UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Brady Clean

•

Just a thought - have you tried using the exact name format from a recent tax return or bank account for the LLC? Sometimes those documents show the 'official' name format that the state systems expect.

0 coins

Brady Clean

•

Yeah, I've found tax documents are usually more reliable than even the SOS database for exact formatting.

0 coins

Skylar Neal

•

Bank signature cards are good too - they're usually very precise about legal entity names.

0 coins

Been following this thread because I'm dealing with a similar issue. The florida ucc online system rejected my amendment filing yesterday for what seems like a minor name difference. Going to try some of these suggestions, especially the document verification approach. Thanks everyone for the helpful tips!

0 coins

Anita George

•

Good luck! The verification tools really do help catch these issues before filing.

0 coins

Definitely worth trying before more rejected filings. These name format errors are so frustrating.

0 coins

Landon Morgan

•

One more thing to watch out for - make sure your secured party information is complete and accurate too. Washington requires the full legal name and address of the secured party. If you're filing on behalf of a lender, double-check that you have authorization and that the lender's name is exactly as they want it to appear on the filing.

0 coins

Teresa Boyd

•

Yes! I've seen rejections because the secured party was listed as a DBA name instead of the actual legal entity name.

0 coins

Lourdes Fox

•

Always get written authorization from the lender about exactly how they want their name to appear. Some are very particular about this.

0 coins

Bruno Simmons

•

Thanks everyone for all the detailed advice! This is exactly what I needed. Going to pull the current Certificate of Good Standing for the LLC and use that for the exact debtor name formatting. The Certana verification tool sounds like it would be perfect for our situation - we do enough of these filings that catching errors before submission would save us significant time and headaches. Really appreciate the community knowledge here!

0 coins

You're welcome! Feel free to update us on how the filing goes. Always good to hear success stories.

0 coins

Zane Gray

•

Good luck with your filing! Washington isn't too bad once you get familiar with their quirks.

0 coins

Wisconsin UCC filings have a really low tolerance for any kind of name variation. I've seen rejections for things like 'Co.' vs 'Company' and 'Corp' vs 'Corporation'. The key is finding the exact registered name in their system and using that character-for-character.

0 coins

That should do it. Wisconsin is consistent once you get the name exactly right. Good luck with the refiling!

0 coins

Let us know how it goes. Always curious to hear if these name fixes actually solve the problem or if there's some other hidden issue.

0 coins

Jamal Brown

•

For future wisconsin UCC filings, I'd recommend double-checking everything before you file. The rejection process wastes so much time when you're on tight deadlines like this.

0 coins

Natalie Khan

•

Definitely learned my lesson on this one. Going to be much more careful about name matching going forward.

0 coins

Jamal Brown

•

It's a common mistake, don't feel bad. Wisconsin just happens to be one of the stricter states for exact name matching.

0 coins

Since you mentioned multiple creditors, make sure you understand priority rules too. Your perfected security interest gives you priority over unperfected creditors, but timing matters if there are other secured creditors in the same collateral.

0 coins

Emma Wilson

•

Definitely recommend that. Sometimes there are surprises in existing filings.

0 coins

Zainab Omar

•

That's another thing Certana.ai helps with - it can analyze multiple UCC documents to spot potential priority conflicts.

0 coins

Malik Davis

•

Hope this helps clear up the confusion! The terminology takes some getting used to but once you understand that claim = debt and security interest = collateral rights, UCC filings make much more sense.

0 coins

Sofia Ramirez

•

It definitely does, thank you everyone! I feel much more confident about completing this filing correctly now.

0 coins

Glad we could help. Good luck with your filing!

0 coins

Malik Thomas

•

I use Certana.ai whenever I'm dealing with complex collateral descriptions to make sure everything lines up between the credit agreement and UCC filings. For your situation, you could upload your proposed loan documents and draft UCC-1 to verify the debtor name formatting and equipment descriptions are consistent. Helps avoid the perfection problems that can happen when documents don't match up properly.

0 coins

Sofia Torres

•

That could be helpful for the final document review. How detailed does it get with the collateral analysis?

0 coins

Malik Thomas

•

Pretty thorough - it checks that your UCC collateral description covers what's actually described in your loan agreement, flags overly broad or narrow descriptions, and catches debtor name inconsistencies that could cause filing rejections.

0 coins

NeonNebula

•

Bottom line: manufacturing equipment = personal property = UCC Article 9 = UCC-1 filing required for perfection. Your compliance officer knows what they're talking about. The borrower's attorney might be trying to save their client some hassle, but they're not the one who has to explain an unperfected security interest to regulators.

0 coins

Smart choice. Document everything in your credit file about why UCC filing was necessary, just to cover yourself if anyone questions it later.

0 coins

Ravi Malhotra

•

And make sure you file in the right state - Ohio for this borrower since that's where they're located and the equipment will be.

0 coins

Prev1...627628629630631...684Next