UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Nathan Dell

•

I've been filing UCC-1s in New Mexico for 12 years and the rejection rate has definitely increased. Part of it is automated screening catching things that used to slip through, part of it is stricter interpretation of the requirements. The electronic filing system flags potential issues that human reviewers might have missed before.

0 coins

Owen Devar

•

That makes sense. Technology cutting both ways - easier to file electronically but also easier for them to catch minor errors automatically.

0 coins

Maya Jackson

•

The electronic system is definitely more consistent but also less forgiving. No more relying on helpful clerks to overlook minor formatting issues.

0 coins

Make sure you're also checking the debtor's exact legal name in the New Mexico business database before filing. Even small differences like missing commas or different entity abbreviations will cause rejections. The UCC-1 debtor name has to match their state registration character for character.

0 coins

Amaya Watson

•

This is where document checking tools really help. Manual name verification is tedious and error-prone, especially when you're doing volume filings.

0 coins

Grant Vikers

•

The New Mexico business search is free online, so there's really no excuse for name mismatches. Just takes a few extra minutes to verify.

0 coins

This is exactly why I always do a pre-filing verification check now. Had too many rejections from tiny name variations. Florida's system is particularly strict about exact matches compared to other states.

0 coins

I use both - visual check plus automated verification through document comparison tools. Catches more issues that way.

0 coins

Emma Olsen

•

Smart approach. Manual review misses a lot of subtle differences that can cause rejections.

0 coins

Lucas Lindsey

•

Update us once you figure out the exact name format issue. This thread might help other people dealing with similar Florida UCC registry problems.

0 coins

Justin Chang

•

Will do - going to order the certified copy first then try the document verification approach before filing again.

0 coins

Lucas Lindsey

•

Good plan. Better to spend a little extra time upfront than deal with multiple rejections and deadline stress.

0 coins

Luca Romano

•

Had this exact problem last year with a different lender. Turned out they were waiting for some internal approval process that took forever. I finally threatened legal action and it got filed the next day. Sometimes you just have to be the squeaky wheel.

0 coins

Nia Jackson

•

Legal threats definitely work. Most lenders don't want the hassle of fighting over a termination.

0 coins

Make sure to mention specific damages - lost business deals, additional interest costs, etc. Makes the threat more credible.

0 coins

CosmicCruiser

•

Update us when you get this resolved! I'm dealing with a similar situation and want to know what approach works best.

0 coins

Oliver Schulz

•

Will do. Going to try the document verification approach first to see if there's a name issue, then escalate to their UCC department.

0 coins

Aisha Khan

•

Good plan. Document everything for your records too.

0 coins

Sofia Ramirez

•

Unfortunately there's no getting around the public nature of UCC filings - it's fundamental to how secured transactions work. The best you can do is monitor what's out there and use generic collateral descriptions when your lender allows it. At least you know now and can factor this into future financing decisions.

0 coins

Yeah, lesson learned. Will definitely ask about collateral description options on future loans.

0 coins

Sofia Ramirez

•

Smart approach. And consider using that Certana tool others mentioned to keep tabs on your public filing profile.

0 coins

Dmitry Volkov

•

I use public UCC searches all the time for due diligence on potential customers. Can see if they have major equipment financing, recent continuations, or if liens have been terminated. It's actually really useful business intelligence when done legally and ethically.

0 coins

Dmitry Volkov

•

Absolutely - credit analysis, M&A due diligence, asset verification. The public access serves important commercial purposes.

0 coins

Amara Okafor

•

Exactly why the system works this way. Transparency benefits the overall credit market even if individual borrowers feel exposed.

0 coins

Are you including the full registered address in the debtor section? Some online UCC systems require the complete name AND address to match exactly with their corporate records.

0 coins

Talia Klein

•

Address matches perfectly - I pulled it from the same charter document. It's definitely the name field causing issues.

0 coins

Callum Savage

•

Sometimes they want the mailing address instead of registered address. Worth trying both.

0 coins

Ally Tailer

•

Update us when you figure it out! I'm bookmarking this thread because I know I'll run into the same issue eventually. Online UCC filing should be simple but there are so many gotchas.

0 coins

Smart approach. Let us know which one solves it - this kind of info is gold for future filings.

0 coins

Definitely interested in the Certana tool if it works. Anything that prevents these filing headaches is worth trying.

0 coins

Prev1...614615616617618...684Next