IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Ruby Knight

•

This thread has been incredibly helpful! As someone new to employing a nanny, I had no idea about the insurance implications or that nannies can't deduct mileage anymore. One quick question - when you reimburse at the IRS standard rate, do you need to issue any special tax forms at the end of the year for the mileage reimbursements? Or does it just not get reported anywhere since it's non-taxable? I want to make sure I'm handling the paperwork correctly from day one. Also, for those who've set up mileage tracking systems - do you have your nanny take photos of the odometer or is a simple written log sufficient for IRS purposes?

0 coins

Great questions! For the tax forms, mileage reimbursements at the IRS standard rate don't need to be reported on any tax forms as long as they're properly documented and don't exceed the standard rate. They don't go on the W-2 and you don't issue a separate 1099 for them. As for tracking, a simple written log is generally sufficient for IRS purposes. The key elements are date, business purpose, starting location, ending location, and total miles. Photos of the odometer aren't required, though some families prefer them for extra documentation. The IRS mainly wants to see that you have a contemporaneous record (meaning it's recorded at or near the time of the trip, not reconstructed later). Just make sure to keep these mileage logs separate from other employment records - it helps show they're legitimate business expense reimbursements rather than additional compensation.

0 coins

Chloe Martin

•

This is such a timely question! I'm dealing with the exact same situation with our nanny right now. After reading through all these responses, I'm convinced that reimbursing mileage is definitely the way to go - both from a fairness standpoint and tax-wise. What really struck me was the point about nannies not being able to deduct mileage anymore since 2018. I had no idea about that change! It makes total sense that our nanny would want reimbursement rather than essentially paying out of her own pocket to drive our kids around. I'm planning to set up a simple Google Sheet for tracking like someone mentioned, and I'll definitely be looking into the insurance coverage issue too. Thanks everyone for such helpful insights - this community is amazing for navigating all these household employment questions that come up!

0 coins

Mary Bates

•

One thing to watch out for with Cash App - if you deposit over $10,000 in cash within a short period, your bank might file a Currency Transaction Report. This isn't a tax issue but a regulatory thing for preventing money laundering. It doesn't mean you're in trouble, but if you're regularly depositing large amounts of cash, it might trigger some questions.

0 coins

Is that $10,000 in a single transaction or cumulative over time? I help my parents with cash deposits pretty regularly and now I'm worried.

0 coins

Luca Romano

•

The $10,000 threshold is for individual transactions, not cumulative. Banks are required to file Currency Transaction Reports (CTRs) for any single cash deposit over $10,000. However, they also watch for patterns of deposits just under $10,000 (called "structuring") which can also trigger reports. For most people helping family with smaller regular deposits, this isn't something to worry about. The CTR is just a regulatory filing - it doesn't automatically mean you're under investigation or doing anything wrong. It's just part of the banking system's anti-money laundering requirements.

0 coins

I had a similar situation with my elderly grandmother who doesn't trust banks but needed digital payments for some services. What helped me was keeping detailed records of all the cash I converted to Cash App funds - like taking photos of the bills before depositing and noting the amounts and dates. Even though it's not technically required for personal transfers, having that documentation gave me peace of mind in case anyone ever questioned where the money came from. I also made sure to never mark any of these transfers as "goods and services" in the app - always kept them as personal transfers or gifts. The $2500 you mentioned is well under any concerning thresholds, but good record-keeping never hurts. I use a simple spreadsheet with dates, amounts, and notes like "converted grandmother's grocery money to Cash App." Takes 30 seconds each time but could save headaches later if you ever need to explain the transactions.

0 coins

This is really smart advice about keeping records! I'm new to all this and honestly hadn't thought about documenting anything since it's just my own money. But you're right that having a paper trail could be helpful if questions ever come up. I like the idea of taking photos of the cash before converting it - that seems like solid proof that it's legitimate money I already had. And the spreadsheet approach sounds simple enough that I could actually keep up with it. Thanks for sharing what worked for you! One question - when you say "never mark as goods and services," where exactly is that option in Cash App? I want to make sure I'm not accidentally categorizing things wrong.

0 coins

Omar Fawzi

•

This is a nuanced situation that I've encountered multiple times in my practice. The consensus here is correct - the compensation requirement hinges on whether the owners are providing actual services versus passive investment. One practical approach I've used successfully is conducting a "services audit" with the client. Document everything: Who handles tenant screening? Lease negotiations? Maintenance coordination? Financial reporting? Even if they use a property management company, there are often oversight duties that constitute services. For clients transitioning away from W-2s after years of issuing them, I recommend a phased approach over 2-3 years while building strong documentation. Start by reducing compensation to reflect only actual services performed, then potentially eliminate it entirely if the documentation supports truly passive ownership. Also consider the state tax implications - some states may have different rules or be more aggressive in examining S corp compensation. The federal position is only part of the equation. The key is having a defensible position backed by solid documentation. Better to be conservative and pay some modest compensation than face an audit where you can't substantiate a zero-compensation position.

0 coins

Zara Mirza

•

This services audit approach is brilliant and something I wish I'd thought of earlier. I'm curious about the state tax implications you mentioned - are there specific states that are particularly aggressive on this issue? Also, when you do the phased approach over 2-3 years, do you typically reduce by a set percentage each year or base it on documented changes in the level of services? I have a client in a similar situation and want to make sure I'm being appropriately conservative while not overpaying unnecessarily.

0 coins

@db2df52f7d9f Great question about state-specific issues! In my experience, California and New York tend to be more aggressive, particularly California's FTB which often follows federal S corp adjustments closely. Some states also have their own reasonable compensation requirements that may differ from federal standards. For the phased approach, I typically base reductions on documented changes rather than arbitrary percentages. For example, if a client transitions from self-managing to using a property management company, that's a clear reduction in services that justifies lower compensation. I'll document the before/after service levels and adjust compensation accordingly. The key is making each year's compensation defensible on its own merits. If services truly decrease each year (maybe they automate more processes, delegate more responsibilities), then the compensation should reflect that. But if service levels remain constant, the compensation should too. The documentation trail showing the business rationale for any changes is what matters most in an audit scenario.

0 coins

I appreciate all the thorough analysis here, but I want to add a practical perspective from recent experience. The IRS has been increasingly scrutinizing S corps with rental activities, particularly during examinations. What I've found works well is creating a contemporaneous log of all owner activities related to the rental property. This includes time spent on tenant communications, reviewing management company reports, making capital improvement decisions, handling insurance matters, etc. Even seemingly minor activities can add up to justify reasonable compensation. For clients who have been issuing W-2s consistently, I typically recommend maintaining some level of compensation unless you can clearly demonstrate the owners have become completely passive. The burden of proof is on the taxpayer to show why compensation isn't warranted, and "we want to save on payroll taxes" isn't going to fly with an examiner. One thing I haven't seen mentioned is the potential impact on QBI deductions under Section 199A. The interaction between S corp wages and QBI calculations can sometimes make modest W-2 compensation beneficial from an overall tax perspective, even if it's not strictly required. Always run the numbers both ways before making a final recommendation.

0 coins

This is exactly the kind of practical guidance I was hoping to find! The contemporaneous log idea is brilliant - I never thought about documenting seemingly minor activities like reviewing management reports or insurance decisions, but you're absolutely right that these can add up to justify at least some compensation. Your point about the QBI interaction is particularly interesting. I hadn't considered how the W-2 wages might actually benefit the overall tax picture through the QBI calculations. Could you elaborate on when this might make modest compensation beneficial? I'm assuming it relates to the W-2 wage limitation for certain taxpayers, but I'd love to understand the mechanics better. Also, do you have any specific recommendations for how detailed the activity log should be? Daily entries, weekly summaries, or something else? I want to make sure my clients are documenting appropriately without creating an administrative burden.

0 coins

Has your wife tried talking to her employer directly about this before filing the SS-8? Some companies genuinely don't understand the classification rules and might fix it voluntarily if approached. I was misclassified a few years ago, and when I explained the issue to my boss with some printouts from the IRS website, they actually reclassified me and issued a W-2 instead. Saved a lot of hassle with forms and waiting for IRS determinations.

0 coins

Roger Romero

•

This is terrible advice. Most employers know exactly what they're doing - saving themselves the employer portion of payroll taxes and avoiding labor laws. Approaching them directly just gives them a heads up that you're onto them and time to prepare a defense or even fire you.

0 coins

Dylan Cooper

•

You're absolutely right to file the SS-8 and 8919 forms - this is exactly the situation they're designed for. Based on what you've described about your wife's work arrangement, she clearly meets the common law test for employee status. A few key points to keep in mind: 1. You'll report the 1099-NEC income on your return, but the Form 8919 will calculate the correct employee share of Social Security and Medicare taxes (7.65% instead of the full 15.3% self-employment tax). 2. For the reason code on Form 8919, use code G since you're filing the SS-8 first and waiting for determination. 3. Make sure to keep copies of everything and consider certified mail for the SS-8 filing to have proof of submission. 4. The SS-8 process typically takes 3-6 months, but filing the 8919 with your current return protects you from overpaying taxes while you wait. The fact that she has an employee handbook to follow while being classified as a contractor is particularly strong evidence in your favor. Good luck with the process!

0 coins

Bartender here - I think my restaurant is taxing my shared tips incorrectly. Help needed!

I've been bartending at this place for about 2.5 years, and we had a major system change around 8 months ago that's causing some tax concerns. Previously, we pulled all our tips from the cash drawer and used one employee number for two bartenders. Now, we only put cash tips in our jar, get credit card tips on a tip card at night, and use individual numbers to ring in orders. With this new system, we get "readings" that show our individual sales and tips. Management told us tips are still split 50/50 for bartenders sharing a shift (standard practice with shared tip jars), but our readings are NEVER equal. Here's the issue: If Bartender A rings in $2,500 in sales with $312 in tips, and Bartender B rings in $650 in sales with $78 in tips, we each walk home with $195 after the 50/50 split. But my readings show I made $312 in tips when I actually only got $195. I'm worried I'm being taxed on $312 when I only received $195! Meanwhile, Bartender B is only being taxed on $78 when they actually got $195 too. Our managers just "adjust" the amounts at the end of the night to make our take-home pay even, but they don't seem to understand the tax implications. I'm concerned I'm unfairly paying taxes on money my partner received. Several bartenders have raised this issue, and management claims all locations in our corporate chain use this system. But I know that's not true - other locations still pull cash from the drawer for all tips. Is this tax reporting incorrect? Am I paying taxes on tips I never actually received?

Rachel Tao

•

Has anyone calculated how much extra you might be paying in taxes because of this? Like if you're getting taxed on an extra $50 per shift that you're not actually getting, that adds up to thousands over a year!

0 coins

Derek Olson

•

I did the math on this for my situation which was similar. If you're overtaxed on just $40 per shift, working 4 shifts a week, that's $8,320 in falsely reported income over a year. At even a 15% tax rate, you're overpaying about $1,248 annually. And that doesn't include state taxes!

0 coins

This is a really common issue in the restaurant industry, and you're absolutely correct to be concerned. The IRS requires that tip income reported on your W-2 matches what you actually received, not what the POS system initially allocated. Your employer needs to implement a proper tip pooling adjustment in their payroll system. Many modern POS systems have tip pooling features that can handle this automatically, but if yours doesn't, they need to manually adjust the allocations before processing payroll. Here's what I'd recommend: Document everything for at least 2-3 weeks (your readings vs actual take-home), then present this to management with a clear explanation of the tax implications. If they don't understand or refuse to fix it, you can contact your state's Department of Labor or file Form SS-8 with the IRS to get an official determination on proper tip reporting procedures. Also keep in mind that if this has been going on for 8 months, you may be able to file amended tax returns to recover any overpaid taxes from previous years. The IRS allows amendments up to 3 years after the original filing date.

0 coins

Honorah King

•

This is really helpful advice! I'm curious about the amended returns - if I've been dealing with this incorrect tip reporting for 8 months, would I need to wait until I get my W-2 to see if they actually report the wrong amounts? Or can I start documenting now to prepare for filing an amendment? Also, is there a specific form or process for challenging tip allocation on a W-2 if the employer won't fix it voluntarily?

0 coins

Prev1...27732774277527762777...5644Next