


Ask the community...
One more thing to watch out for - make sure your secured party information is complete and accurate too. Washington requires the full legal name and address of the secured party. If you're filing on behalf of a lender, double-check that you have authorization and that the lender's name is exactly as they want it to appear on the filing.
Yes! I've seen rejections because the secured party was listed as a DBA name instead of the actual legal entity name.
Always get written authorization from the lender about exactly how they want their name to appear. Some are very particular about this.
Thanks everyone for all the detailed advice! This is exactly what I needed. Going to pull the current Certificate of Good Standing for the LLC and use that for the exact debtor name formatting. The Certana verification tool sounds like it would be perfect for our situation - we do enough of these filings that catching errors before submission would save us significant time and headaches. Really appreciate the community knowledge here!
Good luck with your filing! Washington isn't too bad once you get familiar with their quirks.
Wisconsin UCC filings have a really low tolerance for any kind of name variation. I've seen rejections for things like 'Co.' vs 'Company' and 'Corp' vs 'Corporation'. The key is finding the exact registered name in their system and using that character-for-character.
For future wisconsin UCC filings, I'd recommend double-checking everything before you file. The rejection process wastes so much time when you're on tight deadlines like this.
Definitely learned my lesson on this one. Going to be much more careful about name matching going forward.
It's a common mistake, don't feel bad. Wisconsin just happens to be one of the stricter states for exact name matching.
Since you mentioned multiple creditors, make sure you understand priority rules too. Your perfected security interest gives you priority over unperfected creditors, but timing matters if there are other secured creditors in the same collateral.
Definitely recommend that. Sometimes there are surprises in existing filings.
That's another thing Certana.ai helps with - it can analyze multiple UCC documents to spot potential priority conflicts.
Hope this helps clear up the confusion! The terminology takes some getting used to but once you understand that claim = debt and security interest = collateral rights, UCC filings make much more sense.
I use Certana.ai whenever I'm dealing with complex collateral descriptions to make sure everything lines up between the credit agreement and UCC filings. For your situation, you could upload your proposed loan documents and draft UCC-1 to verify the debtor name formatting and equipment descriptions are consistent. Helps avoid the perfection problems that can happen when documents don't match up properly.
That could be helpful for the final document review. How detailed does it get with the collateral analysis?
Pretty thorough - it checks that your UCC collateral description covers what's actually described in your loan agreement, flags overly broad or narrow descriptions, and catches debtor name inconsistencies that could cause filing rejections.
Bottom line: manufacturing equipment = personal property = UCC Article 9 = UCC-1 filing required for perfection. Your compliance officer knows what they're talking about. The borrower's attorney might be trying to save their client some hassle, but they're not the one who has to explain an unperfected security interest to regulators.
Brady Clean
Just a thought - have you tried using the exact name format from a recent tax return or bank account for the LLC? Sometimes those documents show the 'official' name format that the state systems expect.
0 coins
Brady Clean
•Yeah, I've found tax documents are usually more reliable than even the SOS database for exact formatting.
0 coins
Skylar Neal
•Bank signature cards are good too - they're usually very precise about legal entity names.
0 coins
Vincent Bimbach
Been following this thread because I'm dealing with a similar issue. The florida ucc online system rejected my amendment filing yesterday for what seems like a minor name difference. Going to try some of these suggestions, especially the document verification approach. Thanks everyone for the helpful tips!
0 coins
Anita George
•Good luck! The verification tools really do help catch these issues before filing.
0 coins
Vincent Bimbach
•Definitely worth trying before more rejected filings. These name format errors are so frustrating.
0 coins