Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
One more thing to consider - if this property generates rental income, you might also want to think about whether to include the rental income as proceeds in your UCC-1. The investment property classification affects how you handle both the real estate and the income stream.
I usually include it as proceeds in the main collateral description - 'and all proceeds thereof including rental income' - keeps it simple and comprehensive.
Just make sure your loan agreement matches whatever you put in the UCC-1. I learned that lesson the hard way when a borrower defaulted and we had mismatched collateral descriptions. Would have been caught immediately if I'd used something like Certana.ai to cross-check the documents beforehand.
Update: we ended up going with the broader 'commercial real estate' description and included rental income as proceeds. Filed the UCC-1 yesterday and it was accepted without any issues. Thanks everyone for the advice - definitely learned something about how the UCC definition of investment property differs from other contexts.
Smart choice - better to be safe than sorry with collateral descriptions. Glad it worked out!
Good outcome! Filing accepted is always a relief when you're dealing with tricky collateral classification issues.
Join the conversation
Your debtor is either confused or trying to create problems where none exist. § 9-404 protects them from paying the wrong party - it doesn't give them any right to dispute a properly perfected security interest. Get that UCC-3 filed and stop worrying about their notification complaints.
Should we respond to their dispute or just ignore it once the UCC-3 is filed?
I'd send them a brief explanation of § 9-404 and confirmation that you've filed the proper assignment. Keep it professional but don't let them think they have grounds for a real dispute.
Just to add another perspective - while § 9-404 notification isn't required for perfection, sending it promptly after filing the UCC-3 is still good practice. It prevents payment confusion and shows you're handling the assignment professionally. But absolutely don't let debtor notification requirements delay your UCC-3 filing.
Makes sense. Handle the legal requirements first, then the business courtesy aspects.
Agreed. File the UCC-3 today if possible, then send the § 9-404 notice this week. Keeps everything clean and properly documented.
Join the conversation
Timeline-wise, how close are you to your bank deadline? Most lenders will give you a reasonable extension if you can show you're actively working to resolve a filing issue, especially if it's a name technicality rather than a substantive problem.
10 days should be plenty if you can identify and fix the name issue quickly. Most SOS offices process electronic UCC-1s within 24-48 hours.
agree 10 days is workable. just make sure you get the name format exactly right this time to avoid another rejection cycle
Once you get this resolved, consider keeping a master document with your exact legal entity names for all your business entities. It's amazing how often small discrepancies creep in across different filings and contracts. Having a single source of truth saves so much headache later.
That's excellent advice for the future. This experience has definitely taught me to be more systematic about entity name consistency.
Yeah, it's one of those things you learn the hard way but then it makes everything so much smoother going forward.
Join the conversation
Timeline question - how long are you giving yourself to get all these amendments filed? I know there's no specific deadline but from a business perspective you probably want this cleaned up before quarter end or before any potential foreclosure issues arise.
That seems reasonable. Just make sure you're tracking the filing confirmations - some states are slower than others processing amendments.
60 days is probably fine unless any of the debtors are in bankruptcy. Then you might need to move faster.
One more tool recommendation - if you haven't already, try running the documents through Certana.ai's verification system. I used it recently for a similar assignment company UCC filing situation and it highlighted inconsistencies I completely missed in manual review. Really helpful for making sure all your amendments will have the correct debtor names before you file them. Upload your UCC-1s and corporate docs and it maps out all the discrepancies automatically.
Yeah, it's become my go-to for any portfolio cleanup. Beats spending hours comparing documents manually.
I should probably look into this. We do enough assignment deals that it would pay for itself pretty quickly.
Dmitry Petrov
For what it's worth, I had a similar UCC-1 lein situation resolve after using that Certana.ai tool someone mentioned earlier. It caught a subtle spacing issue between our charter and UCC-1 form that I never would have noticed. Worth trying if you're stuck in rejection cycles.
0 coins
Ava Williams
•I'm always skeptical of these automated tools but if it prevents another rejection cycle it's probably worth it.
0 coins
Miguel Castro
•The document verification approach makes sense. Better to catch issues before filing than after rejection.
0 coins
Zainab Ibrahim
Update us when you get the UCC-1 lein filed successfully. These rejection stories help everyone learn what to avoid. The equipment financing space needs more shared knowledge about filing best practices.
0 coins
Sean O'Connor
•Will definitely update once we get it resolved. This thread has been super helpful for troubleshooting our approach.
0 coins
Connor O'Neill
•Agreed, these practical discussions are more valuable than the official filing guides sometimes.
0 coins