IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Honorah King

β€’

This has been such an informative discussion! As someone new to selling collectibles, I really appreciate everyone breaking down the cost basis calculations and record-keeping requirements. I have a quick follow-up question about timing - if I sell an item in December 2024 but don't receive payment until January 2025 (maybe due to a return/refund situation or delayed payment processing), which tax year does that income belong to? I'm assuming it's when I actually receive the money, but want to make sure I'm not missing something important. Also, for anyone who mentioned using spreadsheets to track everything - do you happen to have a template you'd be willing to share? I'm just getting started with organizing my records and would love to see what columns/categories experienced sellers find most useful for tax reporting purposes. Thanks again to everyone who's shared their knowledge here - this thread is going to save me a lot of headaches come tax season!

0 coins

Great questions! For timing, you're correct - income is generally recognized when you actually receive payment, not when the sale occurs. So if you sell something in December 2024 but get paid in January 2025, that income would typically be reported on your 2025 tax return. However, if you use eBay's managed payments and they hold funds temporarily, the income is usually recognized when eBay makes the payment available to you, not necessarily when it hits your bank account. Regarding spreadsheet templates, I don't have one to share directly, but based on what others have mentioned in this thread, your columns should include: Date Sold, Item Description, Sale Price, Original Cost, Purchase Date, Packaging Costs, Shipping Costs, Platform Fees, Net Profit/Loss, and Holding Period (to track if over 1 year for potential capital gains treatment). You might also want columns for Transaction ID and Payment Method to help match things up with your 1099-K forms. The separate bank account suggestion from Paolo is really smart for beginners - it makes reconciling everything so much easier! Welcome to the collectibles selling world, and great job thinking about organization from the start.

0 coins

Amara Nnamani

β€’

This thread has been incredibly helpful for understanding collectibles taxation! I'm also selling items from my collection (mostly vintage toys and action figures) and had been confused about the cost basis calculations. One thing I'd like to add for fellow collectors - if you're selling items that came in original packaging, don't forget that you might be able to include restoration or cleaning costs in your basis too. For example, I had some vintage Star Wars figures that needed careful cleaning to remove decades of dust and grime before selling. I kept receipts for the specialized cleaning supplies I used specifically for those items. Also, for anyone tracking insurance costs - if you pay for shipping insurance on valuable items, that's definitely another cost you can include to reduce your taxable gain. I learned this the hard way after forgetting to include insurance costs on several high-value sales last year. The record-keeping advice here is spot on. I started photographing every item before and after packaging, plus keeping screenshots of all my eBay listing details and final sale prices. It creates a complete paper trail that would be really helpful if the IRS ever had questions about my calculations.

0 coins

PixelWarrior

β€’

This is such a great point about restoration and cleaning costs! I never thought about including those in my basis calculations. I've been selling vintage gaming consoles and have spent quite a bit on specialized cleaning solutions and replacement parts to get them in working condition before sale. Your mention of insurance costs is really helpful too - I always opt for insurance on items over $100 but hadn't considered that as a deductible cost. Between the cleaning supplies, replacement parts, insurance, and all the other costs discussed in this thread, it really adds up and makes a significant difference in the actual taxable amount. The photography documentation approach you described sounds comprehensive. I've been taking photos of items but not always of the packaging process - that's a smart addition to show the condition and care taken with each sale. Thanks for sharing these practical tips from your experience!

0 coins

Dmitry Volkov

β€’

I've been following this thread as someone who recently completed the EIN application process for my Hungarian Kft., and I wanted to add a few observations that might help future applicants. First, the C-Corporation designation advice here is absolutely correct - I can confirm this worked perfectly for my Hungarian limited company. The IRS processed it without any questions or delays. One thing I'd add that I haven't seen mentioned: if you're applying during peak tax season (January-April), expect longer processing times. I submitted my SS-4 in March and it took nearly 4 weeks instead of the typical 2-3 weeks others have reported. The IRS international line confirmed this was due to higher application volumes during tax season. Also, regarding the international fax number (+1-304-707-9471), I recommend calling your fax service provider first to confirm they can send to US numbers. Some European fax services have restrictions on international transmissions that I discovered the hard way after my first attempt failed. For anyone still on the fence about those callback services mentioned earlier - I was initially skeptical but ended up using Claimyr when I needed to check my application status. It genuinely worked as described and saved me hours of frustration trying to get through on my own. The key takeaway is that this process is very manageable once you know the right steps. European limited companies should confidently select C-Corporation, use "Banking purpose" if that's your intent, and be patient with processing times. This community's collective experience makes it much easier for newcomers to navigate successfully.

0 coins

Luca Greco

β€’

This is such a helpful comprehensive summary! As someone completely new to this process with a Danish ApS company, I really appreciate how this thread has evolved into a complete guide for European limited companies applying for EINs. The timing insight about peak tax season is particularly valuable - I was planning to submit next month but now I'll consider waiting until after April to avoid the longer processing delays. Four weeks versus two weeks is a significant difference when you're trying to get business operations set up. Your point about checking with fax service providers is also something I wouldn't have thought of. I'll definitely verify international transmission capabilities before attempting to send my SS-4. It's amazing how consistent everyone's experience has been across different European countries - Hungarian Kft, Romanian SRL, German GmbH, etc. All successfully using the C-Corporation designation. This gives me complete confidence that my Danish ApS will follow the same pattern. Thanks to everyone who contributed their real-world experiences here. This thread should be bookmarked by anyone dealing with European company EIN applications!

0 coins

Liam Cortez

β€’

This has been an incredibly thorough and helpful thread! I'm preparing to apply for an EIN for my Swiss GmbH and this collective wisdom has answered virtually every question I had. The consistency across all European limited company types is remarkable - whether it's Belgian, German, Romanian, Hungarian, or any other EU limited liability structure, the C-Corporation designation seems to be the universal solution. This gives me complete confidence moving forward. A few key takeaways I'm noting from everyone's experiences: - Use "Banking purpose" if that's your actual reason (not "Started new business" for existing companies) - Format addresses clearly with country name in caps - Use personal name as responsible party rather than company name - International fax number: +1-304-707-9471 - Expect 2-4 weeks processing time (longer during tax season) - Keep company registration docs handy but they likely won't be requested For anyone still reading this thread in the future, this is basically a complete playbook for European companies getting US EINs. The community knowledge here is invaluable and could save hours of research and potential mistakes. Thanks to everyone who shared their real experiences - this is exactly the kind of practical guidance that makes these bureaucratic processes manageable!

0 coins

Luis Johnson

β€’

This thread has been absolutely invaluable! As someone just getting started with this process, I can't thank everyone enough for sharing their real-world experiences. Reading through all these different European company types successfully using the same approach gives me so much confidence. I'm particularly grateful for the detailed practical tips that you'd never find in official documentation - things like the address formatting, timing around tax season, and even the fax service provider check. These are the kinds of details that can make or break an application. One quick question for the group: has anyone had experience with multiple EIN applications for the same company? My company might need separate EINs for different business activities in the US down the line. Is that something that's commonly done or should we try to handle everything under one EIN? Thanks again to this amazing community for creating such a comprehensive resource!

0 coins

Nia Davis

β€’

As someone who recently went through this exact process, I can't stress enough how important it is to start gathering your preliminary financial statements early. I made the mistake of waiting until the last minute and discovered that one of our brokerage firms needed 10 business days to generate the year-to-date report. Here's what I wish I had known earlier: create a comprehensive asset inventory first, then systematically contact each institution about 6-8 weeks before your planned termination date. For investment accounts, ask specifically for "income and realized gains/losses through [termination date]" rather than just a general statement - this ensures you get the tax-relevant information. Also, don't forget about any automatic reinvestment plans (DRIPs) that might generate small amounts of additional income right up until termination. These often get overlooked but can affect your final tax calculations. One last tip - if your trust has any money market accounts or CDs that will mature after your planned termination date, factor in that accrued interest when calculating your reserves. The preliminary statements often don't capture interest that's earned but not yet paid, which can create surprises later.

0 coins

Ruby Blake

β€’

This is incredibly thorough advice - thank you! I'm curious about the DRIP issue you mentioned. How do you typically handle those small reinvestments that happen right up until termination? Do you just estimate based on the dividend schedule, or is there a way to get the companies to provide exact amounts through a specific date? I'm dealing with several stocks that have monthly dividend reinvestment and want to make sure I'm not missing anything significant.

0 coins

Fidel Carson

β€’

For DRIP reinvestments, I found the best approach was to contact the transfer agent directly (not the brokerage) about 2-3 weeks before termination. Most transfer agents can provide a "dividend reinvestment projection" that shows expected dividend payments and reinvestment dates through your termination date. For monthly dividend stocks, you're right to be concerned - those small amounts can add up. I had success calling the investor relations departments of the companies directly. They were usually able to tell me the exact ex-dividend dates and payment amounts for the next few months, which let me calculate precisely which dividends would be reinvested before termination. The key is being specific about your cutoff date when you make these calls. Say something like "I need to know all dividend reinvestments that will occur through [specific date]" rather than asking for general information. Most companies have this data readily available since they need it for their own tax reporting. One thing that caught me off guard - some DRIPs have a 1-2 day processing delay, so a dividend paid on your termination date might not actually reinvest until after termination. Make sure to clarify the actual reinvestment timing, not just the dividend payment date.

0 coins

I'm in a very similar boat as the original poster - dealing with trust termination pressure from beneficiaries while trying to handle the tax complexities properly. Reading through all these responses has been incredibly helpful, especially the practical tips about contacting brokerage firms directly for preliminary statements. One additional consideration I haven't seen mentioned yet: if your trust has any foreign investments or accounts, the reporting requirements can get significantly more complex with a short-year return. I discovered our trust had a small position in a foreign mutual fund that required additional forms (8621 for PFICs) that I wasn't prepared for. The fund company couldn't provide the detailed income breakdown I needed for the short-year period, which ultimately delayed our termination by several months. Also want to echo the advice about strategic timing. We initially planned to terminate in early November but shifted to late December after realizing we'd miss out on some year-end capital loss harvesting opportunities that significantly reduced our overall tax liability. Sometimes waiting those extra few weeks can save thousands in taxes, which more than justifies the additional administrative burden. For anyone considering this route, I'd strongly recommend creating a detailed timeline working backwards from your target termination date. Include time for: gathering all statements (8-10 weeks), CPA review and planning (4-6 weeks), beneficiary notices if required by your trust document (varies), and a buffer for unexpected complications (2-4 weeks). Better to plan conservatively and finish early than rush the process and make costly mistakes.

0 coins

Philip Cowan

β€’

This is such valuable insight about foreign investments - I hadn't even considered PFIC reporting complications! Your point about the timeline working backwards is spot on. I'm dealing with a similar situation and initially underestimated how long everything would take. The capital loss harvesting opportunity you mentioned is particularly interesting. Did you work with your CPA to identify those opportunities, or were you able to spot them yourself when reviewing the portfolio? I'm wondering if there are other year-end tax strategies I should be considering before finalizing our termination date. Also, when you say "beneficiary notices if required by your trust document" - is there a standard timeframe for this, or does it vary significantly by state? I'm trying to build out my own timeline and want to make sure I'm not missing any mandatory waiting periods.

0 coins

Fiona Sand

β€’

This has been such an incredibly detailed and helpful discussion! As someone who's been lurking in expat tax forums for months trying to understand this exact situation, I can't thank everyone enough for sharing their real-world experiences. I'm currently on an H1B visa planning to return to the Netherlands in about 2 years, and I've been contributing to my Roth IRA for the past 3 years. After reading through all these experiences, I'm realizing I need to research the Dutch tax treatment much more thoroughly than I initially thought. One thing that's become clear from everyone's stories is that the US-side tax treatment (qualified distributions being tax-free) is really just the beginning of the analysis. Each country's domestic tax law, reporting requirements, banking regulations, and even recent policy changes can completely change the practical benefits of maintaining a Roth IRA as an expat. @Liam McConnell - your questions about cost-benefit analysis really resonated with me. I'm starting to wonder if the complexity and ongoing compliance costs might outweigh the tax benefits, especially for those of us with shorter US work periods. The currency risk aspect that several people mentioned is also something I hadn't fully considered. With the euro-dollar exchange rate volatility, there's an additional layer of uncertainty about the real purchasing power of future distributions. I think I need to start researching Netherlands-specific treatment of US retirement accounts and possibly consult with a cross-border tax advisor sooner rather than later. This thread has made it clear that early planning with country-specific expertise is absolutely essential. Has anyone dealt with Dutch tax authorities regarding US retirement accounts, or found good resources for Netherlands-US tax treaty implications for retirement planning?

0 coins

Connor Murphy

β€’

@Fiona Sand - I can actually help with the Netherlands situation! I went through this exact process when I moved back to Amsterdam three years ago with my Roth IRA. The good news is that the Netherlands generally has favorable treatment for US retirement accounts under the tax treaty. Qualified Roth IRA distributions are typically not subject to Dutch income tax, and the treaty s'pension article usually covers this. However, you will need to report the account annually to the Dutch tax authorities Belastingdienst (on) your income tax return under Box 3 if the balance exceeds the reporting threshold. One thing that s'specific to the Netherlands - they have a concept called fictitious "income fictief" (rendement for) foreign assets, but retirement accounts are generally exempt from this if they qualify under the treaty provisions. You ll'want to make sure your financial institution provides proper documentation showing it s'a qualified retirement account. The Dutch are generally quite efficient with tax treaty applications, but you should file Form 8833 with your US return if you re'claiming treaty benefits. Also, consider getting a statement from the Belastingdienst confirming their position on your specific account - they re'usually helpful with written rulings for expats. Currency risk is definitely real, but the Netherlands strong' financial system gives you good options for managing EUR/USD exposure in your other investments. Overall, I ve'found the Dutch treatment to be much more straightforward than what others have described for other countries in this thread!

0 coins

Angelica Smith

β€’

This thread has been absolutely invaluable! I'm on an H1B visa planning to return to Taiwan in about 2-3 years, and I've been contributing to my Roth IRA for the past 2 years. After reading everyone's experiences, I'm realizing there are several Taiwan-specific considerations I need to research that I hadn't even thought about: 1) Taiwan's Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) system has specific rules for overseas income that might affect how Roth distributions are treated, even if the US-Taiwan tax agreement generally covers retirement income. 2) Taiwan's Central Bank has foreign exchange controls that could complicate receiving large USD distributions - there are annual limits on how much foreign currency individuals can bring into Taiwan without special approval. 3) The recent changes to Taiwan's tax residency rules (the 183-day test vs. domicile test) could affect when these rules start applying, similar to what @Maya Patel mentioned about Australia's tie-breaker provisions. What's particularly concerning is that Taiwan doesn't have a comprehensive tax treaty with the US - just a more limited tax agreement that might not cover all the retirement account scenarios discussed here. This could mean fewer protections than what others have described for countries with full treaties. @Liam McConnell - your cost-benefit analysis approach is really smart. For those of us from countries without comprehensive US tax treaties, the ongoing complexity might be even higher, making the simple approach of withdrawing contributions before leaving more attractive. Has anyone dealt with jurisdictions that only have limited tax agreements rather than full treaties with the US? I'm curious how much this affects the practical treatment of retirement account distributions.

0 coins

Zara Ahmed

β€’

@Angelica Smith - your situation with Taiwan s'limited tax agreement rather than a full treaty is really important to highlight! This is a crucial distinction that could significantly impact the treatment of US retirement accounts. The Taiwan-US tax agreement primarily covers withholding taxes and information sharing, but doesn t'have the comprehensive retirement income provisions that full treaties typically include. This means you might not get the same protections that others in this thread have mentioned for countries with full treaties. Your point about Taiwan s'AMT system is particularly concerning - if Roth distributions are treated as overseas income subject to AMT calculations, you could face unexpected tax liabilities even if the distributions are tax-free in the US. The foreign exchange controls you mentioned add another layer of practical complexity that could affect both the timing and cost of accessing your funds. Given Taiwan s'183-day residency test, you might have some flexibility in timing your transition to Taiwan tax residency, but the limited agreement means you d'have fewer treaty benefits to rely on during that transition period. For jurisdictions with limited agreements rather than full treaties, I d'strongly recommend getting a formal tax opinion from professionals familiar with both US and Taiwan tax law before making any major decisions. The stakes are higher when you don t'have comprehensive treaty protections. Your situation really reinforces @Liam McConnell s cost-benefit'analysis approach - with limited treaty protections and additional compliance complexity, the simple strategy of withdrawing contributions before leaving might make even more sense for Taiwan-bound expats than for those going to countries with full treaty coverage.

0 coins

Why Does IRS Transcript Show "Information Not Available" for 2024 While on PATH Hold? No Adjustment Requested

I just checked my transcript at 12:39 and noticed something concerning with my 2024 balance. When I look at Details By Year, it shows "Your Information Is Not Available at This Time" with an INFO notice. There's a specific message stating "If you requested an adjustment to your account your information will not be available until that transaction is complete." Looking at my previous years, I can see 2023, 2022, and 2021 all show $0.00 owed for Income Tax, but this 2024 message has me worried. When I check the "Details By Year" section of my transcript, here's exactly what I'm seeing: Tax Year | You Owe | Income Tax ---|---|--- 2024 | INFO | Your Information Is Not Available at This Time 2023 | $0.00 | 2022 | $0.00 | 2021 | $0.00 | Under the 2024 section, there's this message: "If you requested an adjustment to your account your information will not be available until that transaction is complete." I'm currently on PATH act hold - does this unavailable information message mean I'm going to owe money? I don't remember requesting any adjustments to my account, so I'm confused why it says this. The "Frequently Asked Questions About Balances" section doesn't seem to address this specific situation either. Has anyone else seen this message about account adjustments and information not being available? Should I be concerned that there's an INFO notice instead of a dollar amount for 2024?

Mohammed Khan

β€’

I'm dealing with this exact same thing right now and it's been driving me crazy! 😩 That "Information Not Available" message is so misleading - I was convinced I'd made some huge mistake on my return. But reading through everyone's responses here has been incredibly reassuring. It's wild how the IRS uses such scary language for what's basically just "we're still working on your return." The fact that your previous years show $0.00 balances is definitely a good sign that everything is normal. I've been obsessively checking my transcript hoping for changes but sounds like we just need to wait for PATH to run its course. Thanks for posting this - clearly tons of us needed this peace of mind! πŸ™

0 coins

Malik Johnson

β€’

I totally get the obsessive transcript checking! πŸ˜… Been there myself and it's honestly exhausting. That "Information Not Available" wording really is the worst - makes it sound like you're in trouble when it's literally just the IRS saying "still processing." It's actually pretty comforting to see how many people are going through this exact same thing right now. Makes you realize it's just part of the PATH process and not something we need to panic about. Hopefully we'll all see some movement soon and can finally stop refreshing our transcripts every few hours! 🀞

0 coins

Aisha Hussain

β€’

This is totally normal during PATH processing! I went through the same anxiety last year seeing that exact "Information Not Available" message. The IRS system automatically displays that generic "adjustment" language whenever they're actively reviewing a return, even though you didn't actually request any changes. Your clean $0.00 balances for 2021-2023 are actually really reassuring - shows your account history is solid. I know it's nerve-wracking when you're expecting your refund and see such confusing wording, but this INFO status is just their way of saying "still working on it." Should clear up once they finish PATH verification, usually within a couple weeks. Try not to stress too much - you're definitely not alone in seeing this! 😊

0 coins

Prev1...17291730173117321733...5643Next