70½ after December 31, 2019. Since you were born in 1949, you would have turned 70½ in 2019 or 2020, depending on your birth month. If your 70th birthday was in the first half of 2019, you would have hit 70½ in 2019 and needed to start RMDs under the old rules. If your birthday was in the second half of 1949, you would have benefited from the change to age 72. Either way, you're definitely required to take RMDs now, so you're on the right track!
0 coins
Drake
19 Does anyone know if QCDs (Qualified Charitable Distributions) can help with this double-RMD situation? I've heard you can donate directly from your IRA to charity to satisfy the RMD requirements without counting as taxable income, up to $100,000.
0 coins
Drake
•4 Yes, QCDs are a great strategy if you're charitably inclined! You can direct up to $100,000 per year from your IRA to qualified charities, and that amount counts toward your RMD requirement but doesn't count as taxable income. So if you're facing two RMDs in 2025, you could potentially satisfy some or all of that requirement through QCDs, reducing the tax impact. The money goes directly from your IRA to the charity - it never passes through your hands. Just make sure you follow the proper procedure and get documentation for tax purposes.
0 coins
Holly Lascelles
Just to add another perspective on timing - if you're still working at age 73+ and participating in your current employer's 401(k), you might be able to delay RMDs from that specific 401(k) until you actually retire (assuming you don't own 5% or more of the company). This is called the "still working exception." However, this only applies to your current employer's plan - you'd still need to take RMDs from IRAs and previous employers' 401(k)s. If you have old 401(k)s sitting around, you might want to consider rolling them into IRAs for easier management, but be aware this would subject them to the normal RMD rules without the still-working exception. This won't help with your 2024 RMD situation since that's from an IRA, but it's something to keep in mind for future planning if you're still employed.
0 coins
Alejandro Castro
•That's a really helpful point about the still working exception! I wasn't aware that it only applies to your current employer's 401(k). I have two old 401(k)s from previous jobs that I've been meaning to consolidate - sounds like rolling them into an IRA might make management easier but would definitely subject them to RMD rules. For someone in the original poster's situation though, this is good to keep in mind for future years. If they're still working, they might have some flexibility with their current 401(k) contributions and distributions that could help with overall retirement tax planning.
0 coins
TommyKapitz
One important detail to clarify about the tax year reporting - while your March 2025 withdrawal will be reported on your 2025 tax return, make sure you understand how this affects your quarterly estimated tax payments if you make them. Since you'll have potentially two RMDs worth of income in 2025 (your delayed 2024 RMD plus your regular 2025 RMD), you may need to adjust your estimated payments to avoid underpayment penalties. The IRS expects you to pay taxes throughout the year, not just when you file your return. If you decide to take your 2024 RMD in December 2024 instead, you could spread this tax burden more evenly and potentially avoid having to make large estimated tax payments in 2025. Just something to factor into your planning beyond just which tax return the income appears on.
0 coins
Yara Nassar
•This is such an important point about estimated taxes that often gets overlooked! I'm dealing with a similar situation and hadn't even thought about the quarterly payment implications. If you're used to having taxes withheld from regular paychecks, it's easy to forget that IRA distributions don't have automatic withholding unless you specifically request it. Would it make sense to have taxes withheld directly from the RMD distributions themselves? I'm wondering if that might be simpler than trying to calculate and make estimated payments separately. Has anyone tried this approach?
0 coins