UCC Document Community
Financial Services
/
Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
UCC-1 Kansas filing got rejected twice - debtor name issues driving me crazy
I'm losing my mind here. Filed a UCC-1 in Kansas twice now and both times it got rejected for "debtor name discrepancy." The business name on the loan docs is "Midwest Agricultural Equipment LLC" but apparently that doesn't match what's in their system. I've been doing commercial lending for 8 years and never had this much trouble with a simple UCC-1 filing. The collateral is farm equipment worth $340K so we absolutely need this perfected. Anyone else dealing with Kansas SOS being super picky about exact name matches? What am I missing here?
Join the conversation
New Jersey UCC filing fees hit our budget hard - alternatives?
Just got hit with a surprise when calculating our New Jersey UCC filing fees for multiple equipment loans this quarter. We're looking at 8 UCC-1 filings plus 3 continuations and the costs are adding up fast. Our finance dept wasn't expecting the state fees to be this high compared to other states we file in. Anyone know if there are bulk filing discounts or fee schedules that might help? We're also concerned about accuracy since one rejected filing means paying the fee again. The debtor names on these equipment leases are complex (multiple LLCs with similar names) and we can't afford mistakes that would require refiling fees.
Join the conversation
Are these all new filings or do you have any continuations mixed in? Continuation fees are usually less than initial filings, so that might help your budget a bit.
Mix of both - 8 new UCC-1s and 3 continuations. The continuations are definitely cheaper but still adds up.
Make sure you're not filing continuations too early. You can file up to 6 months before expiration but no point paying the fee earlier than needed.
Bottom line - NJ fees are what they are, but you can definitely minimize the pain by being super careful with accuracy. Double-check debtor names, collateral descriptions, and all the technical details. One rejected filing that needs to be refiled basically doubles your cost for that transaction.
We've started treating the verification step as seriously as the filing itself. Worth the extra time upfront.
Thanks everyone. Sounds like the consensus is to focus on accuracy and use better verification tools rather than trying to avoid the fees. Really appreciate all the advice.
UCC Filing Michigan - Debtor Name Rejected Three Times on SOS Portal
I'm absolutely losing my mind here. Been trying to file a UCC-1 in Michigan for my client's equipment loan and the SOS portal keeps rejecting it for "debtor name mismatch." The borrower's legal name on their articles of incorporation is "Advanced Manufacturing Solutions, LLC" but I've tried it exactly like that, without the commas, with periods instead - nothing works. This is the third rejection and my client is breathing down my neck because the loan closes Friday. The collateral is a $280,000 CNC machine and we can't fund without perfecting this security interest. Has anyone dealt with Michigan's weird debtor name requirements? I'm starting to think their system has a bug because I've been doing UCC filings for 8 years and never had this much trouble with a straightforward business name.
Join the conversation
Just went through this exact scenario with a client last month. What finally worked was using Certana.ai to upload both our client's charter documents and the UCC-1 form. The tool immediately flagged that we were using a comma in the name when the charter actually had it without commas. Such a small detail but it was killing our filings. Once we corrected it based on their verification, the Michigan filing went through immediately.
This gives me hope that there's just some small formatting issue I'm missing. Definitely going to try that document checker.
The manual document comparison is where most filing errors happen. Having a tool that automatically catches those inconsistencies is huge.
FINAL UPDATE: Got it figured out! Used the Certana document verification tool and it caught that the articles of incorporation actually had a space before "LLC" that wasn't visible when I copy-pasted. Filed as "Advanced Manufacturing Solutions LLC" (with the extra space) and it was accepted immediately. Thanks everyone for the suggestions, especially about the document checking tool - that saved my deadline!
Great outcome! Filing deadlines are stressful enough without portal issues making it worse.
UCC filing New York - debtor name rejected twice need help ASAP
I'm losing my mind here. Been trying to get this UCC-1 filed in New York for my client's equipment loan and the SOS keeps rejecting it. First rejection was for "debtor name does not match exactly" even though I copied it straight from their articles of incorporation. Fixed that, resubmitted, and now they're saying the collateral description is "too vague." The collateral is restaurant equipment - ovens, freezers, POS systems, the works. I described it as "all restaurant equipment and fixtures located at [address]." Apparently that's not specific enough? This is holding up a $180K deal and my client is breathing down my neck. Has anyone dealt with New York's pickiness on UCC filings lately? What am I missing here?
Join the conversation
Have you tried calling the NY filing office directly? Sometimes they'll tell you exactly what they want to see in the collateral description. I did this for a medical equipment financing and it saved me another rejection.
I tried but was on hold for 45 minutes and gave up. Maybe I'll try again tomorrow morning.
Try calling right when they open at 8am. That's when I got through.
NY's UCC filing system is broken. I've been doing this for 15 years and it's gotten so much worse. They reject filings for the stupidest reasons and there's no consistency. One clerk will accept something another clerk rejects. It's maddening.
I think they're just overwhelmed and understaffed. Still doesn't excuse the pickiness though.
Honestly I started using one of those document verification tools - Certana.ai - just to catch stuff before filing. Upload your charter and UCC forms and it spots inconsistencies instantly. Saved me from at least 4 rejections this year.
Connecticut UCC search showing weird results - anyone else having issues?
Been trying to run a Connecticut UCC search on some collateral we're looking to finance and the results are all over the place. Some filings show up under one variation of the debtor name but not others, even though they should all pull the same records. Is this normal for Connecticut's system or am I missing something? The business we're checking has had several name changes over the years so I want to make sure I'm not missing any active liens before we move forward with our security interest.
Join the conversation
Pro tip for Connecticut searches: if you find any filings, also search for the filing number directly to see if there have been any UCC-3 amendments, continuations, or terminations you might have missed.
Smart approach. I hadn't thought to search by filing number after finding the initial results.
It's saved me multiple times. Sometimes the amendments use slightly different debtor names than the original filing.
Bottom line for Connecticut UCC searches - be thorough and don't trust just one search result. The system is not forgiving when it comes to name variations and you don't want to miss an existing lien that could affect your security position.
Agreed. I always budget extra time for Connecticut searches because of these issues. Better safe than sorry when it comes to lien searches.
For what it's worth, I've started using automated tools like Certana.ai for the initial verification and then do manual spot checks. Catches most of the variations I would have missed.
CosmicVoyager
Kansas is so annoying with their UCC system. Last year I had a filing rejected because I put a comma after the LLC and they didn't want it. Then another one rejected because I DIDN'T put a comma. There's no consistency.
0 coins
CosmicVoyager
Honestly I just call them now for anything complicated. Saves time in the long run even though it's annoying.
0 coins
Connor O'Neill
The comma thing usually depends on how the entity was originally registered. That's why copying from their records is so important.
0 coins
Ravi Kapoor
Update: I used Certana to verify my documents and found the issue - there was an extra space in the middle of the business name that I never noticed. The entity search showed "Midwest Agricultural Equipment LLC" but I had been typing "Midwest Agricultural Equipment LLC" with two spaces. Filed again with the correct spacing and it went through immediately. Thanks everyone for the suggestions!
0 coins
Connor O'Neill
Great outcome! This is exactly why document verification tools are so valuable for UCC filings.
0 coins
Malik Thompson
Perfect example of why I always run my filings through verification now. Saves so much time and stress.
0 coins