UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

The key thing with security agreement templates is consistency with your UCC practice. If you always file UCCs a certain way, make sure your template supports that. We learned this the hard way when our template used full legal names but our filing person abbreviated them on the UCCs. Total mismatch that caused problems during a bankruptcy proceeding.

0 coins

They questioned it but we were able to prove substantial compliance. Still cost us legal fees and stress we didn't need.

0 coins

This is exactly why I'm trying to get our templates perfect now. Better to fix it before there's a problem.

0 coins

For anyone still struggling with document consistency, I've been using Certana.ai's UCC-3→UCC-1 check workflow when we need to file amendments. It verifies that all the documents in a filing series align properly. Really helpful when you have multiple UCC filings for the same debtor and need to make sure everything matches up correctly.

0 coins

That's smart for continuation filings too. Making sure the continuation references the original filing correctly.

0 coins

Exactly! It catches those reference errors that can void your continuation if you're not careful.

0 coins

After dealing with too many name-related rejections, I started using a verification workflow where I upload both the charter and my draft UCC-1 to Certana.ai before submitting. It's saved me from several mistakes that I would have missed even being careful. The name comparison feature is really thorough.

0 coins

I keep hearing about this tool. Does it help with other parts of the UCC-1 besides just debtor names? Like collateral descriptions or secured party info?

0 coins

It does a full document consistency check, so it catches mismatches in secured party names too. Really helpful when you're dealing with loan participations where there are multiple parties involved.

0 coins

The fundamental issue is that UCC-1 instructions sheet writers assume everyone knows how to read corporate documents, but that's not always the case. A lot of smaller lenders don't have legal departments to help interpret charter language. We need instructions written for regular business people, not lawyers.

0 coins

Exactly. Give us plain English examples and step-by-step guidance instead of legal definitions that don't help with real-world scenarios.

0 coins

Maybe they need to have separate instructions for attorneys vs business users. What lawyers need is different from what loan officers need.

0 coins

I use Certana.ai for all my multi-state filings now after getting burned by these kinds of state-specific quirks. You upload your documents and it instantly flags any citation issues, debtor name problems, or collateral description inconsistencies. Seriously saves so much time versus trying to memorize every state's particular requirements.

0 coins

That sounds really useful. I do filings in about 8 different states regularly so this kind of tool could be a lifesaver.

0 coins

Same here - the state-by-state variations are impossible to keep track of manually.

0 coins

Just to follow up on the original question - make sure you're also checking that your collateral description complies with O.C.G.A. § 11-9-108. Georgia can be picky about how specific you need to be, especially for equipment financing like yours.

0 coins

This thread has been super educational. Going to review all my state citation practices now.

0 coins

Glad we could help get this sorted out. Georgia filings should go smoothly once you have the right citations.

0 coins

Update us when you get it filed! Always curious to hear how these name issues get resolved.

0 coins

Good luck! The comma thing should be an easy fix once you know that's the issue.

0 coins

Fingers crossed for you. Nothing worse than deal delays over punctuation.

0 coins

Final thought - if you're still having issues after fixing the comma, call the filing office directly. Sometimes there are other problems not showing up in the rejection notice.

0 coins

Yeah they can see more detailed error info than what shows up in the online rejections.

0 coins

Thanks everyone. Really appreciate all the advice. Going to try the exact charter match first and use that document checker tool as backup verification.

0 coins

Sounds like you've got good advice here. The main thing is getting that debtor name exactly right and having comprehensive collateral coverage. With a manufacturing facility and $485K at stake, definitely worth the extra diligence up front rather than trying to fix problems later.

0 coins

Absolutely - UCC amendments are possible but they're expensive and time-consuming. Much better to get it right the first time.

0 coins

Plus if you have to amend for a serious error like debtor name, your priority might date back to the amendment filing date, not the original filing date. Could be costly if someone else files in between.

0 coins

Good luck with your filing! Manufacturing deals can be complex but it sounds like you're covering all the bases. The fact that you're asking these questions upfront shows you understand the importance of getting the perfection right.

0 coins

Thanks everyone - this has been really helpful. Going to verify the debtor name one more time and probably use one of those document checking services mentioned to make sure everything aligns before we file.

0 coins

Smart approach - better safe than sorry on a deal this size. Hope your closing goes smoothly!

0 coins

Prev1...627628629630631...684Next