IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Zara Rashid

•

Hey has anyone used TurboTax to report royalty income from a 1099-MISC? I'm wondering if the software walks you through where to put this or if I need to know which forms/schedules to use ahead of time?

0 coins

Luca Romano

•

I used TurboTax last year for my music royalties. It definitely asks about 1099-MISC income and guides you through the process. It'll ask questions to determine if it should go on Schedule C or Schedule E based on your situation. Just make sure you're using at least the Deluxe version - the free one doesn't support these forms.

0 coins

I went through this exact situation with my first book royalties last year! What really helped me was understanding that the IRS looks at whether writing is an active business for you or more of a passive activity. Since you self-published and are actively involved in the process, you have options. One thing to consider: if you plan to continue writing and publishing, treating this as a business (Schedule C) might be worth the self-employment tax because you can deduct a lot more expenses - not just the direct costs like editing and cover design, but also a portion of your home office, computer equipment, research materials, even attending writing conferences. However, if this was more of a one-time project and you're not actively pursuing writing as an ongoing business, Schedule E for royalties might be simpler and avoid the extra SE tax. The key is being consistent with how you treat it going forward. Keep good records either way - the IRS likes to see that you're treating it seriously if you claim it's a business.

0 coins

NebulaNomad

•

This is really helpful insight! I'm actually planning to write more books - I have two more manuscripts in progress and am treating this as a serious business venture. Based on what you're saying, it sounds like Schedule C might be the way to go even with the self-employment tax, especially since I could deduct my home office setup, writing software subscriptions, and the marketing courses I've been taking. Do you know if there's a minimum income threshold where Schedule C becomes more advantageous than Schedule E, or is it really just about whether you're actively pursuing it as a business?

0 coins

Ryan Young

•

Just wanna mention - my ex and I alternated years claiming our kid when we were dealing with student loans and MFS. So one year she'd claim the kid, next year I would. Our tax guy said this was totally fine as long as we both agreed and it helped maximize our refunds over time. Maybe that's something to think about for future years?

0 coins

Sophia Clark

•

That doesn't work for married couples still living together. The IRS has specific tiebreaker rules, and alternating years is only really an option for divorced or separated parents with custody agreements.

0 coins

Lilly Curtis

•

Based on your situation, you should almost certainly claim your child on your return rather than your wife claiming him. Here's why: With your income at $16,000 and your wife's at $105,000, you're in a much better position to benefit from the Child Tax Credit. For married filing separately, the Child Tax Credit begins phasing out at $75,000 of adjusted gross income, so your wife would still get the full credit, but you're so far below that threshold that you'd definitely get the maximum benefit. More importantly, with your very low income, you might also qualify for the Additional Child Tax Credit (the refundable portion), which could give you money back even if you don't owe any taxes. This is huge when your income is this low. Also consider that you took unpaid leave specifically to care for your child - this strengthens your position as the primary caregiver from the IRS perspective, which matters for the dependency claim. I'd strongly recommend using tax software to run both scenarios (you claiming vs. your wife claiming) to see the actual dollar difference, but in most cases with this large of an income gap, the lower-income spouse claiming the child results in significantly better overall tax benefits for the household.

0 coins

This is a really complex area of tax law that I've dealt with professionally. One thing I haven't seen mentioned yet is the importance of determining whether this is a "bonus" split dollar arrangement or a "split premium" arrangement - the tax treatment can be significantly different. Also, don't overlook the potential for installment treatment of the transfer. Sometimes these policy transfers can be structured over multiple years to minimize the tax impact in any single year, especially if the cash surrender value is substantial. I'd strongly recommend getting copies of all the Form 1099s or W-2 entries related to the economic benefit reporting over the years. These will be crucial for calculating her actual tax basis in the policy. The employer should have detailed records of these amounts. One more thing to consider - if this is a significant amount, it might push your mother into a higher tax bracket in the year of transfer. You might want to explore whether the transfer can be timed strategically (early in the year vs. late) or structured differently to optimize the tax outcome.

0 coins

Lily Young

•

This is exactly the kind of detailed guidance I was hoping to find! The distinction between "bonus" and "split premium" arrangements is something I hadn't come across in my research. Could you explain briefly what the key differences are in tax treatment between these two types? Also, regarding the installment treatment option - is this something that needs to be negotiated with the employer before retirement, or can it potentially be structured at the time of transfer? My mom's retirement is still a few months away, so there might be time to explore different structuring options if that could help minimize the tax impact. The timing consideration is really important too. Her other retirement income will start in January, so if the policy transfer happens late in the current tax year versus early next year, it could make a significant difference in her overall tax situation.

0 coins

Great question about the bonus vs. split premium distinction! In a "bonus" arrangement, the employer pays the full premium and reports the economic benefit as taxable income to the employee each year. In a "split premium" arrangement, the employee actually pays part of the premium (usually the term cost portion) directly, which creates immediate basis. Regarding installment treatment, this definitely needs to be negotiated with the employer before the transfer occurs. The employer would need to agree to transfer the policy in stages or structure it as a series of partial transfers over multiple tax years. Since your mom still has a few months, I'd recommend discussing this option with both the employer and a tax advisor. The timing is crucial - if she's going to have significant other retirement income starting in January, completing the transfer in the current tax year might be better to avoid stacking all the income in the same year. However, this depends on her specific tax situation and marginal rates. A tax projection comparing both scenarios would be very helpful for making this decision.

0 coins

I've been following this discussion with great interest as my spouse and I are facing a very similar situation with her employer's split dollar policy. One aspect that hasn't been fully addressed is the potential impact on Medicare premiums down the road. If your mother is approaching Medicare eligibility (or already enrolled), a large taxable income spike from the policy transfer could trigger IRMAA (Income-Related Monthly Adjustment Amount) surcharges on her Medicare Part B and Part D premiums. These surcharges are based on modified adjusted gross income from two years prior, so a big income hit in 2025 would affect her Medicare premiums in 2027-2028. This is another reason why the installment treatment option mentioned by Cameron Black could be really valuable - spreading the taxable income over multiple years might help avoid or minimize these Medicare surcharge thresholds. The income thresholds for IRMAA change annually, but they can add hundreds of dollars per month to Medicare premiums for higher-income retirees. Just something else to factor into the timing and structuring decisions. Medicare planning often gets overlooked in these types of retirement benefit transfers, but it can have a significant long-term financial impact.

0 coins

This is such an important point about Medicare IRMAA that I hadn't considered! My mom is 63, so she'll be enrolling in Medicare in a couple of years, and a large income spike from the policy transfer could definitely trigger those surcharges down the road. I looked up the current IRMAA thresholds and they start at around $103,000 for individuals, with multiple tiers going up from there. If the policy transfer adds a significant amount to her AGI, it could easily push her into a higher IRMAA bracket for those future years. This really reinforces the importance of exploring the installment treatment option that was mentioned earlier. Even if it means slightly more complexity in the transfer process, spreading the taxable income over 2-3 years could potentially save thousands in Medicare premiums later on. Do you know if there are any other "look-back" tax consequences like IRMAA that we should be considering? It seems like these types of retirement income spikes can have ripple effects that extend well beyond the immediate tax year.

0 coins

Lourdes Fox

•

This thread has been absolutely incredible! I'm on an H-4 EAD (spouse of H1-B holder) and have been struggling with Form 8802 for weeks. Reading through everyone's detailed experiences across so many visa types has finally made everything click. Like many others here, I was getting confused by the "resident alien" terminology since I'm clearly not a permanent resident. But now I understand that line 4a is asking about TAX residency status, not immigration status. I've been in the US for 4 years and definitely meet the substantial presence test, so I should check "Individual U.S. citizen/resident alien" and then put "H-4 EAD" in section 4e. What's really helpful is seeing the consistent approach work across H1-B, L1, F-1, TN, E-3, R-1, and now H-4 situations. The substantial presence test truly is the universal determining factor regardless of the specific visa category. I'll be including my H-4 visa copy, EAD card copy, I-94, recent tax returns showing I filed as a resident alien, and a brief cover letter explaining my tax residency qualification. Based on everyone's timelines, I'm expecting about 8 weeks for processing. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences - this thread should definitely be saved as a reference guide for anyone dealing with Form 8802 confusion! The IRS instructions really need to be clearer about the tax residency vs. immigration status distinction.

0 coins

This is such a helpful summary! I'm also on H-4 EAD and was completely lost with this form until I found this thread. Your approach sounds exactly right - the key insight that everyone has shared here is that line 4a is about tax classification, not immigration status. One thing I'd add for fellow H-4 EAD holders: make sure to include both your H-4 visa stamp AND your EAD card in your documentation package. I initially thought I only needed one or the other, but including both helps show the complete picture of your legal status and work authorization. The substantial presence test really is the magic key here - it doesn't matter whether you're H-4, H1-B, or any other nonimmigrant status. If you meet those 183 days over 3 years (with the formula), you're a tax resident for Form 8802 purposes. Thanks for mentioning the 8-week timeline too. It's so reassuring to have realistic expectations based on everyone's actual experiences rather than just guessing! This thread has been a game-changer for understanding this confusing form.

0 coins

Raul Neal

•

This thread has been absolutely amazing! I'm on a J-1 visa (research scholar) and have been completely stuck on Form 8802 for the past two weeks. Like so many others here, I was getting tripped up by the "resident alien" language when I know I'm not a permanent resident. The key insight that everyone keeps emphasizing - that line 4a is about TAX residency, not immigration status - finally makes perfect sense. I've been in the US for 2.5 years doing postdoctoral research and clearly meet the substantial presence test, so I should check "Individual U.S. citizen/resident alien" and then specify "J-1" in section 4e. What's really remarkable is seeing this same pattern work across literally every visa type mentioned here - H1-B, L1, F-1, TN, E-3, R-1, H-4 EAD, and now J-1. The substantial presence test is truly the universal standard the IRS uses, regardless of whether you're here for work, study, research, or any other purpose. I'll be including my J-1 visa copy, DS-2019 form, I-94, past two years of tax returns showing I filed as a resident alien, and a cover letter explaining my substantial presence test qualification. The 7-9 week processing timeline everyone has shared gives me realistic expectations. One J-1 specific question - since research scholars sometimes have different substantial presence test rules in their first few years, should I include any documentation about my specific J-1 category? Or is the standard approach everyone has outlined sufficient? This community discussion has been infinitely more helpful than the confusing IRS instructions. Thank you all for sharing your detailed experiences!

0 coins

NebulaNomad

•

I'm a tax professional who works with a lot of international students, and I want to emphasize something important that hasn't been fully addressed here: landlords generally should NOT be requesting W-8 forms from tenants at all, regardless of whether it's W-8ECI or W-8BEN. These forms are specifically for entities that need to report payments to foreign persons to the IRS. When you're paying rent TO the landlord, they're not making payments TO you that would require IRS reporting. The confusion likely stems from the landlord using a generic application packet or misunderstanding the purpose of these forms. If your landlord absolutely insists on some form of tax documentation, here's what I'd suggest: 1. Ask them to specify exactly what they need it for and what they plan to do with it 2. Offer to provide a letter from your university's international office instead 3. If they still insist, the W-8BEN would be less inappropriate than W-8ECI, but it's still not really the right form for this situation The real issue here might be that the landlord wants to verify your legal status to work/study in the US, which would be better addressed with your I-20 form and visa documentation rather than tax forms. Don't let them pressure you into filling out forms that don't apply to your situation!

0 coins

This is really helpful clarification! I think you've hit the nail on the head about what's actually happening here. The landlord is probably just following some standard procedure without understanding what these forms are actually for. Your suggestion about asking them to specify what they need the form for is brilliant - that would probably expose the confusion immediately. If they can't explain why they need tax reporting forms from someone who's paying them (not receiving payments), that should make it clear these forms don't apply. I'm definitely going to lead with providing my I-20 and visa documentation instead, since that directly addresses legal status verification. Thanks for the professional perspective - it's exactly what I needed to understand the bigger picture here rather than just getting stuck on which wrong form is "less wrong"!

0 coins

I went through this exact same confusion when I was applying for apartments as an international graduate student! The key thing to understand is that you're absolutely right to question this - W-8ECI is completely inappropriate for your situation. Here's the breakdown: - **W-8ECI**: For foreign persons receiving income from US business activities (like if you owned rental property or ran a business in the US) - **W-8BEN**: For foreign persons receiving certain types of US-source income (interest, dividends, etc.) - **Your situation**: You're PAYING rent, not receiving any income from the landlord Honestly, your landlord probably grabbed this from a standard packet without understanding what it's for. Most residential rentals don't require any W-8 forms at all since you're the one making payments to them, not the other way around. My advice: Contact your university's international student office first - they deal with this constantly and often have template letters explaining F-1 student status that satisfy landlords' verification needs. If the landlord still insists on a form, ask them to explain exactly what they need it for. Once they realize these are IRS reporting forms for payments TO foreign persons, they'll usually drop the request. Your I-20 and visa documentation are much more relevant for proving your legal status to rent than any tax forms. Don't let them pressure you into inappropriate paperwork!

0 coins

Prev1...15161517151815191520...5643Next