


Ask the community...
One thing to remember is that you'll need to pay quarterly estimated taxes next year if you continue doing deliveries. Since there's no withholding on cash payments, you're responsible for making those payments yourself if you expect to owe $1,000 or more in taxes. The IRS can charge penalties if you wait until filing season.
How do you figure out how much you owe for the quarterly payments? I just started doing deliveries this year and am totally lost.
You need to estimate your annual income from deliveries, calculate the taxes you'll owe, and divide by four for each quarterly payment. The simplest approach is to set aside about 30% of your delivery earnings (15.3% for self-employment tax plus your income tax rate). You can use Form 1040-ES to calculate the exact amount, or many tax software programs have quarterly tax calculators. The quarterly due dates are April 15, June 15, September 15, and January 15 of the following year.
Just want to clarify something - I did UberEats and Instacart last year and I got 1099s from them. But it sounds like the original poster was just doing cash delivery work directly for people in the neighborhood? The reporting would be the same (Schedule C) but obviously there's no 1099 form in your case.
Something critical that hasn't been mentioned yet is the concept of "tax residency" vs just physical presence or visa status. The US-Canada tax treaty has specific provisions that might apply to your situation as a Canadian citizen. Even if you meet the substantial presence test, you might be able to claim closer connection to Canada under the treaty's "tie-breaker rules" if you maintain significant ties there. However, claiming treaty benefits requires filing Form 8833, which actually puts you on the IRS radar rather than hiding from it. And if you're trading US securities while physically present in the US, that income may still be considered US-sourced regardless of treaty provisions. The offshore entity adds another layer of complexity because of anti-avoidance rules like CFC (Controlled Foreign Corporation) regulations. If you control the entity, the IRS may look through it and tax you directly.
Can you clarify how the tie-breaker rules work? I'm a Canadian citizen on TN status but have been in the US for 4 years. I was told I can't claim treaty benefits anymore because I'm clearly a US resident for tax purposes now.
Tie-breaker rules look at factors like where you have a permanent home, center of vital interests (closer personal/economic ties), habitual abode, and nationality. After 4 years in the US on a TN, it's difficult (but not impossible) to claim closer connection to Canada. You would need to demonstrate stronger ties to Canada than the US - permanent home there, family, bank accounts, voting, etc. The longer you stay in the US, the harder this becomes. Most tax professionals advise that after 3-4 years, you're likely a US tax resident unless you've deliberately maintained stronger Canadian connections. Filing Form 8833 to claim treaty benefits doesn't guarantee approval - it just asserts your position.
Everyone's missing a crucial point here. The INTENTION behind your structure matters legally. If the IRS determines the primary purpose of your offshore structure is tax avoidance rather than legitimate business purposes, you could face serious consequences beyond just taxes. I'm not an expert, but I've seen cases where people were hit with civil penalties and even criminal charges under various anti-money laundering and tax evasion statutes. The IRS and FinCEN don't look kindly on structures designed primarily to hide income. If you're trading US markets while physically present in the US, using an offshore entity primarily for tax benefits is exactly the kind of arrangement that gets flagged. The "economic substance doctrine" means the IRS can disregard arrangements that don't have legitimate business purpose beyond tax savings.
This is a really important point. My friend went down this road with a Cayman Islands setup for his trading business. Ended up with a full IRS audit, massive penalties, and had to pay all back taxes plus interest. The IRS agent specifically cited the lack of economic substance to the arrangement as the primary issue. Not worth the risk.
You should immediately consult with a trust litigation attorney. The accountant's obligations are important, but your primary concern should be protecting the remaining trust assets ASAP. In my experience, once a trustee starts misappropriating funds, they rarely stop voluntarily. Your attorney can seek a temporary restraining order to freeze the trust accounts while the investigation proceeds. Also, document EVERYTHING from this point forward - every conversation, email, and phone call related to the trust. Keep copies of all statements and documents you receive. This documentation will be crucial for any legal proceedings.
What kind of attorney should I look for specifically? Is there a certain specialty that deals with trustee misconduct? And roughly what should I expect this to cost? I'm worried about spending a ton on legal fees when the trust assets have already been diminished.
You want an attorney who specializes in trust and estate litigation specifically - not just any estate planning attorney. Many estate planners focus primarily on creating trusts and wills but have limited experience with litigation when things go wrong. Look for terms like "trust litigation," "fiduciary litigation," or "trust disputes" on their website or firm description. Ideally, find someone who has experience specifically with trustee removal cases and financial misconduct. Regarding costs, most trust litigation attorneys work on an hourly basis, typically $300-$500 per hour depending on your location and the attorney's experience. Many states allow for attorney fees to be paid from the trust itself when the litigation benefits the trust (like removing a dishonest trustee), but this usually happens after the case concludes. You might need to pay upfront and seek reimbursement later.
Has anyone considered criminal charges? When my cousin stole from our family trust, we initially just tried to remove her as trustee. But our attorney explained that trustee theft over certain amounts is actually felony embezzlement in most states. Filing a police report created a lot more pressure and ultimately led to a much better settlement because she wanted to avoid prosecution. Just something to consider alongside the civil remedies.
This is an important point. My family went through something similar, and we found that once we filed a police report, the trustee suddenly became much more cooperative with returning funds. The district attorney in our county had a financial crimes unit that took it quite seriously.
Just want to share my experience - I tried deducting my patio renovation as a business expense because I host client meetings there. Got audited. It was not fun. The IRS agent basically said home improvements that add value to your property are almost never deductible as business expenses, even if you sometimes use them for business. What DID work for me was claiming a portion of my utilities and internet as business expenses based on the percentage of my home used exclusively for business. That's the key word - "exclusively.
Did you try writing off the furniture for the patio instead of the construction? Like outdoor tables or chairs used for client meetings? Wondering if that would be treated differently.
Yes, I was able to deduct the outdoor furniture since it was clearly business-related and doesn't add permanent value to the home. The IRS treats movable business assets differently than permanent improvements. The agent actually suggested keeping a log of client meetings to demonstrate business use of those assets. Furniture is typically depreciated over 7 years for business use, but depending on cost you might be able to use Section 179 to deduct it all in one year. Definitely different than trying to deduct the actual construction of the deck or patio.
Has anyone successfully used the home office deduction? I'm trying to figure out if it's worth claiming or if it's an audit red flag. I've heard both.
Layla Mendes
Something nobody's mentioned yet - if you go S Corp, make sure you're extremely diligent about maintaining corporate formalities, keeping business and personal finances separate, and documenting shareholder meetings/minutes. My business got audited last year and they scrutinized EVERYTHING because they thought my S Corp status was just a tax avoidance strategy. Also, remember that with these income levels, you might face the 3.8% Net Investment Income Tax on at least part of your S Corp distributions. That should factor into your calculations.
0 coins
Lucas Notre-Dame
β’How often do you need to document shareholder meetings if you're the only owner? Is that even necessary for a single-member S Corp? Seems like excessive paperwork.
0 coins
Layla Mendes
β’Yes, it's still necessary even as a single owner! I hold and document quarterly meetings with myself (sounds ridiculous, but it's important) and maintain a corporate minute book. My accountant advised doing this because maintaining the corporate veil is critical - if you're ever challenged, you need to show you're treating the business as a separate entity. The documentation doesn't need to be complex, but should demonstrate you're making business decisions as a corporation rather than as an individual. This includes formally approving major purchases, loans, salary changes, etc. Many single-owner S Corps get sloppy with this paperwork and it can create real problems during an audit.
0 coins
Aria Park
Has anyone considered the healthcare implications? As a C Corp owner, you can deduct 100% of health insurance premiums as a business expense, but S Corp owners have to report that benefit as income. With good coverage costing $20k+ annually for a family, that's a significant consideration.
0 coins
Noah Ali
β’This is actually a common misconception. S Corp shareholders who own more than 2% can still deduct health insurance premiums on their personal returns (Form 1040) as an adjustment to income, so it ends up being a wash tax-wise in most cases. You just can't deduct it directly on the S Corp return.
0 coins