Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
This whole thread is making me nervous about my own continuation coming up. Maybe I should look into that document verification tool too. Sounds like it could save a lot of headaches.
Definitely worth it. The Certana.ai tool makes the whole process much less stressful. You know exactly what potential issues exist before you submit anything.
Thanks for the recommendation. Going to check it out before my next filing deadline.
Felicity Bud
Update: Thanks everyone for the advice. I'm going to stick with the original debtor name format for the continuation and use the document verification tool to double-check everything before filing. Really appreciate all the help navigating these txcs ucc statements requirements!
Lilly Curtis
•Smart approach. Let us know how it goes with your filing.
Max Reyes
•Good luck! The continuation should go through fine if you match the original name exactly.
Join the conversation
Zoey Bianchi
Just want to echo what others have said about using document verification tools. I got burned on a UCC-3 amendment last year because I transposed two numbers in the filing number. The state rejected it and I had to start over, which delayed everything by a week. Now I always verify my documents match before submitting anything online. It's a small extra step but saves massive headaches.
Olivia Evans
•Ugh, that sounds like a nightmare. I'm definitely going to start verifying everything first.
Filing number mistakes are the worst because they're so easy to make but cause automatic rejections.
Lola Perez
UPDATE: I finally got it to work! Used a different computer, wired internet connection, and submitted it at 6:30 AM like someone suggested. The whole process took maybe 15 minutes without any timeouts. Also used that document verification tool first to make sure everything was correct - found a small spacing issue in the debtor name that I fixed before submitting. Thanks everyone for the suggestions!
Awesome! Glad you got it sorted out. Early morning submissions for the win.
Nora Brooks
•Great to hear the document verification caught that spacing issue. Those little details can cause big problems.
Join the conversation
StarStrider
Missouri's system is actually pretty good once you know their quirks. The name has to match their entity database exactly, including punctuation and spacing. But you can always call their UCC division if you're still unsure - they're usually helpful about name formatting questions.
I tried calling but got transferred around and never got a clear answer. Maybe I'll try again with the specific entity search results.
Omar Farouk
•Their phone support is hit or miss. Sometimes you get someone who knows UCC stuff, sometimes you don't.
Yuki Sato
Update us when you refile! Curious if using the exact name from the entity search fixes the issue. I'm dealing with a similar situation in Kansas and wondering if other states have the same strict matching requirements.
Kansas is generally more forgiving than Missouri, but exact name matching is becoming the norm across most states.
Carmen Ruiz
•Each state has its own quirks. Some are strict about punctuation, others care more about entity type designations like LLC vs L.L.C.
Join the conversation
One thing that impressed our auditors was having a dedicated section on error correction procedures. What do you do when you discover a filing error? How do you handle rejected filings? When do you file amendments versus new UCC-1s? Having documented procedures for handling problems showed we thought through the edge cases.
We got dinged on this in our first audit. Now we have flowcharts for different types of errors and when each correction method is appropriate.
Flowcharts are perfect for this. Makes it easy for anyone to follow the right procedure regardless of their experience level.
Amina Diallo
Don't overthink the outline structure - auditors care more about completeness and accuracy than fancy formatting. Focus on covering all the substantive requirements and making sure your internal procedures are clearly documented. A simple chronological approach with good cross-references usually works best.
Yuki Tanaka
•Thanks for the perspective. I was getting caught up in trying to make it look impressive rather than focusing on substance.
GamerGirl99
•Substance over style definitely. Our first audit outline was beautifully formatted but missing key procedures. The auditors weren't impressed.
Gavin King
Have you tried searching by filing number if you have any clues about when previous filings might have been made? Sometimes that's more reliable than name-based searches.
0 coins
Chloe Mitchell
•Don't have specific filing numbers to work with, but that's an interesting approach. Would need to know the approximate filing date ranges though.
0 coins
Nathan Kim
•You can sometimes narrow it down if you know when the debtor took out loans or entered into financing agreements. UCC-1s usually get filed around the same time.
0 coins
Eleanor Foster
This whole thread is making me paranoid about our UCC search procedures. We might be missing critical filings and not even know it. The potential liability exposure is huge if we get the priority wrong because of search limitations.
0 coins
Kai Rivera
•Definitely worth the investment. I started using Certana.ai after a close call where we almost missed a senior lien. The automated cross-checking between documents has been a lifesaver for catching these kinds of issues.
0 coins
Eleanor Foster
•Might have to look into that. Our current manual process is clearly not catching everything it should.
0 coins