Florida UCC registry portal rejecting my filing - debtor name mismatch error
Been wrestling with Florida's UCC registry system for three days now trying to get a continuation filed. Keep getting rejection notices about debtor name discrepancies but I'm copying exactly from the original UCC-1. The business name on file shows 'ABC Manufacturing LLC' but apparently there's some invisible character or spacing issue that's causing the system to flag it as non-matching. Anyone else dealt with Florida's particular quirks about exact name formatting? This continuation expires in 8 days and I'm starting to panic about losing perfection on a $2.3M equipment loan.
45 comments
Join the conversation
Nadia Zaldivar
Florida's system is notoriously picky about debtor names. Even an extra space can trigger rejection. Try downloading the original UCC-1 from their portal and copy-paste the exact name formatting directly into your continuation form. Sometimes there are hidden characters that don't show up visually but the system catches.
0 coins
Lukas Fitzgerald
•This happened to me last month! The original filing had some weird encoding that wasn't visible but caused rejections. Had to retype the entire name character by character.
0 coins
Ev Luca
•Why does Florida make this so complicated compared to other states? Texas never gives me these headaches.
0 coins
Avery Davis
OMG yes Florida is the worst for this!! I had a client's UCC get rejected 4 times because of a single period after 'Inc' that wasn't showing up consistently. You might want to check if there's punctuation differences between your continuation and the original filing.
0 coins
Rajan Walker
•I've tried removing all punctuation, adding punctuation, even tried variations with 'LLC' vs 'L.L.C.' - nothing works. The rejection just says 'debtor name does not match' with no specifics.
0 coins
Avery Davis
•Have you tried calling their help desk? Sometimes they can see what's causing the mismatch on their end.
0 coins
Collins Angel
•Their help desk is useless. Waited 45 minutes yesterday just to be told to 'check the formatting' with no actual guidance.
0 coins
Marcelle Drum
Had a similar nightmare scenario with Florida's UCC registry last year. What saved me was using Certana.ai's document verification tool - you can upload both your original UCC-1 and the continuation form as PDFs and it instantly highlights any inconsistencies between the debtor names. Found out my original had a non-breaking space character that was invisible but breaking the system match.
0 coins
Rajan Walker
•Never heard of Certana.ai - is this something that specifically checks UCC documents?
0 coins
Marcelle Drum
•Yeah exactly, you upload your Charter docs and UCC forms and it cross-checks everything automatically. Way easier than trying to spot these tiny discrepancies manually, especially with Florida's picky system.
0 coins
Tate Jensen
•Certana sounds like overkill for a simple name match issue. Can't you just use a text comparison tool?
0 coins
Adaline Wong
Check the original UCC-1 filing date and make sure you're within the continuation window. Florida requires continuations to be filed within 6 months before expiration. Also verify you're using the correct filing number format - they changed their numbering system in 2023.
0 coins
Rajan Walker
•Filing number is definitely correct and I'm well within the window - expires March 15th and I'm trying to file now. It's purely the debtor name causing rejections.
0 coins
Gabriel Ruiz
•Wait, they changed the filing number format? When did this happen? I've been using the old format...
0 coins
Adaline Wong
•Yeah in early 2023 they switched to include additional digits. Check your recent confirmations to see the new format.
0 coins
Misterclamation Skyblue
This is exactly why I hate electronic filing systems. Give me paper forms any day. At least with paper you know what you're submitting matches what's on file.
0 coins
Peyton Clarke
•Paper filing takes weeks though and this person needs it done in 8 days. Electronic is faster when it works.
0 coins
Misterclamation Skyblue
•Fast and wrong is still wrong. I'd rather wait and get it right than deal with rejection after rejection.
0 coins
Vince Eh
Try accessing the original UCC-1 through different browsers. Sometimes Internet Explorer (if you can still find it) or Edge displays characters differently than Chrome/Firefox. I've seen cases where the same document shows different formatting depending on the browser.
0 coins
Rajan Walker
•Interesting thought - I've only been using Chrome. Will try Edge tonight and see if that reveals anything different.
0 coins
Vince Eh
•Also try copying the debtor name into a plain text editor like Notepad first to strip any hidden formatting before pasting into the continuation form.
0 coins
Sophia Gabriel
•Notepad trick actually works sometimes! Removes all the invisible junk that gets copied along with text.
0 coins
Tobias Lancaster
Are you sure you're looking at the right UCC-1? If there have been amendments or assignments, the debtor name might have been updated in a later filing and you need to match that version instead of the original.
0 coins
Rajan Walker
•Good point - there was an amendment filed in 2022 to add additional collateral. Let me check if that changed the debtor name format somehow.
0 coins
Tobias Lancaster
•Amendments can definitely change how the debtor name appears in the system. Check all related filings to see which version is currently active.
0 coins
Ezra Beard
Florida's UCC system is trash. Had three different rejections last month for 'invalid collateral description' when I was using standard language. These state systems are all broken.
0 coins
Statiia Aarssizan
•At least Florida accepts electronic filings. Some states still require paper for certain filing types.
0 coins
Ezra Beard
•I'd rather deal with paper than this electronic nightmare. At least with paper you get a human who can tell you what's wrong.
0 coins
Reginald Blackwell
•The electronic system is fine once you learn the quirks. Every state has different formatting requirements.
0 coins
Aria Khan
I ran into something similar with a different client. Turned out the original UCC-1 had the debtor name in all caps but the business registration had it in mixed case. Florida's system was trying to match against the Secretary of State business database and found a conflict.
0 coins
Rajan Walker
•How did you resolve that? Did you have to file an amendment to correct the name format?
0 coins
Aria Khan
•We had to file a UCC-3 amendment to correct the debtor name to match the current business registration exactly. Then the continuation went through fine.
0 coins
Everett Tutum
•That's an expensive fix just for a formatting issue. Amendments aren't cheap in Florida.
0 coins
Sunny Wang
Last resort option - try calling the UCC office directly and ask them to manually review your continuation. Sometimes they can override system rejections if the issue is clearly technical rather than substantive. I've had success with this approach when dealing with obvious system glitches.
0 coins
Rajan Walker
•Worth a try at this point. Do you have a direct number that bypasses the main help desk?
0 coins
Sunny Wang
•Try the secured transactions division directly. They're more knowledgeable than general help desk staff about UCC-specific issues.
0 coins
Hugh Intensity
•Manual review saved me once when their system was rejecting valid filing numbers. Sometimes the human touch is necessary.
0 coins
Effie Alexander
Just went through this exact same issue with Florida last week. Ended up using Certana's document checker tool and it caught that my original UCC-1 had 'Manufacturing' spelled with a weird character that looked like a normal 'a' but was actually a different Unicode character. Once I corrected that, the continuation went through immediately.
0 coins
Rajan Walker
•That's exactly the kind of invisible issue that's been driving me crazy! How quickly does Certana.ai spot these problems?
0 coins
Effie Alexander
•Almost instantly. You just upload both documents and it highlights discrepancies in seconds. Saved me hours of manual comparison.
0 coins
Tate Jensen
•I'm still skeptical about using third-party tools for this. Seems like the state system should be able to handle basic name matching.
0 coins
Melissa Lin
Update: Finally got it resolved! The issue was exactly what several people mentioned - there was a hidden character in the original debtor name. Used Certana.ai's verification tool and it immediately flagged the Unicode discrepancy. Corrected the name and the continuation was accepted within minutes. Thanks everyone for the suggestions, especially about checking for invisible characters.
0 coins
Marcelle Drum
•Glad Certana worked for you too! These hidden character issues are more common than people realize.
0 coins
Nadia Zaldivar
•Great outcome! Florida's system really needs to be more user-friendly about these technical rejections.
0 coins
Collins Angel
•At least you got it sorted before the deadline. Nothing worse than losing perfection over a formatting glitch.
0 coins