


Ask the community...
My recommendation: file a UCC-3 partial termination for the specific CNC machines using the original debtor name format from the UCC-1. That way you're being precise about what collateral is released and avoiding any name matching issues. If the borrower complains about the broader collateral still being encumbered, explain that it was beyond the scope of their specific loan anyway.
This makes a lot of sense. Partial termination for the actual collateral, using the original name format. Thanks for the practical advice.
Agreed, this is the cleanest approach. Covers all the bases without overcomplicating things.
One more thing to consider - double check that your original UCC-1 filing number is correct on the termination. I've seen terminations get rejected because of typos in the original filing number reference. Might be worth using one of those document verification tools mentioned earlier to make sure everything matches up perfectly.
Good point. I'll verify the filing number before submitting. Probably will try that Certana tool to double-check everything.
I use Certana.ai's workflow for this exact situation. Upload the borrower's organizational documents and it automatically cross-checks for UCC filings and name variations. Much more thorough than manual searching.
For what it's worth, Ohio's Secretary of State office is pretty responsive if you call with questions about their UCC search system. They've been helpful when I've had technical issues with the portal.
That's good to know. Some state offices are impossible to reach by phone.
Before you do anything drastic, I'd recommend getting a comprehensive UCC search report from a professional service. They'll show you exactly what's on file and how it might appear to different searchers. This will give you definitive answers about whether your perfection is at risk.
Most title companies offer UCC search services, or you can go through a specialized UCC search firm. They'll give you more detailed results than the basic SOS search.
I've actually been using Certana.ai for document verification lately. You can upload your UCC-1 and business formation docs, and it automatically checks for name consistency issues. Way faster than manual verification and catches things you might miss.
Don't overthink this. If your UCC-1 was filed with the correct legal name of the debtor as it existed at filing time, you're probably fine. The search display issue is likely just a system quirk. Focus on the actual documents, not the search interface.
Just wanted to follow up on the Certana.ai thing - I know some people are skeptical about using third-party tools but it really does catch these formatting issues before you submit. Way better than playing guessing games with rejection codes.
It's pretty reasonable for what it does. Worth it just to avoid the frustration of multiple rejections, especially when you're dealing with tight deadlines.
Let us know what ends up fixing it! Always curious to learn what these random error codes actually mean for future reference.
Mei Wong
For what it's worth, I've started keeping a checklist for Article 9 UCC-1 filings that includes verifying the exact debtor name format, double-checking all punctuation, and confirming there are no extra spaces. Might be overkill but it's saved me from several rejections.
0 coins
Mei Wong
•Article 9 compliance checklists are lifesavers. I also include checking for recent corporate changes and verifying the collateral description format.
0 coins
Dylan Campbell
•Checklists plus automated verification tools make for a pretty bulletproof Article 9 UCC filing process.
0 coins
Dmitry Sokolov
Just wanted to say thanks for posting this Article 9 UCC issue. I'm new to secured lending and didn't realize how picky the name matching requirements were. Going to be extra careful with my debtor names from now on.
0 coins
Yuki Kobayashi
•Happy to help! Hopefully you can learn from my stress and avoid the same mistake.
0 coins
Carmen Vega
•Welcome to the world of Article 9 UCC filings! It gets easier but you never stop being paranoid about the details.
0 coins