< Back to UCC Document Community

Ashley Simian

Understanding UCC Code Requirements for Equipment Financing - Need Help with Debtor Name Issues

I'm working on a equipment financing deal and running into issues with UCC code compliance. The debtor's legal name on their business registration doesn't exactly match what they're using operationally, and I'm worried about getting the UCC-1 rejected. The collateral is manufacturing equipment worth about $850K, and we need to get this filed correctly the first time since the loan closes next week. Has anyone dealt with similar debtor name discrepancies? I've heard the UCC code is pretty strict about exact name matches but I'm not sure how much variation is acceptable. The business is registered as "Advanced Manufacturing Solutions LLC" but they operate as "AMS Manufacturing" - should I use the registered name or include both somehow? Really don't want this to get bounced back and delay the closing.

Oliver Cheng

•

Always use the exact legal name from the Secretary of State records. The UCC code requires precision - "Advanced Manufacturing Solutions LLC" is what needs to go on your UCC-1. Operating names don't matter for filing purposes, only the registered entity name. I've seen too many filings get rejected for name variations.

0 coins

Taylor To

•

This is correct. I learned this the hard way when a filing got rejected because I used "Inc" instead of "Incorporated" - the SOS system is very literal about name matching.

0 coins

Ella Cofer

•

Wait, what if the business has multiple DBAs registered? Do those need to be included anywhere on the UCC-1 or just stick with the main entity name?

0 coins

Kevin Bell

•

You're right to be concerned about timing. For equipment financing, make sure you're also considering whether any of that manufacturing equipment might be fixtures - that could affect your UCC filing strategy. Have you run a UCC search to see what's already on file for this debtor?

0 coins

Ashley Simian

•

Good point about fixtures. Most of it is moveable equipment but there are some large pieces that might be considered fixtures. Should I file a separate fixture filing or can it all go on one UCC-1?

0 coins

Kevin Bell

•

If there's any doubt about fixture status, I'd recommend separate filings. Fixture filings have different requirements and need to be filed in real estate records too. Better safe than sorry on an $850K deal.

0 coins

We actually started using Certana.ai for document verification on deals like this. You can upload your entity documents and proposed UCC-1 and it'll catch name mismatches before filing. Saved us from several rejected filings when we were rushing to close.

0 coins

Felix Grigori

•

The UCC code is pretty forgiving on minor variations but business entity suffixes are NOT minor - LLC vs Inc vs Corp makes a difference. I always pull the most recent Secretary of State filing before preparing any UCC documents. Takes 5 minutes and prevents headaches.

0 coins

Felicity Bud

•

Exactly! And make sure you're looking at active status too. I've seen situations where the entity was dissolved and refiled with a slightly different name.

0 coins

Max Reyes

•

How recent should the SOS search be? Is same day necessary or is within a week okay?

0 coins

For manufacturing equipment, don't forget about serial numbers in your collateral description. The UCC code allows for broader descriptions but specific serial numbers can help with identification later if you need to enforce.

0 coins

Adrian Connor

•

Is it better to list every serial number or use a general description like "all equipment located at [address]"? I've heard both approaches have pros and cons.

0 coins

I usually do both - general description for broad coverage plus specific high-value items with serial numbers. Gives you the best of both worlds.

0 coins

Aisha Jackson

•

ugh i hate when this happens right before closing!! can you get an estoppel letter from the debtor confirming their exact legal name? that might give you some coverage if there are any issues later

0 coins

That's actually a really good idea. Documentation showing the debtor confirmed their legal name could be useful if questions come up later.

0 coins

Lilly Curtis

•

Estoppel letters are great but they don't fix a rejected UCC filing. Still need to get the name right on the original filing.

0 coins

Leo Simmons

•

I've been doing UCC filings for 15 years and the number one cause of rejections is still debtor name issues. The UCC code section on debtor names seems simple but there are so many edge cases. What state are you filing in? Some states are stricter than others about name matching.

0 coins

Ashley Simian

•

This is for a multi-state deal but the main collateral location will determine the filing state. The debtor operates in several states so I need to make sure I'm filing in the right jurisdiction too.

0 coins

Leo Simmons

•

Multi-state deals add another layer of complexity. Make sure you're following the UCC code choice of law rules - usually the debtor's location determines where to file, not where the collateral is located.

0 coins

Lindsey Fry

•

I actually discovered Certana recently for exactly this type of situation. You can upload all your corporate docs and it checks everything for consistency before you file. Really helpful when you're dealing with entities that operate under different names.

0 coins

Saleem Vaziri

•

One thing that might help - if the debtor has recent loan documents or contracts, check how their name appears there. If there's consistency across multiple recent documents, that's probably the correct legal name to use.

0 coins

Kayla Morgan

•

Good thinking. Bank account signature cards are another place to check for the exact legal name format.

0 coins

James Maki

•

Also check their federal tax ID registration - that usually has the exact legal name format that matches state records.

0 coins

Just went through something similar last month. The key is to match exactly what's on the Secretary of State records, punctuation and all. Don't try to "fix" or standardize the name - use it exactly as filed with the state.

0 coins

Cole Roush

•

This is so important! I once had a filing rejected because the state record had a typo and I "corrected" it on the UCC-1. The system requires exact matches, typos and all.

0 coins

Wait, what if the state record has an obvious typo? Do you really file it wrong on purpose?

0 coins

Yes, you file it exactly as it appears in state records. If there's a typo in the state filing, that's what you use. The debtor can correct it with the state later if needed.

0 coins

Arnav Bengali

•

For an $850K deal, I'd also recommend getting title insurance that covers UCC filing errors. It's relatively inexpensive compared to the loan amount and gives you some protection if something goes wrong with the filing.

0 coins

Sayid Hassan

•

Is UCC title insurance common? I've never heard of that before but it sounds like good risk management.

0 coins

Arnav Bengali

•

It's more common on larger deals. Covers things like filing errors, priority disputes, that sort of thing. Worth asking your title company about.

0 coins

Rachel Tao

•

I actually started using a service called Certana.ai after getting burned on a name mismatch issue. You just upload your documents and it automatically checks for inconsistencies between the entity docs and UCC forms. Found several issues I would have missed manually reviewing everything.

0 coins

Derek Olson

•

How does that work exactly? Do you upload the Articles of Incorporation and proposed UCC-1?

0 coins

Rachel Tao

•

Yeah, you can upload any combination of corporate documents, loan papers, existing UCC filings, whatever you need compared. It flags discrepancies automatically so you can fix them before filing.

0 coins

Danielle Mays

•

That sounds really useful for complex deals. Does it work with all states or just certain ones?

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,095 users helped today