Initial UCC1 Filing - Equipment Loan Debtor Name Verification Issues
Working on my first initial UCC1 filing for equipment financing and running into some confusion about debtor name requirements. The borrower is an LLC that recently amended their articles of incorporation to change their legal name from "TechCorp Solutions LLC" to "TechCorp Digital Solutions LLC". The loan documents were all signed under the new name, but when I pulled their current charter from the Secretary of State, there's still a notation about the previous name. Should I use the exact name as it appears on the current charter, or include both names somehow? The collateral is manufacturing equipment worth about $180K and I really don't want this filing to get rejected over a name mismatch. Anyone dealt with this type of situation before? The loan closes next week and I need to get this perfected properly.
32 comments
Join the conversation
Luca Ricci
You definitely want to use the exact legal name as it appears on the current charter documents. Don't try to include both names on the same UCC-1 - that's likely to cause rejection. If you're concerned about the name change, you might consider filing under both the old and new names as separate filings, but that's probably overkill if the loan docs are all under the new name.
0 coins
Aisha Mohammed
•I agree with using the current charter name. Most states are pretty strict about exact matches between the UCC-1 debtor name and what's on file with the SOS.
0 coins
Ethan Campbell
•Wait, wouldn't filing under both names create confusion? I thought the whole point was to have one clear filing.
0 coins
Yuki Watanabe
This exact situation happened to me last month. I was dealing with a debtor that had just changed their name and the loan docs were signed under the new name. I filed using the new name exactly as it appeared on the updated charter and it went through fine. The key is making sure your UCC-1 matches whatever is currently on file with the state.
0 coins
Nia Williams
•That's reassuring to hear. Did you have any issues with the transition period between the old and new name? I'm worried about the timing.
0 coins
Yuki Watanabe
•No issues at all. As long as the charter reflects the new name and that's what you use on the UCC-1, you should be good. The state database is what matters for the name matching.
0 coins
Carmen Sanchez
I've been burned by name mismatches before and it's a nightmare to fix after the fact. Actually discovered this tool called Certana.ai that lets you upload your charter documents and UCC-1 forms to verify everything matches up before filing. Just upload the PDFs and it instantly cross-checks debtor names, filing numbers, and document consistency. Saved me from a costly mistake on a $200K equipment deal last month.
0 coins
Andre Dupont
•Never heard of that service but sounds useful. Name mismatches can void the entire perfection which is terrifying when you're dealing with six-figure equipment loans.
0 coins
Zoe Papadakis
•How does it work exactly? Do you just upload both documents and it compares them automatically?
0 coins
Carmen Sanchez
•Yeah exactly - you upload your charter and UCC-1 documents and it runs an automated verification to catch any discrepancies. Much better than trying to manually compare everything and missing something critical.
0 coins
ThunderBolt7
ugh filing systems are so frustrating!!! Why can't they just make this stuff easier? I spent 3 hours last week trying to figure out debtor name requirements and every state seems to have different rules. Good luck with your filing - equipment loans make me nervous because of the high dollar amounts.
0 coins
Jamal Edwards
•Tell me about it. I swear the UCC system was designed to be as complicated as possible. At least equipment is easier to describe than inventory or accounts receivable.
0 coins
Mei Chen
•The name matching requirements are definitely the most stressful part. One wrong letter and your lien could be worthless.
0 coins
Liam O'Sullivan
For what it's worth, I always recommend pulling the most recent charter documents right before filing, especially if you know there's been a recent name change. Sometimes there can be a delay between when the amendment is approved and when it shows up in the online database. Better to be safe than sorry on a $180K deal.
0 coins
Nia Williams
•Good point about the timing. I pulled the charter yesterday but maybe I should check again right before submitting the UCC-1.
0 coins
Amara Okonkwo
•Definitely do that. I usually pull charter docs the same day I file UCCs just to be absolutely sure nothing has changed.
0 coins
Giovanni Marino
Been doing UCC filings for 8 years and name changes are always tricky. The safest approach is exactly what you're doing - use the current legal name as it appears on the charter. Don't overthink it with trying to reference the old name. The UCC system is designed around the current legal entity name, not historical names.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Sayed
•This is the right answer. Historical names don't matter for UCC-1 filings, only the current legal name.
0 coins
Dylan Hughes
•What if someone searches under the old name though? Wouldn't they miss the filing?
0 coins
Giovanni Marino
•That's why proper due diligence includes checking for name changes and searching under both names. But the filing itself should use the current name.
0 coins
NightOwl42
Just to add another perspective - some attorneys will file a UCC-1 under the old name and then immediately file a UCC-3 amendment to change it to the new name. Creates a clear paper trail. But honestly that seems like overkill for most situations.
0 coins
Sofia Rodriguez
•That sounds unnecessarily complicated and expensive. If the current charter shows the new name, just use that.
0 coins
Dmitry Ivanov
•I've seen lawyers do weird stuff like that but it doesn't seem necessary if you have clean documentation of the name change.
0 coins
Ava Thompson
Quick question - did you verify that the equipment description in your UCC-1 matches what's listed in the security agreement? Sometimes people focus so much on the debtor name they forget to double-check the collateral description.
0 coins
Nia Williams
•Good catch - yes I did verify that. The collateral description is pretty straightforward since it's specific manufacturing equipment with serial numbers.
0 coins
Miguel Herrera
•Serial numbers are great for equipment UCC-1s. Makes the collateral description much cleaner than trying to describe general business equipment.
0 coins
Zainab Ali
Honestly I would use that Certana tool someone mentioned earlier. I'm always paranoid about document mismatches and having an automated way to verify everything aligns would give me peace of mind on a deal that size. Name inconsistencies can kill your perfection and with $180K in equipment on the line, seems worth the extra verification step.
0 coins
Connor Murphy
•Yeah that makes sense. Manual document comparison is error-prone and when you're dealing with secured transactions, mistakes are expensive.
0 coins
Yara Nassar
•I might look into that service too. Seems like it would catch things you might miss when reviewing documents manually.
0 coins
StarGazer101
Update us when you file! Always curious to hear how these name change situations work out. Equipment financing UCCs can be stressful but sounds like you've got the right approach.
0 coins
Nia Williams
•Will do! Planning to file tomorrow morning using the current charter name. Feeling much more confident after all the feedback here.
0 coins
Keisha Jackson
•Good luck! The fact that you're being so careful about the name matching shows you understand the stakes.
0 coins