
IRS
CommunityGovernment Services


Ask the community...
So I've been helping my wife with her taxes this year and we just realized her employer has been treating her as an independent contractor when she clearly isn't one. She got a 1099-NEC instead of a W-2 which is totally wrong based on everything I've researched. Looking at the IRS guidelines, she's definitely an employee: her boss controls when and how she works, she uses the company's equipment, they set her pay rate, and they're super specific about how everything needs to be done. The few times she's had to use her own stuff for work, they've reimbursed her way more than necessary. We're planning to file Form SS-8 to get a determination from the IRS about her proper classification, then wait a day and file Form 8919 "Uncollected Social Security and Medicare Tax on Wages" since she shouldn't be paying self-employment taxes. What's confusing me is whether we need to file the 1099-NEC along with Form 8919, and which reason code to use on the 8919. Anyone dealt with this misclassification issue before? Really appreciate any advice!
I just took on a new client and discovered they have their rental property inside an S corporation. I know this generally isn't recommended, but that ship has sailed. What's interesting is that they've been issuing W-2s to the owners all along. I'm trying to determine if this is actually necessary though. In my mind, this is essentially a passive investment and the owners aren't really providing services that would require compensation. If this property were held in a partnership structure instead, this rental income wouldn't be subject to self-employment tax. Is there a legitimate requirement for S corp shareholder-owners to take W-2 wages in this scenario? Or are they unnecessarily complicating their tax situation? Any insights from those who've dealt with similar situations would be appreciated.
Has anyone considered suggesting they convert to a partnership or LLC? Might be worth exploring if holding in an S corp is causing more headaches than benefits. Especially with the TCJA 199A deduction considerations.
I've handled several similar situations, and the key is really documenting the level of services the owners actually provide. If they're truly passive (using a property management company, minimal involvement in tenant selection, repairs handled by others), you can make a strong case for minimal or no compensation. However, I'd be cautious about completely eliminating W-2s if they've been issuing them consistently. A middle ground approach might work better - reduce the compensation to reflect only the actual services performed (maybe equivalent to what you'd pay for bookkeeping, tax prep coordination, major decision-making) while treating the rest as distributions. The documentation is crucial here. Keep detailed records of what services the owners actually perform, time spent, and how decisions are made. This will support your position whether you go with minimal compensation or argue for none at all.
I've been bartending at this place for about 2.5 years, and we had a major system change around 8 months ago that's causing some tax concerns. Previously, we pulled all our tips from the cash drawer and used one employee number for two bartenders. Now, we only put cash tips in our jar, get credit card tips on a tip card at night, and use individual numbers to ring in orders. With this new system, we get "readings" that show our individual sales and tips. Management told us tips are still split 50/50 for bartenders sharing a shift (standard practice with shared tip jars), but our readings are NEVER equal. Here's the issue: If Bartender A rings in $2,500 in sales with $312 in tips, and Bartender B rings in $650 in sales with $78 in tips, we each walk home with $195 after the 50/50 split. But my readings show I made $312 in tips when I actually only got $195. I'm worried I'm being taxed on $312 when I only received $195! Meanwhile, Bartender B is only being taxed on $78 when they actually got $195 too. Our managers just "adjust" the amounts at the end of the night to make our take-home pay even, but they don't seem to understand the tax implications. I'm concerned I'm unfairly paying taxes on money my partner received. Several bartenders have raised this issue, and management claims all locations in our corporate chain use this system. But I know that's not true - other locations still pull cash from the drawer for all tips. Is this tax reporting incorrect? Am I paying taxes on tips I never actually received?
Has anyone calculated how much extra you might be paying in taxes because of this? Like if you're getting taxed on an extra $50 per shift that you're not actually getting, that adds up to thousands over a year!
This is a really common issue in the restaurant industry, and you're absolutely correct to be concerned. The IRS requires that tip income reported on your W-2 matches what you actually received, not what the POS system initially allocated. Your employer needs to implement a proper tip pooling adjustment in their payroll system. Many modern POS systems have tip pooling features that can handle this automatically, but if yours doesn't, they need to manually adjust the allocations before processing payroll. Here's what I'd recommend: Document everything for at least 2-3 weeks (your readings vs actual take-home), then present this to management with a clear explanation of the tax implications. If they don't understand or refuse to fix it, you can contact your state's Department of Labor or file Form SS-8 with the IRS to get an official determination on proper tip reporting procedures. Also keep in mind that if this has been going on for 8 months, you may be able to file amended tax returns to recover any overpaid taxes from previous years. The IRS allows amendments up to 3 years after the original filing date.
I just checked my transcript and noticed my taxable income shows exactly $0.00 this year, with my Adjusted Gross Income also showing $0.00. I'm filing as Head of Household with 2 exemptions, but last year it had a large amount. Here's what my transcript shows: EXEMPTIONS: 02 FILING STATUS: Head of Household ADJUSTED GROSS INCOME: $0.00 TAXABLE INCOME: $0.00 TAXPAYER INCOME: $0.00 SE TAXABLE INCOME: $0.00 SPOUSE: $0.00 Even my SE taxable income is showing $0.00, and spouse's income is listed as $0.00 as well. I'm really concerned because every single income field is showing zeros across the board - taxpayer income $0.00, spouse $0.00. This is definitely not right. Last year my transcript showed over $45,000 in income, and I made even more this year through my self-employment. I've already filed and was expecting a refund based on my earnings and withholdings. Anyone else seeing this kind of situation with completely zeroed out income fields? What could this mean for my return? Could this be some kind of IRS glitch or processing error? Should I call the IRS about this or wait to see if it updates? I'm worried this might delay my refund or trigger some kind of audit.
I'm seeing alot of zeros on mine too. Called IRS and was on hold for 2hrs just to get hung up on ๐คก
Same thing happened to me last year! All zeros across the board even though I had W2 income. Turns out the IRS was just behind on processing - took about 3-4 weeks for my transcript to update with the actual numbers. Since you mentioned self-employment income, make sure all your 1099s were filed correctly by your clients. Sometimes if there's a mismatch between what you reported and what was filed, it can cause processing delays. Don't panic yet, but definitely keep an eye on it and maybe call if it doesn't update in the next couple weeks.
You can check your wage and income transcript on the IRS website - it should show all the 1099s that were filed under your SSN. If something's missing or doesn't match what you reported, that could be causing the processing delay. You can also contact the clients directly to confirm they filed, but the transcript is usually the easiest way to verify.
You can check your wage and income transcript on the IRS website - it shows all the 1099s and W2s that were filed with your SSN. Just go to irs.gov and look for "Get Transcript Online." If something's missing or the amounts don't match what you reported, that could be why your account transcript is showing zeros. The IRS basically puts a hold on processing until they can reconcile everything.
So I'm in a bit of a mess and honestly freaking out about my health insurance situation. I was unemployed for a while and got Medicaid, but I already had an ACA Marketplace plan with premium tax credits that was affordable, so I kept both. When I applied for Medicaid due to being unemployed and having some health issues, I disclosed that I already had insurance coverage and they approved me anyway. What I didn't know is that you can't legally receive premium tax credits for Marketplace insurance while you have Medicaid coverage. No one at Medicaid ever mentioned this was a problem when I told them about my other insurance! The nightmare started when I called my Marketplace insurer to update my info since I got a full-time job. The customer service guy was SUPER rude and dramatic, saying I'm "facing penalties from the IRS" and will have to repay all the tax credits I received from June through August (the overlap months with Medicaid). I've now canceled my Medicaid since I'm employed, but the Marketplace rep said I need to authorize removing the tax credits for those months when I technically didn't qualify for them. If I remove the tax credit going forward, my premium jumps by $250 a month, which is a lot for me right now. What should I do? Will I actually face criminal charges when I file taxes next year? Could this be considered fraud even though it was an honest mistake? I had no idea I was doing anything wrong and now I'm absolutely panicking. Any advice would be so appreciated.
I just went through this exact nightmare scenario in my 2024 taxes. Had Medicaid and Marketplace overlap for 5 months without realizing it was a problem. Here's what happened: 1) I used TurboTax and when I entered my 1095-A form, it automatically calculated that I had to repay some premium tax credits 2) Because my income was about 250% of the federal poverty level, I hit the repayment cap of $850 rather than paying back the full $2,100 in tax credits I received during the overlap 3) No one accused me of fraud, no criminal charges, just had to pay back the $850 with my tax return 4) The IRS did NOT care that it was an honest mistake - the system just sees it as a tax credit you have to repay One thing to think about: don't remove your current tax credits if you no longer have Medicaid. That would just be giving away money you're now eligible for. Just be prepared to handle the repayment for those past overlap months when you file your taxes next year. This whole system is ridiculously confusing and you're not the only one who's gotten caught in this trap!
I completely understand your panic - I was in a very similar situation last year and felt the same way! The good news is that this is definitely not a criminal issue, and you won't face jail time. What you're dealing with is called "excess advance premium tax credits" and it happens more often than you'd think. The IRS treats this as a reconciliation issue during tax filing, not fraud. When you file your 2025 taxes, you'll need to complete Form 8962 (Premium Tax Credit) which will calculate how much you need to repay for those overlap months. The key thing that helped me was understanding that there are repayment caps based on your income level. If your household income is under 400% of the Federal Poverty Level, you won't have to repay the full amount - there are maximum limits that protect you from huge repayment amounts. My advice: Don't remove your current tax credits since you no longer have Medicaid and are now eligible for them. Keep accurate records of which months you had both coverages, and consider working with a tax professional who understands ACA premium tax credit issues when you file next year. This will all work out - it's just paperwork and a manageable repayment amount, not the disaster it feels like right now!
Danielle Mays
Has your wife tried talking to her employer directly about this before filing the SS-8? Some companies genuinely don't understand the classification rules and might fix it voluntarily if approached. I was misclassified a few years ago, and when I explained the issue to my boss with some printouts from the IRS website, they actually reclassified me and issued a W-2 instead. Saved a lot of hassle with forms and waiting for IRS determinations.
0 coins
Roger Romero
This is terrible advice. Most employers know exactly what they're doing - saving themselves the employer portion of payroll taxes and avoiding labor laws. Approaching them directly just gives them a heads up that you're onto them and time to prepare a defense or even fire you.
0 coins
Dylan Cooper
You're absolutely right to file the SS-8 and 8919 forms - this is exactly the situation they're designed for. Based on what you've described about your wife's work arrangement, she clearly meets the common law test for employee status. A few key points to keep in mind: 1. You'll report the 1099-NEC income on your return, but the Form 8919 will calculate the correct employee share of Social Security and Medicare taxes (7.65% instead of the full 15.3% self-employment tax). 2. For the reason code on Form 8919, use code G since you're filing the SS-8 first and waiting for determination. 3. Make sure to keep copies of everything and consider certified mail for the SS-8 filing to have proof of submission. 4. The SS-8 process typically takes 3-6 months, but filing the 8919 with your current return protects you from overpaying taxes while you wait. The fact that she has an employee handbook to follow while being classified as a contractor is particularly strong evidence in your favor. Good luck with the process!
0 coins