That's really helpful - I hadn't even considered the QBI deduction. Do you know if there are any special requirements for short-term rentals to qualify for this? And would taking the QBI deduction affect my ability to offset losses against W2 income in any way?

For short-term rentals to qualify for the QBI deduction, they need to rise to the level of a "trade or business" under Section 162, which generally means regular, continuous, and substantial activity - which your hands-on management would likely satisfy. The IRS also issued Revenue Procedure 2019-38 which provides a safe harbor specifically for rental real estate activities. Taking the QBI deduction doesn't affect your ability to offset losses. They're completely separate concepts. If your rentals show a net loss in a given year, there's no QBI deduction to take (since it's calculated on profits). But in profitable years, you'd potentially get both the regular business expense deductions and the additional QBI deduction on what's left.

Agreed about documentation. My friend got audited on exactly this issue and the IRS disallowed their short-term rental losses because they couldn't prove they met the material participation hours. Keep a calendar or app with dates, times, and descriptions of all activities.

That's terrifying! Did you end up actually having to pay the full $10k penalty? Were you able to get it reduced at all? I'm freaking out now because my accounts were inherited from my grandmother and I honestly didn't realize I needed to report them since the interest was only like $300.

I was eventually able to get the penalty reduced to about $1,200 after going through a formal appeal process and demonstrating it was an honest mistake. The key was that I voluntarily amended my return before they discovered it. In your case, with such a small amount of interest and the fact that you're correcting it immediately, you might qualify for a complete penalty waiver under their "reasonable cause" exception. Make sure you include a detailed letter explaining that you inherited the accounts, were unaware of the reporting requirements, and are now voluntarily correcting the oversight as soon as you discovered it. The IRS is more understanding with inherited accounts since many people don't realize the reporting requirements apply to those too.

That's actually incorrect advice. Form 14653 is only for U.S. persons who have been living abroad. Based on the original poster's mention of filing a California state return, they likely don't qualify for the Streamlined Foreign Offshore Procedures. They would potentially qualify for the Streamlined Domestic Offshore Procedures, which uses Form 14654, not 14653. However, even that program is generally for taxpayers who have failed to report foreign accounts for multiple years, not just a single oversight on a recently filed return. For a simple correction of a recent return where foreign interest was omitted, a standard 1040-X amendment is usually the appropriate approach, along with filing any required FBAR forms.

Thanks for this suggestion! My dispute is actually for about $45,000 so this would apply to me. Do you know if filing this way still preserves all my rights if I later decide to get an attorney involved? And does the simplified procedure still allow the examiner to continue working on my case?

Yes, filing under the simplified procedure (S case) still preserves your rights. The main difference is that S cases have a more informal process and you can't appeal the decision beyond the Tax Court. But that's rarely an issue since most cases settle before trial anyway. And absolutely, the examiner can still continue working on your case even after you file. In fact, once you file the petition, your case gets assigned to an IRS attorney who will often work with your examiner to try to settle the case quickly rather than going to trial. Many people find that filing the petition actually speeds up resolution because it puts time pressure on the IRS to wrap things up.

And make sure to send it CERTIFIED mail with return receipt if you're mailing it! That way you have proof of when you sent it in case there's any question.

Can you really use de minimis for a converted personal asset though? I thought that only applied to new purchases specifically for the business.

You're right to question this - there's some nuance here. The de minimis safe harbor typically works best for new business purchases. For converted personal assets, the IRS generally wants you to use depreciation based on the fair market value at the time of conversion. That said, there are some tax professionals who believe you could potentially apply de minimis in the year of conversion if you properly document the fair market value and business use percentage. It's definitely a gray area though, and depreciation is the more conservative and clearly acceptable approach.

Not everyone has the money to buy multiple devices though. When you're just starting out self-employed, you've gotta work with what you have. The tax savings from properly deducting a converted laptop could help fund that dedicated device later.

I understand your point theoretically, but most regular people aren't investing that extra $50-100 per paycheck. It's just getting spent. For many people, tax refunds function as a forced savings plan. I personally prefer getting a chunk back because otherwise that money would just disappear into my daily spending.

You're making a fair point about the psychological benefit. The math doesn't lie though - if you're getting $3000 back, that's $250 per month you could have had in your pocket. Even if you just put that in a high-yield savings account at 4%, you'd earn an extra $70+ over the year. Not life-changing but still better than giving it to the government for free. The real solution is to improve financial discipline rather than using the tax system as a savings account.

I noticed this too! I was getting a really low refund and right after showing me that number, they immediately tried to sell me audit defense for an extra $49.99. Seems predatory to me.

That's exactly what happened to me! It honestly feels like they're using scare tactics. When I went through the same info with FreeTaxUSA instead, I got a much higher refund estimate without all the upsell attempts. I'm never using TurboTax again.