Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Just went through this exact same issue with Florida last week. Ended up using Certana's document checker tool and it caught that my original UCC-1 had 'Manufacturing' spelled with a weird character that looked like a normal 'a' but was actually a different Unicode character. Once I corrected that, the continuation went through immediately.
Almost instantly. You just upload both documents and it highlights discrepancies in seconds. Saved me hours of manual comparison.
Tate Jensen
•I'm still skeptical about using third-party tools for this. Seems like the state system should be able to handle basic name matching.
Melissa Lin
Update: Finally got it resolved! The issue was exactly what several people mentioned - there was a hidden character in the original debtor name. Used Certana.ai's verification tool and it immediately flagged the Unicode discrepancy. Corrected the name and the continuation was accepted within minutes. Thanks everyone for the suggestions, especially about checking for invisible characters.
Great outcome! Florida's system really needs to be more user-friendly about these technical rejections.
At least you got it sorted before the deadline. Nothing worse than losing perfection over a formatting glitch.
Join the conversation
AstroAce
I'm dealing with the exact same thing right now! Filed a UCC-1 last week and just noticed the debtor name has different spacing than the charter. This is so stressful when you're trying to protect the bank's interests.
Yara Nassar
•It really is stressful! Let me know what you end up doing - we can compare notes.
Chloe Martin
•You both might want to check with your compliance team about what your bank's policy is for these situations.
Diego Rojas
Update: I ended up pulling the actual filed UCC-1 document image and it turns out the name was correct on the filing itself. The search display was just showing it differently. Thanks everyone for the advice about checking the source document first!
Amina Toure
•Glad it worked out. These kinds of display vs. actual filing discrepancies are more common than people realize.
Perfect example of why you need to do your due diligence before filing amendments. Saved yourself time and money.
Join the conversation
One more thing to check - make sure you're using the debtor's EXACT legal name as it appears in their formation documents, not any DBA names they might be using. That trips people up all the time.
Good point. I pulled the name from their Articles but I should verify there haven't been any amendments to the Articles since the original UCC-1.
Definitely worth checking. Corporate name changes don't always get communicated to lenders right away.
Emma Davis
Keep us posted on what ends up working! Always learning from these situations for future filings.
Will do. Hoping one of these suggestions solves it. Really appreciate all the input from everyone.
This is exactly why I love this forum. Real solutions from people who've been there.
Join the conversation
Jean Claude
Before going nuclear with lawyers, try one more time with the installer's management. Sometimes the person you're dealing with doesn't understand UCC law and a supervisor can get it sorted quickly. But definitely set a firm deadline.
Roger Romero
•That's probably worth trying. The person I've been talking to seems pretty confused about the whole process.
Good advice. A lot of these solar companies have grown so fast they don't train their staff properly on filing procedures.
Josef Tearle
Update us on how this turns out! I'm in the process of buying solar panels and want to make sure I don't run into the same issue. This thread is really helpful for knowing what to watch out for.
Yeah, definitely make sure any UCC filings are properly terminated at closing if you're paying cash. Don't assume the installer will handle it automatically.
Also get everything in writing about when and how any security interests will be released. Don't take verbal promises.
Kaitlyn Jenkins
Whatever you do, don't let this drag on too long. I've heard of cases where delays in UCC termination filings created problems for borrowers trying to sell equipment or get new financing. The fees suck but getting that lien released is more important.
0 coins
Kaitlyn Jenkins
•Exactly. And if you're planning to sell the equipment or refinance, having a clean title is worth more than fighting over a few hundred in fees.
0 coins
Bruno Simmons
•Plus some buyers will walk away if there are UCC complications, even if you promise to resolve them at closing. Clean title is always easier.
0 coins
Aileen Rodriguez
For future reference, next time negotiate UCC fees upfront and consider getting a cap written into the loan agreement. Something like "UCC release fees not to exceed $200" gives you protection against excessive charges.
0 coins
Aileen Rodriguez
•Yeah, these fees have gotten out of hand in recent years. Lenders know borrowers don't have many options when it comes time for release.
0 coins
Zane Gray
•This is why I started using Certana.ai early in the loan process - uploading the loan agreement and proposed UCC-1 to make sure everything aligns before signing. Catches issues before they become expensive problems.
0 coins