IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Based on all the great advice here, I wanted to share what finally worked for me after going through this same situation. The key is having a systematic approach rather than just keeping everything "just in case." Here's the retention schedule I follow now: - Regular tax returns: 3 years minimum, but I keep 6 years to be safe - Returns with significant deductions or business income: 7 years - Property-related documents: Until 3 years after you sell the property - Roth IRA conversions and basis records: Forever - Investment records with carryforward losses: Until all carryforwards are used For disposal, absolutely shred everything - tax returns are goldmines for identity thieves. I use a Fellowes crosscut shredder that handles about 12 sheets at a time, and it's been worth every penny. The game-changer for me was going digital first. Now I scan everything when I file each year, store encrypted copies in cloud storage, then only keep the current year's paper copies in my filing cabinet. After the retention period expires, I shred the physical documents but keep the digital copies indefinitely since storage is cheap. One last tip: if you're ever unsure about a specific document, you can request your tax transcripts from the IRS website to verify what they have on file before shredding anything. It's free and gives you peace of mind.

0 coins

@Sofia Hernandez This is such a helpful systematic approach! I really like how you ve'broken down the retention schedule by category rather than just using blanket timeframes. One question about your digital-first system - when you scan documents each year, do you scan everything including (all the supporting receipts and forms or) just the main tax return? I m'wondering how much time this actually takes during tax season when everything is already hectic. Also, I m'curious about the IRS tax transcripts you mentioned for verification. Can you get transcripts for any year, or are they only available for recent years? This could be really useful for double-checking what I actually need to keep before I start my own shredding project. Thanks for sharing such a practical system - it sounds way more manageable than my current keep "everything forever approach!"

0 coins

For your specific situation with returns from 2014-2018, you can safely shred 2014-2016 based on the standard 3-year rule. However, I'd recommend keeping 2017-2018 for another year or two just to be extra cautious. Regarding disposal method - absolutely SHRED, never just recycle! Tax returns contain everything an identity thief needs: SSN, full address, income details, dependent info, etc. Even torn-up documents can be pieced back together by determined criminals. A few additional considerations for your retention decision: - If you had any business income, rental properties, or claimed significant deductions in those years, consider keeping them longer (6-7 years) - Keep anything related to property purchases, major home improvements, or investment basis calculations indefinitely - If you had any capital loss carryforwards from those years that you're still using, keep those returns until the carryforwards are exhausted For the actual shredding, invest in a good crosscut shredder (not just strip-cut). You can get a decent one for $50-70 that will handle the volume and won't jam constantly. Given the amount of sensitive financial information in tax documents, it's worth doing this properly to protect yourself from identity theft. Your brother-in-law is technically correct about the 3-year rule for basic returns, but the "better safe than sorry" approach of keeping them a bit longer is usually worth the small amount of extra storage space.

0 coins

Emma Morales

•

@ElectricDreamer This is really solid advice! I'm actually in a very similar situation to the original poster - found a bunch of old returns while cleaning out my home office. Your point about capital loss carryforwards is especially relevant for me since I had some investment losses in 2016 that I'm still carrying forward. Quick question about the crosscut shredder recommendation - do you have experience with any specific models that handle tax document volume well? I tried using a cheap strip-cut shredder last time and it jammed constantly with stapled documents. Also, is there any benefit to removing staples first, or should a good crosscut shredder handle them fine? The identity theft concern is what really convinced me to finally tackle this project. A neighbor recently had their identity stolen from documents found in recycling, so I'm definitely not taking any chances with my tax info!

0 coins

@Emma Morales For crosscut shredders that handle tax documents well, I ve'had great success with the Fellowes Powershred 79Ci around ($80-90 .)It can handle staples and paper clips without issue, and does 16 sheets at once which makes quick work of thick tax packets. If you re'looking for something more budget-friendly, the AmazonBasics 12-sheet crosscut shredder around ($60 is) solid too, though you might need to remove staples from really thick documents. Most decent crosscut shredders can handle standard staples fine - no need to remove them manually. Just don t'overload the machine and let it rest if it starts getting warm during heavy use. Your situation with the 2016 investment loss carryforwards is exactly why the blanket 3-year "rule doesn" t'always apply! Keep those returns until you ve'used up all the carryforward losses, which could be years depending on your annual limit. The IRS will want to see the original loss documentation if they ever audit the years you re'claiming those carryforwards. Smart move getting ahead of this after your neighbor s'identity theft experience. Tax documents really are identity thief goldmines - better to spend an afternoon shredding than months dealing with stolen identity cleanup!

0 coins

Gianna Scott

•

Be very careful with this approach. I've seen several businesses get into trouble trying to use remote addresses purely for tax savings without proper substance behind them. The key factors tax authorities look for are: 1. **Actual business activity** at the address (not just mail forwarding) 2. **Proportional allocation** based on where services are actually used 3. **Legitimate business purpose** beyond tax savings Since you mentioned having employees in low-tax states, you're in better shape than someone just using a PO Box. However, you still need to ensure the allocation makes business sense. If 80% of your team is in Washington but you're routing 100% of SaaS purchases through Oregon, that's going to look suspicious. My recommendation: Work with a multi-state tax specialist to develop a defensible allocation methodology. Document everything - employee locations, actual software usage patterns, business operations at each location. The small upfront cost of proper planning is much less than the penalties and back taxes you'd face if caught doing this incorrectly. Also remember that nexus rules are complex and constantly evolving. What works today might not work tomorrow, so regular reviews with a tax professional are essential.

0 coins

This is exactly the kind of comprehensive advice I was hoping to find! As someone new to multi-state business operations, I really appreciate you breaking down the specific factors that tax authorities look for. The point about proportional allocation particularly resonates - it makes total sense that routing 100% of purchases through a state where only 20% of your team works would raise red flags. Your mention of documenting everything is also really valuable. I hadn't thought about keeping records of actual software usage patterns, but that seems like it would be crucial evidence if ever questioned. Do you have any recommendations for what specific documentation would be most important to maintain for this kind of allocation strategy? Also, when you mention that nexus rules are constantly evolving, are there particular changes or trends you're seeing that businesses should be aware of? I want to make sure we're not just compliant today but prepared for future changes as well.

0 coins

Yara Abboud

•

Great questions! For documentation, I'd recommend maintaining: **Usage Documentation:** - Monthly reports showing which employees access each SaaS platform and from which states - Screenshots or exports from your SaaS admin dashboards showing user login locations - Records of which business functions occur at each location (e.g., "Oregon office handles customer support, uses Zendesk") **Business Substance Documentation:** - Lease agreements or office documentation for each location - Employee records showing work locations and job functions - Evidence of actual business decisions being made at remote locations - Local business registrations and permits **Financial Allocation Records:** - Clear methodology for how you allocate costs (by headcount, usage hours, revenue generation, etc.) - Consistent application of that methodology across all software purchases - Regular reviews and updates when business operations change **Regarding trends:** The biggest change I'm seeing is states getting much more sophisticated about tracking digital services. Many are implementing "market-based sourcing" rules and sharing data between jurisdictions. Remote work has also complicated things - states are now looking at where employees actually work, not just where they're officially based. The key is having a reasonable, consistent approach that you can defend with documentation. Even if the rules change, having good records of your legitimate business reasoning will help protect you.

0 coins

Ava Thompson

•

As someone who's dealt with similar multi-state tax issues, I'd strongly recommend taking the conservative approach here. While it might be tempting to route all purchases through your low-tax state locations, the risk-reward calculation usually doesn't work out in your favor. The reality is that tax authorities are getting increasingly sophisticated about detecting artificial tax avoidance schemes. Washington state, in particular, has been very aggressive in pursuing businesses they suspect of improperly avoiding sales tax. They have the resources to conduct detailed audits and cross-reference data across jurisdictions. Here's what I'd suggest instead: Develop a legitimate allocation methodology based on actual business operations. If you have 5 employees in Washington and 1 in Oregon, consider allocating roughly 17% of your SaaS costs to Oregon (1/6 of your workforce) - but only for software that the Oregon employee actually uses or benefits from. Document everything meticulously: which employees use which software, where they're physically located when using it, and what business functions occur at each location. This creates a paper trail that shows legitimate business reasoning rather than pure tax avoidance. The few thousand dollars you might save annually probably isn't worth the potential penalties, interest, legal fees, and business disruption that could come from an audit. Focus on legitimate tax strategies instead - there are often other ways to reduce your overall tax burden without walking this particular tightrope.

0 coins

Miguel Silva

•

This is really sound advice, especially about Washington state being aggressive with audits. As someone just starting to navigate multi-state business operations, I'm realizing there's so much more complexity here than I initially thought. The 17% allocation based on workforce distribution makes intuitive sense and seems like something you could easily defend if questioned. Your point about the risk-reward calculation is particularly compelling. When I think about it, saving a few thousand dollars annually versus potentially facing penalties, legal fees, and the stress of an audit really doesn't seem worth it. Plus there's the reputational risk if you're found to be improperly avoiding taxes. I'm curious about your mention of "other legitimate tax strategies" - are there specific approaches you'd recommend for reducing tax burden that don't involve this kind of address manipulation? I'm always looking for ways to optimize our business expenses legally and transparently. Also, when you say to document "which employees use which software," do you mean we should be tracking individual logins and usage, or is it sufficient to document which roles/departments use which tools? I want to make sure we're collecting the right level of detail without creating an administrative nightmare.

0 coins

Ethan Moore

•

I completely understand your frustration - that first property tax bill is a real gut punch! When I bought my house last year, I had the same "wait, what do you mean I have to keep paying thousands just to live here?" moment. It felt like the government was holding my home hostage. What helped me get through it was realizing that property tax is essentially the cost of living in a place where your $425k investment will actually hold its value. When you think about it, those taxes are funding the very things that made you want to buy in that neighborhood - good schools, safe streets, reliable utilities, emergency services that respond quickly. Without those services, your home would be worth a lot less. That said, don't just accept whatever bill they send you! I discovered I was overpaying by about $750 annually. First, apply for any homestead exemptions you qualify for - most new homeowners don't even know these exist. Second, if your assessment seems high compared to recent sales of similar homes nearby, appeal it. The process is less scary than it sounds, and the potential savings make it totally worth the few hours of research. Also, remember that unlike rent (which can increase dramatically each year), property taxes are usually capped by state law on how much they can go up annually. And unlike throwing money away on rent, at least you're paying to maintain something you actually own. It's still frustrating, but understanding the "why" behind it helps make it feel less like highway robbery!

0 coins

Zara Rashid

•

This really resonates with me! I'm still pretty new to homeownership myself and that "government holding my home hostage" feeling is so accurate. It's wild how buying a house opens your eyes to all these ongoing costs that nobody really talks about upfront. Your point about property taxes funding the things that protect home values is helping me reframe this whole situation. I never connected the dots between my tax bill and things like emergency response times or school ratings, but when you put it that way, it makes sense that areas with better services command higher home prices. I'm definitely going to look into those homestead exemptions you mentioned - seems like almost everyone in this thread has found some kind of savings they didn't know about initially. The appeal process still feels intimidating, but hearing that you saved $750 annually makes it seem worth conquering that fear. Thanks for the reminder about the annual increase caps too. Coming from renting where my landlord could basically raise rent however much they wanted each year, having some legal protection against huge spikes is actually pretty reassuring. Still not thrilled about the expense, but at least I'm building equity instead of just paying someone else's property taxes!

0 coins

Emma Garcia

•

I totally feel your pain on this! I bought my first home 18 months ago and had that exact same "wait, I have to pay HOW MUCH every year just to live here?" moment. The sticker shock is real, especially when you've already stretched your budget for the down payment and closing costs. What really helped me was getting involved in my local government to see where the money actually goes. I started attending budget meetings and discovered that about 60% of my property taxes fund the school district (which keeps home values strong even if you don't have kids), 25% goes to emergency services, and the rest covers roads, parks, libraries, and other infrastructure I use regularly. Here's something practical that made a huge difference: I found out my county has a "circuit breaker" program for people whose property taxes exceed a certain percentage of their income. Even though I don't qualify now, knowing these safety nets exist made me feel less anxious about potential job loss or financial emergencies. Many states have similar programs specifically designed to prevent people from losing their homes due to property taxes. Also, definitely challenge your assessment if it seems high! I compared my home to recent sales in the neighborhood and found I was over-assessed by about 8%. Filed an appeal with comparable sales data and got my annual bill reduced by $520. The process took maybe 4 hours total but saves me money every year going forward. The system isn't perfect, but once you understand it and make sure you're not overpaying, it becomes just another cost of protecting your investment rather than feeling like legalized theft!

0 coins

This is such helpful perspective! I love that you actually went to budget meetings to see the breakdown - that 60% going to schools really puts things in perspective since good school districts are such a huge factor in home values. Even without kids, I can see how that's protecting my investment. The circuit breaker program sounds like an amazing safety net that I had no idea existed! That addresses one of my biggest fears about property taxes - what happens if I lose my job or have a medical emergency. Knowing there are programs specifically designed to prevent people from losing their homes over property taxes is hugely reassuring. Your assessment appeal success story is really motivating too. Everyone in this thread seems to have saved significant money by challenging their assessments, which makes me think way more homes are probably over-assessed than people realize. Four hours of work to save $520 annually is an incredible return on investment! I think you've hit the nail on the head with that mindset shift - thinking about it as protecting my investment rather than legalized theft makes it feel so much more reasonable. I'm definitely going to look into my local budget meetings and start researching those safety net programs. Thanks for sharing such practical, actionable advice!

0 coins

I went through something very similar with a temp agency job that lasted only a few days. Here's what I learned after dealing with the IRS directly about this issue: You absolutely should report all income, even from very short employment periods. The good news is you have several viable options that don't require waiting indefinitely for that W-2. First, try one more direct approach - ask Burger King specifically for their "payroll processing company" contact info. Many franchises use third-party payroll services (like ADP or Paychex), and contacting them directly often works better than going through corporate. If that fails, Form 4852 is definitely your best bet. For your calculations, you'll need to estimate both gross wages and all withholdings (federal income tax, Social Security 6.2%, Medicare 1.45%, and any state taxes). Since you worked such a short time, the withholdings were probably minimal anyway. Pro tip: When filling out Form 4852, attach a brief explanation of your attempts to obtain the W-2. The IRS appreciates documentation showing you made good faith efforts to get the actual form. Don't let $120 in wages delay your entire return, especially if you're expecting a refund from your other jobs. File with the substitute form and move forward - you can always amend later if needed when/if the actual W-2 ever shows up.

0 coins

This is really solid advice! The tip about contacting the payroll processing company directly is brilliant - I never would have thought of that. Most people just assume the employer handles everything themselves, but you're right that many franchises outsource payroll. Quick question though - when you attach that explanation about your attempts to get the W-2, does it need to be anything formal or just a simple note? I'm planning to file Form 4852 for a similar situation and want to make sure I document everything properly for the IRS. Also, did you ever end up getting the actual W-2 later, and if so, did you need to file an amended return or did the IRS just match everything up automatically?

0 coins

Omar Farouk

•

For the explanation letter, nothing formal is needed - just a simple note works fine. I wrote something like: "Attempted to obtain W-2 from [Employer Name] via phone calls on [dates] and online portal access. Unable to receive form despite multiple contacts. Using Form 4852 with best estimates based on employment records." As for getting the actual W-2 later - yes, mine showed up about 8 months after I filed! The numbers were very close to my estimates (within about $25 total). The IRS automatically matched everything and I didn't need to file an amended return since the difference was so small and actually in the government's favor (I had slightly underestimated my withholdings). If there's a significant discrepancy when the real W-2 shows up, you might need to amend, but for short-term, low-wage jobs like this, the differences are usually minimal. The key is being conservative with your estimates - slightly underestimating income or slightly overestimating withholdings keeps you on the safe side.

0 coins

I've been through this exact situation with a retail job I quit after just one shift! Here's what I wish someone had told me from the start: Don't waste any more time chasing that W-2 from Burger King - you've already done your due diligence by calling multiple times. For a two-day job earning around $120, you're looking at maybe $10-15 in actual tax impact, so this definitely shouldn't hold up your entire return. Here's your fastest path forward: File Form 4852 (Substitute for Form W-2) with your return. You'll need to estimate your gross wages (hours worked Ɨ hourly rate) and withholdings. For the withholdings, use these standard rates: - Federal income tax: probably 10-12% for your bracket - Social Security: 6.2% - Medicare: 1.45% - State taxes if applicable Look at your other W-2s to see what percentage each tax was of your gross income, then apply similar percentages to estimate the Burger King withholdings. The IRS accepts reasonable estimates on Form 4852, especially when you document that you tried to get the actual W-2. Just attach a brief note explaining your attempts to contact the employer. File your return with the substitute form and get your refund! If the real W-2 ever shows up and there's a big difference (unlikely for such a small amount), you can always amend later. But don't let a $120 job delay getting money back that's rightfully yours.

0 coins

Eli Butler

•

This is exactly the kind of practical advice I needed to hear! I've been stressing about this for weeks when the actual tax impact is probably less than what I'd spend on lunch. Your breakdown of the withholding percentages is super helpful too - I was overthinking how to calculate those estimates. One quick follow-up question: when you filed Form 4852, did you have any documentation from your one-shift job (like a pay stub or anything), or did you just go off memory for the hours and rate? I'm in the same boat where I remember my hourly wage but don't have any paperwork from such a short stint. Thanks for the reality check that this shouldn't delay my whole return. Sometimes you need someone to spell out that $10-15 in taxes isn't worth weeks of stress and delayed refunds!

0 coins

Daniel White

•

I've been dealing with missing W-2s from closed businesses for years as part of my work, and I want to emphasize something important that might not be obvious: **contact the payroll company directly if you can figure out who it was.** Even when the main business closes, payroll companies often retain records for several years due to legal requirements. They may be able to issue you a corrected W-2 or at least provide detailed records of your wages and withholding that you can use for Form 4852. If you can't identify the payroll company, check your old pay stubs for any company names other than your employer, or ask former coworkers. Common payroll services include ADP, Paychex, and QuickBooks Payroll. Also, a practical tip for your Form 4852: when estimating federal withholding, remember that it's typically around 10-12% for lower incomes, 22% for middle incomes. Don't forget to estimate Social Security (6.2%) and Medicare (1.45%) taxes as well - these are often overlooked but should be included in your substitute W-2. The IRS would much rather see you file with reasonable estimates than miss the deadline entirely. You're doing the right thing by taking action now rather than waiting longer.

0 coins

This is fantastic advice about contacting the payroll company directly! I never thought about that angle, but it makes total sense that they'd have to keep records even after the business closes. I'm going to dig through my old files to see if I can find any pay stubs that might have the payroll company name on them. Even if I can't get a proper W-2 from them, having their records would make my Form 4852 estimates much more accurate than just guessing. The breakdown of the different tax withholding percentages is super helpful too. I was lumping everything together as "taxes" but you're right that I need to separate out federal, Social Security, and Medicare. That's probably going to make my estimates way more realistic. Thanks for pointing out that the IRS prefers reasonable estimates over missed deadlines - that really takes some of the pressure off trying to get everything perfect!

0 coins

Mateo Lopez

•

I've been following this thread and want to add one more important point that hasn't been mentioned yet: **make sure you're filing Form 4852 for the correct tax year and that you understand how it affects your refund/balance due.** Since you worked for this company in 2023 and they closed mid-year, you'll be filing Form 4852 for tax year 2023. If you had taxes withheld from your paychecks at this job, those withholdings should increase your refund or reduce what you owe - but only if you report them accurately on the substitute form. One thing that helped me when I was in a similar situation: look at your other W-2s from 2023 to see what percentage of your gross wages were typically withheld for federal taxes. This can give you a baseline for estimating withholding from your missing employer, especially if your income levels were similar. Also, don't forget that if this was a service industry job (restaurant, retail, etc.), you may have had tips that need to be reported separately on your return, even if they're not reflected in your base wage calculations. The most important thing right now is just getting your return filed before the October 15 extension deadline. Missing that deadline will result in penalties that are much worse than any minor inaccuracies in your wage estimates.

0 coins

Prev1...946947948949950...5643Next