IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls โ€“ which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Lucas Kowalski

โ€ข

This is definitely frustrating but you're not alone! I had a similar issue with an empty envelope from the Michigan Treasury Department about 6 months ago. It turned out to be a notice about a small refund I was owed. The key thing is to act quickly - I called their customer service line at (517) 636-4486 and they were actually more responsive than the IRS number. They could see exactly what document was supposed to be mailed and expedited a replacement. Keep that envelope as proof you received something, and don't stress too much - these printing/stuffing errors happen more often than they should but they're usually easy to resolve!

0 coins

Brianna Schmidt

โ€ข

This is super helpful! I'm dealing with the same thing right now and was worried I'd be stuck on hold forever. The Michigan Treasury number you provided seems way more reasonable than trying to get through to the IRS. Did they ask for any specific reference numbers from the envelope, or just your personal info? I'm definitely keeping the empty envelope as proof like you suggested!

0 coins

Amara Nwosu

โ€ข

I work at a tax prep office and we see this issue every tax season unfortunately. The good news is that Michigan Treasury Department is usually pretty responsive compared to the IRS. Since the envelope clearly states it's from Michigan Treasury (not IRS), definitely call them first at (517) 636-4486 like others mentioned. They can tell you exactly what document was supposed to be included and whether it affects any deadlines. Keep that empty envelope - sometimes they ask for the envelope number or postmark date to track down what went wrong in their mailing process. Usually it's just a notice about your account status or a refund update, but better safe than sorry!

0 coins

StarStrider

โ€ข

Thanks for the professional insight! That's really reassuring to hear from someone who deals with this regularly. I was starting to panic thinking I missed something crucial for my tax return. Definitely going to call that Michigan Treasury number first thing tomorrow morning. Quick question - do these kinds of mailing errors typically delay any processing on their end, or do they usually just resend and continue with whatever process was happening?

0 coins

Everyone in the tax community knows the first two weeks of February are chaos for PATH Act returns. The system is overloaded with millions of returns. Your transcript will likely update this Thursday or next Tuesday - those are the main batch processing days. Don't stress about the wrong filing status showing - it's just placeholder data until your return gets fully processed. Focus on the cycle code once it appears - that's your real indicator of progress.

0 coins

Mei Liu

โ€ข

I'm going through the exact same thing right now! Filed MFJ on Sunday night, got my acceptance confirmation Monday morning, but my transcript still shows single with all zeros. Reading through these responses has been incredibly helpful - especially learning about the placeholder data and batch processing cycles. It's reassuring to know this is completely normal during the first week after filing. I was about to panic thinking I'd somehow filed incorrectly, but now I understand it's just how their system works during the initial processing phase. Thanks everyone for the detailed explanations about transaction codes and processing timelines!

0 coins

Mia Alvarez

โ€ข

I've been filing taxes for over 15 years now, and this DDD vs. actual deposit date confusion happens every single tax season. Back in 2019, I got my refund 2 days early. In 2020, it was exactly on the DDD. Last year, one day early. This year, right on the DDD again. Same bank throughout. I've come to believe there are multiple factors at play - not just your bank's policy, but also the Treasury's batch processing schedule, the day of the week your DDD falls on, and possibly even random variation in processing loads. The system isn't perfectly consistent year to year.

0 coins

Anthony Young

โ€ข

Thank you for sharing your experience across multiple years! That's super helpful to see the variation even with the same bank. Makes me feel better about not being able to perfectly predict it.

0 coins

Ella Thompson

โ€ข

I appreciate this historical perspective. It aligns with what I've observed in my research as well.

0 coins

Carter Holmes

โ€ข

I was in EXACTLY the same situation with a DDD of 3/13/2024. My transcript showed cycle code 20240905 with the 846 refund issued code. My refund hit my account precisely at 3:14am on 3/13 - not a minute before. I've tracked this for three years now since I'm always counting on that money for spring expenses. My credit union has never once released my tax refund early, though they do release my paycheck a day early. Different ACH codes are handled differently by financial institutions. The Treasury uses a specific ACH code (XXX) for tax refunds that some banks treat differently than regular direct deposits.

0 coins

Amara Okafor

โ€ข

This is really helpful information about the specific ACH codes! I never knew that tax refunds use different codes than regular direct deposits. That would definitely explain why my bank handles my paycheck differently than my tax refund. Do you happen to know what the specific ACH code is for tax refunds? I'd love to ask my bank about their policy for that particular code type.

0 coins

Quinn Herbert

โ€ข

I've been lurking on this thread because I'm dealing with the exact same situation! Working in manufacturing with tons of OT available but always second-guessing myself on the tax implications. What really hit home for me was the example someone gave showing that even at 3x pay, you're still keeping over $100/hour after taxes. That's more than double your regular rate even after Uncle Sam takes his cut! One thing I learned the hard way - make sure you're setting aside some of that overtime money for taxes if your employer isn't withholding enough. I got burned last year when I worked a ton of OT in Q4 but my withholding was based on my regular pay rate. Ended up owing at tax time instead of getting my usual refund. But the bottom line everyone's been saying is absolutely true - you'll ALWAYS make more money by working more hours, even if you jump tax brackets. The math just doesn't work any other way with our progressive tax system. Now I just focus on whether the time away from family is worth the extra cash, not whether the taxes make it pointless.

0 coins

James Johnson

โ€ข

This is such valuable advice about setting aside money for taxes on overtime! I hadn't thought about that aspect. How much would you recommend setting aside as a percentage of the OT pay? I'm in a similar boat where I could pick up a lot of extra shifts but I want to make sure I'm not caught off guard at tax time. Did you end up having to pay penalties for under-withholding, or just the additional tax amount? Also really appreciate everyone sharing the tools and resources in this thread. It's given me the confidence to actually crunch the numbers for my specific situation instead of just avoiding overtime based on hearsay from coworkers.

0 coins

Connor O'Brien

โ€ข

This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm actually a tax preparer and see this confusion about overtime and tax brackets constantly during tax season. People come in convinced they "lost money" by working overtime, but when we run the actual numbers, they always made more. One additional point I'd make - if you're consistently working this much overtime, you might want to consider increasing your 401k contribution percentage if your employer offers it. Not only does this reduce your taxable income (which can help offset some of that bracket creep), but you're also saving more for retirement during these high-earning periods. With your 3x overtime rate especially, even maxing out your 401k contribution ($23,000 for 2024 if you're under 50) would still leave you way ahead financially compared to your base pay alone. Plus the tax-deferred savings means more of that overtime money stays in your pocket now. Just something to consider as you're clearly in a great position to build wealth with these overtime opportunities!

0 coins

Layla Mendes

โ€ข

This is such great advice about the 401k strategy! I never thought about using high overtime periods to really boost retirement savings. That's actually brilliant - you get the immediate tax benefit of reducing your taxable income AND you're putting away more for the future when you have the extra earning power. Quick question though - does the 401k contribution come out before or after overtime calculations? Like if I'm making $127.50/hr on that 3x overtime, does my 401k contribution reduce that specific overtime pay, or does it just reduce my overall taxable income at the end of the year? I want to make sure I understand how the timing works with payroll deductions. Also, is there a rule of thumb for what percentage to contribute when you're in these high-earning overtime situations? I've been contributing the basic amount to get my company match, but sounds like I should be thinking bigger picture here.

0 coins

Destiny Bryant

โ€ข

The excessive withholding you're experiencing is unfortunately very common with multiple jobs, and you're right to question it! When you check Step 2 Option C, both employers calculate withholding as if that job alone puts you in a higher tax bracket, which creates significant overwithholding. Here's a practical approach that has worked well for many people: Keep Option C checked on your higher-paying job ($60k), but on your lower-paying job ($25k), switch to leaving Step 2 blank or use the Multiple Jobs Worksheet instead. This prevents the "stacking" effect where both jobs assume the worst-case scenario for your tax bracket. Also, don't forget that you can adjust your withholding mid-year! If you're consistently seeing $400+ in federal withholding on a $2,350 paycheck, you're likely on track for a massive refund. While that might feel good in April, you're essentially giving the government an interest-free loan of your money all year long. I'd recommend running your numbers through the IRS Tax Withholding Estimator with both paystubs handy - it'll give you a much more accurate picture of what you should actually be withholding based on your combined income and help you avoid that rent-sized chunk disappearing from every paycheck.

0 coins

Mia Roberts

โ€ข

This is really helpful advice, thank you! I think the "stacking" effect you mentioned is exactly what's happening to me. Both jobs are treating my income like I'm in a higher bracket when really it's the combined income that should determine my actual tax situation. I'm going to try your suggestion about keeping Option C on my higher-paying job but leaving Step 2 blank on the lower-paying one. That sounds like a much more balanced approach than what I'm doing now. The IRS Tax Withholding Estimator keeps getting mentioned in this thread so I'll definitely give that a shot this weekend. You're absolutely right about the interest-free loan situation - I never thought about it that way but it makes total sense. I'd rather have that extra $180-200 per paycheck in my pocket throughout the year instead of waiting for a big refund. Thanks for breaking this down in such a clear way!

0 coins

Lauren Johnson

โ€ข

Based on everyone's advice here, I just wanted to share what ended up working for me in a similar situation. I was also getting hit with massive withholding across two jobs ($65k and $20k), and after reading through all these suggestions, I tried the approach of keeping the multiple jobs box checked only on my higher-paying job and leaving it blank on the lower-paying one. The difference was immediate and significant! My next paycheck had about $160 less in federal withholding, which feels much more reasonable. I also ran the IRS Tax Withholding Estimator like several people suggested, and it confirmed I was on track for about a $2,200 overpayment with my original setup. One thing I learned that might help others: the estimator actually walks you through different scenarios, so you can see how various W-4 adjustments will affect your withholding throughout the year. It's way less intimidating than I thought it would be, and having that concrete feedback gave me confidence to make the changes. For anyone still struggling with this, definitely don't just accept excessive withholding as "normal" for multiple jobs. There are absolutely ways to get it more balanced while still ensuring you don't owe at tax time.

0 coins

Angelica Smith

โ€ข

This is exactly the kind of real-world follow-up that's so helpful! It's great to hear that the advice from this thread actually worked in practice. The $160 reduction in withholding per paycheck really puts it in perspective - that's almost $4,200 more in your pocket throughout the year instead of waiting for a refund. I'm curious about your experience with the IRS Tax Withholding Estimator - did it give you specific recommendations for what to put on each W-4 form, or was it more general guidance? I'm planning to try it myself this weekend and want to make sure I'm getting the most out of it. Also, did you end up making any other adjustments beyond just unchecking the multiple jobs box on your lower-paying job's W-4?

0 coins

Prev1...17301731173217331734...5643Next