UCC Document Community
Financial Services
/
Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
UCC financing statement Maryland debtor name keeps getting rejected - same business different spellings
Having major issues with a UCC financing statement Maryland filing that keeps bouncing back. We're trying to perfect our security interest in manufacturing equipment for a $280K commercial loan, but the debtor business name on our UCC-1 apparently doesn't match exactly what's in the state records. The borrower operates as 'Chesapeake Metal Works LLC' on all their contracts and signage, but when I check the Maryland Department of Assessments and Taxation database, I'm seeing slight variations like 'Chesapeake Metalworks, LLC' (no space) and 'Chesapeake Metal Works, L.L.C.' with periods. Our loan docs all reference the version with the space, but now I'm worried we've been using the wrong legal name this whole time. The rejection notice just says 'debtor name does not match records' but doesn't specify which version they want. Anyone dealt with Maryland's system being this picky about punctuation and spacing? This is holding up our entire closing and the borrower is getting antsy about the delay.
Join the conversation
UCC 1-308 language requirements for French-speaking debtors - filing complications
Having major issues with a UCC-1 filing where the debtor's legal name contains French characters and accents. The secretary of state's portal keeps rejecting our electronic filing, and I'm not sure if this is related to the UCC 1-308 provisions or just a system limitation. The debtor entity was formed in Quebec but does business here, and their charter documents show the name with proper French accents (é, à, ç). When I try to input the exact legal name from their articles of incorporation, the system either strips the accents or throws an error. Has anyone dealt with international debtor names in UCC filings? I'm worried about getting the debtor name wrong since that could invalidate the entire security interest. The loan closes next week and I need to get this perfected properly. Should I be filing the name exactly as it appears on the charter documents, or should I be using some anglicized version? Really need guidance on this one.
Join the conversation
Update us on what Delaware tells you! This is a common enough issue that their guidance would be helpful for all of us dealing with international entities.
Will do. Planning to call them first thing Monday and will report back with what they say.
Really interested to hear their response. I have a similar filing coming up next month with a Spanish entity.
In the meantime, you might want to prepare both versions of the UCC-1 - one with accents and one without - so you're ready to file whichever format Delaware recommends. Just don't submit both obviously.
Good thinking. Having both versions ready will save time once you get the official guidance.
And make sure to document Delaware's guidance in your file. If there's ever a question later about why you used a particular name format, you'll have the state's official position.
UCC 9-105 compliance verification help needed after debtor restructuring
Has anyone dealt with UCC 9-105 compliance issues during a corporate restructuring? Our borrower just went through a merger and I'm trying to verify if our existing UCC-1 filings still provide proper security interest perfection under the new entity structure. The debtor name changed from 'ABC Manufacturing LLC' to 'ABC-NewCorp Manufacturing Solutions LLC' and I'm concerned about whether our original collateral descriptions meet the 9-105 sufficiency standards. The financing statements were filed 3 years ago with fairly broad language like 'all equipment, inventory, and accounts' but now I'm wondering if that's specific enough for compliance. Anyone know if we need to file UCC-3 amendments to update the debtor name and potentially revise collateral descriptions to ensure we're meeting current 9-105 requirements? This is a $2.8M credit facility so getting this wrong isn't an option.
Join the conversation
Been through this exact scenario multiple times. File the UCC-3 name change amendment within 60 days max, and your broad collateral description should be fine for 9-105 purposes. The courts have generally been reasonable about what constitutes sufficient description.
That's reassuring. Did you ever have any issues with lenders questioning the adequacy of broad descriptions?
Occasionally, but usually more about comfort level than actual legal requirements. Most sophisticated lenders understand that overly specific descriptions can actually create more problems than they solve.
Update - just wanted to thank everyone for the input. Filed the UCC-3 amendment yesterday with the new debtor name and kept the original collateral language. Also ran everything through that Certana tool someone mentioned and it confirmed our documents were consistent. Feeling much better about our 9-105 compliance position now.
Glad it worked out! Quick action on name changes is always the right move.
Great to hear the verification tool was helpful. Those document consistency checks really do provide peace of mind on complex filings.
UCC 11 form keeps getting rejected - debtor name issues?
Been dealing with this nightmare for weeks now. Filed what I thought was a straightforward UCC 11 continuation but it keeps bouncing back from the Secretary of State office. The rejection notice mentions 'debtor name discrepancy' but I'm looking at the original UCC-1 and I swear the names match exactly. Has anyone run into this before? The continuation deadline is coming up fast and I'm starting to panic that we're going to lose perfection on a $2.3M equipment loan. The debtor is an LLC and I used the exact same entity name from the Articles of Organization. What am I missing here?
Join the conversation
One more thing to check - make sure you're using the debtor's EXACT legal name as it appears in their formation documents, not any DBA names they might be using. That trips people up all the time.
Good point. I pulled the name from their Articles but I should verify there haven't been any amendments to the Articles since the original UCC-1.
Definitely worth checking. Corporate name changes don't always get communicated to lenders right away.
Florida UCC registry portal rejecting my filing - debtor name mismatch error
Been wrestling with Florida's UCC registry system for three days now trying to get a continuation filed. Keep getting rejection notices about debtor name discrepancies but I'm copying exactly from the original UCC-1. The business name on file shows 'ABC Manufacturing LLC' but apparently there's some invisible character or spacing issue that's causing the system to flag it as non-matching. Anyone else dealt with Florida's particular quirks about exact name formatting? This continuation expires in 8 days and I'm starting to panic about losing perfection on a $2.3M equipment loan.
Join the conversation
Just went through this exact same issue with Florida last week. Ended up using Certana's document checker tool and it caught that my original UCC-1 had 'Manufacturing' spelled with a weird character that looked like a normal 'a' but was actually a different Unicode character. Once I corrected that, the continuation went through immediately.
Almost instantly. You just upload both documents and it highlights discrepancies in seconds. Saved me hours of manual comparison.
I'm still skeptical about using third-party tools for this. Seems like the state system should be able to handle basic name matching.
Update: Finally got it resolved! The issue was exactly what several people mentioned - there was a hidden character in the original debtor name. Used Certana.ai's verification tool and it immediately flagged the Unicode discrepancy. Corrected the name and the continuation was accepted within minutes. Thanks everyone for the suggestions, especially about checking for invisible characters.
Great outcome! Florida's system really needs to be more user-friendly about these technical rejections.
At least you got it sorted before the deadline. Nothing worse than losing perfection over a formatting glitch.
Yara Abboud
Maryland UCC filings are online now so at least you'll get the rejection notice quickly. In the old paper days you'd wait weeks just to find out about a name mismatch. Still frustrating but at least the turnaround is faster.
0 coins
PixelPioneer
True, the electronic system is much faster for both submissions and rejections. Usually know within a few hours if there's a problem.
0 coins
Keisha Williams
Yeah but the rejection notices are still cryptic. They need to be more specific about exactly what doesn't match.
0 coins
Paolo Rizzo
Update us when you figure out the correct name format! I do a lot of Maryland filings and would love to know what the issue was. These name matching problems seem to be getting worse, not better.
0 coins
QuantumQueen
AuthorWill do! I'm going to try the Certana verification tool that a couple people mentioned, and also request the certified formation docs to compare. Hopefully one of those approaches works.
0 coins
Amina Sy
Good luck! Maryland can be tricky but once you get the exact name format down they're actually pretty efficient with processing.
0 coins