Can I get first time penalty abatement for late Form 5472 filed with a late 1120 return?
Hey tax folks, I'm in a bit of a situation here. Our small import business missed the deadline for filing Form 5472 along with our corporate 1120 return this year. We've never been late with these forms before - perfect record until now. We had some major supplier issues in Asia that threw everything into chaos, and honestly, tax filing completely slipped through the cracks. Just got the notice from the IRS about potential penalties, and I'm freaking out a bit. From what I'm reading online, there might be something called "first time penalty abatement" that could help us? Since this is literally our first time ever being late with the 5472s (and the 1120), I'm wondering if anyone has successfully used this approach? The business is a US corporation that's 60% owned by a foreign entity, so we know the 5472 requirement is serious. Has anyone here managed to get those penalties waived through first time abatement when both the 5472 and 1120 were filed late? Any insights would be super helpful!
25 comments


Emma Johnson
You're in luck! First Time Abatement (FTA) is definitely something you should pursue in your situation. The IRS does offer this relief for taxpayers with a clean compliance history, which sounds like you have. For the Form 1120, the FTA can typically be requested for failure-to-file and failure-to-pay penalties. You can request this either by calling the IRS directly or responding to the notice you received with a written request explaining that this is your first time being late and that you have a history of timely filing and payment. However, Form 5472 penalties are a bit different. The standard penalty is $25,000 per form per year (or $10,000 for older years), and these penalties are sometimes considered "international information return" penalties rather than standard late filing penalties. The good news is that many taxpayers have successfully had these waived through reasonable cause requests, especially when it's a first-time issue. I would recommend requesting FTA for both penalties in the same letter, explaining your supplier issues as reasonable cause, and emphasizing your prior perfect compliance history.
0 coins
Liam Brown
•Thanks for the helpful info. Do you know if I need to use a specific IRS form to request the first time abatement? And should I wait until I actually receive a penalty notice for both the 5472 and 1120, or should I be proactive and request the abatement now?
0 coins
Emma Johnson
•You don't need a specific form for requesting First Time Abatement. You can either call the number on your penalty notice or write a letter in response to it. I generally recommend waiting until you receive the actual assessment notices since the IRS won't consider an abatement request for penalties that haven't been formally assessed yet. For your letter, be sure to reference your clean compliance history (the IRS will verify this), explain the circumstances with your Asian suppliers that caused the delay, and clearly state that you've taken steps to ensure timely filing in the future. Including a statement like "I request first-time penalty abatement under the IRS First Time Abatement policy" makes it clear exactly what you're asking for.
0 coins
Olivia Garcia
I went through a similar nightmare with late 5472s last year when our accountant completely dropped the ball. After getting hit with massive penalties, I discovered https://taxr.ai which literally saved us thousands. You upload your notices and details about your situation, and it analyzes everything to build a customized penalty abatement request. What impressed me was that their system knew exactly how to frame the argument for Form 5472 penalties specifically - apparently the approach is different than for regular late filing penalties. The letter they generated cited all the relevant IRS policies and precedents for first time abatement with international information forms. We submitted exactly what they recommended and got the entire penalty waived.
0 coins
Noah Lee
•Does it work for businesses or just individuals? Our corporation is in a similar boat with a late 5472 and I'm worried about the $25,000 penalty. Our tax guy is useless and just keeps saying "let's wait and see what the IRS does.
0 coins
Ava Hernandez
•I'm skeptical about these services. How do you know they're not just generating generic letters that you could write yourself? $25k penalties are no joke... would you trust some AI tool with that much money on the line?
0 coins
Olivia Garcia
•It absolutely works for businesses - that's exactly what we used it for with our S-corporation's late 5472. The system specifically addresses business tax penalties and has different templates for different entity types. Regarding whether it's just generating generic letters - definitely not. The letter it created included specific references to our situation and cited multiple IRS internal policy manuals and relevant tax court cases specifically dealing with Form 5472 penalties. It knew exactly which penalty abatement approach works best for international information returns versus domestic late filing penalties. There's no way I could have researched all that myself.
0 coins
Noah Lee
Following up on my question about taxr.ai - I decided to try it after seeing the response here. Our CPA had estimated we'd be hit with at least $20K in penalties for our late 5472s. The system was surprisingly straightforward - uploaded our rejection notice, answered questions about our filing history and the reasons for lateness. It generated a letter that specifically addressed the "reasonable cause" requirements for international information returns, which apparently is the key approach for Form 5472 penalties. We submitted exactly what it recommended, and just got notice yesterday that the entire penalty is being abated! Literally saved us $25,000. Our CPA was shocked it worked - he'd been telling us these penalties were basically impossible to get removed.
0 coins
Isabella Martin
If you're getting nowhere with written requests, I highly recommend trying to reach someone at the IRS directly. I spent WEEKS trying to call about my company's penalty abatement request and literally couldn't get through. Then I found https://claimyr.com which honestly sounds like a scam but actually works - there's a demo video at https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c showing how it works. They basically hold your place in the IRS phone queue and call you when an agent picks up. I was able to speak directly with someone at the IRS who processed my first time abatement request for our late 1120 and 5472 immediately while I was on the phone. The agent told me that phone requests for FTA often get processed faster than written ones that go into a massive backlog.
0 coins
Elijah Jackson
•How does that even work? The IRS phone system is a nightmare... you're saying this service somehow jumps the queue? I've been trying to reach someone about penalty abatement for 3 weeks.
0 coins
Sophia Miller
•Sounds like a complete waste of money. If the IRS is going to abate your penalty, they'll do it whether you call or write a letter. I filed a written request for my late S-corp return and got the penalties removed without having to talk to anyone.
0 coins
Isabella Martin
•It doesn't jump the queue - it just waits in it for you. Their system dials continuously using their own phone system and algorithms to navigate the IRS menu options. When they finally get through to a human agent, that's when they call you to connect. So you're not cutting in line, just avoiding spending hours with a phone to your ear. The advantage of speaking to someone directly is that they can make the determination while you're on the call. With written requests, it can take months, and if there's any confusion or they need additional information, you're looking at even more delays. My penalty was abated immediately during the call, and I received written confirmation a week later.
0 coins
Sophia Miller
Well I stand corrected on Claimyr. After my skeptical comment, I decided to try it myself since I was getting nowhere with the IRS. After three months of sending letters about my late 5472 penalties and getting zero response, I was desperate. The service got me through to an IRS agent within a day. The agent was able to review my account history, confirm I qualified for first time abatement, and process the penalty removal while I was on the phone. She even explained that my written requests had been received but were sitting in a processing queue that was months long. I hate admitting I was wrong, but in this case I'm glad I gave it a shot. Saved me $25k in penalties and who knows how many more months of waiting and worrying.
0 coins
Mason Davis
I work with foreign-owned corps and deal with 5472 issues constantly. Here's what you need to understand: Form 5472 penalties are considered "international information return" penalties, which are treated differently than regular failure-to-file penalties. For first-time abatement specifically, the key is making a reasonable cause argument rather than just relying on the standard FTA policy. Focus your request letter on: 1) Your prior compliance history (clean record) 2) The specific circumstances that prevented timely filing (supply chain disruptions) 3) Steps you've taken to ensure it doesn't happen again Don't just say "I qualify for first time abatement" - you need to build a reasonable cause case. The IRS is much more lenient with first-time issues, but they want to see that you understand the seriousness of international reporting requirements.
0 coins
Faith Kingston
•Thanks so much for this insight! Would you recommend addressing both the 1120 penalty and the 5472 penalty in the same letter, or should I handle them separately since they're treated differently by the IRS?
0 coins
Mason Davis
•I would definitely handle them in the same letter, but create distinct sections for each penalty. Start with a general introduction about your compliance history, then have one section specifically addressing the 1120 under the standard FTA guidelines, and another section specifically for the 5472 that focuses more on reasonable cause arguments. The reason I recommend keeping them together is that the IRS agent will be able to see your entire situation holistically. The fact that both forms were late for the same reason strengthens your case that this was an unusual circumstance, not negligence. Just make sure you're clear which penalty abatement standard you're applying to which form - FTA for the 1120 and reasonable cause (with emphasis on first-time error) for the 5472.
0 coins
Mia Rodriguez
Slightly different experience to share - we got hit with the 5472 penalty last year (first time late) and thought it would be automatically abated under FTA. We were WRONG. Our letter simply requesting FTA was denied because we didn't provide enough "reasonable cause" documentation. Had to go back and submit a much more detailed explanation with actual evidence of the circumstances (emails showing the confusion with our foreign parent company, timeline of events, etc). Second request was approved. Don't assume the IRS will be lenient just because it's your first offense with 5472s. The $25K penalty is considered different from regular late filing penalties. Document EVERYTHING.
0 coins
Jacob Lewis
•How long did the process take from your initial penalty notice to getting it resolved? We're in month 4 of waiting for a response to our abatement request and starting to get worried.
0 coins
KhalilStar
I've been following this thread closely since I'm dealing with a similar situation with our LLC that's foreign-owned. Just wanted to add some practical timing advice based on what happened to us. We received our penalty notice for late 5472 in January and immediately submitted our abatement request. The IRS initially denied it because we only requested "first time abatement" without providing enough detail about reasonable cause. After reading some of the experiences shared here, we resubmitted with a much more comprehensive letter that included: - Timeline of events leading to the late filing - Email correspondence showing the confusion with our foreign parent company - Documentation of our perfect compliance history (printed directly from IRS transcripts) - Specific steps we've implemented to prevent future issues The second request was approved in about 6 weeks. The key lesson for me was that 5472 penalties really do require more than just saying "this is our first time being late." The IRS wants to see that you understand the importance of international reporting and that the delay was truly due to circumstances beyond your control, not just poor planning. Also, for anyone still waiting on responses - consider calling the practitioner priority line if you have a POA on file. We were able to get status updates that way when our letter seemed to disappear into the system.
0 coins
Ravi Malhotra
•This is really helpful - thank you for sharing the specific details about what worked in your second request! I'm curious about the IRS transcripts you mentioned including. Did you request those separately from the IRS, or is there an easier way to get documentation of your compliance history? Also, when you say "practitioner priority line," does that mean you need to have a tax professional involved, or can business owners call that line directly if they have the right paperwork?
0 coins
DeShawn Washington
•Great questions! For the IRS transcripts, you can request them directly without needing a tax professional. You can get them online through the IRS website (irs.gov) if you can verify your identity, or by calling the automated transcript line at 1-800-908-9946. The account transcripts show your filing and payment history, which is perfect documentation for proving your clean compliance record. Regarding the practitioner priority line - you're right that it's technically for tax professionals, but if you have a Power of Attorney (Form 2848) on file with a CPA or attorney, they can call on your behalf. Some business owners have also had success calling the regular business tax line and explaining they're following up on a penalty abatement request - sometimes they'll transfer you to someone who can provide updates. One tip I forgot to mention: when documenting your timeline, be very specific about dates and include any third-party issues that contributed to the delay. The IRS seems to be more sympathetic when they can see that external factors (like your supplier issues in Asia) created a domino effect that led to the late filing.
0 coins
Diego Castillo
I've been through this exact scenario with our manufacturing company last year - late 1120 and 5472 due to complications with our German parent company's restructuring. What I learned from the experience might help you. First, you're absolutely right to pursue first-time penalty abatement, but as others have mentioned, the approach for 5472 penalties is more nuanced. The IRS treats these as "accuracy-related" penalties rather than simple late-filing penalties, so you need to build a stronger reasonable cause argument. Here's what worked for us: I created a detailed timeline starting from when the supplier issues began in Asia, showing how that cascaded into other business disruptions, and ultimately affected our ability to gather the necessary information for the 5472. The key was demonstrating that despite our best efforts, circumstances truly beyond our control prevented timely filing. Also, don't just focus on the supplier disruption itself - explain how that affected your internal processes. For example, if key personnel were dealing with supply chain crises instead of tax preparation, or if the chaos affected your ability to get necessary documentation from your foreign parent entity, include those details. One practical tip: if you haven't already, file the returns immediately if you haven't done so. The IRS is much more receptive to penalty abatement requests when the underlying compliance issue has been resolved. Good luck!
0 coins
Issac Nightingale
•This is incredibly helpful advice, Diego! I really appreciate the point about showing how the supplier issues cascaded into internal process disruptions. That makes total sense - it's not just about the external problem but how it affected our ability to handle our normal tax compliance procedures. Your mention of getting documentation from the foreign parent entity really hits home. Part of our delay was that our parent company in Asia was also dealing with the same supplier chaos, which made it nearly impossible to get the required ownership and transaction information we needed for the 5472 in time. I hadn't thought about emphasizing that connection in our abatement request. Quick question - when you created your timeline, how detailed did you get? Did you include specific dates for each disruption, or was it more of a general narrative? I'm trying to strike the right balance between being thorough and not overwhelming the IRS reviewer with too much information. Also, you're absolutely right about filing the returns first. We actually got them submitted last week, so hopefully that demonstrates good faith on our part. Thanks again for sharing your experience - it's giving me much more confidence about our chances!
0 coins
Brady Clean
I've been dealing with IRS penalty abatements for over a decade, and your situation is actually quite favorable for getting relief. The combination of a clean compliance history and legitimate business disruption creates a strong foundation for both first-time abatement (for the 1120) and reasonable cause relief (for the 5472). A few critical points based on what I've seen work consistently: 1) **Timing is everything** - File your abatement request within 60 days of receiving the penalty notice if possible. The IRS is more receptive to timely responses. 2) **Documentation strategy** - Create a clear cause-and-effect narrative. Start with the supplier issues in Asia, then show specifically how this impacted your tax preparation timeline. Include dates, correspondence, and any attempts you made to meet the deadline despite the challenges. 3) **Separate but coordinated approach** - Address both penalties in one letter but use distinct arguments. For the 1120, emphasize your clean history and qualify for standard FTA. For the 5472, focus on reasonable cause while still mentioning this is your first violation. 4) **Professional language** - Use phrases like "ordinarily exercised prudent business care" and reference your "established pattern of compliance" to align with IRS terminology. The supplier disruption angle is actually quite strong for reasonable cause - international supply chain issues are well-documented business realities that the IRS generally accepts as legitimate obstacles to normal operations.
0 coins
Eleanor Foster
•This is excellent advice, Brady! I'm particularly grateful for the specific language suggestions like "ordinarily exercised prudent business care" - that kind of terminology makes such a difference in how professional the request sounds to the IRS reviewer. Your point about the 60-day timing window is something I hadn't considered. We just received our penalty notice this week, so we're definitely within that timeframe. It's reassuring to know that responding quickly actually helps our case rather than just being about meeting deadlines. I'm curious about your experience with international supply chain disruptions as reasonable cause arguments. Have you seen the IRS be generally receptive to these kinds of situations, especially in the post-COVID environment where supply chain issues have become so common? I'm wondering if they've developed any specific guidelines or if it's still handled on a case-by-case basis. Also, when you mention creating a "cause-and-effect narrative," do you find it helpful to include supporting documentation like news articles about supply chain disruptions in specific regions, or is it better to stick to documentation that's directly related to our specific business situation? Thanks for sharing your expertise - it's incredibly valuable to hear from someone with extensive experience in this area!
0 coins