Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
I've been filing UCC-1s in New Mexico for 12 years and the rejection rate has definitely increased. Part of it is automated screening catching things that used to slip through, part of it is stricter interpretation of the requirements. The electronic filing system flags potential issues that human reviewers might have missed before.
That makes sense. Technology cutting both ways - easier to file electronically but also easier for them to catch minor errors automatically.
The electronic system is definitely more consistent but also less forgiving. No more relying on helpful clerks to overlook minor formatting issues.
Make sure you're also checking the debtor's exact legal name in the New Mexico business database before filing. Even small differences like missing commas or different entity abbreviations will cause rejections. The UCC-1 debtor name has to match their state registration character for character.
This is where document checking tools really help. Manual name verification is tedious and error-prone, especially when you're doing volume filings.
The New Mexico business search is free online, so there's really no excuse for name mismatches. Just takes a few extra minutes to verify.
Join the conversation
One more thing to consider - if this property generates rental income, you might also want to think about whether to include the rental income as proceeds in your UCC-1. The investment property classification affects how you handle both the real estate and the income stream.
I usually include it as proceeds in the main collateral description - 'and all proceeds thereof including rental income' - keeps it simple and comprehensive.
Just make sure your loan agreement matches whatever you put in the UCC-1. I learned that lesson the hard way when a borrower defaulted and we had mismatched collateral descriptions. Would have been caught immediately if I'd used something like Certana.ai to cross-check the documents beforehand.
Update: we ended up going with the broader 'commercial real estate' description and included rental income as proceeds. Filed the UCC-1 yesterday and it was accepted without any issues. Thanks everyone for the advice - definitely learned something about how the UCC definition of investment property differs from other contexts.
Smart choice - better to be safe than sorry with collateral descriptions. Glad it worked out!
Good outcome! Filing accepted is always a relief when you're dealing with tricky collateral classification issues.
Join the conversation
Timeline-wise, how close are you to your bank deadline? Most lenders will give you a reasonable extension if you can show you're actively working to resolve a filing issue, especially if it's a name technicality rather than a substantive problem.
10 days should be plenty if you can identify and fix the name issue quickly. Most SOS offices process electronic UCC-1s within 24-48 hours.
agree 10 days is workable. just make sure you get the name format exactly right this time to avoid another rejection cycle
Once you get this resolved, consider keeping a master document with your exact legal entity names for all your business entities. It's amazing how often small discrepancies creep in across different filings and contracts. Having a single source of truth saves so much headache later.
That's excellent advice for the future. This experience has definitely taught me to be more systematic about entity name consistency.
Yeah, it's one of those things you learn the hard way but then it makes everything so much smoother going forward.
Join the conversation
Your debtor is either confused or trying to create problems where none exist. § 9-404 protects them from paying the wrong party - it doesn't give them any right to dispute a properly perfected security interest. Get that UCC-3 filed and stop worrying about their notification complaints.
Should we respond to their dispute or just ignore it once the UCC-3 is filed?
I'd send them a brief explanation of § 9-404 and confirmation that you've filed the proper assignment. Keep it professional but don't let them think they have grounds for a real dispute.
Just to add another perspective - while § 9-404 notification isn't required for perfection, sending it promptly after filing the UCC-3 is still good practice. It prevents payment confusion and shows you're handling the assignment professionally. But absolutely don't let debtor notification requirements delay your UCC-3 filing.
Makes sense. Handle the legal requirements first, then the business courtesy aspects.
Agreed. File the UCC-3 today if possible, then send the § 9-404 notice this week. Keeps everything clean and properly documented.
Ruby Knight
Quick question - do we need to update our internal procedures or just be more careful with the existing ones?
0 coins
Diego Castillo
•I think just being more careful. The basic process is the same.
0 coins
Logan Stewart
•I added an extra review step where someone else checks the debtor names before filing. Caught 2 mistakes that way.
0 coins
Mikayla Brown
Thanks everyone for the input. Sounds like the main thing is being extra careful about exact name matches and filing numbers. I'll start working through these continuations with more lead time and double-check everything. This forum is a lifesaver!
0 coins
Sean Matthews
•Good luck! Let us know how it goes.
0 coins
Ali Anderson
•Yeah, keep us posted if you run into any other issues with the revisions.
0 coins