IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

As a newcomer to this community, I wanted to add my experience to this incredibly helpful discussion! I recently received $16,200 from my parents to help with some unexpected veterinary bills for my dog's emergency surgery, and I went through the exact same worry spiral about tax implications. Reading through everyone's responses has been so reassuring - it's clear that family gifts under the annual exclusion are very straightforward from a tax perspective. Your $13,500 from your mom is comfortably within the $18,000 limit for 2025, so you can definitely put those tax concerns to rest. What I found most valuable was learning how common these family financial support situations actually are. Between all the examples shared here - down payments, medical expenses, education costs, emergency repairs - it's obvious that families regularly help each other with significant expenses, and the tax code is designed to make these normal relationships simple and tax-free. I also followed the documentation approach that many people recommended - kept screenshots of the transfers and got a simple email from my parents confirming it was a gift for veterinary expenses. Having that clear paper trail eliminated any lingering anxiety, even though it's not technically required for gifts under the annual exclusion. Your mom's help with your home purchase is such a wonderful gesture, and you can focus on the exciting parts of becoming a homeowner rather than worrying about tax complications that simply won't occur. This community has been amazing for helping newcomers understand that family financial support is both normal and well-protected under current gift tax rules!

0 coins

Thank you for sharing your veterinary emergency experience! As someone who's also completely new to this community, I really appreciate how you and everyone else have shared such detailed real-world examples of family financial support situations. Your point about the "worry spiral" really resonates with me - I think that's exactly what happens when you're dealing with large family transfers for the first time. Everything feels potentially problematic until you understand how the gift tax rules actually work in practice. The veterinary emergency scenario you described is such a perfect example of how families naturally support each other during unexpected crises. It's encouraging to see that the tax code recognizes and accommodates these normal family relationships rather than creating barriers or complications. I'm definitely going to follow the documentation approach you and others have mentioned if I ever find myself in a similar situation. The combination of transfer records and simple email confirmations seems like the perfect level of record-keeping - thorough enough for peace of mind without being overly complicated. This entire thread has been such an education for newcomers like me. Between all the different scenarios people have shared, I now feel much more confident about understanding family gift situations and know that the $18,000 annual exclusion provides substantial room for normal family financial support. Thanks for contributing another reassuring example to help others navigate these situations with confidence!

0 coins

Yuki Sato

•

As a newcomer to this community, I wanted to share my recent experience that's very similar to yours! My grandmother gave me $12,800 last month to help with some unexpected car repairs after an accident, and I had the exact same panic about tax implications and reporting requirements. After reading through all these incredibly helpful responses and doing my own research, I can absolutely confirm what everyone has been saying - family gifts under the annual exclusion limit are completely straightforward and tax-free for recipients. Your $13,500 from your mom is well within the $18,000 limit for 2025, so you can truly put those tax worries aside. What really helped ease my anxiety was understanding just how common these family financial support situations are. The IRS processes thousands of these cases daily - parents helping with down payments, grandparents assisting with emergencies, siblings supporting each other through major expenses. It's all incredibly normal and the gift tax rules are specifically designed to make these family relationships simple and hassle-free. I followed the documentation advice that several community members have shared - kept screenshots of the bank transfers and got a simple text from my grandmother confirming it was a gift for car repairs with no repayment expected. While not legally required for gifts under the exclusion limit, having that paper trail gave me complete peace of mind during tax season. Your mom's generosity in helping you achieve homeownership is wonderful! You can focus entirely on the exciting aspects of buying your first home rather than worrying about tax complications that simply won't happen. This community has been such a valuable resource for understanding that family financial support is not only normal but also very well-protected under current tax laws.

0 coins

Zara Shah

•

Thank you for sharing your car repair situation! As another newcomer to this community, I'm really grateful to see yet another real-world example of how family financial support works in practice. Your grandmother's help with unexpected car repairs after an accident is exactly the kind of emergency situation where family assistance makes such a difference. What strikes me most about reading through all these responses is how the $18,000 annual exclusion limit really does provide families with substantial flexibility to help each other during various life events - whether planned like down payments and weddings, or unexpected like medical bills, car repairs, and emergency home fixes. I'm definitely going to remember the documentation approach you and others have described if I ever find myself in a similar situation. The simple text confirmation from your grandmother seems like such a practical way to create a clear record without overcomplicating things. This entire discussion has been incredibly educational for someone like me who's new to understanding these family gift tax rules. Between all the different scenarios people have shared, it's become so clear that what initially seems like a scary or unique tax situation is actually one of the most common and well-handled aspects of family financial relationships. Thanks for adding another encouraging example to help other newcomers navigate these situations with confidence!

0 coins

I've been working through similar tiered partnership 163(j) issues and wanted to share what I've learned from experience. The M-1 adjustment approach everyone is discussing is definitely correct, but I'd recommend a few additional steps to make sure you're bulletproof on this: First, create a detailed supporting schedule that shows the flow-through from the lower-tier partnership. Start with the K-1 ordinary income as reported, then show the embedded interest expense (from the footnote), your Form 8990 calculation, and finally the disallowed amount. This creates a clear audit trail. Second, make sure your partnership agreement addresses how these disallowed amounts are allocated among partners. Sometimes the standard profit/loss percentages don't apply to these tax attributes, and you want to be clear about the allocation method. Finally, consider sending a brief explanatory memo to your partners along with their K-1s. Most partners don't understand these complex calculations, and explaining that there's a disallowed interest carryforward that may benefit them in future years helps with client relations and reduces confusion. The good news is that once you set up the process correctly, it becomes much easier to handle in subsequent years. Just make sure you're carrying forward the prior year disallowed amounts correctly when you prepare next year's Form 8990.

0 coins

This is excellent advice, especially the point about the partnership agreement! I hadn't considered that the allocation of disallowed interest might not follow the standard profit/loss ratios. Could you elaborate on when the agreement might specify different allocation methods for these tax attributes? Also, your suggestion about the explanatory memo is really smart. I can imagine partners getting confused when they see their income increased but don't understand it's due to a timing difference from the 163(j) limitation. Do you have a template or standard language you use to explain these situations to clients in layman's terms? One more question - when you mention carrying forward prior year disallowed amounts on next year's Form 8990, is there a specific line where these carryforwards are entered, or do they get included in the current year business interest expense calculation?

0 coins

Malik Davis

•

I've been following this discussion and wanted to add a perspective from someone who's handled quite a few of these tiered partnership 163(j) situations. You're absolutely correct in your approach - the M-1 adjustment is the way to go. One thing I'd emphasize is the importance of timing in these calculations. Make sure you're applying the 163(j) limitation based on your partnership's adjusted taxable income for the current year, not the lower-tier partnership's limitation calculation. Since they weren't subject to 163(j), their entire $270K interest expense was properly deducted in computing their ordinary income that flowed through to you. Your Form 8990 should treat that $270K as current year business interest expense (line 1) along with the corresponding adjusted taxable income from the footnote (line 13). If line 31 shows zero deductible amount, then yes, you need to add back the full $270K through an M-1 adjustment to effectively "undo" the interest deduction that's embedded in the K-1 ordinary income. One practical tip: In Lacerte, I usually enter this as an "Other Addition" on the M-1 with a clear description like "Section 163(j) disallowed interest expense from [Partnership Name] K-1 - see attached Form 8990." This makes it crystal clear during review what's happening and why the adjustment exists. Don't forget to prepare the required disclosure statement for your partners showing their allocable share of the disallowed interest carryforward. They'll need this for their own tax planning and basis calculations.

0 coins

Tate Jensen

•

This is really comprehensive guidance - thank you! I'm relatively new to handling these complex partnership scenarios and this thread has been incredibly educational. One follow-up question on the practical side: when you mention preparing the required disclosure statement for partners, is this something that gets attached to each individual K-1, or is it a single statement that references how the disallowed amounts are allocated among all partners? Also, I'm curious about the interaction with state tax returns. If we're making this M-1 adjustment at the federal level to increase ordinary income, do most states follow the federal treatment, or do we need to consider separate state-specific adjustments for the 163(j) limitation? I know some states have different rules around interest deductions, so I want to make sure I'm not missing anything on the compliance side. The timing point you made is really helpful too - it's easy to get confused about which year's limitation applies when you're dealing with these flow-through situations.

0 coins

This is a really comprehensive discussion with excellent points from everyone! I'm dealing with a similar situation and wanted to add one more consideration that might be relevant. If you do end up filing Form 1065, make sure you understand the timing requirements. Partnership returns are due March 15th (with possible extension to September 15th), which is earlier than individual returns. Missing the deadline can result in penalties that multiply by the number of partners, so even though it's just you and your spouse, late filing penalties can add up quickly. Also, regarding the depreciation question that started this thread - if you go the Form 1065 route, you might want to consider having the LLC pay you and your spouse a guaranteed payment for the use of the property. This creates a deductible expense for the LLC and taxable income for you personally, where you can then claim the depreciation on Schedule E. Your tax professional can help structure this properly. One last thought - given all the complexity discussed here, it might be worth revisiting whether the LLC structure is still the best fit for your situation. Sometimes the tax complications outweigh the liability benefits, especially for a single rental property. You could potentially get similar liability protection through proper insurance coverage without the partnership tax filing requirements.

0 coins

@92434574153c Great point about the March 15th deadline! I wish someone had mentioned that earlier - we almost missed it last year because I was focused on the April individual deadline. The penalty structure for partnerships is no joke. Your suggestion about revisiting the LLC structure entirely is really insightful. We set up our LLC thinking it was the obvious choice for liability protection, but after going through a year of partnership tax filings and all the associated complexity, I'm starting to wonder if we overcomplicated things. The guaranteed payment approach you mentioned is interesting - we ended up doing something similar after our CPA recommended it. The LLC pays us rent for using the property, which creates a clean deduction for the partnership and lets us handle depreciation on our personal return. It felt weird at first "paying ourselves rent" but it actually simplified the tax reporting quite a bit. Has anyone here actually compared the liability protection of an LLC versus just having really good umbrella insurance coverage? I'm curious if the tax headaches are really worth it for a single rental property.

0 coins

Great question about LLC vs umbrella insurance! I actually went through this exact analysis last year with my insurance agent and attorney. For a single rental property, a good umbrella policy (we went with $2M coverage) costs about $300/year and covers personal liability from the rental activity. Compare that to LLC annual fees, separate tax filings, and the complexity we've all been discussing here. The key difference is that an LLC provides "entity-level" protection - if there's a major lawsuit, they can go after the LLC's assets (the rental income, bank accounts) but generally can't "pierce the veil" to get your personal assets. With umbrella insurance, you're covered for liability up to the policy limits, but the property itself and rental income aren't in a separate legal entity. Our attorney's take was that for one property with good tenants and proper maintenance, umbrella insurance often provides adequate protection without the tax headaches. But if you're planning to acquire multiple properties or have higher-risk situations (like short-term rentals), the LLC structure becomes more valuable despite the complexity. We ended up keeping our LLC because we're planning to buy another rental next year, but honestly, if it was just going to be the one property, I probably would have dissolved it and gone the insurance route after experiencing all these tax complications firsthand.

0 coins

Evelyn Kelly

•

@2d3087dd5b7a This is such valuable real-world perspective! I'm actually in the process of setting up an LLC for our first rental property right now, and your comparison really makes me pause and reconsider. The $300/year for umbrella insurance versus LLC annual fees, tax prep complexity, and potential penalties is a pretty compelling argument. I hadn't really thought about the "entity-level" protection distinction you mentioned - that's a great way to frame the difference. Your point about planning for multiple properties is especially relevant. We're not sure yet if this will be a one-and-done situation or if we'll expand, so maybe it makes sense to start simple with umbrella insurance and then consider restructuring if we decide to grow the rental business. Did your attorney mention anything about how umbrella insurance handles things like slip-and-fall accidents on the property versus more serious issues like discrimination lawsuits or major property damage claims? I'm trying to understand if there are specific types of rental-related risks that an LLC handles better than insurance. Also, for anyone else following this thread - it seems like the key takeaway is that there's no one-size-fits-all answer here. The "right" structure really depends on your specific situation, risk tolerance, and long-term plans.

0 coins

QuantumQuest

•

One thing nobody's mentioned - if you're using the iPhone for product photography, you might want to also deduct photography accessories like a ring light, tripod, maybe even photo editing software if you use it. All of these would be legitimate business expenses too since they directly relate to your Amazon sales activity. I sell on Etsy and deduct all my product photography equipment. Just make sure everything passes the "ordinary and necessary" test for your business. And keep those receipts organized!

0 coins

That's actually super helpful! I didn't think about the accessories but you're right - I'll definitely need a tripod and probably some lighting to make the photos look professional. Do you recommend any specific setup that's worked well for you? I've also been wondering about photo editing software. Is that something I can deduct as well? I was looking at getting either Lightroom or maybe just using some kind of app directly on the phone.

0 coins

QuantumQuest

•

For my setup, I use a basic smartphone tripod ($25-30) and a 10" ring light ($40) I found online - nothing fancy but it makes a huge difference in photo quality. I also got a set of small backdrop boards in different colors/textures that photograph really well for about $20. Absolutely, photo editing software is deductible! I use Lightroom subscription ($9.99/month) and it's 100% a business expense since I only use it for product photos. Even if you go with a one-time purchase app on your phone, that's fully deductible too. Just make sure to pay for it from your business account if possible, or keep clear records if you use a personal payment method. Since you're selling on Amazon, good photos are essential to your business success, so all these tools easily pass the "ordinary and necessary" test.

0 coins

Don't forget to consider the timing of your purchase if you're planning to deduct it! If you buy the iPhone late in the tax year, you might want to start using it for business purposes immediately to establish the business use pattern. Also, I'd recommend setting up a separate Apple ID or at least organizing your apps so you can clearly distinguish between business and personal use. Having your photography apps, business communication apps, and Amazon seller app grouped together makes it easier to demonstrate the business purpose if you ever need to justify the deduction. One more tip - if you're taking the business use percentage approach, consider taking screenshots of your photo gallery periodically showing the ratio of business photos to personal ones. It's a simple way to document your usage pattern over time.

0 coins

Edwards Hugo

•

Great advice about the timing and documentation! I'm actually planning to make the purchase next month, so this is perfect timing. The separate Apple ID idea is brilliant - I hadn't thought of that but it would make it so much easier to show the business vs personal split if questioned. Quick question though - for the photo gallery screenshots, how often would you recommend taking them? Like monthly, quarterly? And do you think it's overkill to also keep a simple log of business activities where I use the phone? I want to be thorough but not go overboard with record-keeping. Also wondering if anyone knows whether using the phone for business calls with suppliers or Amazon support would count toward the business use percentage, or if it's mainly just about the photography aspect for this type of deduction?

0 coins

Sasha Reese

•

For photo gallery screenshots, I'd suggest quarterly is plenty - you don't want to go overboard with documentation. A simple log noting business activities is actually a great idea and not overkill at all! Just track the main business uses like "product photography session," "supplier calls," or "Amazon support calls." And yes, absolutely count those business calls toward your business use percentage! Any legitimate business communication - whether it's calls with suppliers, Amazon support, or even coordinating with shipping companies - all counts as business use. The photography might be your primary business purpose, but the phone is clearly serving multiple business functions beyond just taking pictures. The key is being reasonable and consistent with your tracking. A quarterly screenshot plus a basic log of business activities should give you solid documentation without creating a paperwork nightmare.

0 coins

This has been an incredibly helpful thread! I'm dealing with a similar situation - variable income throughout the year and trying to avoid overpaying estimated taxes during lower-income quarters. One thing I wanted to add for anyone following along: if you're self-employed or have significant 1099 income in addition to your W-2, don't forget to factor in the self-employment tax when doing your annualized calculations. The SE tax applies to the full amount of self-employment income (subject to Social Security wage base limits), and it's easy to underestimate your total tax liability if you only focus on income tax. Also, I've found it helpful to do a mid-quarter check-in on my calculations, especially for Q1 when you might get late-arriving tax documents (like corrected 1099s or K-1s) that could affect your annualized projections. Better to adjust early than get surprised at filing time. For those using tax software or online tools, make sure whatever system you choose can handle multiple income types and timing differences. I learned this lesson the hard way when my first tax software couldn't properly account for the timing of my consulting income versus my day job salary. The record-keeping advice mentioned earlier is spot-on - I keep a monthly spreadsheet with income sources, estimated tax payments made, and withholdings. Takes 10 minutes a month but saves hours during tax season and gives me peace of mind that I'm on track.

0 coins

Great point about self-employment tax! That's something I completely overlooked in my original question. I do have some 1099 consulting income on top of my W-2, and you're right that the SE tax calculation can really throw off your estimates if you're not careful about it. The mid-quarter check-in is brilliant advice too. I've already had one corrected 1099 come in that changed my Q1 numbers slightly. Nothing major, but it made me realize how easy it would be to base my whole year's estimated payments on incomplete information from January. Your point about tax software capabilities is something I hadn't considered either. I was planning to just use the basic version of my usual software, but it sounds like I might need to upgrade to handle the complexity of annualized calculations with multiple income streams and timing differences. Better to invest in the right tools upfront than deal with penalties later. Thanks for sharing your monthly tracking approach - that sounds much more manageable than trying to reconstruct everything quarterly. I'm definitely going to set up something similar. This whole thread has been a masterclass in estimated tax planning!

0 coins

Zoe Stavros

•

This thread has been incredibly comprehensive! As a tax professional who works with clients in similar situations, I want to add a few practical tips that might help anyone implementing the annualized income method: **Quarterly Documentation Best Practices:** - Create a simple one-page summary for each quarter showing your income sources, deductions, annualization factor, and resulting tax calculation - Include copies of pay stubs, 1099s, and any other income documents received during that quarter - Note any assumptions made (like estimated K-1 amounts) so you can adjust in later quarters **Common Pitfalls to Avoid:** - Don't forget state estimated taxes if you live in a high-tax state - the annualized method applies there too - Remember that some deductions (like student loan interest or IRA contributions) have income phase-outs that might affect your calculations - If you're married, make sure you're coordinating estimated payments with your spouse's withholding and any estimated payments they might be making **Technology Integration:** While manual tracking works great, many modern accounting software solutions can help automate the quarterly income tracking. Even basic versions of QuickBooks or similar software can categorize income by quarter and generate reports that make the annualized calculations much easier. **Final Reality Check:** Always do a sanity check by comparing your calculated quarterly payment to what you would owe using the equal installment method. If there's a huge discrepancy, double-check your math - it's easy to make errors when annualizing complex income streams. The annualized method is powerful for uneven income situations, but it does require more attention to detail than the standard approach. The effort is usually worth it to avoid overpaying during low-income quarters!

0 coins

Maya Diaz

•

This is exactly the kind of comprehensive guidance I was hoping to find! As someone new to dealing with complex estimated tax situations, I really appreciate how this thread has evolved from the basic question about annualized income calculations to covering all these practical implementation details. The point about state estimated taxes is particularly important - I live in California and completely forgot that I'd need to apply similar logic to my state tax calculations. That could have been an expensive oversight! I'm curious about the technology integration you mentioned. For someone just starting out with this level of tax complexity, would you recommend jumping straight into accounting software, or is it better to do it manually for the first year to really understand the process? I'm worried about becoming too dependent on automated calculations without understanding the underlying mechanics. Also, regarding the sanity check comparison to equal installment method - is there a rule of thumb for how different the payments should be? I'm getting nervous about my Q2 payment being significantly lower than what I paid in Q1, even though the math seems right based on the annualized method. Thanks to everyone who contributed to this discussion - it's been incredibly educational!

0 coins

Prev1...946947948949950...5644Next