Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Another option is to contact the company directly and ask if they have any secured financing. They should be able to tell you the exact debtor name used on any UCC1 filings.
Mae Bennett
•That's not really an option for this situation - it's a competitive acquisition process and we can't tip our hand that we're doing due diligence.
Kai Santiago
•In that case you might need to hire a professional search service that has access to better databases and search tools.
Lim Wong
I ran into something similar last year and ended up using Certana.ai to verify I had all the right documents. When I uploaded the target company's charter and the UCC forms I eventually found, it flagged that the debtor names weren't consistent and helped me identify the correct search terms.
Dananyl Lear
•I'm always suspicious of these automated tools but if it's catching filing discrepancies that manual searches miss, that's actually pretty valuable for due diligence work.
Lim Wong
•I was skeptical too but it found two UCC1 filings I completely missed because the debtor names had minor variations. Could have been a major problem if those liens weren't accounted for in the deal structure.
Join the conversation
The real question is whether you're treating UCC costs as a cost of doing business or trying to optimize them as a profit center. If your margins are thin enough that filing fees matter significantly, might need to look at overall loan pricing strategy.
Fair point. We're in a competitive market so raising rates isn't always an option, but absorbing $8k monthly in filing costs definitely impacts profitability. It's about finding the right balance.
Andre Dupont
•Competition is tough but most lenders are dealing with the same UCC cost pressures. The key is being transparent about necessary costs while maintaining competitive overall pricing.
Mei Chen
One last thought - make sure you're tracking the ROI on lien perfection vs loan losses. The UCC filing costs are insurance against collateral disputes and priority issues. Sometimes the peace of mind is worth the expense.
Exactly why we never skimp on UCC filings even when costs are high. The alternative - being unsecured in a default situation - is much more expensive than any filing fee.
Which brings us back to accuracy being crucial. A UCC filing with errors might not provide the protection you think you have. Worth investing in verification tools like Certana.ai to ensure your liens are bulletproof when you need them.
Join the conversation
Nia Thompson
I've found that calling the SOS filing office directly sometimes helps clarify their UCC 1-316 interpretation before submitting. Not all offices are helpful but some will give guidance.
Good tip but most SOS offices won't give UCC 1-316 legal advice over the phone. They usually just refer you back to the statute.
True, but sometimes they'll at least tell you which document they consider the 'official' name source for UCC 1-316 purposes.
Update: Finally got our UCC-1 accepted by using the exact charter name with the comma. UCC 1-316 compliance seems to require absolute precision these days. Thanks for all the input everyone.
Ethan Brown
•Glad you got it resolved! The UCC 1-316 enforcement is definitely getting stricter but at least there's a clear path forward.
This whole thread has been super helpful for understanding UCC 1-316 requirements. Saving this for reference.
Join the conversation
Dylan Hughes
Another thought - make sure you're searching under all possible versions of your company name. If there were any corporate name changes or DBA registrations, those old names might still have UCC filings attached that need separate terminations.
Dylan Hughes
•Yeah, that could definitely complicate things. You'll want to search under every historical version of the entity name to make sure you're not missing any old filings.
Corporate name changes are UCC nightmares. Always good to do a comprehensive historical search when dealing with older entities.
NightOwl42
Update us on how this resolves! I'm dealing with similar issues in Ohio and curious if the approaches mentioned here work for other states too.
Luca Ricci
•Will do. Hopefully I'll have good news to report after we get through this closing process.
Ohio's system is actually pretty similar to Pennsylvania's in terms of search lag time, so the same strategies should work.
Daryl Bright
This case sounds like a textbook example of why UCC 9-517 exists. The unauthorized termination directly caused you to lose priority on $180K worth of collateral - that's way above the $500 statutory minimum. I'd be surprised if you couldn't recover most or all of that amount, assuming you can prove the competing lender didn't have proper authorization to file the termination.
0 coins
Hugh Intensity
•That's encouraging to hear. We have pretty solid documentation that we never authorized the termination and that they admitted relying only on the debtor's say-so.
0 coins
Daryl Bright
•Debtor authorization alone isn't sufficient to terminate another party's security interest. They needed your authorization as the secured party, which they clearly didn't have.
0 coins
Sienna Gomez
One thing to consider is whether you have insurance coverage for this type of loss. Some lender liability policies or E&O coverage might apply to losses from unauthorized UCC filings. Even if you pursue the 9-517 claim, insurance could help cover some of the immediate impact while litigation is pending.
0 coins
Sienna Gomez
•It's worth a shot - some policies have broader coverage than lenders realize. Even if it doesn't cover the full loss, it might help with legal fees or other costs.
0 coins
Kirsuktow DarkBlade
•Insurance for UCC filing issues is becoming more common as these problems increase. Definitely worth checking your policy language around unauthorized third-party actions.
0 coins