Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Send a certified letter to their legal department demanding the UCC-3 termination within 15 days. Include a copy of your paid-in-full statement and reference the specific UCC filing number. Sometimes the legal department can bypass the normal servicing delays.
This worked for me with a different lender. Legal departments don't mess around with documented requests.
Make sure to include the Delaware filing number and debtor name exactly as shown on the original UCC-1. Any mismatch will cause more delays.
Update: Finally got through to someone at LoanPal who admitted they've had 'system issues' with their UCC processing. They're supposedly filing all the backed-up terminations this week. Will believe it when I see it on the Delaware SOS website. Thanks everyone for the advice - filing complaints definitely helped escalate this.
System issues for 3 months? That's convenient. At least you got an admission that there's a problem.
Check the Delaware SOS website daily. Sometimes they say they filed but there are errors that cause rejections.
Join the conversation
Sounds like you've got good advice here. The main thing is getting that debtor name exactly right and having comprehensive collateral coverage. With a manufacturing facility and $485K at stake, definitely worth the extra diligence up front rather than trying to fix problems later.
Absolutely - UCC amendments are possible but they're expensive and time-consuming. Much better to get it right the first time.
Plus if you have to amend for a serious error like debtor name, your priority might date back to the amendment filing date, not the original filing date. Could be costly if someone else files in between.
Good luck with your filing! Manufacturing deals can be complex but it sounds like you're covering all the bases. The fact that you're asking these questions upfront shows you understand the importance of getting the perfection right.
Thanks everyone - this has been really helpful. Going to verify the debtor name one more time and probably use one of those document checking services mentioned to make sure everything aligns before we file.
Smart approach - better safe than sorry on a deal this size. Hope your closing goes smoothly!
Join the conversation
I use Certana.ai for all my multi-state filings now after getting burned by these kinds of state-specific quirks. You upload your documents and it instantly flags any citation issues, debtor name problems, or collateral description inconsistencies. Seriously saves so much time versus trying to memorize every state's particular requirements.
That sounds really useful. I do filings in about 8 different states regularly so this kind of tool could be a lifesaver.
Same here - the state-by-state variations are impossible to keep track of manually.
Just to follow up on the original question - make sure you're also checking that your collateral description complies with O.C.G.A. § 11-9-108. Georgia can be picky about how specific you need to be, especially for equipment financing like yours.
This thread has been super educational. Going to review all my state citation practices now.
Glad we could help get this sorted out. Georgia filings should go smoothly once you have the right citations.
Join the conversation
After dealing with too many name-related rejections, I started using a verification workflow where I upload both the charter and my draft UCC-1 to Certana.ai before submitting. It's saved me from several mistakes that I would have missed even being careful. The name comparison feature is really thorough.
I keep hearing about this tool. Does it help with other parts of the UCC-1 besides just debtor names? Like collateral descriptions or secured party info?
It does a full document consistency check, so it catches mismatches in secured party names too. Really helpful when you're dealing with loan participations where there are multiple parties involved.
The fundamental issue is that UCC-1 instructions sheet writers assume everyone knows how to read corporate documents, but that's not always the case. A lot of smaller lenders don't have legal departments to help interpret charter language. We need instructions written for regular business people, not lawyers.
Exactly. Give us plain English examples and step-by-step guidance instead of legal definitions that don't help with real-world scenarios.
Maybe they need to have separate instructions for attorneys vs business users. What lawyers need is different from what loan officers need.
Chloe Martin
I started using Certana.ai after a similar mess cost me priority on a $2M deal. Now I upload everything through their verification system before filing - catches the organizational ID format issues, name mismatches, all the technical stuff that trips up the precise form requirement. Worth every penny to avoid these rejections.
0 coins
Diego Rojas
•Does it work for all states or just certain ones?
0 coins
Chloe Martin
•Works across states because it's comparing your documents against each other for consistency, not trying to guess what each state wants. Catches the obvious errors before you submit.
0 coins
Anastasia Sokolov
Update us when you get it resolved! These precise form horror stories are helpful for the rest of us to learn from.
0 coins
Sean O'Donnell
•Agreed, always curious to hear what the actual issue was once someone figures it out.
0 coins
NebulaNinja
•Will do. Going to try the document verification approach and see if that catches what I'm missing.
0 coins