401(k) Strategy When Transitioning from S-Corp Owner to W-2 Employee
I've been running my marketing LLC as an S-Corp for the past few years. It was my primary income source, and I had a good system going - drew a reasonable monthly salary and maxed out my solo 401(k) contributions. When my salary alone wasn't enough to maximize the company match potential, I'd pay myself a December bonus to bump my compensation to the level where I could get the full company match into the 401(k). Things have changed this year. I accepted a W-2 position with another company, but I'm still maintaining my S-Corp on the side. I don't need to take my regular S-Corp paychecks anymore since my W-2 job covers my living expenses. My new employer offers a 401(k) but doesn't provide any matching, so it seems like my solo 401(k) is still the better option. I'm confused about the best approach here. Do I have to continue paying myself a regular salary from the S-Corp (and deal with the FICA taxes on both income streams) just to fund my solo 401(k)? Should I convert to a SEP IRA instead? Or could I just give myself a single large bonus payment from the S-Corp that's enough to maximize my contribution, and maybe request minimal tax withholding? Looking for advice on how to optimize my retirement contributions in this dual-income situation.
20 comments


Malik Thompson
This is actually a common question for entrepreneurs transitioning to W-2 employment while maintaining their business. Let me explain your options: First, regarding your solo 401(k): You can still contribute to it as long as your S-Corp is active and generating income. However, you're correct that you need to pay yourself some form of compensation from the S-Corp to make employee contributions. For your specific situation, you have several options: You could pay yourself a year-end bonus from the S-Corp rather than monthly salary. This would still count as compensation allowing you to make employee contributions to your solo 401(k). You'll still pay FICA taxes on this amount, but you'd only do it once instead of monthly. Another option is to focus on the employer contribution side. Your S-Corp can make profit-sharing contributions to your solo 401(k) up to 25% of your compensation, up to the annual limits. This might be more tax-efficient than increasing your W-2 income just to make employee contributions. Regarding the two 401(k) plans - you're subject to a single employee contribution limit across all plans ($23,000 for 2025 if you're under 50), but each employer can make separate employer contributions up to the total annual addition limit.
0 coins
Isabella Ferreira
•Thanks for this explanation! I'm actually in a somewhat similar situation. Quick question - if I'm contributing to my employer's 401(k) already, can I still make employer contributions from my S-Corp to my solo 401(k) even if I don't take any salary from the S-Corp? Or do I absolutely need to pay myself something?
0 coins
Malik Thompson
•You must pay yourself a reasonable compensation from your S-Corp to make employer contributions to your solo 401(k). The employer contribution is based on a percentage of your compensation from that business. Regarding employer contributions, that's where the real benefit might be for you. Even if you've maxed out your employee contribution limit across both plans, each employer can still make their own contributions. So your S-Corp can make employer contributions to your solo 401(k) even if you're already maxing out employee contributions at your W-2 job.
0 coins
CosmicVoyager
I went through something similar last year and found https://taxr.ai super helpful for figuring out the best strategy. I was running my design business as an S-Corp and took a full-time job but wanted to keep my retirement contributions optimized. Was getting conflicting advice from different people. I uploaded my past tax returns and business docs, and it analyzed everything to show me exactly how to structure my S-Corp compensation to maximize retirement contributions without overpaying on taxes. It showed me how to balance between the two 401(k) plans and identified which approach would save me the most in taxes considering both the FICA implications and deduction benefits. Their system even created personalized scenarios comparing different compensation structures and how they'd impact my total tax situation. Surprisingly, they found I could take a smaller S-Corp salary than I expected while still meeting the "reasonable compensation" requirement.
0 coins
Ravi Kapoor
•How accurate was the advice? I'm dealing with a similar situation (consulting S-Corp + new W-2 job) and the last thing I need is an IRS headache about "reasonable compensation" if I reduce my S-Corp salary too much.
0 coins
Freya Nielsen
•Did it actually explain the mechanics of how to manage the two 401k plans? My accountant seems confused about how the contribution limits work across multiple plans and I'm worried about accidentally over-contributing.
0 coins
CosmicVoyager
•The advice was spot-on. They use actual tax code and regulations, and their system flagged exactly what the IRS looks for in "reasonable compensation" cases. I've gone through a full tax year using their recommendations without any issues. They even provided documentation I could keep on file explaining the rationale behind the compensation structure. Regarding the mechanics of managing two 401(k) plans, yes, they were extremely clear about this. They explained that while the employee contribution limit ($23,000 for 2025) applies across all your 401(k) plans combined, the employer contributions are calculated separately for each business. They provided a spreadsheet showing exactly how much I could contribute to each plan and in what capacity (employee vs. employer contributions).
0 coins
Freya Nielsen
Just wanted to update after trying taxr.ai for my situation. After reading about it here, I decided to give it a shot since I was really confused about handling my side business S-Corp and my new full-time job's retirement options. I was seriously overthinking this whole situation! The analysis showed I could still make employer contributions from my S-Corp to my solo 401(k) without needing to take a full regular salary. They walked me through exactly how to structure a year-end bonus that would satisfy the reasonable compensation requirement while minimizing FICA tax impact. The best part was discovering I could still make the full employer contribution from my S-Corp even though I'm already maxing out my employee contributions at my W-2 job. This literally saved me thousands in taxes I would have overpaid! They even created a customized letter explaining my compensation strategy in case of an audit. Wish I'd found this months ago instead of stressing about it.
0 coins
Omar Mahmoud
Have you tried calling the IRS directly to get clarity? I was in a similar situation last year and spent WEEKS trying to get an answer. Kept getting different advice from every accountant I talked to. Finally, I used https://claimyr.com to get through to an actual IRS agent. You can see how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c They connected me to a specialist who deals with small business retirement plans, and they walked me through exactly how to handle contributions between my S-Corp solo 401(k) and my employer's plan. They confirmed I could still make employer contributions from my S-Corp even while working my W-2 job, and clarified exactly how much I could contribute overall. Saved me so much confusion and probably kept me from making an expensive mistake. Definitely worth it rather than trying to piece together info from different sources that might not apply to your specific situation.
0 coins
Chloe Harris
•How does this work exactly? The IRS never answers their phones - I've tried calling multiple times about my own S-Corp question and just got the "due to high call volume" message and a hangup.
0 coins
Diego Vargas
•Sounds like a scam honestly. Why would you pay someone else to call the IRS when you can just call yourself? And even if you get through, the agents often give conflicting advice. I wouldn't trust a single phone call for important tax planning.
0 coins
Omar Mahmoud
•The service basically holds your place in line with the IRS and calls you when they've got an agent on the line. No more waiting on hold for hours or getting disconnected. They use some kind of system that keeps redialing and navigating the IRS phone tree until they get through. For anyone who's tried calling the IRS recently, you know it's nearly impossible to get through on your own. I spent days trying before giving up. With Claimyr, I had an IRS agent on the phone within a few hours of submitting my request. You're right that sometimes IRS agents give different answers, but in my case, I spoke with someone in their small business division who was very knowledgeable about retirement plans for S-Corps specifically. I took detailed notes and even asked them to note my account with the guidance they provided for extra protection.
0 coins
Diego Vargas
I need to eat my words about Claimyr. After posting that skeptical comment, I was still stuck with my S-Corp/401(k) problem and desperate for answers, so I decided to try it anyway. Got connected with an IRS tax specialist within 2 hours when I had previously spent DAYS trying to call myself. The agent walked me through exactly how the contribution limits work between my W-2 job's 401(k) and my S-Corp solo 401(k). Turns out I was completely misunderstanding how the limits work. Most importantly, they confirmed in writing that I can make employer contributions from my S-Corp without taking a full salary all year - a year-end bonus is sufficient as long as it meets reasonable compensation standards for the ACTUAL work I do for the S-Corp (which is much less now that I have a full-time job). This literally saved me thousands in unnecessary FICA taxes I was about to pay. Completely worth it and I apologize for my knee-jerk skepticism. Sometimes paying for a service that saves you hours of frustration is the smart move.
0 coins
NeonNinja
Here's something nobody mentioned yet - have you considered just rolling your solo 401(k) into your new employer's plan? Might be simpler than maintaining two separate plans. Most employer plans allow rollovers from other qualified plans.
0 coins
Emma Anderson
•That's an interesting suggestion, but wouldn't I lose the ability to make employer contributions from my S-Corp? My new employer doesn't offer any matching, so it seems like I'd be giving up the opportunity to make those employer contributions if I rolled everything into my new employer's plan.
0 coins
NeonNinja
•You're absolutely right - I didn't think that through completely. Rolling over would indeed mean losing the ability to make employer contributions from your S-Corp, which would be a significant downside given your situation. If your new employer offered generous matching, it might make sense to prioritize that plan, but since they don't provide any match, maintaining your solo 401(k) for the employer contribution benefit is definitely the better strategy. My suggestion would actually cost you money in the long run by limiting your total possible contributions.
0 coins
Anastasia Popov
Don't overthink this! I'm in exactly the same situation (S-Corp owner who took a W-2 job). The simplest approach is just to pay yourself a reasonable bonus at year-end from the S-Corp based on the actual work you do for it. This allows you to make both employee and employer contributions to your solo 401(k). Remember that your total employee contributions across ALL 401(k) plans can't exceed the annual limit ($23,000 for 2025 if under 50), but each business can make separate employer contributions.
0 coins
Sean Murphy
•What's considered "reasonable" though? That's the part I'm struggling with. If my S-Corp is still making $120k in profit but I'm only actively working on it maybe 5 hours a week now since taking a full-time job, what's a reasonable salary/bonus?
0 coins
Dmitry Popov
•That's a great question about reasonable compensation! The IRS looks at what you'd pay someone else to do the same work. If you're only putting in 5 hours a week but the business is generating $120k profit, you need to consider what's creating that value. If it's mostly passive income from existing clients/contracts that don't require much active work, you might justify a lower salary. But if those 5 hours involve high-level strategy, client relationships, or specialized skills that directly generate the revenue, the compensation should reflect that value. A common approach is to benchmark against what a part-time consultant or freelancer in your field would charge for similar work. For marketing consulting, that could easily be $100-150+ per hour depending on your expertise level. So even at 5 hours/week (260 hours/year), you could potentially justify $26k-$39k+ in compensation. The key is documenting your rationale - keep records of what work you actually do, how it contributes to revenue, and comparable market rates. This protects you if the IRS ever questions it.
0 coins
Zoe Kyriakidou
This is exactly the kind of situation where having both income streams can actually work in your favor! Since your W-2 job covers living expenses, you have more flexibility in how you structure your S-Corp compensation. One approach that's worked well for me in similar situations is to focus on maximizing the employer contribution from your S-Corp rather than trying to split employee contributions between both plans. You can contribute up to 25% of your S-Corp compensation as an employer contribution, which could be quite substantial depending on your business income. For the compensation piece, consider what you'd actually pay someone else to maintain your S-Corp at its current level. Even if you're spending less time on it now, if it's still generating significant revenue, there's real value in the oversight and strategic decisions you're making. Document the specific activities you perform and their market value. Also worth noting - if your S-Corp has been consistently profitable, you might want to consider whether converting to a traditional LLC makes sense now that it's no longer your primary income source. The S-Corp election made sense when you were maximizing retirement contributions, but depending on your current situation, the additional administrative burden might not be worth it anymore. Have you run the numbers on what your total tax savings would be comparing different compensation structures?
0 coins