IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

I'm dealing with this exact same nightmare right now! Filed my return two weeks ago and got hit with this rejection message yesterday. What's really frustrating is that I actually DID get acknowledgment letters from most of my charities when I made the donations, but they're all in different formats and some don't have the specific language the IRS apparently wants. One thing I discovered is that the acknowledgment needs to include specific elements: the charity's name, date of contribution, location of the contribution, and a description of any non-cash property donated. Some of my letters were missing one or two of these elements, which I think is why my return got flagged. I'm now going back to each organization to request updated acknowledgments with all the required language. It's ridiculous that they changed this requirement in the middle of tax season with basically zero notice. Has anyone found a template or standard language that works for requesting these from charities?

0 coins

Zoe Stavros

•

I'm new here but just went through this exact same situation! For the template language, I found that asking the charity to include these specific elements worked well: "This letter acknowledges that [Charity Name] received a charitable contribution from [Your Name] on [Date] at [Location/Address]. The contribution consisted of [Description of items donated]. No goods or services were provided in exchange for this contribution." Most charities were familiar with this format once I explained the new IRS requirement. Hope this helps save you some time!

0 coins

Ethan Clark

•

This whole situation is absolutely maddening! I'm a tax preparer and have been dealing with dozens of clients getting hit with these rejections over the past few weeks. What makes it worse is that the IRS issued this new enforcement quietly through their electronic filing system without any formal announcement or guidance update on their website. For anyone still struggling with this, here's what I've learned works best: Contact each charity and specifically request a "donee acknowledgment letter per IRS Publication 526." Most established charities know exactly what this means and can provide the proper format. Make sure the letter includes the charity's legal name (exactly as it appears on their tax-exempt determination), your name, donation date, and a clear description of what you donated. The frustrating part is that many people actually received these acknowledgments when they made their donations but didn't realize they'd need them attached to their tax return. The IRS has always required charities to provide these, but now they're actually checking that taxpayers include them with their filings. It's enforcement of an existing rule, not technically a "new" rule, but the practical effect is the same for all of us scrambling to gather documentation. If you're running out of time before the deadline, definitely consider filing an extension to give yourself more time to collect proper documentation rather than rushing and potentially making errors.

0 coins

Alfredo Lugo

•

Thank you so much for this detailed explanation! As someone who's completely new to dealing with tax issues this complex, your breakdown of requesting a "donee acknowledgment letter per IRS Publication 526" is incredibly helpful. I had no idea there was specific language I should use when contacting the charities. I'm definitely going to reach out to my organizations today using that exact terminology. It's reassuring to hear from a tax preparer that this really did come out of nowhere - I was starting to think I had somehow missed obvious guidance somewhere. The fact that it's enforcement of an existing rule rather than a completely new requirement makes sense, but like you said, the practical effect is still a huge headache for everyone involved. One quick question - when you mention making sure the charity's name appears "exactly as it appears on their tax-exempt determination," is there an easy way to verify this? Some of the organizations I donated to use shortened names in their everyday communications that might not match their official legal names.

0 coins

As a newcomer to this community, I just want to say how incredibly helpful this entire thread has been! I was literally in the same boat as Sofia - driving myself crazy searching for this elusive "Federal Supporting Statement" that my tax preparer mentioned I needed for some unusual consulting expenses. What's fascinating is reading through everyone's experiences and seeing the same pattern: we all got confused by generic terminology when what we actually needed were specific IRS forms. The clarity everyone has provided about Form 8275 being the proper disclosure form is exactly what I needed to hear. I'm particularly grateful for the real-world examples - from home office conversions to equipment purchases - because they show how Form 8275 handles different types of legitimate but unusual business expenses. The recurring theme that being proactive and transparent with the IRS actually helps rather than hurts is such valuable insight. For anyone else who might stumble into this thread with the same confusion: skip the hours of fruitless searching that we all went through. There is no "Federal Supporting Statement" form from the IRS. Use Form 8275 for unusual but legitimate business disclosures, or a simple written explanation for straightforward situations. The IRS website actually has clear guidance once you know what forms you're looking for. This community has been incredibly welcoming and informative - thanks to everyone who shared their experiences!

0 coins

Philip Cowan

•

Welcome to the community, Benjamin! I'm also a newcomer here and couldn't agree more about how valuable this thread has been. It's honestly mind-blowing how many of us got stuck in the same "Federal Supporting Statement" rabbit hole - really makes you wonder how widespread this confusion is across the tax preparation industry. What I find most reassuring from everyone's shared experiences is that the IRS actually wants taxpayers to be transparent about unusual situations. Using Form 8275 to proactively explain legitimate but uncommon expenses shows good faith compliance rather than trying to hide anything. It's such a different mindset than worrying about "flying under the radar." Your point about the real-world examples is spot on - seeing how Form 8275 worked for garage conversions, basement offices, equipment purchases, and now consulting expenses gives me confidence it'll handle my unusual rental property situation too. Thanks for the excellent summary of key takeaways! This thread should definitely be pinned for future newcomers dealing with the same confusion.

0 coins

As another newcomer to this community, I want to add my voice to the chorus of thanks for this incredibly helpful thread! I literally found this discussion while frantically searching for the same non-existent "Federal Supporting Statement" that everyone else was looking for. What strikes me most about reading through all these experiences is how this confusion seems to stem from tax professionals using generic language instead of specific IRS form numbers. My CPA told me I needed "federal supporting documentation" for some unusual partnership distributions, and I spent days trying to figure out what form that meant! Based on everyone's shared experiences here, it's clear that Form 8275 is the proper vehicle for proactively disclosing unusual but legitimate items that might raise questions. The consistent message that transparency helps rather than hurts is so valuable - it completely flips the script from trying to avoid attention to demonstrating good faith compliance. I'm particularly encouraged by all the success stories - from home office conversions to consulting expenses to equipment purchases - showing that Form 8275 effectively handles various types of legitimate but uncommon business situations. For my partnership distribution issue, it sounds like being upfront with a detailed explanation on Form 8275 is exactly the right approach. Thanks to everyone who took the time to share their real-world experiences. This community is proving to be an amazing resource for navigating these confusing tax situations!

0 coins

Welcome Sean! As another newcomer, I'm so glad I found this thread too - it's been a lifesaver! Your partnership distribution situation sounds complex, and I think you're absolutely right that Form 8275 is the way to go based on everyone's experiences here. What really stands out to me from all these stories is how the confusion about "Federal Supporting Statement" seems to be industry-wide. It makes me wonder if there should be better standardization in how tax professionals communicate about specific IRS forms instead of using these generic terms that send us all down rabbit holes. I'm dealing with some unusual freelance income reporting issues myself, and reading through all these success stories with Form 8275 has given me confidence that proactive disclosure really is the smart approach. The consistent theme that the IRS appreciates transparency rather than seeing it as a red flag is such an important insight. Thanks for adding your voice to this discussion - it's amazing how this one thread has become such a comprehensive resource for anyone dealing with unusual but legitimate tax situations. This community is definitely a gem for practical tax guidance!

0 coins

Brady Clean

•

Uber actually provides a yearly tax summary in your driver account even if you don't get a 1099. Just go to the tax information section in your account and you should find a detailed breakdown of all your earnings, Uber's cut, fees, etc. Just use those numbers on Schedule C.

0 coins

Skylar Neal

•

This is it right here! I was stressing over the same thing last month until I found the tax summary in my account. It has everything you need to fill out your taxes properly without a 1099.

0 coins

Niko Ramsey

•

Just to add to what others have said - don't forget about tracking your vehicle expenses beyond just mileage! As an Uber driver, you can deduct things like car washes, phone mounts, phone chargers, and even a portion of your car insurance if you use the actual expense method instead of the standard mileage rate. Also, keep in mind that since you're reporting self-employment income, you'll likely owe self-employment tax (Social Security and Medicare taxes) on top of regular income tax. This is about 15.3% of your net earnings, so factor that in when planning. You might want to make estimated quarterly payments next year if you continue driving to avoid owing a large amount at tax time. The good news is that with proper deductions, your actual tax liability on that $638 might be quite small. Just make sure to keep detailed records of all your driving-related expenses!

0 coins

Carmen Ruiz

•

This is really helpful information about the additional expenses! I had no idea about the self-employment tax part - that 15.3% on top of regular taxes is a big surprise. When you mention making quarterly payments for next year, how do you even calculate what to pay? And is there a minimum amount where you'd need to start doing quarterlies, or should anyone doing gig work be thinking about this?

0 coins

Paolo Conti

•

This is such a helpful discussion! I'm actually in a similar situation with my ESA at Schwab and was dreading the tax implications. Reading through everyone's experiences has been really enlightening. One question I have - for those who've gone through this process, how long did it take to receive the 1099-Q form from Schwab after taking the distribution? I want to make sure I plan accordingly for tax filing season and don't end up scrambling to get the paperwork I need. Also, has anyone here dealt with an ESA that had both traditional contributions and rollover funds from another 529 plan? I'm wondering if that complicates the tax calculations at all or if it's treated the same way as regular contributions when determining the taxable portion.

0 coins

Great questions! I received my 1099-Q from Schwab in late January, so about 6-8 weeks after my December distribution. They're pretty good about getting them out on time. Regarding rollover funds from a 529 - that does add some complexity to the calculations. The rollover amount is generally treated as contributions (since it was already after-tax money), but you'll need to track the basis carefully. Schwab should have records of when the rollover happened and the amount, but I'd definitely recommend getting a detailed statement showing all contributions, rollovers, and earnings before you take any distributions. The tax treatment can get messy if you don't have clear documentation of each funding source. You might also want to consider consulting with a tax professional if the rollover amounts are significant - the rules around ESA distributions with mixed funding sources can be tricky to navigate on your own.

0 coins

I went through this exact process with my Schwab ESA about 6 months ago and can share some practical insights. The biggest surprise for me was discovering that I could use the distribution for my spouse's continuing education courses to avoid penalties - I had no idea qualified educational expenses could be for family members beyond just children. Here's what I'd recommend: Before you do anything, call Schwab and ask for a detailed breakdown of your account showing original contributions vs. current value. They can usually provide this over the phone. Then, seriously consider whether you or any family members have ANY educational expenses coming up - even things like professional development courses, certification programs, or graduate school can qualify. The tax hit really depends on how much growth your account has seen. In my case, I had contributed about $12K over the years and the account was worth $16K, so I only faced taxes/penalties on the $4K in earnings. But if your account has grown significantly, that tax bill can add up fast. One last tip - if you do end up owing penalties, make sure to make estimated tax payments if the amount is substantial. I got hit with underpayment penalties on top of everything else because I didn't realize how much extra tax I'd owe from the distribution.

0 coins

Rami Samuels

•

I just wanted to share my experience as someone who went through this exact situation two years ago as an F1 student. The confusion about 1042-S vs 1099 forms is completely normal, and you're asking all the right questions! A few practical tips that would have saved me stress: 1) Set up alerts in your Robinhood account for when tax documents become available - you'll get notified as soon as your 1042-S is ready, usually sometime in late March. 2) Start organizing your records now rather than waiting. Create a simple spreadsheet with columns for: Date, Action (Buy/Sell), Symbol, Shares, Price, Total Amount. This will make tax preparation much smoother. 3) Don't worry about the W8-BEN form - Robinhood likely had you complete this electronically during account setup when you provided your visa information. It's automatic for international accounts. 4) Your tax consultant is right about needing detailed transaction records. The 1042-S will only show dividend income, so you'll need to calculate and report your capital gains separately using your trading history. The most important thing is not to rush. Wait for your 1042-S even if it feels late, and make sure you understand both the dividend reporting (from the 1042-S) and capital gains reporting (from your transaction records) before filing. You're being appropriately cautious, which will serve you well. This gets much easier once you've done it the first time!

0 coins

This is exactly the kind of step-by-step guidance I needed! Setting up alerts for tax documents is brilliant - I had no idea that was even an option in Robinhood. I'm going to do that right now along with starting that spreadsheet you mentioned. Your point about not rushing really resonates with me. I've been feeling pressure seeing other students already filing, but you're absolutely right that getting it correct is more important than getting it done early. The whole dividend vs capital gains separation is starting to make sense now - it sounds like I need to think of these as completely different types of income that get reported in different ways. One follow-up question: when you were calculating your capital gains from the transaction history, did you run into any issues with cost basis calculations, especially if you bought the same stock multiple times at different prices? I'm wondering if there are any gotchas I should be aware of when doing these calculations manually. Thanks for sharing your experience - it's really helpful to hear from someone who's been through this exact process successfully!

0 coins

Great question about cost basis calculations! Yes, this can definitely get tricky when you've bought the same stock multiple times at different prices. The IRS requires you to use either FIFO (first in, first out) or specific identification method for calculating gains. With FIFO, you assume the first shares you bought are the first ones you sold. So if you bought 10 shares of Apple at $150 in January, then 10 more shares at $180 in March, and later sold 15 shares at $200, you'd calculate gains on the first 10 shares using the $150 basis and 5 shares using the $180 basis. Robinhood's transaction history usually shows the specific lots when you sell, which makes this easier. But if you're doing the calculations manually, keep detailed records of each purchase (date, quantity, price) so you can properly match up your sales. One gotcha to watch out for: wash sale rules can complicate these calculations if you buy and sell the same stock within 30 days. The disallowed losses get added to your cost basis of the replacement shares, which can be confusing to track manually. Honestly, this is one area where tax software or professional help really pays off - they handle all the cost basis matching automatically and account for wash sales. But if you're doing it manually, just be extra careful with your record-keeping and double-check your math!

0 coins

I went through this exact same situation last year as an F1 student! The anxiety is completely understandable, but you're asking all the right questions. Here's what I learned: Robinhood automatically classifies F1 visa holders under W8-BEN status, which is why you'll receive a 1042-S instead of a 1099. This is actually correct for your situation as a nonresident alien. The 1042-S will show your dividend income with any applicable tax treaty withholding, but you're absolutely right that it won't include your capital gains from stock trading. For your capital gains, you'll need to download your complete transaction history from Robinhood (go to Account > Statements & History) and calculate these gains separately. This goes on your Form 1040NR along with the dividend income from your 1042-S. A few important points: - Don't panic about the timing - 1042-S forms typically arrive in late March or early April, much later than regular 1099s - Keep detailed records of all your trades now rather than trying to reconstruct everything later - Consider whether your trading frequency might trigger "effectively connected income" rules (this can affect your tax treatment) - Your tax treaty with your home country might provide benefits on dividend withholding Given the complexity of nonresident taxation with investment income, I'd strongly recommend working with a tax professional who has experience with F1 visa holders and trading income. Your campus international student services might also have specialized tax help available. You're being appropriately cautious - better to get it right than to rush and face penalties later!

0 coins

Prev1...10821083108410851086...5645Next