Can you get unemployment if fired for looking for another job in California?
So I got let go from my job last week and I'm honestly still in shock about how it happened. I'd been quietly sending out resumes and doing a few phone screens on my lunch break - nothing crazy, just the normal thing people do when they're feeling stuck somewhere. Somehow my manager found out and that was basically it. They called me in, said I violated some kind of 'loyalty policy' or 'conflict of interest' clause in my handbook, and walked me out the same day. Here's the thing though - I never actually accepted another job. I was just LOOKING. I didn't take any clients, didn't share any trade secrets, didn't start working somewhere else while still on their clock. I literally just updated my LinkedIn and had a couple of conversations with recruiters. Now I've filed a UI claim with California EDD and I'm terrified it's going to get denied because my separation reason shows as 'terminated by employer.' I've heard that if you get fired for misconduct your claim gets disqualified, but does job searching even count as misconduct? It feels completely unfair that someone can lose their income just for trying to improve their situation. Has anyone been through something like this with California EDD? I'm especially worried about the adjudication process and whether I need to prepare any kind of documentation to support my case. Would really appreciate hearing from people who've dealt with similar terminations.
75 comments

Lara Woods
This is actually a really important distinction that California EDD adjudicators look at carefully. Being fired doesn't automatically disqualify you - the key question is whether your conduct rose to the level of 'misconduct' as defined under California Unemployment Insurance Code Section 1256. Job searching on its own is NOT considered misconduct under California law. Employees have every right to look for other employment. The fact that you were doing phone screens on lunch breaks, not on company time or using company resources, actually works strongly in your favor. For misconduct disqualification, EDD generally needs to show that you willfully violated a reasonable company policy AND that violation directly harmed the employer. Simply looking for work - even if your employer disapproves - typically doesn't clear that bar. Make sure when EDD contacts you for your side of the story (and they will), you explain exactly what you did and didn't do. Emphasize: no client solicitation, no proprietary information shared, all job searching done on personal time/personal devices. Document everything you can remember.
0 coins
Oliver Alexander
AuthorThis is really reassuring to hear. I was so scared that because my termination paperwork literally says 'terminated for cause' that EDD would just automatically deny me without looking deeper into what actually happened.
0 coins
Adrian Hughes
yeah the misconduct definition is way stricter than most people realize. edd has to actually prove it was willful and substantial not just that your boss was mad at you
0 coins
Molly Chambers
Agreed with this. I'd also add - make sure you're keeping track of all communications. If your employer tries to protest your claim and says you violated policy, you want to be able to push back with specifics about what you actually did vs what they're claiming.
0 coins
Ian Armstrong
went thru almost exact same thing two years ago. fired for 'disloyalty' because my boss saw i had updated my indeed profile. filed with edd, went into adjudication for like 5 weeks which was stressful as hell, but ultimately got approved. the edd interviewer called me and asked pretty specific questions about what i did - whether i was on the clock, whether i used work email, whether i told coworkers i was leaving. i just answered honestly and they sided with me. looking for work isnt misconduct period
0 coins
Oliver Alexander
Author5 weeks in adjudication sounds rough but it's good to know there's light at the end of the tunnel. Did you have to submit any documents or was it just the phone interview?
0 coins
Ian Armstrong
just the phone interview mostly. i did write down a timeline beforehand so i wouldnt forget details when they called. that helped a lot
0 coins
Eli Butler
5 weeks omg that is so long to wait with no income coming in, how did you survive that
0 coins
Marcus Patterson
When my claim went into adjudication last year I genuinely could not get through to anyone at California EDD to find out what was happening or what documentation they needed from me. Spent days hitting redial and getting the 'we are experiencing high call volume' recording over and over. Somebody in another thread mentioned Claimyr and it completely changed things for me. You go to claimyr.com and they basically navigate the phone system and get you connected to an actual EDD rep. There's a video demo at https://youtu.be/JmuwXR7HA10 that shows how it works. I was skeptical but after two weeks of failed call attempts I was willing to try anything. Got through to an agent who was able to tell me exactly what my adjudication was about and what they needed from me. For your situation especially - being able to actually speak to someone who can see your claim notes could make a huge difference in how you prepare for your interview.
0 coins
Oliver Alexander
AuthorI've already been trying to call EDD for three days straight with zero luck. Going to check out that Claimyr thing tonight, thank you.
0 coins
Lydia Bailey
I was also super skeptical about services like this but honestly edd phone lines are just impossible. if it works it works
0 coins
Mateo Warren
just watched that video, seems pretty straightforward. might try it if my adjudication drags on
0 coins
Molly Chambers
Let me clear something up because I see people get this wrong a lot - there are actually TWO separate legal questions EDD looks at when your separation is listed as termination for cause: 1. Was there actual misconduct under UI Code 1256? 2. If yes, was it severe enough to warrant disqualification? For your situation (job searching), you'd almost certainly fail the employer's argument at step 1. California courts have consistently held that seeking other employment is not misconduct. It doesn't harm the employer in any concrete way, it doesn't violate a fundamental obligation of employment, and it's something every single employee has a legal right to do. The only way this gets complicated is if there was a legitimate non-compete or non-solicitation agreement you violated by actively recruiting their clients or something like that. But passive job searching? No.
0 coins
Sofia Price
wait so if someone has a non compete does that change the edd analysis too or is that a separate legal thing
0 coins
Molly Chambers
Non-competes are almost entirely unenforceable in California anyway - California Business and Professions Code 16600 basically voids them. So even then you'd likely be fine for EDD purposes. But for the OP's situation none of that applies since they weren't bound by anything like that as far as I can tell.
0 coins
Oliver Alexander
AuthorNo non-compete in my case thankfully. I work in pretty standard office admin stuff, not like a specialized industry where that would even make sense.
0 coins
Alice Coleman
omg this thread is exactly what i needed to find. literally in almost the same situation right now. my employer found my resume on a job board and called it a 'violation of trust' and terminated me on the spot. i filed edd yesterday and i am SPIRALING waiting to see if it gets denied can they like... see that i filed? can my old employer find out i filed for unemployment? i dont even know how any of this works im so stressed
0 coins
Lara Woods
Yes - when you file a UI claim, EDD notifies your base period employers and gives them a chance to respond. Your most recent employer especially will get a notice and can contest your claim. This is normal and expected - don't panic. It doesn't mean you'll be denied, it just means they get to give their side and then EDD decides.
0 coins
Alice Coleman
so they definitely will find out. great. i just hope edd actually looks at the facts and not just whatever my employer says
0 coins
Adrian Hughes
employers contest claims all the time and claimants still win. edd isnt just going to take the employers word for it
0 coins
Mateo Warren
Something I want to add from my experience going through a similar adjudication: WRITE EVERYTHING DOWN before EDD calls you. Like seriously, sit down tonight and make a document that includes: - Exact dates of any job search activity - What devices you used (your personal phone? work computer?) - Whether any searching was done during work hours or personal time - Any conversations you had with recruiters and when - The company's exact stated reason for firing you - Whether you were given a written policy about this When EDD called me I was so flustered I kept saying 'I think' and 'maybe' and the interviewer specifically asked me to be more precise. Having notes in front of you makes you sound way more credible and prepared.
0 coins
Oliver Alexander
AuthorThis is such practical advice. I actually do have my phone records showing all the recruiter calls were during my lunch hour or after 5pm. That seems like it would be pretty definitive.
0 coins
Mateo Warren
YES that's exactly the kind of thing that wins adjudication interviews. Time-stamped records are gold.
0 coins
Owen Jenkins
saving this comment for when edd calls me next week about my own claim situation
0 coins
Lydia Bailey
idk why companies even bother fighting these unemployment claims when the person clearly wasnt doing anything wrong. they already fired you, they win, why spend time contesting it too. pettiness honestly
0 coins
Molly Chambers
A lot of companies do it because their unemployment insurance tax rate goes up when former employees successfully claim benefits. It's a financial incentive to contest even borderline cases.
0 coins
Lydia Bailey
ohhhh i genuinely never knew that. so its literally costing them money when claims get approved, that explains so much
0 coins
Sofia Price
yep and some companies even hire third party services specifically to contest ui claims on their behalf. its a whole industry
0 coins
Eli Butler
My cousin went through almost this exact situation and her claim got denied initially because EDD sided with the employer at first. She appealed it though and won at the hearing. Just want to make sure you know appeals are an option if it comes to that - you have 30 days from any denial notice to file an appeal with the California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board (CUIAB). The appeals process is actually more favorable to claimants than a lot of people think because you get to present your evidence in front of an administrative law judge and the burden is on the employer to prove misconduct, not on you to prove innocence.
0 coins
Oliver Alexander
AuthorGood to know about the appeals option. Hoping I won't need it but it's reassuring that there's a path forward even if the initial decision goes wrong.
0 coins
Alice Coleman
wait you get an actual judge?? i thought appeals were just like another edd form you fill out
0 coins
Eli Butler
Yeah it's a real hearing, either in person or by phone, with an administrative law judge. You can even bring documents and witnesses. It's way more formal than the initial adjudication process.
0 coins
Adrian Hughes
been reading this whole thread and just want to say OP you have a really strong case. the fact pattern you described - personal time, personal device, no client poaching, no actual harm to employer - is about as clean as it gets for a wrongful termination UI claim the only thing i'd caution is don't say anything to edd that sounds like you were planning to leave 'soon' or had already accepted something else. just stick to the facts: you were exploring options, you remained fully committed to your current role, and you were terminated before you made any decisions
0 coins
Oliver Alexander
AuthorThat's a good point. I hadn't accepted anything, hadn't even gotten to offer stage with anyone. I was genuinely still committed to my job when they fired me.
0 coins
Mateo Warren
this is solid advice. just answer what they ask, dont overshare or speculate about your intentions
0 coins
Lilah Brooks
Has anyone successfully gotten through to EDD by phone lately?? I've been trying for literally two weeks for a completely different issue and cannot get a human being on the line no matter what time I call. 8am, 11am, 3pm, doesn't matter, always the same 'high call volume' message. Sorry slightly off topic but this thread seemed active and I'm desperate lol
0 coins
Marcus Patterson
Not off topic at all - this is exactly what Claimyr fixed for me. Seriously check out claimyr.com if you haven't already. They handle the hold queue navigation and connect you to an EDD agent. I know it sounds too good to be true but it genuinely worked when I had tried everything else. There's even a demo video at https://youtu.be/JmuwXR7HA10 so you can see exactly what it does before committing.
0 coins
Lilah Brooks
two weeks of trying and just found out about this now. going to try it tonight, thank you
0 coins
Ian Armstrong
yeah edd phone lines are basically impossible without some kind of help getting through. good luck
0 coins
Sofia Price
Question for the thread - what if OP's employer handbook actually DID have a written policy against job searching? Like say it literally said employees cannot seek outside employment during their tenure. Would that change anything? I feel like that would at least make the employer's argument stronger even if it's still sketchy
0 coins
Molly Chambers
It would make it slightly more complex but probably still wouldn't result in disqualification. California EDD defines misconduct as conduct that materially harms the employer OR shows a willful disregard of the employer's interests. A blanket policy prohibiting job searching is arguably unenforceable as a matter of public policy, and EDD adjudicators know this. They're not going to disqualify someone for exercising their fundamental right to seek employment just because an employer wrote that in a handbook.
0 coins
Lara Woods
Agreed. The enforceability of that kind of policy under California law is really questionable. Courts and administrative bodies generally look skeptically at policies that restrict employee rights to seek other work.
0 coins
Oliver Alexander
AuthorI went back and looked at my handbook and there's nothing specifically about job searching. There's a conflict of interest policy but it talks about things like financial interests in competitors, not just looking for a new job.
0 coins
Owen Jenkins
just want to share something that helped me during my adjudication period because i was going absolutely crazy waiting - you can check your UI Online account every day and the claim status will actually update before you get any letters. when mine moved from 'pending' to 'adjudication in progress' i saw it on the portal first also the letters from edd are often really vague so dont panic if you get something that sounds scary, sometimes you need to actually call to understand what it means
0 coins
Oliver Alexander
AuthorI've been refreshing my UI Online account like every hour honestly. Currently still showing pending. When yours was in adjudication did it say anything more specific or just that status?
0 coins
Owen Jenkins
just the status unfortunately, no details. the details only come when they call you or send a formal determination letter
0 coins
Alice Coleman
the waiting is genuinely the worst part, my anxiety is through the roof
0 coins
Jackson Carter
Real talk - companies use 'loyalty policy violations' and 'conflict of interest' as pretextual reasons to fire people all the time when the real reason is something else (like they found out you were looking and they were about to lay you off anyway and wanted to get ahead of it, or they just didn't like you). EDD sees this constantly. The good news is EDD adjudicators are pretty good at identifying pretextual reasons. They'll ask your employer to explain specifically how job searching harmed the company or violated your fundamental job duties. Most employers can't actually articulate that because it didn't.
0 coins
Lydia Bailey
this is really validating to hear. i always wondered if edd could see through BS employer claims or if they just take the employer's word
0 coins
Jackson Carter
they definitely don't just rubber stamp employer claims. if they did, the approval rate for terminated claimants would be way lower than it actually is
0 coins
Oliver Alexander
AuthorHonestly I wouldn't be surprised if there was some element of that in my situation. My company had been going through budget discussions and I wonder if my manager saw my updated LinkedIn as a convenient excuse.
0 coins
Kolton Murphy
I work in HR (not at OP's former company obviously lol) and can confirm that when we receive notice of a former employee's UI claim, we have to decide whether to formally contest it. For a situation like OP describes - job searching, no client solicitation, no proprietary info shared - honestly most HR departments would probably just let the claim go through rather than contest it, because we know EDD's definition of misconduct and we know we'd likely lose. The companies that contest everything regardless of merit are usually the larger ones with dedicated third-party unemployment management services. They contest on volume hoping claimants don't respond or appeal.
0 coins
Oliver Alexander
AuthorThat's really interesting perspective. My old company is pretty small, like 40 people. So hopefully they just let it go.
0 coins
Eli Butler
this matches what ive heard, smaller companies often dont bother contesting because the time cost isnt worth it
0 coins
Adrian Hughes
the third party unemployment management services thing is wild to me. companies literally pay other companies to deny their former employees benefits
0 coins
Evelyn Rivera
update from someone who had a very similar situation last year: I was fired for 'planning to resign' which is even more absurd than what OP described - my manager ASSUMED I was job hunting based on nothing and preemptively fired me. Filed with EDD, went into adjudication, got approved after 6 weeks. the edd interviewer told me directly that 'intention to leave' is not misconduct. actually quitting would have been a different story (voluntary quit has its own rules) but them firing me for what I might do someday? absolutely not a basis for disqualification
0 coins
Oliver Alexander
Author6 weeks is a long time but your outcome is exactly what I'm hoping for. The 'intention' framing is interesting - my employer kind of did the same thing, assumed I was about to leave so they acted first.
0 coins
Evelyn Rivera
yep very common pattern unfortunately. hang in there, the waiting is brutal but the outcome usually works out if you actually weren't doing anything wrong
0 coins
Alice Coleman
fired for what I might do' someday is the most dystopian thing ive heardtoday
0 coins
Julia Hall
one thing nobody has mentioned - make sure you keep filing your weekly certifications while your claim is in adjudication!! i didn't realize i was supposed to keep certifying and missed like 3 weeks. when my claim was finally approved they could only backpay to certifications that were actually filed. lost three weeks of benefits because i thought i wasn't supposed to certify until the adjudication was resolved this is a really common mistake pls don't do what i did
0 coins
Oliver Alexander
AuthorOh wow this is so important, thank you for saying this. I did my first weekly certification already but I wasn't sure if I should keep doing them while in adjudication. Definitely going to keep certifying every week now.
0 coins
Mateo Warren
THIS. cannot stress this enough. always certify every week no matter what your claim status is. edd has been very explicit that failing to certify means no benefits for that week even if claim gets approved later
0 coins
Owen Jenkins
adding to this - also make sure you're meeting your job search requirements each week even while in adjudication. you need to record your 3 employer contacts per week in your job search log
0 coins
Arjun Patel
OK so I'm going to be the slightly pessimistic voice here because I think people are being overly rosy. I had a termination for cause claim that I was SURE I would win - very similar situation, employer accused me of 'disloyal conduct' - and EDD initially denied me. I did appeal and eventually won, but it took 4 months total before I got any money. I'm not saying OP's claim will be denied, just saying prepare emotionally and financially for it potentially taking longer than you hope. And definitely look into other resources in the meantime just in case.
0 coins
Oliver Alexander
AuthorI appreciate the honest perspective. I'm trying to have some savings as a cushion but it's stressful. Did you have any way to speed up the appeals process at all?
0 coins
Arjun Patel
not really in terms of the actual hearing timeline, those are set by the appeals board. what I would suggest is use every tool available to stay informed about your claim status - including calling EDD regularly even when it's frustrating to get through
0 coins
Marcus Patterson
For staying informed on your claim, Claimyr (claimyr.com) is genuinely the best tool I've found for actually getting through to an EDD rep. The video at https://youtu.be/JmuwXR7HA10 walks through how it works. Being able to call regularly and actually get answers changes everything about managing the waiting period.
0 coins
Jade Lopez
slightly different angle here - has anyone looked into whether being fired for job searching could support a wrongful termination claim in addition to the UI stuff? I know this is an EDD forum but if the employer violated any implied covenant or something it might be worth a free consult with an employment attorney. some employment attorneys in California work on contingency for wrongful termination so it wouldn't necessarily cost anything upfront
0 coins
Molly Chambers
California is an at-will employment state so simple job searching probably doesn't give rise to a traditional wrongful termination claim unless there was an employment contract or implied contract involved. BUT if OP is a member of a protected class and this was used as a pretext, there could be other angles. Worth a free consultation for sure.
0 coins
Oliver Alexander
AuthorI honestly hadn't thought about the employment law angle at all. I don't think I have a strong case there but might be worth one free consultation just to know my options.
0 coins
Jade Lopez
yeah even just the peace of mind of knowing is worth the hour. most employment attorneys will do a free initial consult
0 coins
Tony Brooks
this thread is actually so helpful i'm bookmarking it. my situation is a little different - i resigned from my job before they could fire me when i found out they were about to let me go. wondering if that changes anything with edd since technically i resigned... does that count as a forced resignation?
0 coins
Lara Woods
That's actually a very different EDD situation - voluntary quits have a different standard than terminations. The key concept you want to look up is 'constructive discharge' or 'quit with good cause' under California UI Code. If you resigned because of a material change in working conditions or to avoid imminent layoff in certain circumstances, you may still qualify, but it's more complicated than a straightforward termination claim.
0 coins
Tony Brooks
oh interesting, i didn't realize there was a separate standard. i should probably post my own thread for this haha
0 coins
Eli Butler
yeah definitely post a separate thread, voluntary quit rules are complicated enough that it's its own whole topic
0 coins