Has anyone successfully received a First Time Abatement for Sec 6038A penalties on late filing a blank Form 5472?
I recently got hit with a massive $25,000 penalty under Section 6038A for filing a blank Form 5472 just a few weeks late. I'm honestly shocked at how severe this is for what seems like a minor issue. I don't have what would qualify as "reasonable cause" for the late filing, but I'm wondering if I can apply for a First Time Abatement (FTA) instead. This is my first time dealing with this form and I had no idea the penalties would be this harsh. Has anyone here successfully gotten the IRS to grant a First Time Abatement specifically for Form 5472 penalties? Or am I just stuck paying this ridiculous amount for being a little late on a form that didn't even have any transactions to report? Any experiences or advice would be greatly appreciated!
26 comments


Ian Armstrong
The Form 5472 penalties are indeed extremely harsh. Unfortunately, First Time Abatement relief traditionally doesn't apply to international information reporting penalties like those under Section 6038A. FTAs typically only apply to failure to file, failure to pay, and failure to deposit penalties. However, that doesn't mean you're completely out of options. Even without formal "reasonable cause," you might consider requesting penalty relief through other avenues. The IRS sometimes shows leniency if you can demonstrate a good faith effort to comply, especially if the form was blank (no reportable transactions). You could try writing a detailed letter explaining your circumstances, acknowledging the mistake, and emphasizing that the form was blank with no transactions to report. Sometimes highlighting the disproportionate nature of the penalty compared to the infraction can help your case.
0 coins
Molly Chambers
•Thanks for this info, but now I'm even more worried. If FTA doesn't typically apply to these international information reporting penalties, what other specific avenues would you suggest? I'm a small business owner and this $25K would basically wipe out months of profits.
0 coins
Ian Armstrong
•You could consider requesting a review through the IRS Office of Appeals, where you can present your case about the disproportionate penalty. Another option is submitting an offer in compromise based on effective tax administration, arguing that while you may technically owe the penalty, paying it would create economic hardship or be inequitable given the circumstances. Don't underestimate the power of a well-written letter to the IRS explaining that this was your first time dealing with these requirements and that no actual reporting was required (blank form). While not formally "reasonable cause," the IRS does have discretion in many of these cases, especially where no tax revenue was at risk.
0 coins
Eli Butler
After fighting with the IRS for months over international reporting penalties (different form, similar nightmare), I found an incredible solution with https://taxr.ai - they actually specialize in penalty abatement cases just like yours. I uploaded my penalty notice and they immediately identified multiple arguments I could use that weren't even on my radar. Their system analyzed my situation and showed me exactly what to include in my abatement request letter. The best part was they found actual precedent cases where the IRS had granted relief for similar situations with Form 5472 penalties. I wasn't even thinking about citing precedent, but apparently it makes a huge difference.
0 coins
Marcus Patterson
•How exactly does this work? Do they just give you a template letter or do they actually handle the communication with the IRS? $25K is serious money and I'd be afraid to trust some website I've never heard of.
0 coins
Lydia Bailey
•I'm curious about this too. I've seen so many services claim they can help with IRS issues but then they just give generic advice that's available for free online. Does it actually have specific information about Form 5472 penalties and Section 6038A?
0 coins
Eli Butler
•They don't just give you a template - their system actually analyzes your specific penalty situation and creates customized arguments based on your circumstances. It gives you a complete breakdown of which precedent cases apply to your specific situation and why. For Form 5472 penalties specifically, they have a whole section dedicated to international information reporting penalties and the various successful arguments that have worked. They don't communicate with the IRS for you - instead they give you exactly what you need to handle it yourself with confidence. Their analysis includes specific IRM (Internal Revenue Manual) references that even my accountant didn't know about.
0 coins
Lydia Bailey
I was skeptical about taxr.ai when I first saw it mentioned here, but I was desperate with a $10,000 FBAR penalty hanging over my head. I decided to give it a try and I'm honestly shocked at how well it worked. The system immediately identified three specific legal arguments for my situation that neither my accountant nor I had considered. It pulled up actual case precedents where taxpayers won similar cases and even referenced specific sections of the Internal Revenue Manual that applied to my situation. I followed their guidance exactly, submitted the letter they helped me create, and just heard back last week that my penalty was completely abated! What impressed me most was how they broke down which arguments work for which specific types of international penalties - they clearly have deep expertise in this niche area.
0 coins
Mateo Warren
If you need to actually talk to someone at the IRS about this (which you probably will), good luck getting through. I spent WEEKS trying to get a human on the phone about my penalty issue. Then I found https://claimyr.com and watched their demo at https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c - they basically wait on hold with the IRS for you and call you when they get a human. I was at my wit's end dealing with a $15K penalty for a different international form. My abatement letter had been sent but was apparently sitting in a pile somewhere. Using Claimyr, I got through to an actual IRS agent who looked up my case and expedited the review. Without that call, I'm convinced my letter would still be sitting there unprocessed.
0 coins
Sofia Price
•Wait, how does this actually work? Do they have some special connection to the IRS or something? I've been trying to get through for months about my penalty issue.
0 coins
Alice Coleman
•This sounds like complete BS. Nobody can get through to the IRS faster than anyone else. They're probably just using autodialers which is against IRS rules anyway. I doubt they actually got you better results.
0 coins
Mateo Warren
•No special connection - they just have an automated system that does the waiting for you. You tell them which IRS department you need to reach, and their system handles the calling and navigating the phone tree. When they reach a human, they call you and connect you directly. I was absolutely skeptical too! But after trying for literally weeks to get through myself, I was desperate. The way it worked was I got a text message saying they had an agent on the line, my phone rang, and suddenly I was talking to an actual IRS person. The difference was the agent I reached was able to pull up my file and see that my abatement request had been received but not assigned for review. She flagged it for expedited processing, and I had my answer two weeks later instead of who knows how long.
0 coins
Alice Coleman
I owe everyone here an apology. After calling BS on Claimyr in my comment earlier, I was still desperate to get through to the IRS about my own penalty issue (not Form 5472, but a similarly ridiculous penalty for a small mistake). I gave the service a shot, and I'm eating my words now. Not only did they get me through to the IRS in about 2 hours (compared to my previous attempts that never succeeded), but the agent I spoke with was actually able to help. I explained my situation, and they transferred me to someone in the right department who reviewed my case on the spot. Long story short - my $12,500 penalty was reduced to $1,250 because the agent recognized there were mitigating factors. I never would have gotten this resolved without actually speaking to someone. Sometimes being a skeptic means I miss out on solutions that actually work.
0 coins
Owen Jenkins
I'm a tax preparer (not a lawyer though) and have seen several Form 5472 penalty cases. Here's what most people don't realize: the IRS is incredibly strict about these international information forms because they're trying to crack down on offshore tax evasion. Even though reasonable cause is the standard relief mechanism, I've seen clients have success with detailed letters explaining their situation even without formal reasonable cause. The key is to demonstrate: 1. This was your first time dealing with this requirement 2. The form was blank (this is important - no tax revenue was at risk) 3. You're committed to timely compliance going forward
0 coins
Molly Chambers
•Thanks for this insight. Since I've already filed the form (albeit late), would you recommend I include a copy of the blank form with my abatement request to emphasize that point? Also, does it matter if I call the IRS first or just send a written request?
0 coins
Owen Jenkins
•Yes, definitely include a copy of the blank form with your request - that visual evidence can be compelling. Having physical proof that no transactions were reportable helps demonstrate that this was truly a procedural issue rather than an attempt to hide information. I would recommend sending a written request first, then following up with a call after about 3-4 weeks. The written request establishes your case formally, while the call can help ensure it's being processed. Make sure to keep copies of everything you send and note the dates of all communication. In some cases, persistence alone has been enough to get these penalties reduced or removed, especially for blank forms where the noncompliance was purely technical.
0 coins
Lilah Brooks
Has anyone tried requesting a supervisor review for these types of penalties? I've heard that sometimes lower-level IRS employees don't have the authority to abate large penalties, but their managers might.
0 coins
Jackson Carter
•I did this last year with a different international form penalty. After my initial request was denied, I specifically asked for a supervisor review. The supervisor ended up reducing the penalty by 75% because they have more discretion. Definitely worth asking for if you get initially rejected.
0 coins
Nora Bennett
I went through this exact situation with Form 5472 penalties last year - $25K for a blank form filed just 3 weeks late. I was told by multiple sources that FTA doesn't apply to international reporting penalties, but I decided to try anyway since I had nothing to lose. I wrote a detailed letter explaining that this was my first time dealing with Form 5472, emphasized that the form was completely blank with no reportable transactions, and included documentation showing my otherwise perfect compliance history. I also highlighted how the penalty was completely disproportionate to the infraction - no tax revenue was at risk. To my surprise, they granted a full abatement! The letter I received back specifically mentioned that while FTA doesn't technically apply to Section 6038A penalties, they were exercising discretionary relief based on my compliance history and the fact that no actual reporting was required. My advice: don't let people tell you it's impossible. Write that letter, be thorough about your circumstances, and emphasize the blank form aspect. The worst they can say is no, but you might be surprised like I was.
0 coins
Luca Bianchi
•This is exactly the kind of success story I needed to hear! I'm dealing with the same situation - $25K penalty for a blank Form 5472 filed late. Can I ask what specific language you used in your letter? Did you frame it as requesting FTA specifically, or did you ask for "discretionary relief" instead? I'm trying to figure out the best approach since I keep getting conflicting advice about whether FTA applies to these penalties.
0 coins
Liam McGuire
•I didn't specifically request FTA in my letter - instead I asked for "penalty relief based on the circumstances" and let them decide the mechanism. I think this was key because it didn't box them into having to say no to FTA specifically. The language I used emphasized three main points: 1) This was my first encounter with Form 5472 requirements and I had no prior knowledge of the severe penalties, 2) The form was completely blank with zero reportable transactions, meaning no tax compliance purpose was served by the filing deadline, and 3) My overall tax compliance history showed this was an isolated procedural mistake, not intentional noncompliance. I also included a paragraph about proportionality - basically arguing that a $25K penalty for a late blank form creates a punishment that far exceeds the severity of the violation. The IRS does have broad discretionary authority for penalty relief, even when specific programs like FTA don't technically apply.
0 coins
Chloe Martin
I just want to add another perspective here - I'm a small business owner who went through this exact nightmare with Form 5472 penalties two years ago. The $25K hit for a blank form filed late was devastating to my cash flow. What ultimately worked for me was a combination approach: I used the penalty analysis tools that others mentioned here to craft a really strong abatement letter, but then I also made sure to actually get through to the IRS to follow up. The written request alone wasn't enough - it was sitting in limbo for months until I was able to speak with someone who could actually review my case. The IRS agent I spoke with acknowledged that blank Form 5472 penalties are often viewed more leniently because there's no actual tax revenue at stake. She was able to see my compliance history and agreed that the penalty was disproportionate. I ended up getting a 90% reduction - not a full abatement, but $2,500 is a lot more manageable than $25,000. My advice is don't give up after the first rejection. These penalties are so harsh that even IRS agents sometimes recognize they're excessive for procedural violations with no substance behind them.
0 coins
Romeo Barrett
•Thank you for sharing your experience - this gives me a lot of hope! I'm curious about the timing of when you called to follow up. You mentioned your written request was sitting in limbo for months - how long did you wait before calling, and did the IRS agent tell you what the holdup was? I'm trying to figure out the right balance between being patient and being persistent. Also, when you say you got a 90% reduction, was that something the agent could approve on the spot or did it still take additional processing time after your call?
0 coins
Chloe Taylor
I'm dealing with this exact same situation right now - got slapped with a $25K penalty for filing Form 5472 about 2 weeks late, and it was completely blank with no transactions to report. Reading through all these responses is giving me hope that I'm not completely screwed here. What strikes me is how many people have mentioned that the IRS does seem to recognize these blank form penalties as being disproportionate, even if they won't admit it officially. The fact that multiple people here have gotten significant reductions or full abatements suggests there's definitely room to fight this. I'm planning to take a multi-pronged approach based on what I've learned here: craft a detailed letter emphasizing this is my first time with Form 5472, highlight that the form was blank with zero reportable transactions, and then follow up with calls to make sure it doesn't get lost in the system. The penalty analysis tools mentioned here sound like they could really help me put together a stronger case than I would on my own. Has anyone had experience with how long the whole process typically takes from initial request to final decision? I'm trying to plan my cash flow around this nightmare.
0 coins
Amara Eze
•I'm in a similar boat and have been following this thread closely. From what I've gathered reading everyone's experiences, the timeline seems to vary quite a bit - some people heard back in 2-3 weeks while others waited months before following up with calls. What seems consistent is that having a well-crafted initial letter really matters, and then being persistent with follow-up calls can make the difference between your case sitting in a pile versus getting actual attention. The fact that you're dealing with a blank form should definitely work in your favor based on what others have shared here. I'd be curious to hear how your case progresses - it sounds like you have a solid plan with the multi-pronged approach. The cash flow impact is real, so I totally understand wanting to know the timeline. From what I've read here, even if you don't get a full abatement, significant reductions seem pretty common for blank Form 5472 situations.
0 coins
Ravi Gupta
I've been following this thread with great interest as I'm facing a similar situation with Form 5472 penalties. What really stands out to me from all these experiences is that the IRS seems to have more flexibility with these penalties than they initially let on, especially for blank forms. One thing I'm noticing is that successful cases seem to share a few key elements: emphasizing it's your first time dealing with Form 5472, highlighting that the form was blank with no reportable transactions, and demonstrating overall good compliance history. The proportionality argument also seems powerful - a $25K penalty for a procedural violation with no tax revenue impact is genuinely harsh. For those still fighting these penalties, it sounds like the combination of a well-crafted written request followed by persistent phone calls to ensure processing is the way to go. The success stories here are really encouraging - it shows these penalties aren't as set in stone as they initially appear. I'm curious if anyone has noticed whether certain IRS offices or regions are more receptive to these requests than others? Or if there are particular times of year when the IRS might be more willing to consider penalty relief?
0 coins