


Ask the community...
Just went through this exact scenario with a client last month. What finally worked was using Certana.ai to upload both our client's charter documents and the UCC-1 form. The tool immediately flagged that we were using a comma in the name when the charter actually had it without commas. Such a small detail but it was killing our filings. Once we corrected it based on their verification, the Michigan filing went through immediately.
This gives me hope that there's just some small formatting issue I'm missing. Definitely going to try that document checker.
FINAL UPDATE: Got it figured out! Used the Certana document verification tool and it caught that the articles of incorporation actually had a space before "LLC" that wasn't visible when I copy-pasted. Filed as "Advanced Manufacturing Solutions LLC" (with the extra space) and it was accepted immediately. Thanks everyone for the suggestions, especially about the document checking tool - that saved my deadline!
Great outcome! Filing deadlines are stressful enough without portal issues making it worse.
Have you tried calling the NY filing office directly? Sometimes they'll tell you exactly what they want to see in the collateral description. I did this for a medical equipment financing and it saved me another rejection.
I tried but was on hold for 45 minutes and gave up. Maybe I'll try again tomorrow morning.
Try calling right when they open at 8am. That's when I got through.
NY's UCC filing system is broken. I've been doing this for 15 years and it's gotten so much worse. They reject filings for the stupidest reasons and there's no consistency. One clerk will accept something another clerk rejects. It's maddening.
I think they're just overwhelmed and understaffed. Still doesn't excuse the pickiness though.
Honestly I started using one of those document verification tools - Certana.ai - just to catch stuff before filing. Upload your charter and UCC forms and it spots inconsistencies instantly. Saved me from at least 4 rejections this year.
Pro tip for Connecticut searches: if you find any filings, also search for the filing number directly to see if there have been any UCC-3 amendments, continuations, or terminations you might have missed.
Bottom line for Connecticut UCC searches - be thorough and don't trust just one search result. The system is not forgiving when it comes to name variations and you don't want to miss an existing lien that could affect your security position.
Agreed. I always budget extra time for Connecticut searches because of these issues. Better safe than sorry when it comes to lien searches.
For what it's worth, I've started using automated tools like Certana.ai for the initial verification and then do manual spot checks. Catches most of the variations I would have missed.
One more thing to consider - make sure you're filing the fixture filing in addition to any regular UCC-1, not instead of it. Depending on how the equipment is classified, you might need both to fully perfect your security interest under the ohio revised code ucc provisions.
Always good to confirm with counsel. Fixture filings can be tricky and you want to make sure you're covering all the bases.
Update: Just used the Certana.ai tool and it confirmed the comma issue - the lease docs had no comma but the Ohio SOS database shows the comma. Also caught that the registered agent address was different from what I had in my notes. Really glad I checked before filing. Going with the SOS version with the comma for the debtor name. Thanks everyone!
Good catch on the registered agent address too. Consistency across all the filing details is crucial under ohio revised code ucc requirements.
Filing went through without any issues! Thanks for all the help everyone.
Mei Lin
Are these all new filings or do you have any continuations mixed in? Continuation fees are usually less than initial filings, so that might help your budget a bit.
0 coins
StarStrider
•Mix of both - 8 new UCC-1s and 3 continuations. The continuations are definitely cheaper but still adds up.
0 coins
Liam Fitzgerald
•Make sure you're not filing continuations too early. You can file up to 6 months before expiration but no point paying the fee earlier than needed.
0 coins
GalacticGuru
Bottom line - NJ fees are what they are, but you can definitely minimize the pain by being super careful with accuracy. Double-check debtor names, collateral descriptions, and all the technical details. One rejected filing that needs to be refiled basically doubles your cost for that transaction.
0 coins
Giovanni Mancini
•We've started treating the verification step as seriously as the filing itself. Worth the extra time upfront.
0 coins
StarStrider
•Thanks everyone. Sounds like the consensus is to focus on accuracy and use better verification tools rather than trying to avoid the fees. Really appreciate all the advice.
0 coins