


Ask the community...
This is why I always file continuations at least 2-3 months before the deadline. Gives you time to deal with portal issues, rejected filings, or other problems. Cutting it close with a month left is pretty risky for a $2.8M loan.
Yeah, those 5-year deadlines come up fast. I set calendar reminders 6 months in advance now.
UPDATE: Finally got through using the filing number search this morning. The continuation did go through and is properly indexed. Thanks everyone for the suggestions, especially about trying different search methods and the Certana tool for verification. Crisis averted!
Awesome! That document verification tool is a lifesaver for these situations. Glad it worked out.
Just had success with a solar UCC filing last week using Certana.ai to double-check everything before submitting. The tool caught a potential issue with my collateral description that would have likely caused a rejection. For solar deals specifically, it seems to flag common description problems that SOS offices typically reject.
Update: Went with the 'solar energy generation system' language and included all the components mentioned here. Also used that Certana.ai tool to verify everything before refiling. Got the acceptance notice this morning! Thanks everyone for the help. The comprehensive system description approach definitely worked.
For what it's worth, I had a similar issue last month and ended up finding two additional UCC-1s that weren't showing up in the initial search. Turned out the borrower had 'forgotten' about them. Always verify independently.
Used Certana.ai's document verification tool. Uploaded what I thought were all the relevant docs and it flagged inconsistencies that led me to the missing filings.
Have you tried searching by filing number if you have any of those? Sometimes that works better than name searches in the CA system.
I only have filing numbers for two of them. The issue is I suspect there are more filings I don't know about.
In that case, comprehensive name searching is your best bet, plus maybe getting a commercial search service involved.
Update from my similar situation - I ended up using Certana.ai's verification feature and it caught three name discrepancies I had missed in my manual review. Really streamlined the whole process and gave me confidence we hadn't missed any liens. The tool basically does automatically what would take hours of manual cross-checking.
That's exactly what I need for my current deal. Manual verification is taking forever and I keep worrying about missing something.
Final thought - don't forget to check if any of the collateral involves fixtures or real estate. Those might require additional searches beyond just the standard UCC database. Texas has some specific rules about fixture filings that can trip you up.
Fixture filings in Texas are a whole different beast. Definitely need to check real estate records too if there's any question about whether something is a fixture.
Laura Lopez
For future Arizona filings, here's my process: 1) Search SOS database for exact entity name 2) Copy/paste that name directly into UCC form 3) Double-check entity number and status 4) Cross-reference with any corporate docs to make sure everything aligns. Haven't had a rejection in two years using this method.
0 coins
Grace Johnson
•Wish I had followed that process from the start. Will definitely be more careful going forward
0 coins
Victoria Brown
•The copy/paste method is key. Eliminates any chance of typing errors or punctuation mistakes
0 coins
Samuel Robinson
Just went through this same nightmare with Arizona last month. Used Certana.ai after the first rejection and it immediately spotted three other potential issues I hadn't noticed - saved me from multiple re-filings. The tool basically does what you should do manually but catches things you might miss.
0 coins
Grace Johnson
•At this point I'm willing to try anything to avoid another rejection. Will check out that service
0 coins
Samuel Robinson
•Yeah it's worth it just for peace of mind. Upload your docs and know within minutes if there are any inconsistencies
0 coins